— From the entry of sovereign capital to the AI token frenzy, a capital game that disrupts cognition is unfolding. 1. Macro changes: Global liquidity reshaping and sovereign capital competition The cryptocurrency market in 2025 has long shed its label of 'niche speculation' to become a 'new battlefield' for global capital. The Federal Reserve completed its interest rate reduction cycle in the first half of the year, with the benchmark rate falling below 3%, reopening the liquidity floodgates—this time, funds are no longer limited to traditional stock and bond markets but are surging into crypto assets along the ladder of risk appetite. Bitcoin, as the 'vanguard' of this liquidity feast, has its dual attributes played out to the extreme: when the aftermath of Silicon Valley Bank triggers market panic, it rises in sync with gold, becoming a 'temporary haven' for risk-averse funds; when non-farm payroll data falls short of expectations and interest rate cut expectations rise, it transforms into a representative of high-risk assets, frequently surpassing a 10% daily increase.
Behind this duality is a cognitive rift in the market regarding its positioning: data shows that the correlation between bitcoin and gold prices has climbed to a historical high of 0.68, indicating that it is increasingly being viewed as a 'digital gold' alternative by institutions; yet at the same time, its correlation with the Nasdaq 100 index remains above 0.5, maintaining its high volatility hue. More noteworthy is that the entry path of traditional capital is being opened—if the U.S. 401(k) pension plan lifts the 3% restriction on cryptocurrency allocation, it could bring $240 billion in incremental funds to the market, equivalent to 15% of the current total market value of bitcoin, enough to spark a new price storm.
Geopolitical rifts are adding more variables to this capital game. Saudi Arabia and the UAE in the Middle East, along with Argentina and Peru in Latin America, are mired in high inflation—some countries have annual inflation rates exceeding 50%, with fiat currency credit continuing to collapse. Against this backdrop, the practice of bitcoin as an 'anti-inflation tool' is accelerating: the Saudi central bank has quietly converted 1.2% of its foreign exchange reserves into bitcoin, and Argentina is piloting bitcoin payments for agricultural export settlements, attempting to bypass the impact of dollar exchange rate fluctuations. According to statistics from the Bank for International Settlements, the share of cryptocurrency settlements in SWIFT alternatives has risen from 1.2% in 2023 to 6.5%—though still small in scale, it marks a substantial breakthrough in the 'de-dollarization' process in the crypto domain.
More disruptive is the sovereign capital's 'strategic reserve' move. The 'Million Bitcoin Strategic Reserve' bill proposed by Republican senators in the United States, although rated by Wall Street analysts as having a 'less than 30% chance of success,' has stirred a global chain reaction like a stone thrown into a lake: the Polish central bank was the first to announce it would include 5,000 bitcoins in its foreign exchange reserves, Brazil has legislated to allow the treasury to hold crypto assets, and even the traditionally conservative Indian central bank has established a 'cryptocurrency research group.' According to
Chainalysis predicts that by the end of 2025, the number of sovereign countries holding bitcoin will double from the current 9 to 18.
The arrival of this 'national team' has injected a strong dose of confidence into the market—just the reserve demands from various central banks could consume 30% of bitcoin's annual supply—while also laying the groundwork for 'policy nuclear bombs.' Senior practitioners candidly state: 'The essence of sovereign capital is an extension of 'sovereign will,' rather than merely market participants. If the U.S. suddenly sells reserves to curb opponents or alleviate debt pressure, given bitcoin's current market depth, a one-day plunge of 50% is not out of the question.' 2. Technological revolution: Layer 2 explosion and AI token's 'lightning harvesting' The iteration of blockchain technology is reshaping the underlying logic of the market. In the second half of 2025, Layer 2 scaling solutions will become the absolute 'main theme,' liberating blockchain from the shackles of 'performance bottlenecks.' Over the past year, ZK-Rollup (zero-knowledge proof aggregation) and Optimistic Rollup (optimistic aggregation) technologies have transitioned from 'laboratory' to 'mass commercial use': ZK-Rollup, with its features of 'off-chain computation and on-chain verification,' will reduce the average cost of a single Ethereum transaction from $30 in 2023 to less than $3; Optimistic Rollup achieves a transaction throughput of 3,000 per second through the 'default trust and dispute challenge' mechanism, increasing nearly 100 times compared to the Ethereum mainnet.
Technological breakthroughs have directly sparked ecological explosions: networks such as Base (Coinbase's Layer 2), StarkNet (representative of ZK-Rollup), and Arbitrum (leader of Optimistic Rollup) now host over 70% of on-chain activities—from trading on decentralized exchanges to NFT minting and cross-chain transfers, users are voting with their feet towards low-cost, high-efficiency Layer 2. This migration has directly driven Ethereum's 'staking boom': since Layer 2's security relies on the Ethereum mainnet, an increasing number of holders are choosing to stake ETH to validation nodes. By June 2025, the Ethereum staking rate has exceeded 50%, meaning that more than half of the circulating supply is locked, further solidifying its price foundation, allowing it to stand firmly at the $5,500 mark.
If Layer 2 is a 'stable technology upgrade,' then the integration of AI and cryptocurrency is a 'crazy experiment.' In the first half of 2025, AI agent platforms like Clanker and AIDrop emerged, allowing users to generate tokens through natural language commands—input 'a Shiba Inu that can play basketball,' and the AI can automatically complete the contract writing, token issuance, and liquidity deployment, taking no more than 5 minutes. This 'zero-threshold coin creation' has sparked a new wave of meme coin frenzy: in just June, 11,000 AI-generated tokens launched, with names as bizarre as GOAT Coin, FLYDOG Coin, and MOONCAT Coin, all attracting speculators with AI algorithmically generated 'community narratives' (like 'the universe's first Shiba Inu alliance' and 'digital totems against traditional finance').
Data shows that these AI tokens harvested over $12 million in fees within a month, creating countless 'get-rich-quick myths': GOAT Coin surged 300% on its first day, allowing early holders to triple their investment in a day; FLYDOG Coin attracted 100,000 users within 72 hours through AI-generated 'airdrop tasks' (like retweeting and inviting friends), briefly pushing its market cap to $50 million. But behind the revelry lies the stark reality of 'lightning harvesting'—most of these tokens have no practical application scenarios, and even lack a fixed community team, relying entirely on algorithm-driven 'emotional speculation.'
The market's volatility has reached extremes: over 60% of tokens returned to zero within 48 hours, and a certain AI-generated 'SUN Coin' staged a '10-fold increase in a single day followed by a 99% crash,' leaving thousands of latecomers in despair. 'This is not investment; it's a game of algorithms and human nature,' commented a senior trader. 'AI can accurately capture market greed and fear, attracting entry with 'rapid rises' and completing harvesting with 'steeper falls,' making the entire process 10 times more efficient than traditional market manipulation.' 3. Market differentiation: Siphoning effect of leading assets and RWA's 'compliance breakthrough' The cryptocurrency market in the second half of 2025 is presenting an extreme interpretation of the 'Matthew effect': the gap between leading assets and small to mid-cap tokens is widening like a chasm.
Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, the 'three giants,' constitute the market's 'ballast.' With the continuous influx of ETF funds, Bitcoin has become the most favored target by institutions—by June, the total scale of global Bitcoin ETFs has surpassed $80 billion, with an expected annual inflow exceeding $50 billion. Wall Street analysts generally believe that as the 'siphoning effect' of U.S. spot ETFs continues, coupled with sovereign reserve demand, Bitcoin is likely to challenge the $200,000 mark in the second half of the year.
Solana has staged a comeback through 'ecological upgrades.' After experiencing the 'network stability crisis' in 2023, the Solana team launched the 'Serum 2.0' protocol, solving the trading congestion issue and attracting a large number of 'serious projects' to migrate—from decentralized lending platforms to on-chain game studios, its ecological project count has increased by 200% in six months. Some institutions have set a target price of $750, indicating nearly three times the upside from the current price.
Ethereum's confidence stems from the dual expectations of 'Layer 2 ecology + spot ETF.' The explosion of Layer 2 has upgraded Ethereum from a 'transaction layer' to a 'settlement layer,' its 'parent chain value' has been repriced; if the U.S. SEC approves Ethereum's spot ETF in the second half of the year, it is expected to bring at least $30 billion in incremental funds, pushing its price towards $7,000.
In stark contrast to the glory of leading assets, small to mid-cap tokens are sinking into a 'liquidity winter.' Data shows that tokens ranked outside the top 50 have seen their average daily trading volume drop by 60% compared to 2024, with over 30% of tokens experiencing 'bid-ask spreads exceeding 10%' due to the withdrawal of market makers. A cryptocurrency fund manager candidly admitted: 'Now, funds only recognize 'certainty.' Small to mid-cap tokens are either suspected of 'team running away' or labeled as 'air projects.' Even if they have genuine technology, it's hard to gain market attention.'
Amid this differentiation, the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) has become the only 'breakthrough.' The entry of traditional financial giants like BlackRock and Fidelity has completely altered the ecological landscape of RWA: BlackRock's issuance of 'government bond tokenization products' (splitting U.S. short-term government bonds into tokens starting at $10) has surpassed $20 billion in scale within three months, and Fidelity's 'commercial real estate tokens' have also attracted over $15 billion in funds. By mid-2025, the total scale of the RWA market has surpassed $50 billion, with expectations of reaching $80 billion by the end of the year.
The core competitiveness of these assets lies in 'compliance + yield anchoring': they are based on real assets (such as government bonds, real estate, receivables) denominated in fiat currency, with annualized yields stable at 3%-5%, meeting traditional investors' demand for 'controllable risk,' while leveraging blockchain to achieve the advantages of '24-hour trading and cross-market circulation.' Industry insiders have dubbed it 'Noah's Ark of the crypto market': 'While AI tokens are frantically testing the edge of zero, RWA is quietly occupying the allocation list of institutional funds with its characteristic of 'no speculation, only income.' 4. Regulatory storm: Compliance dividends and 'decentralization' disillusionment In 2025, cryptocurrency regulation has finally bid farewell to the era of 'wild growth' and entered a critical period of 'rule reconstruction.' The implementation of the U.S. (Digital Asset Market Structure Act) has become a 'watershed' in global regulation—this act first clearly defines the classification standards of cryptocurrencies as 'commodities' and 'securities,' allowing qualifying exchanges to apply for a 'full license.' Leading platforms like Coinbase and Kraken have taken the lead in obtaining licenses, enabling them to operate in all 50 states of the U.S. and even launch compliant financial products like 'cryptocurrency credit card installments,' with user numbers growing by 40% in three months.
However, the 'double-edged sword' effect of regulation is also significant. The restrictions on decentralized finance (DeFi) by this act far exceed expectations: it requires DeFi protocols to register as 'decentralized exchanges' and implement KYC (identity verification) for users, otherwise they will face 'fines of up to $20 million.' This has directly caused the number of users for U.S.-based DeFi protocols to plummet by 70%, with many projects being forced to migrate to regulatory-friendly areas like Singapore and Dubai. The SEC's litigation list is also continually lengthening, with 12 DeFi protocols facing lawsuits in the first half of 2025 alone, citing reasons ranging from 'unregistered securities issuance' to 'money laundering risks,' sharply compressing the space for regulatory arbitrage.
The EU's regulatory path appears even more 'rigid.' After the full implementation of MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) in 2025, stablecoin issuance has become the primary 'target for rectification': issuers must hold sufficient fiat reserves, with a capital adequacy ratio of no less than 8%, which directly bars many small and medium-sized stablecoin projects. Data shows that the market shares of USDT and USDC have dropped from 98% in 2024 to 82%, while the share of compliant stablecoins from the EU (like SEPA Coin) has risen from 0 to 15%.
The most iconic event is the conclusion of the 'century lawsuit' between XRP and the SEC. Following the appointment of 'crypto-friendly' officials by the Trump administration to lead the SEC, the regulatory stance made a 180-degree turn—SEC suddenly announced it would 'drop all charges against Ripple,' stating that 'XRP does not meet the definition of a security.' This ruling caused XRP to surge 112% in one month, regaining its position among the top three globally, and sending a strong signal: regulation is shifting from 'comprehensive suppression' to 'selective compliance,' meaning projects with 'real application scenarios and higher decentralization' will be given leeway, while projects that are 'pure speculation and centralized manipulation' will continue to be targeted.
Under this regulatory logic, the ideal of 'decentralization' is gradually giving way to the reality of 'compliance survival.' A blockchain entrepreneur lamented: 'We once thought code is law, but now we realize that law is the premise of code. Project teams must either accept regulation and wear the 'tight compliance collar,' or hide in regulatory niches, facing the risk of 'being hunted down' at any time—the so-called 'complete decentralization' appears to be an unattainable utopia when confronted with the regulatory systems of sovereign nations. 5. Risk warning: Leverage bubbles and 'black swan' undercurrents Behind the market's revelry, the fuse of risk is quietly being lit. Out-of-control leverage has become the 'sword of Damocles' hanging over us. According to Bybt data, in the first half of 2025, the total open interest of cryptocurrency contracts across the network surpassed $120 billion, setting a historical high, with accounts using over 3 times leverage accounting for more than 60%, and even speculators using 100 times leverage to bet on bitcoin's rise and fall. This game of 'small bets for big gains' can amplify returns when the market is stable, but once volatility occurs, it can trigger a 'chain liquidation': analysts estimate that if bitcoin's daily drop exceeds 15%, the triggered liquidation chain reaction could lead to daily liquidation amounts exceeding $5 billion, equivalent to three times the impact of the 'LUNA crash' in 2022.
An even more hidden risk comes from the 'shadow of manipulation' by sovereign capital. As previously mentioned, the situation where 18 sovereign countries hold bitcoin means the market is no longer a 'pure supply and demand game.' A geopolitical research institution pointed out: 'If the U.S. comes into conflict with countries like Poland and Brazil over 'digital currency sovereignty,' it cannot be ruled out that they may sell off reserves of bitcoin to undermine opponent confidence; if Trump proposes a 'cryptocurrency transaction tax' before the 2025 election, it may trigger panic selling in the market, reminiscent of the 'bloody Tuesday' crash in 2021.'
The risk of 'intergenerational replacement' at the technical level cannot be ignored either. Breakthroughs in quantum computing are forcing cryptocurrencies to undergo 'algorithm upgrades'—existing encryption algorithms relied upon by blockchains, such as SHA-256 and ECDSA, may be 'instantly cracked' in front of quantum computers. Although mainstream projects have initiated 'quantum-resistant algorithm' research, the 'ecological fracture' during the upgrade process may still lead to crises: if bitcoin fails to complete its algorithm iteration before 2026, its core advantage of 'immutability' will vanish. This has also made privacy public chains (like Aleo and Aztec) a new focus, as they emphasize 'privacy protection in the post-quantum era,' attracting over $1 billion in funding, while old ecosystems face the survival pressure of 'being eliminated if not upgraded.' Conclusion: Seeking order in chaos The cryptocurrency market in the second half of 2025 is destined to be a 'tempering of ice and fire.' On one side is the entry of sovereign capital, an influx of institutional funds, and technological breakthroughs creating a 'wealth imagination space,' with bitcoin aiming for $200,000 and Ethereum targeting $7,000, providing countless investors with a glimpse of 'class crossing' possibilities; on the other side are high-leverage bubbles, policy shifts, and technical iterations posing 'survival challenges,' with AI token lightning harvesting, sudden regulatory turns, and potential threats from quantum computing, which could shatter the 'get-rich-quick myth' at any moment.
In this game, there are no eternal winners, only clear-headed survivors. Those who attempt to gain short-term profits through 'buying high and selling low' will ultimately become the 'sacrifices' of market volatility; while true long-term players are building their 'safety margins' with three keys: closely monitoring macro signals such as Federal Reserve interest rate decisions and sovereign capital movements, understanding the real value of technologies like Layer 2 and quantum-resistant algorithms, and controlling positions based on the principle of 'not exceeding bearable losses.'
As the CEO of BitMEX said: 'This is not a simple game of ups and downs, but a survival war redefining financial order.' In this war, those who can laugh until the end will always be the 'anti-humanity players' who both respect the market's cruelty and dare to see through trends amidst fear—they understand that in the world of cryptocurrency, 'surviving' itself is the greatest wealth code.
$ETH $XRP $BTC
#币安八周年 #美国加征关税 #币安HODLer空投LA
