I have always believed that a good analysis must look at 'real behavior' in the data, rather than just focusing on price. I used on-chain tools to capture several core trends of Notcoin and will share my judgment methods with you.
Capture the 'number of wallets claiming airdrops.' Over the past two weeks, I found that the peak time for claims is between 9–10 AM each day, with peaks nearing 3,000 transactions. This indicates that users have become accustomed to 'claiming airdrops on-chain' as a daily activity, rather than doing it occasionally.
The second point is 'voting participation rate.' Many projects have governance participation below 1%, but Notcoin is clearly different. In the last community proposal I saw, the number of participating wallets was 2,200, accounting for 20% of active users. In terms of voting efficiency, this is considered a 'high participation rate' project in the blockchain space.
The third point is 'changes in transfer frequency.' The daily number of NOT transactions remains stable at around 5,000, but the proportion of old wallets transferring to new wallets is as high as 15%. This means that it is not just circulating in place, but 'many users are transferring their earnings to new wallets to participate,' reflecting a conscious strategy of users switching wallets.
I put these three behaviors into a small table: claiming airdrops → participation in voting → transferring and redistributing funds. This constitutes an on-chain user closed loop for Notcoin: earn airdrops → participate in governance → promote funds. This structure, which truly relies on community actions to drive ecological activity, is more appealing than mere marketing.
The conclusion is: not every Meme Coin is created in vain, but Notcoin indeed has a quantifiable 'community behavior rhythm.' Describing your observations with real on-chain data is more convincing than making high claims.
@The Notcoin Official #Notcoin $NOT
