Keep building or Give up?
My choice keep building
Keep building is not just a slogan, but a persistence that can continue when it needs you the most. Perhaps everyone is 'deeply resentful' of our behavior of 'spamming' every day at @virtuals_io, but this is just one of our ways of Building. As the saying goes, those with money support the venue with money, while those without money support the venue with people.
Big players can contribute to Building by staking, but for retail investors who don’t have that much capital, 'spamming' can be one of the best investment methods. Just like today’s reply from Teacher Kaylin @kaylyn_0x, he no longer pursues points too much, let persistence become a habit. In fact, many times continuous output can indeed lead to a lack of inspiration. Moreover, to be frank, especially after the recent drop of a series of projects like $VADER, the market’s heat has dropped sharply, making our already scarce resources even more strained.
After everyone read VADER's tweet yesterday and felt that there would be no way to eat multiple fish in the future, from my perspective, it actually feels like a good thing. His actions will make content output more pure, which is beneficial for quality content creators.
From a personal experience perspective, I believe that the feedback from VADER Yapping is currently the most timely. In comparison, if new users want to obtain Yapping scores, VADER is a good choice. However, Virtual Yapping, which also falls under the Yapping category, may be limited by Kaito's interface update strategy, so the feedback is not as timely. It can indeed be felt that adding more tags after Yapping has immediate effects. On the other hand, not mentioning the corresponding tags leads to a significant drop in scores.
My personal test results are shown in the image above. During the discussion of Virtual point distribution issues in the past two days, almost no $VADER related content was mentioned, leading to a sharp drop in scores. What everyone is pursuing in fairness is nothing more than positive feedback on content recognition, reflecting that effort leads to results. This is also the source of everyone's continuous Building. Essentially, whether through Virtual to obtain Yapping scores or through Kaito to compete for rankings, the ultimate goal is still to make a profit. Although there are pros and cons from the perspective of feedback mechanisms and results, I personally prefer to pursue this rapid T+1 feedback, which allows me to constantly adjust my operations based on scores.
Currently, I am quite confident in the follow-up of @virtuals_io, although the market is poor, although there are many RUGs, although Vader is too emotional. However, the project team is indeed doing things; they know how to enter the market and what to do at each stage. They aim to achieve greater returns through capital, traffic, and data. Obviously, these are the cornerstones for virtual to go further.
just do it!