One of the most paradoxical phenomena in Web3 is:
You can transfer to a stranger's address, but you can't even send a single word.
You can vote, sign, mint, and swap chains...
But you can't even send a 'Hi' to that person on the other side.
You have an identity, yet no dialogue.
You own a wallet, yet cannot communicate.
Isn't it a bit ironic?
🧠 But this situation is quietly being changed by a protocol
It is not about creating new wallets or launching social apps,
It directly defines a new standard for on-chain communication: Chat Protocol.
✅ Direct communication within the wallet
✅ Each address has its own 'dialogue entry point'
✅ Chat messages are encrypted off-chain and verifiable on-chain
✅ Can be integrated into any application or wallet that supports WalletConnect
To put it bluntly:
Web3 is no longer just about 'connecting addresses,' but about 'connecting people.'
So what is WCT useful for?
Chat itself runs on protocol nodes, and transmission, encryption, and pushing require resources.
Future participants, nodes, and users may need to consume WCT or participate in governance.
It is not just a connecting token, but a medium for 'the circulation of message value on-chain.'
Imagine this:
• You mint an NFT, and the creator sends thanks directly to your wallet
• You participate in a DAO, and a proposer messages you for support
• You discover a suspicious transaction and can directly ping the other party to clarify
• You can read messages, receive notifications, and chat for collaboration right in your wallet
This is how Web3 should originally be, isn't it?
Do you think on-chain chatting is really necessary?
$WCT Can it become the settlement center for the future on-chain 'message value network'?
Welcome to chat in the comments section 👇
