BMT Smart Contract Audit Report Interpretation: Security and Reliability @Bubblemaps.io #Bubblemaps $BMT

1. Audit Methods and Tools

The $BMT smart contract has undergone a comprehensive review by a professional audit team, utilizing static analysis tools (such as Slither) and dynamic testing (such as Echidna fuzz testing) to ensure that the code logic is free of vulnerabilities. The audit focused on common risks such as reentrancy attacks, integer overflow, and permission management, and employed formal verification (such as Certora) to prove that key functions meet expectations.

2. Core Security Features

• Permission Control: The contract implements strict permission hierarchy using the OpenZeppelin standard library, restricting key functions (such as token minting) to governance addresses to prevent unauthorized operations.

• Reentrancy Protection: By adopting the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern, it ensures that state updates take precedence over external calls, eliminating risks similar to the DAO attack.

• Liquidity Lock: The audit confirmed that the $BMT liquidity pool has been locked for over 6 months through DxSale, avoiding the risk of team withdrawal.

3. Reliability Verification

The audit report shows that the $BMT contract code complies with Solidity 0.8+ security standards, automatically enabling overflow checks, and all dependent libraries (such as SafeMath) have undergone compatibility testing. Furthermore, the contract has relinquished Owner privileges, achieving complete decentralized management.

Summary

The audit results for $BMT demonstrate a high level of security design, combining automated tools with manual review to provide investors with on-chain transparency and reliability assurance. Future monitoring of potential risks in cross-chain interactions (such as the LayerZero OFT standard) is necessary.