🧨 Don't be anxious about brushing Alpha points anymore! I rely on CAILA, earning more valuable rewards than 20 Alpha projects.
You brush BR, farm AB, click on 20 articles a day, and as a result, your points are worn down to zero by the system;
And I only spent 10U, involved in CAILA, and after one round, I directly redeemed 1000U+.
📍 How to turn Alpha into 'physical work'?
Binance Alpha was indeed a treasure channel at first:
• The projects have all been deeply screened by researchers;
• Participate in tasks for a chance to earn points/airdrop tickets;
• It can also enhance account activity and build an on-chain identity profile.
BUT! The current problem is:
Problem Description
🎯 Points are becoming increasingly difficult to earn. Interaction 'insensitive points', reading articles no longer gives high weight.
🔄 Multiple accounts are severely impacted. The system's wear mechanism is online, and brushing more actually reduces authority.
❌ Airdrops are slow and rules are opaque. Holding AB coins for two weeks is less real than one round of Launchpool.
⏱ High costs: Time, energy, and technical thresholds have all increased.
After brushing points, I found that the airdrop has not been issued, the qualifications have not been obtained, and the rules have already changed.
💥 And what about CAILA? It is a real, redeemable opportunity.
What has CAILA achieved?
• ✅ Featured in the Alpha column, igniting popularity;
• ✅ On-chain AI × DePIN × MEME three narratives integration, hardware + token dual drive;
• ✅ Fair Launch with no VC, low barrier to entry, truly relies on the community;
• ✅ There is a task system, device incentives, and a real token release rhythm;
I initially participated with 10U in CAILA's node deployment + points system + early trading:
After one round of earnings, I accumulated over 1000U+.
It's much faster than brushing 10 Alpha projects + waiting for airdrops.
🎯 CAILA vs Alpha brushing points: Who is more 'reliable'?
Comparison Dimension: Alpha brushing points vs CAILA real participation.
Return certainty: Uncertain, may have no airdrop. Clear release rhythm, has tokens.
Difficulty: High (content brushing + risk control) Medium (device deployment/interactions)
Cost Investment: Mainly time, little money. A small amount of funds is enough (starting from 10U).
Profit Cycle: Long, opaque. Medium to short term can be withdrawn.
Risk control restrictions: Strict wear mechanism + crackdown on multiple accounts. Mainly depends on operational compliance.
🧠 Conclusion: Alpha is a 'long-term strategic positioning', CAILA is a 'short-term profit explosion'.
✅ So, my strategy now is like this:
1. Projects like CAILA: Directly ALL IN with a small position to earn real returns.
2. Alpha channel: Only select key projects for in-depth participation, no point brushing, no multiple accounts.
3. Launchpool / Wealth Management / Staking: Stable returns as a base, waiting for project explosions
4. Commissions + Promotion: Turning content into income, rolling back profits.
Brushing points is ultimately an internal competition;
Farming projects is the realization of faith.
You can continue to wait painfully for AB points to take off,
But I would prefer to earn real rewards from a project like CAILA—
🔥 One explosion is worth ten times of brushing points;
🧠 A single cognitive upgrade is worth more than a hundred qualifications.#CAILA链上AI气象官捕捉下一场Web3风暴 
