I just want to connect to an NFT platform, and need to scan once.
To vote in the DAO, you have to sign again.
Change the wallet, and all previous connections become invalid.
Cross-chain interaction? Sign twice, connect twice, and it might still go wrong.
Who exactly defines the 'anti-user experience standard' in Web3?
This is not your problem; it's that the connection protocol hasn't kept up with the times.
We talk about multi-chain interoperability every day, but the connection experience is still:
• Each chain has a session.
• Each wallet has its own authorization.
• Each dApp has a set of pop-ups.
• Users can't remember, wallets keep disconnecting, and apps can't manage.
This is not an experience, it's torment.
WalletConnect is doing something 'no one notices, yet changes everything'.
Their Sign v2 and Session module have quietly turned the connection experience into a new paradigm of **'unified across the chain, state renewable, multi-app sharing'**:
• One connection allows multi-chain interaction (no more repeated scanning)
• Connection state is not lost (can be persistently maintained)
• Session authorization is controllable and can be renewed (no fear of disconnection)
• Supports all mainstream wallets / multi-chain protocol integration
In simple terms, it wants to transform 'connection' from a 'pay-per-use bad experience' into a 'smooth entry at the infrastructure level'.
So what role does WCT play in this?
Don't forget:
• All connections, sessions, verifications, and message interactions run on a protocol relay network.
• To access, call, operate, and govern, you need to use $WCT.
• The interaction behavior among wallets, apps, users, and nodes may be driven by WCT in the future.
It's not a concept-driven token, but a 'connection asset' that truly spans the entire process of on-chain interaction.
Do you think it's time to completely reconstruct the connection experience in Web3?
Do you believe that the future of 'connect once, use the whole chain' can really be realized?
👇 Let's talk 👇
