based on the materials of the site - By ItsBitcoinWorld

The launch of any innovative technology is inevitably accompanied by initial difficulties, and the latest flagship from OpenAI, GPT-5, was no exception. After the long-awaited debut, users quickly expressed concerns during a Reddit Ask Me Anything (AMA) session with Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. From performance issues to the infamous 'chart crime' - the community had many questions about the new AI models, especially in comparison to the beloved GPT-4o.
What happened to the rollout of GPT-5?
The excitement surrounding GPT-5 quickly turned into confusion for many users. During the AMA session on Reddit r/ChatGPT, many users noted that the new model seemed 'dumber' or less efficient than its predecessor, GPT-4o. This unexpected decline in perceived intelligence led to numerous complaints. Sam Altman promptly responded to these concerns, explaining that the issue was due to a malfunctioning real-time router system that was supposed to automatically determine which AI models to use for specific queries.
Altman explained that this 'auto-switcher' had not been functioning for a significant part of the rollout day. This meant that users did not always receive the optimal model for their queries, resulting in a decline in service quality. He promised to take immediate steps to improve the decision-making process so that users would more often receive the correct model. Additionally, a decision was made to increase transparency so that users would better understand which model was responding to their requests. This move aims to restore trust and provide users with a more complete understanding of how the system operates.
Will GPT-4o return? And double speed limits for ChatGPT Plus users
User protests regarding the return of GPT-4o were particularly strong during the AMA session. Many ChatGPT Plus subscribers expressed a preference for the previous model, actively lobbying for its reinstatement as a potential option. Acknowledging the community's enthusiasm, Sam Altman confirmed these requests, stating that OpenAI is actively 'considering allowing Plus users to continue using 4o.' This indicates a willingness to gather more data and understand the trade-offs associated with simultaneously offering several high-level AI models.
In addition to model selection, Altman also announced a significant update to enhance usability: 'We will double the limits for Plus users upon completion of the rollout.' This is a substantial advantage, providing subscribers with significantly more prompts per month. The increased capacity allows users to thoroughly explore and adapt to the new GPT-5 model without worrying about quickly reaching usage limits. This is a proactive step by OpenAI aimed at encouraging adoption and learning, demonstrating a commitment to supporting its premium user base during this transition. An analysis of the infamous 'chart crime' by OpenAI
Amid serious discussions about model performance, a lighter yet equally memorable moment from the GPT-5 presentation quickly became a viral sensation: the 'chart crime.' During the demonstration, the OpenAI team presented an extremely inaccurate bar chart. This chart displayed a lower benchmark score with an disproportionately high bar, clearly distorting the data and immediately attracting the attention of observant viewers.
Although Sam Altman did not comment directly on the chart during the Q&A session, he had already acknowledged this blunder on X (formerly Twitter), calling it a 'mega-failure with charts.' The incident quickly became the subject of numerous jokes, with social media users ironically noting the irony that an advanced AI model made such a basic data visualization error. Even Simon Willison, a respected reviewer of GPT-5, who generally praised the model, highlighted a related case where converting data into a table was a 'good example of GPT-5's failure.' This incident, while humorous, underscored the ongoing need for strict integrity and presentation of data, even for leading AI models.
Reflections of Sam Altman: Focusing on the Future of AI Models
The Reddit Q&A session provided key insights into OpenAI's philosophy regarding user feedback and product iterations. Sam Altman's direct engagement with the community, acknowledgment of initial mistakes, and description of measures to rectify them highlight a commitment to transparency and continuous improvement. His promises to fix the router, consider the return of GPT-4o, and set double speed limits demonstrate a responsive approach to user issues. This iterative development cycle is vital for the advancement of complex AI models like GPT-5.
For users, these ideas provide confidence that their feedback will be heard and taken into account. The rapid evolution of AI means that initial rollouts may be 'bumpy', but OpenAI's quick response reflects a commitment to improving the user experience. Altman concluded the AMA session with a clear promise: 'We will continue to work on stability and listen to feedback.' This is an ongoing dialogue between developers and users.
$BTC , $XRP , $SUI
#MarketRebound , #Cryptomarketnews
In this group, we strive to promptly familiarize readers with informational news (more than a dozen sites) related to changes in the cryptocurrency market and financial markets. There is no aim to impose anyone from the readers with the correctness (or incorrectness of the site article!).
The information is retransmitted by us for the purpose of familiarizing with changes in the 'news agenda', and with no claims to originality! Conclusions after reading this information, every sane person will always make independently!!!