With $WCT, @WalletConnect can truly be considered 'real decentralized infrastructure'
Many people say 'Web3 needs decentralization', but even basic operations like 'connecting wallets to DApps' relied on centralized tools in the early days—until @walletconnect broke the monopoly with an open-source protocol. Now, $WCT aims to fully decentralize this protocol, even handing over governance rights to the community.
#WalletConnect
It first addressed 'technical decentralization'. The #WalletConnect protocol is open-source, anyone can inspect the code and find vulnerabilities; the connection process is end-to-end encrypted, with data not passing through its servers; it supports over 700 wallets and 65,000+ DApps, without being tied to any single organization—300 million connections with zero incidents prove that 'decentralized connection' is more reliable than centralized ones. But technical decentralization alone is not enough; governance must also be decentralized, which is where $WCT comes in.
WCT distributes 'decision-making power' to the community. Nodes that stake WCT can vote on whether the protocol should support new public chains or add security features; users holding WCT can make suggestions—like 'adding beginner guides to the connection interface', and if the community votes in favor, it can be implemented; the @WalletConnect team has no special privileges, and major decisions depend entirely on the voting results of WCT holders. The way the protocol develops is not dictated by the team, but by its users.
#WalletConnect
This is what Web3 infrastructure should look like: technology is open-source, governance belongs to the community, and value is shared among all. $WCT is not just a token, but a passport for 'decentralized connection'—with it, @walletconnect can truly be said to have completed the leap from 'tool to ecosystem'.
