Bitcoin giảm giá, Eric Trump khuyến nghị mua vào, có nên không?

BTC is facing weak ETF inflows and significant macroeconomic pressure, while Eric Trump's 'buy on dip' comment lacks enough clear confirmation signals to make it a safe solution.

August’s price movements for Bitcoin often carry risks, with historical performance being poor except for post-Halving cycles, while the context of strong ETF outflows makes the 'buy on dip' recommendation need to be cautiously assessed.

MAIN CONTENT

  • ETF inflows into Bitcoin are weakening along with many macroeconomic pressures, making short-term recovery trends face many obstacles.

  • Historically, Bitcoin's price in August tends to perform negatively, except for the years after Halving, while 2025 has yet to gather similar favorable conditions.

  • Eric Trump's 'buy on dip' recommendation has not been confirmed by clear market data, posing many risks for investors.

Who is Eric Trump and why do his opinions play a notable role in the cryptocurrency market?

Eric Trump – a prominent member of the Trump family – has recently gained attention due to his public statements about Bitcoin, attracting interest from the financial community and individual investors.

Many reports indicate that celebrities often have a certain influence on short-term investor sentiment in the cryptocurrency market, especially during periods of strong volatility.

Source: CoinMetrics Report, 2024

Eric Trump is not an expert in the cryptocurrency field, but his personal fame and political influence help his statements create media waves. The actual impact of these comments on the market often depends on many underlying factors, rather than just temporary personal opinions. So far, experts have advised investors to rely on data and analysis rather than act on emotional calls lacking clear market basis.

In what context did Eric Trump's 'buy on dip' statement occur?

Eric Trump made the 'buy on dip' recommendation right when Bitcoin broke the support level of $117,000–$120,000, dropping 3.76% in the last three consecutive trading sessions.

"Each time weak ETF flows coincide with macroeconomic pressures, Bitcoin's decline often becomes dangerous for short-term investors, especially if there are no clear confirmation signals."

Glassnode Analysis, 2025

This recommendation emerged as Bitcoin was undergoing a deep decline dragging liquidity, compounded by the capital bleed from ETF products and macroeconomic risk factors such as tax policies, labor instability, and uncertainty regarding the Fed's interest rate direction.

Attempts to 'buy on dip' during this period, without confirmation from technical factors or strong capital flows, can carry high risks. In reality, emotional trading models and FOMO have been primary reasons many individual investors have faced continuous losses during strong corrections.

Does Bitcoin’s performance in August across years and post-Halving dynamics really repeat?

Historical records show that in the last 12 Augusts, Bitcoin closed in the red 60% of the time, often losing momentum right after the growth phase in July as demand weakened.

August is often a stagnation period for Bitcoin after the summer surge, except for the years immediately following the Halving event.

CoinGlass Report, 2025

However, there are still clear exceptions: the years 2013, 2017, and 2021 saw Bitcoin increase double digits in August, coinciding with post-Halving cycles. At that time, the issuance of new Bitcoin decreased by 50%, with selling pressure from supply diminishing, and speculative demand pushing prices up rapidly (source: Glassnode).

However, in 2025 the market is recording weak ETF flows, economic pressures, and many uncertain factors. Historical data shows that after each strong Halving surge, confirmation is often needed from new capital flows or solid technical factors, rather than relying solely on cycles.

How does the current Bitcoin ETF market affect recovery expectations?

The latest report notes that Bitcoin ETFs have just witnessed the largest capital withdrawal quarter ever, with $800 million flowing out, peaking in February with withdrawals exceeding $1 billion.

Continuous outflows are a negative signal, reflecting institutional investors' caution in the face of macroeconomic volatility, no longer as bold as in the previous cycle.

Farside Investors Opinion, 2025

ETFs are seen as an important sentiment indicator for the institutional market. When this capital flow weakens, expectations for strong short-term Bitcoin recovery are significantly impacted as large funds temporarily stay on the sidelines. Compared to previous post-Halving years, there are no signs of confirmation for a sustainable rise in 2025. The post-Halving momentum is no longer the only factor dominating price behavior as it once was.

ETF capital outflows are often accompanied by deep declines, making the market more vulnerable to macroeconomic shocks or sentiment.

Year | Bitcoin ETF Inflows (USD) | BTC August Performance (%) | Post-Halving Year? 2013 | No ETF Data | +44.9 | Yes 2017 | No ETF Data | +66.6 | Yes 2021 | No spot ETF recorded | +13.2 | Yes 2024 | -5.1 | No 2025 | -800 million USD (Not established) | Yes

How do macroeconomic factors affect Bitcoin's recovery potential in 2025?

The 2025 market is strongly influenced by macroeconomic factors. Notably, these include tax instability, challenging labor data, and no clear signals indicating that the Federal Reserve will shift its monetary policy.

"Only when the inflation trend and Fed policy clearly shift towards 'easing' can speculative capital return strongly to risk assets like Bitcoin."

Bloomberg Macro Outlook, 2025

In this context, demand for BTC is limited as large investors cautiously avoid high-risk positions. Especially, price drop periods often reveal more clearly the lack of new capital inflows and liquidation pressure from highly leveraged positions.

Compared to previous post-Halving years, 2025 faces more challenges both macroeconomically and in market sentiment, making expectations for a sudden recovery in August less certain than before.

Is the historical performance of Bitcoin after public statements from Eric Trump consistent?

History shows that Eric Trump's buy calls are often inconsistent with the subsequent price movements of the Bitcoin market.

For example, on February 25, 2025, Eric Trump tweeted about Bitcoin when the price was stabilizing around $90,000. In the next four sessions, BTC rose by 6.6%, but this momentum did not last, dropping sharply to $77,000 within a week due to pressure from mass liquidation of leveraged positions. The liquidation led to tens of millions of dollars being wiped out in a short time (source: TradingView BTC/USDT).

This indicates that while comments from figures like Eric Trump may create short-term effects in the market, hoping for long-term upward trends requires more solid confirmations from data – for example, ETF flows, improving macroeconomic factors, or strong technical signals. Investors following psychological waves may sometimes face the risk of sharp reversals or sudden pump and dump phases.

What factors should experts and investors consider when following personal recommendations?

After many unpredictable market fluctuations, experts always emphasize that investors need to closely follow data analysis, especially on-chain data, institutional capital flows, and solid technical indicators rather than chasing unverified recommendations.

Factors such as inflows into ETFs, strong support and resistance levels, divergence/reversal signals on charts, and macroeconomic policy decisions will be the 'backbone' for all short-term to medium-term investment decisions. In the market of 2025, every decision based on emotion carries significant risks due to the turbulent and unstable landscape.

The FOMO trend is still seen by experts as the leading cause of losses during corrections, especially during periods when media narratives are 'heated up' by famous individuals or rumors.

Conclusion: Is Eric Trump's 'buy on dip' recommendation truly appropriate at this time?

In 2025, although Bitcoin has a history of strong recovery in August of post-Halving years, current data shows that market conditions are vastly different from previous growth cycles. Weak ETF flows, uncertain macroeconomic context, and continuous price reversals increase the risks outweighing potential profits.

Experienced investors or institutions typically wait for clearer confirmation signals rather than chasing personal calls, as the influence of these statements on Bitcoin's price tends to be short-term or even lead to unsustainable 'bull traps'. A stable recovery for 2025 will require many supporting consensus factors, rather than just relying on the Halving cycle or unverified personal opinions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Eric Trump's 'buy on dip' comment trustworthy?

No, as these statements have not been confirmed by technical data, ETF flows, or macroeconomic factors, posing risks for investors.

Will the price increase in August of the post-Halving years for Bitcoin repeat in 2025?

History supports this possibility, but in 2025 with weak ETF flows and significant macroeconomic pressure, there is no strong evidence to support a repeat.

What impact does strong capital withdrawal from Bitcoin ETFs have on the market?

Weakening institutional demand, reducing price recovery expectations, while increasing the risk of deep reversals in the market.

Why is August often not a favorable month for Bitcoin?

Due to reduced demand following July's surge, liquidity is thin, especially with no buying pressure from funds during this period.

What factors should investors prioritize when considering a trading decision with BTC?

It is advisable to rely on on-chain data, ETF inflows, technical analysis, and macroeconomic factors, avoiding actions based on rumors or unverified statements.

Does weak ETF capital imply a deep drop in the Bitcoin market?

Not completely, but it is an indicator of caution among large capital flows and may extend the sideways or choppy period.

Can the influence of celebrities like Eric Trump predict Bitcoin's price trend?

Often only creating short-term media waves, lacking long-term confirmation and not sufficient to guarantee price trends.

Source: https://tintucbitcoin.com/bitcoin-giam-eric-trump-khuyen-mua/

Thank you for reading this article!

Please Like, Comment, and Follow TinTucBitcoin to stay updated with the latest news on the cryptocurrency market and not miss any important information!