i Got only $0.1 earning 😭😭😂 .. what did you get #Write2E | crypto-kitty- on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

i Got only $0.1 earning 😭😭😂 .. what did you get #Write2Earn! #Write2Earn 
$XRP $BNB $SOL 

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

620

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@crypteow

Explore More From Creator

WalletConnect – Could this become the “TCP/IP” of Web3 apps? WalletConnect isn’t just a QR-scanning bridge between your wallet and dApp anymore — it’s evolving into a Web3 communication protocol suite. Originally built for Ethereum, it now supports 14+ chains, session persistence, push notifications, and multi-chain account handling in a single connection. Their V2 protocol introduces namespaces, letting a dApp request chain-specific permissions in one handshake, which solves the old “one wallet, one chain” limitation. From a market adoption perspective, WalletConnect quietly sits under nearly every major DeFi, NFT, and gaming app’s login button. The trust factor is huge: rather than forcing users to install chain-specific wallets, dApps can support dozens of chains instantly via one integration. On the business side, they’ve been moving towards monetization with WalletConnect Cloud, analytics APIs, and messaging services — hinting at a SaaS-like model for devs while keeping the protocol open. My analysis: If WalletConnect becomes the default “session layer” for Web3, it gains a TCP/IP-level moat. But there’s a tension: protocols that become infrastructure tend to centralize unless governance and funding are carefully distributed. The shift from a free dev tool to a paid service risks pushback unless there’s clear value-add (analytics, fraud detection, cross-chain messaging). The real battleground is push-based user interaction — if WalletConnect nails wallet-to-dApp notifications without spamming or privacy leaks, they could own the re-engagement channel for Web3, much like email and push do for Web2. If one protocol ended up routing every wallet connection, who should own and govern it — the devs who built it, a DAO, or a global standards body? And how would we prevent “connection monopoly” abuse in a trustless space? @WalletConnect #WalletConnect $WCT

--

Can Lagrange make cross-chain truth as cheap as a function call—and what breaks if every app depends on it? Research snapshot: Lagrange isn’t a single feature; it’s a three-part stack — ZK Coprocessor for querying/processing data off-chain, a ZK Prover Network that outsources heavy proving to independent workers, and DeepProve for zkML/AI verification. Together they aim to let any chain verify computations or foreign state with succinct proofs. Recent docs emphasize cross-chain state verification and cost reduction via a competitive prover marketplace. (docs.lagrange.dev ,Binance Academy) On the adoption side, Lagrange launched State Committees as an EigenLayer AVS and reports tens of thousands of state proofs produced — a sign this isn’t vaporware. (Medium) The token LA entered wide awareness with Binance’s HODLer Airdrops and spot listing on July 9, 2025, pushing the project into mainstream dev and user flow. ( Binance ) My view : If Lagrange keeps proof latency predictable and pricing transparent, “verify anything anywhere” becomes developer muscle memory — as ordinary as calling an API. That collapses today’s bridge UX: instead of trusting multisigs or waiting challenge windows, apps can ask for a proof and move on. The hard parts are economic and operational: (1) Prover decentralization — can a marketplace avoid concentration without sacrificing SLOs? (2) Data lineage — do consumers get reproducible inputs and signed snapshots for auditability? (3) Fallbacks — if the coprocessor or a committee stalls, does your app degrade gracefully or brick cross-chain features? What I’d watch: the diversity and uptime of operator sets, proof times under surge, and whether major L2s adopt Lagrange proofs for core flows (liquidations, collateral checks). If those go green, cross-chain could finally lose its “bridge risk” stigma. if your DeFi protocol could trustlessly verify a user’s balance on another chain in one cheap call, which product would you ship first? @Lagrange Official #lagrange $LA

--

Could Caldera make rollup blockspace feel like CDN bandwidth — and what breaks when DA hits 100 MB/s? Research snapshot: Caldera’s “Rollup Engine” turns app-specific chains into a configurable product (deploy/scale via dashboard or API). Recent updates wire EigenDA v2 straight into that engine as a one-click data-availability option. Multiple reports cite throughput targets of up to 100 MB/s, positioning Caldera for games, social, and high-frequency apps that would choke on L1 calldata limits. (Sources : caldera.xyz , Yahoo Finance , Binance , SignalPlus) My take (deep analysis): pushing DA to CDN-like bandwidth changes what “L2 design”even means. If DA is cheap and abundant, developers can optimize for latency and UX instead of byte-paring every action. That invites richer state (feeds, orders, media pointers) and simpler clients. But new bottlenecks appear: (1) Sequencer sovereignty — fast DA is wasted if your sequencer queue or mempool back-pressure stalls; (2) Exit & data availability liveness — do you have multi-DA fallbacks (e.g., Ethereum blobs + EigenDA) if one rail hiccups?; (3) Economic safety — EigenDA inherits security from restaked ETH; app teams must understand operator set health, slashing, and pricing dynamics, not just headline bandwidth. ( caldera.xyz , eigenda.xyz ) The strategic risk is vendor concentration. A one-click DA is great for week-one velocity, but resilience demands pluralism: secondary DA routes, cross-DA proofs, and disaster-recovery playbooks (snapshot cadence, reorg tolerances, replay tooling). Teams that treat DA like a single black box will ship fast—and then stall the first time that box blips. if your app needs >1 MB/s sustained DA, plan sequencer scaling + multi-DA on day zero; otherwise you’ve swapped one bottleneck for another. if blockspace becomes a metered commodity like bandwidth, will app-chains start buying burst capacity the way websites buy CDN spikes—or will the economics of restaked security force everyone back to conservative designs? @Caldera Official #Caldera $ERA #caldera

--

Can Huma’s “PayFi” turn income streams into on-chain credit at scale—without blowing up in bad debt? Research snapshot: Huma presents itself as a PayFi stack — a modular payments + financing framework that lets future income and real-world payment flows be used as the economic basis for on-chain credit. Their docs and product pages position PayFi as six layered rails: settlement, custody, compliance, financing, liquidity, and developer primitives. ( huma.finance ) . Their team and blog lay out tokenomics and product intent: a capped HUMA supply (10B) and explicit mechanisms to onboard real-world flows into cryptographic workflows. ( blog.huma.finance , Tokenomist) Independent explainers and industry coverage describe Huma as one of the first protocols explicitly targeting income-backed lending and 24/7 settlement rails for cross-border flows. ( CoinEx ,Crypto Economy ) Deep analysis & my view: Huma’s idea is clean: instead of requiring crypto collateral, underwrite loans against verifiable income — payroll, invoices, remittances — and settle with on-chain stable value. That unlocks huge addressable markets (SMEs, gig workers, remittance corridors) where collateral is thin but cash flows are steady. Practically, value accrues if three engineering pillars hold up: reliable off-chain attestation (fraud-resistant income proofs), automated on-chain enforcement (escrows, repayment triggers), and instant settlement liquidity (so merchants/borrowers can convert value without custodial drag). Big risks (practical): fraud or synthetic income data, counterparty concentration (single data provider failure), and regulatory friction (consumer credit rules, KYC/AML). Tokenomics also matter — scheduled unlocks and treasury flows can swamp short-term sentiment unless handled transparently. My read: Huma can be transformative in emerging markets if their attestation layer is airtight and they build low-friction merchant rails to absorb loan proceeds instantly into usable liquidity. @Huma Finance 🟣 #HumaFinance $HUMA

--

Could Notcoin’s mass distribution create the first tradable on-chain “attention KPI” that advertisers, DAOs and creators actually buy? Research snapshot: Notcoin’s tap-to-earn game on TON/Telegram reached tens of millions of players during its mint phase; the game converted in-game Notcoins to NOT at 1,000:1, producing a very large circulating base (~100–103B NOT reported across sources). Notcoin is tightly integrated with Telegram’s wallet UX, which is why it scaled so quickly. ( Decrypt , Zerocap , Easy Crypto ) My view & deep analysis: Notcoin didn’t just distribute tokens — it distributed attention. That attention, if verifiable and cheaply attributable, could be packaged as a KPI: impressions, active-engagement minutes, tip events, referral quality — each attested on-chain and linked to a Notcoin flow. Imagine advertisers or DAOs buying an “engagement tranche” that pays out in stable value when a creator hits verified attention thresholds. That would convert ephemeral virality into measurable demand. How it could work in practice: 1) an on-chain attestation layer certifies actions (taps, referrals, time-on-session), 2) attention units are minted as short-duration NFTs or tokens, 3) market makers provide instant swaps to stable value for merchants/advertisers, and 4) sinks (fees, subscription burns, merchant conversions) drain velocity so attention buys real demand rather than pure speculation. Big risks: measurement gaming (bots), volatility (advertisers need price predictability), regulatory treatment of “attention contracts,” and the engineering of low-fee, near-instant on/off-ramps. Tactical experiment creators could run tomorrow: build a one-week “verified-tips” storefront that auto-converts NOT tips to stablecoins for merchants and publish the on-chain attestation—if merchants accept it, you’ve moved from attention to real demand. Provocation: would you pay to own an influencer’s next 100,000 verified impressions as a tradable asset — or is attention too noisy to securitize? @The Notcoin Official #Notcoin $NOT

--

Latest News

Ronin to Transition from Ethereum Sidechain to Layer 2

--

Bullish Joins Top Five Bitcoin Reserve Companies

--

Trader Reports Significant Profits from Bitcoin and Ethereum Short Positions

--

Berkshire Hathaway Adjusts Portfolio with Significant Stock Movements

--

Vana Hosts Exclusive Hackathon in Abu Dhabi Focused on AI Data Sovereignty

--

Trending Articles

ETH/USDT — Next 12 Hours Outlook

7 Years in Crypto: The Hard-Earned Lessons That Changed Everything

Crypto Tech Analyzer

BTC: Reversal Rocket or Buying Trap Black Hole? Master the Market’s Next Move? 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹

XRP Price Prediction for Today (August 15)

🚨 $SOL – Next 12 Hours Could Get Spicy! 🔥📊

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences