Professional Trade-off of Risk and Return: Why is it said that $LA is currently in the "High Odds Low Risk" range?
The core of crypto investment is the "risk-return ratio." The risk points for $LA are concentrated in two areas: the underperformance of ZKP technology implementation and intensified competition in the cross-chain sector. However, from a technical perspective, the PLONK protocol it adopts has been validated by leading projects like zkSync, and the core team members come from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's cryptography lab, demonstrating significant technical barriers; from a competitive standpoint, similar projects often focus on "asset cross-chain," whereas Lagrange specializes in "data validation," making it a leader in a niche sector with a clear first-mover advantage.
The revenue potential is also clearly visible: if the cross-chain data validation sector reaches a scale of $1 billion by 2026, and assuming Lagrange captures a 30% market share, the annual revenue would be $300 million. Based on $LA as a "revenue vehicle," and referencing similar infrastructure tokens with a PS multiple of 5-8 times, a reasonable market capitalization should reach $1.5-2.4 billion, corresponding to a unit price of $1.5-2.4, which presents a 5-8 times upside compared to the current $0.3. This structure of "limited downside risk (supported by technology and ecosystem) and clear upside potential (sector scale and market share)" is precisely what constitutes a "buying signal" in the eyes of professional investors.
