Author: FinTax Owen
On August 7, Eastern Time, U.S. President Trump signed an executive order titled 'Democratizing Access to Alternative Assets for 401(k) Investors' at the White House, requiring the Treasury Department, Labor Department, and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to initiate rule revisions to include cryptocurrencies, real estate, private equity, and other 'Alternative Assets' in the investment range of 401(k) pensions. This news was like thunder from a clear sky, quickly shaking global financial markets — it not only has the potential to unlock a pension pool of up to $8.7 trillion but is also seen as a key step for crypto assets to move from fringe experimentation to the mainstream financial system.
Despite the White House claiming that this move aims to 'expand ordinary investors' access to diversified assets', a core question emerges: does this open a new chapter in wealth appreciation for the retirement future of Americans, or is it a nationwide gamble without regard for consequences?
1. 401(k) Plan: The Cornerstone of the U.S. Pension System
To understand the importance of this move, one must first clarify the weight of the 401(k) in the U.S. retirement security system. The U.S. pension system consists of three pillars: the first pillar is the government-operated mandatory social security (Social Security), which pays a basic pension to retirees monthly; the second pillar is employer-provided retirement savings plans, among which 401(k) is the most prevalent, where funds are accumulated through employee pre-tax contributions and employer-matching contributions, with limited investment options provided by the employer; the third pillar is individual retirement accounts (IRA), which are voluntarily established by individuals with a broader investment scope, and some types of IRAs have long been able to invest in cryptocurrencies.
In the second pillar, the 401(k) is the most representative employer retirement plan, with most employers supporting employee participation and jointly accumulating funds through payroll deductions and matching contributions to achieve compound growth. Besides 401(k), there are also 403(b) plans for employees of public education institutions and certain non-profit organizations. As of the first quarter of 2025, the U.S. 401(k) market size has exceeded $8.7 trillion, serving as a core guarantee for the retirement lives of tens of millions of American families.
Compared to mandatory government social security, the biggest difference of IRA and 401(k) as voluntary savings plans is investment autonomy: both types of accounts enjoy tax-deferred or tax-exempt treatment on investment income, but IRA has a broader investment scope and can directly hold various assets (including allocating cryptocurrencies in some types); the investment scope of 401(k) has long been restricted, with most funds directed towards low-risk products packaged by employer-designated asset management institutions (such as mutual funds, bonds, etc.), rather than directly holding spot assets. Trump's reform is precisely aimed at lifting the investment restrictions of 401(k), creating institutional conditions for high-volatility assets like cryptocurrencies to enter mainstream retirement investment portfolios.
2. From Prohibition to Release: The Shift in Regulatory Concepts and Market Realities
For a long time, the U.S. 401(k) plan strictly excluded high-risk assets like cryptocurrencies, fundamentally due to the need to protect the safety and stability of retirement savings. High volatility naturally contradicts the goal of stable growth in pension funds, and regulators are concerned that ordinary investors lack the capacity to bear risks and professional judgment; if the market fluctuates violently, it will directly impact their retirement security. Meanwhile, financial institutions face additional costs and risks in custody, valuation, and compliance, which also encourages policies to maintain a tightening stance for a long time.
The recent executive order signed by the Trump administration to ease restrictions is not a spur-of-the-moment policy decision, but rather the result of multiple overlapping motivations: on one hand, it responds to the public's demand for high-yield channels in an environment of low interest rates and high inflation, fulfilling the campaign promise of 'deregulation'; on the other hand, it is a realization of political capital — the crypto industry supported the Trump campaign, and his family has investments in the crypto space; more fundamentally, the background is that the crypto market is no longer a fringe experiment, but is gradually being viewed as a mainstream asset driven by institutional investment, ETF approvals, and the accelerated process of global compliance.
It is worth noting that this policy is not only targeted at cryptocurrencies, but also at a broader category of 'Alternative Assets', which officially includes private equity, real estate, commodities, and digital currencies. This means that the original intention of the policy is to comprehensively relax investment restrictions to expand the available options for individual investors, catering to the societal enthusiasm for chasing high-yield assets.
It can be said that this shift from 'prohibition' to 'release' reflects not only the loosening of U.S. regulatory concepts but also mirrors the changes in the capital market landscape and the reshaping of the political ecology.
3. Far-reaching Implications: A Gamble May Just Begin
Including cryptocurrencies and other alternative assets in the 401(k) investment range means that the U.S. government is embarking on an unprecedented high-risk experiment in its retirement system. If pension funds massively enter the crypto market, it will not only significantly enhance market liquidity and price stability but will also create a binding of interests between the government and the crypto market: when the retirement savings of millions of Americans are linked to crypto assets, the government will have to consider how to maintain market stability in policy-making. This deep binding could greatly accelerate the compliance process of cryptocurrencies, compelling regulatory agencies to introduce clearer and more comprehensive regulations, thereby enhancing the maturity, transparency, and credibility of the entire market and attracting more mainstream institutions and individual investors.
At the same time, a deeper political consideration is that the binding of interests may even grant crypto-friendly policies continuity across party transitions. It elevates the protection of cryptocurrencies from being a personal or partisan action of Trump to a 'forced choice' of the government to protect the national wealth — any measures that weaken the crypto market may be seen by voters as 'touching the cheese of retirement funds', thereby triggering political backlash.
(When your pension is on the blockchain, do they still dare to say 'no'? Image source: self-made by the author)
However, this gamble is fraught with concerns. The crypto market is known for its price volatility, and its cyclical bull-bear transitions are often accompanied by significant asset shrinkage. More critically, structural issues such as fraud, money laundering, and illegal financing still lurk in the market, with some assets lacking transparency, and security incidents on trading platforms occurring frequently. If pension funds encounter severe setbacks in such an environment, losses will not only be reflected on paper but will also trigger a trust crisis at the social level — the future security of millions of American families will be directly shaken, and political pressure will quickly be transmitted to the White House and Congress. At that time, the government may be forced to intervene financially to stabilize the market, resulting in a dual hostage situation between policy and markets.
In other words, this move could either propel cryptocurrencies into an era of institutionalization and comprehensive regulation, or in the event of uncontrolled risks, it could backfire on policymakers, turning this 'bold attempt' into a period of reflection or even criticism in history.
4. Another Perspective: The Fiscal Game Behind Tax Deferral
For a long time, the U.S. 401(k) plan has had two tax arrangement models: the traditional type takes 'pre-tax contributions, taxed as ordinary income upon retirement withdrawals', while the Roth type has 'after-tax contributions, tax-free withdrawals when qualified' — regardless of which model, both have the effect of deferring tax on investment income, which is its long-term attraction. Therefore, including crypto assets in the 401(k) investment range does not change these basic tax law rules, but means that this high-volatility asset has entered the compliant 'shell' of tax deferral or exemption for the first time, allowing investors to enjoy the tax advantages of the account while betting on the long-term growth of the crypto market.
Within this framework, the fiscal impact resembles a tax game over time. For investors choosing 'traditional accounts', current taxable income decreases, leading to short-term tax revenue loss for the government, but in the future, during the withdrawal phase, it will be counted as taxable income at once, which is a typical 'let the water flow to raise fish' strategy — using today's benefits to exchange for a larger tax base decades later. If crypto assets succeed in the long term, the returns realized at retirement may far exceed the current amounts, thus bringing higher tax revenue to the government; conversely, if the market is sluggish or the policy environment shifts, the short-term tax sacrifice may lead to long-term fiscal shortfall. This is also the biggest risk and uncertainty of this move in terms of finance and taxation.
Click to learn about job openings at ChainCatcher
Recommended Reading:
Vitalik's latest interview: The path of Ethereum's world ledger and the vision for development in the AI era
Dialogue with Oppenheimer Executive Director: Coinbase's Q2 trading revenue fell short of expectations, which businesses will become new growth points?
Dialogue with TD Cowen Research Director: In-depth analysis of Strategy Q2 financial report, what are the key factors behind the net income of 10 billion?