From the technical underlying perspective, what are the value anchors of $LA: How does ZKP reconstruct the cross-chain trust system?
The core contradiction of the cross-chain ecosystem has always been the balance between 'trustworthy data verification' and 'privacy protection'. Current cross-chain solutions either rely on multi-signature nodes sacrificing decentralization, or sacrifice privacy due to data transparency. However, Lagrange's technology path based on zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) directly addresses this pain point—achieving 'trustless verification' of cross-chain data through non-interactive proofs, while not leaking original data.
This technical barrier determines that LA's value is not only as a medium of exchange but also as the core fuel for ecosystem operations: node verification requires staking LA to gain permissions, generating cross-chain proofs requires consuming LA to pay for computational costs, and the destruction mechanism will permanently remove part of the transaction fees from circulation. The current price range of $0.3-0.4 has yet to reflect its scarcity as 'cross-chain trust infrastructure'—as the scale of multi-chain interactions moves from the current tens of billions to trillions, the demand elasticity for LA will exhibit exponential release, and the target price of $1-1.5 is essentially a reasonable mapping of its ecological value after the technology is implemented.