$BTC 当下行情没有太多可说的，维持此前观点，多头暂且没机会，趋势依然是空头主导——BTC至少需跌破100400美元（标准价格走势需跌破97800美元），ETH需跌破2380美元；前者回补特征序列缺口，后者回测中枢下沿。详细的逻辑解析可回看前面几篇帖子。当然，逻辑有点小复杂，前提是你得看得懂，不然会觉得枯燥无趣。#鲍威尔发言

The price trend of $BTC meets expectations, and the blue line on the chart is chosen as the second selling point. I hope you have already exited. A few days ago, I asked everyone to guess what bearish factors would accompany the subsequent decline, and here it is.
Do you also think that the price dropped because of Israel's attack on Iran? Or is the structure already predetermined? Is it news that comes first followed by the trend, or does the news accompany the trend completion? — This is one of the essences of bottom fishing and peak escaping, also known as 'measuring the unmeasurable'; one must clarify the logical relationship before and after.
Back to the point, the gap in the characteristic sequence is abstract algebra, not the CME spot and futures gap; the two are different. It can be used not only to divide paragraphs but also to deduce future trends. The standard trend is a drop below $97,800 (the position of the red horizontal line drawn on the 4-hour chart), while the non-standard trend drops below $100,400, which needs to be observed based on the actual market choice.
Whether it is the main force, retail investors, policies, news, etc.... all kinds of forces, as well as everyone's greed, anger, ignorance, doubt, and slowness in psychology, as long as trading occurs, the final price trajectory will be reflected on the candlestick chart.
The world is geometric, and so is the price trajectory. The movement of trends has its inherent logic, and both rises and falls have prerequisites. In other words, the sum of the internal angles of a triangle in a two-dimensional space is 180 degrees; if you want it to be greater than 180 degrees, the premise is that it must not be within this dimension. Conversely, it does not hold.
#以色列伊朗冲突