In conclusion, I still want to say that no matter how powerful WalletConnect is, it has three lifelines that must be protected.
First, ecological coverage. It currently almost dominates the Web3 login entry, but if a new protocol emerges or major wallets develop their own connectors, the ecological advantage might be broken.
Secondly, commercial balance. The charging model for value-added services needs to be well controlled. If developers feel that 'official Relay is too expensive,' they may switch to self-built solutions or other standards, which poses a challenge for WalletConnect.
Thirdly, security and education. No matter how secure the protocol is, users can still fall victim to signature scams. If 'security education + wallet reminders' cannot be normalized, it may ultimately harm its reputation.
I use these three points to judge whether it can continue to survive for a long time. In the short term, there are no competitors, but in the long term, it will either become the TCP/IP of Web3 or be replaced by new standards.
Interactive Question: Brothers, if you could only choose one, what do you most hope WalletConnect will prioritize solving? A. Maintaining ecological dominance; B. Reducing commercialization friction; C. Providing good security education. Comment with A/B/C + a one-sentence reason!
@WalletConnect #WalletConnect $WCT
