Coinfomania

Crypto proprietary trading firms have become an increasingly visible part of the digital asset trading ecosystem. These firms allow traders to access allocated capital after meeting predefined evaluation criteria, offering an alternative to trading solely with personal funds. As participation in crypto derivatives markets grows, this model continues to attract both developing and experienced traders.

According to Fred Harrington at Vetted Prop Firms, competition among crypto prop firms has intensified in recent years. As a result, firms have introduced pricing incentives such as discounts and promotional offers, which primarily aim to reduce initial participation costs rather than influence trading outcomes. Understanding these pricing structures can help traders make more informed decisions when selecting a firm.

How Crypto Prop Firms Operate

Crypto prop firms typically require traders to complete an evaluation phase before accessing funded accounts. This process measures factors such as risk control, drawdown management, and consistency under simulated market conditions. The emphasis is generally on disciplined execution rather than aggressive profit-seeking behavior.

After passing the evaluation, traders are allocated firm capital and share profits based on predefined agreements, while the firm assumes most of the downside risk. Many crypto-focused prop firms concentrate on futures and perpetual contracts due to their liquidity and continuous trading availability.

Established Crypto Prop Firms Offering Pricing Incentives

Several crypto prop firms are frequently referenced by traders due to their operational structure, transparency, and focus on digital asset markets, while offering active discount codes through limited partner promotions.

FunderPro FunderPro is commonly associated with structured evaluation rules and an emphasis on risk consistency. Its model is often suited to traders who prioritize predictable enforcement of trading parameters. From time to time, reduced evaluation pricing is made available through partner promotions.

DNA Funded DNA Funded presents itself as a crypto-oriented prop firm supporting a range of trading styles, including intraday and algorithmic approaches. Its evaluation framework places emphasis on drawdown management, and promotional pricing is occasionally offered to lower entry costs for repeat or systematic traders.

Funded Trading Plus Operating across multiple asset classes, Funded Trading Plus includes crypto derivatives among its supported markets. The firm is generally known for structured scaling plans and standardized payout processes. Limited discounts may apply, though pricing stability is often cited as a defining feature.

BrightFunded BrightFunded offers a simplified trading environment with clearly defined rules. It is frequently considered by traders seeking straightforward evaluation criteria. Promotional pricing is periodically available, allowing traders to test the platform with reduced upfront expense.

Why Pricing Incentives Matter in Prop Trading

Evaluation fees represent a trader’s primary financial exposure before accessing funded capital. Pricing incentives can reduce this initial cost, which may be particularly relevant in volatile crypto markets. Lower entry fees do not affect trading performance directly, but they can reduce financial pressure during the evaluation phase.

From a behavioral standpoint, reduced upfront cost may help traders focus more closely on rule adherence and risk management, rather than short-term outcomes.

Common Types of Prop Firm Discounts

Evaluation Fee Reductions These lower the initial cost of entering an evaluation and are most noticeable for higher account tiers.

Reset Fee Adjustments Some firms offer reduced fees when restarting an evaluation, which may benefit traders refining strategies over multiple attempts.

Bundled or Promotional Offers Occasionally, pricing incentives are combined with operational benefits such as adjusted payout timing or account conditions, depending on the firm.

Seasonal or Time-Limited Offers These are typically tied to specific promotional periods. Traders are generally advised to prioritize readiness over timing when entering evaluations.

Considerations Beyond Discounts

While pricing incentives reduce entry costs, they do not change trading rules or operational constraints. Traders should evaluate factors such as drawdown structure, execution conditions, supported assets, and payout reliability before selecting a prop firm.

Profit Sharing and Payouts Long-term value depends on profit split arrangements and withdrawal conditions rather than discounted evaluation pricing alone.

Drawdown Structure Different drawdown models can significantly affect strategy viability, particularly in volatile crypto markets.

Trading Environment Platform stability, leverage limits, asset availability, and fee structures often have a greater impact on performance than promotional pricing.

Common Selection Mistakes

Many traders place disproportionate emphasis on discounts while overlooking rule complexity or capital progression limits. In practice, fair trading conditions and realistic evaluation parameters tend to outweigh short-term cost reductions.

Ignoring reset costs and long-term scaling restrictions can also diminish the practical value of discounted entry fees over time.

Conclusion

Pricing incentives offered by crypto prop firms primarily function as cost-reduction mechanisms rather than performance enhancers. When considered alongside trading rules, risk parameters, and operational reliability, they can contribute to a more informed firm selection process. As the crypto prop trading sector continues to mature, traders who focus on structure and strategy alignment are more likely to benefit than those driven solely by promotional offers.

The post Top Crypto Prop Firm Discounts and Market Overview appeared first on Coinfomania.

Japan stands at the edge of a financial turning point that could reshape global markets. Reports suggest the Bank of Japan may begin selling exchange traded funds as early as January. This step would mark the first real unwind of its massive equity holdings built over decades. Investors now watch closely as policymakers prepare to reverse one of the world’s boldest monetary experiments. The Bank of Japan accumulated ETFs to stabilise markets during deflationary shocks. Over time, those emergency actions became permanent market support. Today, the central bank holds roughly ¥83 trillion in ETFs. This scale transformed the BOJ into Japan’s largest equity holder. Any shift now carries profound implications.

The potential Bank of Japan ETF exit signals more than portfolio management. It reflects growing confidence in economic stability and inflation momentum. It also tests whether markets can stand without central bank protection. This decision may redefine Japan monetary policy for years ahead.

Why the Bank of Japan Built an Enormous ETF Portfolio

The BOJ began buying ETFs during periods of market stress. Policymakers wanted to boost confidence and encourage risk taking. Equity purchases supported asset prices when traditional tools lost power. This approach expanded Japan monetary policy beyond bonds and interest rates.

Over the years, ETF buying became routine rather than exceptional. Markets adjusted to the constant presence of the central bank. Investors priced in BOJ support during downturns. This dynamic blurred the line between public policy and private markets.

What a January Start Signals About Policy Confidence

A January launch would send a strong message to markets. The BOJ appears more confident about inflation sustainability. Wage growth and price stability now support tighter conditions. This confidence underpins the planned Bank of Japan ETF exit. Policymakers likely aim for gradual and predictable sales. They want to avoid sudden price swings or panic selling. A controlled approach would protect market functioning. It would also reinforce trust in Japan monetary policy discipline.

This move also aligns with broader normalization efforts. The BOJ already adjusted yield curve controls and interest rate guidance. ETF selling would complete the transition away from crisis era tools. It would shrink the central bank balance sheet responsibly.

Market Risks Investors Are Already Pricing In

Equity markets may face short term volatility once sales begin. Investors will reassess valuations without guaranteed central bank demand. Sectors heavily owned through ETFs may feel pressure first. This risk explains cautious positioning across Japanese equities. However, gradual execution could soften the impact. Clear communication remains critical. Markets react poorly to surprises, not to transparency. The BOJ understands this lesson well.

Global investors also monitor spillover risks. Japan plays a central role in global liquidity flows. Changes to the central bank balance sheet can influence currency and bond markets worldwide. The Bank of Japan ETF exit therefore matters far beyond Tokyo.

How This Exit Reshapes Japan Monetary Policy Thinking

ETF selling represents a philosophical shift. Japan monetary policy once relied on extraordinary measures to fight deflation. Today, policymakers seek normalisation without destabilisation. That balance defines the challenge ahead.

The exit also restores market price discovery. Equities can reflect fundamentals rather than policy support. This change encourages healthier capital allocation. Long term growth depends on such discipline. At the same time, the BOJ must protect credibility. A poorly managed exit could undermine trust built over years. That risk explains the cautious tone around timelines and volumes. The Bank of Japan ETF exit demands patience and precision.

What Comes Next for Japan’s Markets

The coming months will shape expectations. Investors will look for clarity on pace and scale. Even small ETF sales will carry symbolic weight. They confirm that the era of permanent intervention is ending.

Markets may wobble, but long term stability could improve. A successful Bank of Japan ETF exit would strengthen confidence in institutions. It would also reinforce Japan’s return to economic normalcy. This transition marks the closing chapter of a historic experiment. How Japan navigates it will influence global policy thinking for years.

The post Bank of Japan Prepares Historic Shift as ETF Selling Looms in Early 2026 appeared first on Coinfomania.

The United States crypto landscape has entered a decisive transition. Regulators no longer dominate headlines with lawsuits and enforcement threats. According to The New York Times, the Securities and Exchange Commission has eased more than 60 percent of its active crypto cases. This retreat began after Donald Trump returned to the White House and signaled a friendlier regulatory posture. For years, the SEC defined crypto oversight through aggressive legal action. Startups, exchanges, and developers faced constant uncertainty. Many projects paused expansion or exited the US market entirely. Now, Washington appears ready to rewrite that approach and calm years of regulatory tension.

This shift marks more than a tactical pause. It reflects a broader change in how policymakers view innovation, markets, and global competition. As SEC crypto enforcement slows, the industry senses breathing room. Investors, builders, and institutions now reassess the future of US digital assets with cautious optimism.

LATEST: The SEC has pulled back from crypto enforcement since Trump returned to office, easing over 60% of ongoing cases, per The New York Times. pic.twitter.com/eOjW7XlfSy

— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) December 15, 2025

Why the SEC Is Quietly Reversing Course

The SEC built its crypto strategy around courtroom pressure. Officials believed strict enforcement would protect investors and discipline markets. That approach instead triggered backlash from lawmakers, courts, and industry leaders. Several judges openly challenged the SEC’s legal reasoning in high profile cases.

Political leadership now influences regulatory tone more directly. The Trump administration favors market driven innovation over regulatory confrontation. That stance encourages agencies to reduce headline making battles. As a result, SEC crypto enforcement no longer anchors US digital policy.

Regulators also face practical constraints. Ongoing lawsuits consumed staff, budgets, and political capital. Scaling back enforcement frees resources for clearer rulemaking. This recalibration supports a broader crypto regulation shift across federal agencies.

Which Crypto Cases Are Being Scaled Back

The pullback does not erase every investigation. The SEC continues to pursue cases involving alleged fraud or consumer harm. However, the agency has softened its stance on registration disputes and token classification battles. These cases once formed the backbone of SEC crypto enforcement.

Several enforcement actions against exchanges and infrastructure providers now remain dormant. Others moved toward settlements or quiet dismissals. Legal observers note fewer aggressive filings and less public commentary from the agency.

This moderation sends a powerful signal. Companies once labeled as regulatory targets now regain negotiating leverage. The crypto regulation shift reshapes how US digital assets operate within legal boundaries.

Political Signals Behind the Regulatory Shift

Politics and policy now move in alignment. Trump’s return reshaped regulatory leadership priorities. Officials emphasize competitiveness against Asia and Europe. Excessive enforcement risks pushing innovation offshore.

Lawmakers from both parties also criticized past tactics. Congressional hearings exposed frustration with regulation through lawsuits. That pressure weakened support for aggressive SEC crypto enforcement.

This environment encourages agencies to coordinate rather than confront. Treasury, the SEC, and the CFTC now explore shared frameworks. US digital assets stand to gain from regulatory clarity instead of courtroom ambiguity.

What This Means for the Future of US Crypto Policy

The enforcement retreat does not signal deregulation. Instead, it suggests a transition toward formal rulemaking. Regulators now recognize the limits of punishment driven oversight. Clear standards offer better protection than endless litigation.

SEC crypto enforcement will likely focus on bad actors rather than broad industry suppression. This evolution aligns with global regulatory trends. Europe and Asia already rely more on licensing than lawsuits. If sustained, this crypto regulation shift could anchor the US as a competitive digital asset hub. Innovation thrives when rules exist, remain predictable, and support growth.

Looking Ahead for Crypto and Regulation

The easing of enforcement represents a reset moment. It reflects lessons learned from years of legal conflict. Regulators now seek balance rather than dominance. As policies evolve, the industry gains a chance to mature responsibly. Builders, investors, and regulators must collaborate. The future of US digital assets depends on trust, clarity, and consistent leadership.

The post SEC Softens Crypto Crackdown as Washington Signals a Policy Reset appeared first on Coinfomania.

The global financial system stands at the edge of a historic transformation. Crypto no longer sits on the sidelines of finance. It now enters boardrooms, balance sheets, and long term strategic plans. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong recently confirmed what many insiders already suspected. The world’s largest financial institutions now integrate crypto into their core operations.

This shift did not happen overnight. Years of regulatory debate, market volatility, and technological progress shaped this moment. Yet the momentum feels different now. Major banks, asset managers, and payment networks no longer question whether crypto belongs in finance. They now focus on how fast they can implement it responsibly.

Institutional crypto adoption marks a turning point for digital assets. Crypto moves beyond speculation and enters structured financial systems. Institutions seek efficiency, transparency, and global settlement advantages. Armstrong’s statement reflects an irreversible trend rather than a short term experiment.

BREAKING COINBASE CEO BRIAN ARMSTRONG SAYS THE LARGEST FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE WORLD ARE ALL INTEGRATING CRYPTO pic.twitter.com/SjmniVmdrX

— That Martini Guy ₿ (@MartiniGuyYT) December 15, 2025

Why Brian Armstrong’s Statement Signals a Structural Shift

Brian Armstrong speaks from a unique vantage point. Coinbase works directly with governments, banks, and asset managers worldwide. When he highlights institutional momentum, he reflects real integration efforts. These institutions build crypto infrastructure quietly and methodically.

Banks no longer view crypto as a reputational risk. They view it as a competitive necessity. Payment rails, custody solutions, and tokenized assets offer clear operational benefits. Institutions now chase innovation to protect market relevance.

Institutional crypto adoption also reflects changing client demand. Wealth managers face growing requests for digital asset exposure. Corporate treasuries explore blockchain settlement tools. Institutions adapt because clients demand modern financial access.

How Global Banks Are Moving Beyond Crypto Curiosity

Global banks crypto strategies evolved rapidly during recent years. Early pilots focused on research and sandbox testing. Today, banks deploy production level systems supporting custody, trading, and settlement.

Major banks now offer crypto custody for institutional clients. They recognize that secure asset storage creates long term revenue streams. These services also strengthen relationships with asset managers and funds. Banks also experiment with tokenized deposits and on chain settlements. Blockchain reduces settlement times from days to minutes. These efficiencies directly improve liquidity management and capital utilization.

Global banks crypto initiatives now focus on integration rather than experimentation. Institutions embed into existing financial workflows. This integration signals permanence rather than temporary adoption.

Regulation Has Become an Enabler Rather Than a Barrier

Regulatory clarity accelerates institutional crypto adoption across jurisdictions. Governments now provide structured frameworks for custody, trading, and compliance. Institutions finally operate with legal certainty.

Clear rules reduce reputational risk for banks and asset managers. Compliance teams now approve crypto initiatives with confidence. Institutions prefer regulated environments over unregulated experimentation. Jurisdictions compete to attract crypto capital and innovation. This competition pushes regulatory maturity forward. Institutions benefit from harmonized standards and clearer operational guidelines.

What This Shift Means for the Future of Finance

Institutional crypto adoption signals crypto’s transition into mainstream finance. It is no longer challenges the system from outside. It evolves within the system itself. Financial institutions blockchain infrastructure becomes foundational rather than optional. Payments, settlements, and asset issuance increasingly rely on digital rails. Institutions that delay adoption risk competitive disadvantage. Brian Armstrong’s statement captures this reality clearly. The largest financial institutions now move together toward crypto integration. This coordinated shift reshapes finance faster than individual adoption ever could.

The post Why Global Finance Is Embracing Crypto Faster Than Most People Realise appeared first on Coinfomania.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently stressed the need for more openness in algorithm-driven platforms. He said developers should “ZK-prove every decision made by the algorithm.” According to him, this step can make platforms like X fairer and more trustworthy.

Why ZK-Proofs Matter

ZK-proofs, or zero-knowledge proofs, let someone check that a decision is correct without showing the private information behind it. Vitalik explained that using ZK-proofs can help users trust algorithms. They can see that the system is fair while sensitive data stays hidden.

This method also prevents cheating. It makes sure that no one can secretly change results. Therefore, users can rely on automated systems safely.

On-Chain Timestamps for Transparency

Vitalik also highlighted on-chain timestamps as an important tool. These timestamps record the exact time when actions happen on the blockchain. This allows every algorithmic decision to be tracked and verified.

With timestamps, auditors, researchers, and users can check the timing and order of actions. This adds clear proof that the system works fairly.

Delayed Code Release

Another tip from Vitalik is delayed code release. This means sharing the algorithm’s code in steps or after checks. It helps prevent risks while still allowing public review.

Delayed code release gives the community time to inspect updates. It also reduces the chance of attacks before the code is fully ready. When combined with ZK-proofs and timestamps, this approach builds strong user trust.

Building Trust on Platforms Like X

Vitalik’s advice shows a trend in crypto to improve openness and fairness. Many users worry that algorithms may act unfairly or hide information. Using ZK-proofs, timestamps, and controlled code release can solve these problems.

Platforms that follow these steps can prove their systems are secure, fair, and checkable. This may encourage more people to use decentralized tools safely.

ZK-Proofs to Ensure Algorithm Transparency

In the future, Vitalik ZK-proof methods may become standard. By using transparency tools, developers can make platforms more trustworthy. Vitalik’s insights remind us that openness is not just about showing data, it is about proving it can be trusted.

The post Vitalik ZK-Proofs Can Make Platforms Like X Transparent appeared first on Coinfomania.

Bitcoin’s well-known four-year cycle is still intact, but its drivers have shifted. According to Markus Thielen, head of 10x Research, political events and liquidity now play a bigger role than halving events. Historically, the cryptocurrency’s market peaks have begun to align more closely with US election cycles.

From Halving to Politics

Bitcoin’s four-year cycle was once mainly influenced by halving events. Halving reduces the rewards miners receive, which historically caused supply shocks and price increases. However, Thielen says that halving no longer drives market peaks as strongly as it used to.

Instead, political developments, government policies, and liquidity conditions now shape Bitcoin’s price movement. Elections, fiscal stimulus, and interest rate changes affect investor sentiment and cash flow, which in turn influence crypto markets.

Why US Elections Matter

Thielen points out that Bitcoin’s historical highs often coincide with US election years. Investors pay close attention to fiscal and monetary policies during elections. Decisions about taxation, regulation, and financial stimulus can directly affect market liquidity.

For example, periods of political uncertainty or large stimulus packages have historically led to higher trading volumes and price volatility in Bitcoin. As a result, US elections have become a key timing factor for market peaks.

Liquidity and Bitcoin Behavior

Liquidity now plays a critical role in Bitcoin’s four-year cycle. When cash flow in the system increases, investors often allocate more funds to high-risk assets like cryptocurrencies. Conversely, tighter liquidity can slow market momentum.

Thielen emphasizes that this change reflects Bitcoin’s maturation. The market now reacts more to macroeconomic trends than to purely technical supply events. In other words, Bitcoin has evolved from being a scarcity-driven asset to one influenced by the broader financial environment.

Understanding Bitcoin’s Evolving Four-Year Cycle

Investors should consider political calendars and liquidity conditions when analyzing Bitcoin cycles. While halving events still have symbolic and technical significance, broader market forces are increasingly important.

Thielen’s insights suggest that Bitcoin’s four-year cycle remains a useful guide, but it now requires a more nuanced understanding of external factors. Traders and long-term investors may benefit from combining traditional cycle analysis with macroeconomic and political awareness.

As Bitcoin continues to integrate into mainstream finance, cycles driven by politics and liquidity could become the new norm. Awareness of these patterns may help investors anticipate market peaks more accurately than relying on halving events alone.

The post Bitcoin Four-Year Cycle Now Driven by Politics and Liquidity appeared first on Coinfomania.

CryptoGoos reports a major whale transaction. A single entity purchased 38,576 ETH today. The buy totaled roughly $120 million. The whale executed the purchase through Binance. On-chain data confirms the transfers. Arkham Intelligence tracked the inflows directly from Binance’s hot wallet. The size alone grabbed attention. Timing matters even more.

The Ethereum Whale’s History Adds Weight

This ethereum buyer carries a known track record. Traders previously labeled the address the “66k ETH Borrower Whale.” In 2024, the same entity borrowed 66,000 ETH to short the market aggressively. That strategy made headlines. Since then, behavior has changed. The whale flipped positioning. It now accumulates instead of betting against ETH.

Aggressive Accumulation Signals Conviction

The whale did not stop at this purchase. Data shows total holdings exceeding 432,000 ETH by late November 2025. The entity funded buys through USDT borrowing and spot accumulation. This behavior suggests long-term positioning. Sophisticated players rarely deploy this size without conviction. Smart money typically buys during consolidation, not euphoria.

Ethereum Consolidates as Whales Accumulate

Ethereum currently trades between $3,100 and $3,200. Price action remains tight after the post-election rally. Consolidation often frustrates retail traders. Whales view it differently. Large accumulation during sideways ranges often precedes expansion phases. History supports this pattern, though timing stays uncertain.

Leverage Brings Opportunity and Risk

Large buys do not guarantee immediate upside. Leveraged positions can introduce volatility. Forced liquidations can shake price short term. Still, direction matters more than noise. This whale clearly chooses accumulation over distribution. That shift alone changes market dynamics.

The post $120 Million Ethereum Buy Signals Smart Money Accumulation appeared first on Coinfomania.

Base co-founder Jesse Pollak is facing sharp criticism after publicly promoting a meme token linked to rapper Soulja Boy. The post, shared on X, highlighted a creator payout feature on Base and pointed users toward a newly issued token on the network. Almost immediately, the reaction turned heated. Many community members questioned why a senior figure tied to Coinbase-backed Base would amplify a celebrity with a controversial crypto history. 

Base co-founder Jesse Pollak promoted and backed a meme token issued by Soulja Boy, sparking community criticism. ZachXBT questioned why Soulja Boy was being given a platform, citing his April 2023 research showing 73 promotions and 16 NFT launches, many of which were scams.…

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) December 15, 2025

The debate spread fast, pulling in developers, on-chain investigators and long-time traders. At the center of the backlash is trust. For many users, Base positions itself as a serious on-chain ecosystem. Promoting meme tokens tied to past scandals cuts against that image.

ZachXBT Revives Past Allegations

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT directly challenged Jesse Pollak’s decision. He asked why Soulja Boy was being given visibility at all. ZachXBT pointed to his own 2023 research, which documented 73 crypto promotions and 16 NFT launches tied to the rapper. According to that research, many of those projects collapsed or were alleged scams.

Those old threads resurfaced quickly. Specifically, screenshots circulated and quotes were reposted. The tone was blunt. Indeed, critics argued that this history is well known and hard to ignore. For them, the issue was not legality alone; rather, it was a responsibility. In fact, giving exposure to someone with repeated failed projects, they argued, risks pulling new users into the same cycle. Some went further. They suggested that platform leaders should apply higher standards than everyday users, especially when newcomers often follow signals from well-known builders.

“Base Is for Everyone” Meets Reality

Defenders of Jesse Pollak leaned on a familiar argument. Base is permissionless. Anyone can deploy. Anyone can promote. Tools are neutral. That explanation did little to calm critics. Many replied that neutrality feels thin when a co-founder actively boosts a token. They argued that leadership attention is not the same as passive infrastructure.

Others noted that Base still earns fees regardless of outcomes. In that framing, chaos becomes profitable. Accountability becomes optional. The sarcasm was heavy, and the memes followed. Some users also pointed out that Jesse Pollak previously launched his own creator coin. That comparison fueled claims of double standards and selective concern.

A Broader Trust Problem for Builders

This episode highlights a deeper tension in crypto. Permissionless systems promise openness. At the same time, public figures carry influence whether they want it or not. For builders, the line between “anyone can use this” and “I endorse this” is thin. Once crossed, conversely, reactions are fast and unforgiving. Now, for this reason, Base finds itself in that spotlight. No regulator stepped in, nor was any token halted. Still, reputational damage does not need enforcement; it spreads socially.

Currently, Jesse Pollak has not issued a detailed response to the criticism. Meanwhile, the conversation continues. Some see this as overblown drama. Others see it as another warning sign. Either way, the message from the community is clear. Infrastructure may be neutral. Influence is not.

The post Base Co-Founder Jesse Pollak Criticized for Promoting Soulja Boy Meme Token appeared first on Coinfomania.

Crypto Rover indicates that there is a high-impact day in the market. Two of the most followed corporate acquirers are planning new statements. Tom Lee and BitMine Immersion are going to disclose the quantity of Ethereum they have gathered during this previous week. Michael Saylor and MicroStrategy are about to declare new Bitcoin acquisitions. Such changes put corporate treasuries back in focus. Any serious change in large balance sheets is monitored in markets.

Ethering Stockpiling Triggers Institutional Discourse

BitMine Immersion was already a whistle-blower in the first of the month. On December 8, the company announced a purchase of Ethereum at a cost of $ 435 million. Such a move increased its ETH holdings to approximately 3.86 million tokens. This is approximately 3.2 percent of the total supply of Ethereum. This kind of concentration is an indication of great belief. The Fusaka upgrade made long-term confidence stronger and this led to further accumulation of the institutional ETH.

MicroStrategy is still providing its well-known strategy. Recently, the company purchased 10,624 BTC at the price of 963 million. The total holdings have reached 660,624 BTC. Michael Saylor always consider Bitcoin as an asset in the treasury core. Every revelation supports that position. Another aggressive update is anticipated in the market. Saylor finds it easy to attract traders to confirm new purchases.

MicroStrategy Strengthens Its Bitcoin Plan

The news about the treasury usually causes instantaneous market responses. Institutional buyers are expected to validate retail traders. FOMO follows confirmation. The stock of BitMine increased almost 45 percent earlier the month following its publicity on ETH. Corresponding issues are also open to similar reactions in crypto and other related equities. Visibility and scale are the strengths of momentum.

Macro Conditions are Long-Term Impact Dependent

Short term excitement is not a guarantee of long term rallies. Corporate purchasing is an advocate of feeling, not assurance. Long-term direction is still determined by interest rates, liquidity conditions and ETF flows. Saving by the treasury amplifies the structural bull argument. Durability is eventually determined by macro forces. Modern revelations do not put out the fire.

The post Treasury Fireworks Incoming as Saylor and Tom Lee Prepare New Crypto Buy Reveals appeared first on Coinfomania.

Bitcoin’s network saw a sudden shock this week. On December 15, total hashrate dropped by roughly 100 exahashes per second. That equals an estimated 8% decline in just one day. On-chain observer @punk8185 says this is not a normal fluctuation. 

According to @punk8185, the total network hashrate dropped by approximately 100 EH/s yesterday, a decrease of about 8%, with at least 400,000 Bitcoin mining rigs shutting down, mainly due to the closure of Bitcoin mining farms in Xinjiang, China. The specific reasons for the… https://t.co/u92YaLYJcV

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) December 15, 2025

Based on average machine capacity, the drop suggests that at least 400,000 mining rigs went offline almost at once. The scale alone has grabbed the market’s attention. While Bitcoin has survived similar dips before, sudden changes in hashrate often signal deeper shifts in mining activity and geography. This time, the spotlight has quickly turned to China again.

Xinjiang Mining Shutdowns Back in Focus

Industry sources point to Xinjiang as the main trigger. According to comments from Nano Labs’ Jack Kong, multiple Bitcoin mining farms in the region appear to be shutting down one after another. The exact reason remains unclear. However, miners operating in China have long faced uncertainty. Power inspections, compliance checks and shifting local enforcement often force sudden shutdowns. In many cases, miners receive little warning.

Xinjiang has historically attracted miners due to cheap energy, including coal and solar power. Yet, that advantage comes with policy risk. Even semi-legal or gray-area operations can be switched off quickly. As rigs went dark, the global network felt the impact almost immediately. Hashrate adjusted lower, block times briefly slowed, and speculation followed.

What an 8% Drop Means for the Network

Despite the headline number, Bitcoin’s core design remains intact. When hashrate falls, the network adjusts. Difficulty will recalibrate and remaining miners will earn slightly more until balance returns. Short-term fear often fades fast. Historically, similar drops have not broken Bitcoin. Instead, they reshuffle mining power. When China cracked down in earlier years, hashrate moved to the United States, Kazakhstan and other regions.

That pattern may repeat. Many miners are expected to relocate machines overseas. However, moving hardware is expensive. It also takes time. During that window, some miners may sell Bitcoin to fund logistics, which can add pressure to prices. Still, some analysts see this as a healthy reset. Inefficient or high-risk operations exit. More stable players remain. Over time, the network adapts and strengthens.

Global Mining Power Keeps Shifting

The hashrate drop also revives a familiar narrative. When Chinese miners shut down, the U.S. often gains share without doing much at all. North American mining firms now operate with clearer rules, stronger infrastructure and easier access to capital. This does not mean China is gone from mining forever. Distributed and small-scale operations still exist. Yet, large centralized farms face growing challenges. Policy risk continues to outweigh cheap power.

For Bitcoin, the takeaway is simple. The system absorbs shocks. Miners come and go. Geography changes but the chain keeps producing blocks. An 8% hashrate drop looks dramatic on a chart. In practice, it is another reminder of Bitcoin’s self-correcting nature. Weak setups exit. The network adjusts and the cycle moves forward.

The post Bitcoin Hashrate Drops 8% as 400,000 Mining Rigs Go Offline appeared first on Coinfomania.

Crypto users face a new and serious threat. North Korean hackers are tricking people using fake Zoom meetings. These crypto hacks install malware that steals passwords and private keys. Security experts warn users to act fast to protect their funds.

How the Scam Works

The hackers send Zoom links that look real. When a user clicks the link, malware immediately installs on the device. This malware can record sensitive information. Hackers then access crypto wallets and accounts without permission.

In many cases, victims do not realize their accounts have been compromised until funds disappear. Experts say these attacks are both clever and dangerous. They use social engineering, making people trust the fake meetings.

Steps to Protect Your Crypto

Security Alliance has given clear instructions for anyone who clicked a suspicious link:

Disconnect your device from the internet immediately.

Transfer your crypto to a new, secure wallet.

Change all passwords connected to your accounts.

Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) for extra protection.

Wipe your device’s memory completely before using it again.

Following these steps can stop hackers from stealing funds and protect sensitive information.

Why This Threat Is Serious

As cryptocurrencies grow in popularity, hackers find more ways to attack users. Zoom and other video platforms are common targets because people often trust links from colleagues or community groups.

North Korean hacking groups have a history of sophisticated attacks. They combine technical malware with tricks to make people click links. Analysts warn that attacks like these will likely rise as crypto adoption continues.

How to Stay Safe From Crypto Attacks

Users should stay alert. Never click links from unknown sources, even if they appear legitimate. Keep software up to date. Use strong and unique passwords. Move crypto to new wallets regularly to reduce risk.

Additionally, 2FA adds an extra layer of security. Even if hackers get a password, they cannot access accounts without the second authentication step.

Protecting Against Future Crypto Attacks

This crypto hack highlights the risks in the crypto world. Users must remain vigilant and follow best security practices. As cryptocurrency becomes more popular, awareness and caution are the first line of defense against cybercriminals.

The post Crypto Hack In North Korea Targets Investors via Zoom Scams appeared first on Coinfomania.

Barclays has delivered a cautious message for digital asset investors heading into next year. The global banking giant believes crypto markets could struggle in 2026 without strong catalysts to reignite momentum. Analysts point to weakening activity and fading enthusiasm as major warning signs.

The bank highlights falling spot trading volumes across major exchanges as a clear signal. Lower volumes often reflect reduced participation from both retail and institutional investors. Barclays believes this trend could limit upside moves and increase price vulnerability.

Market optimism surged during previous cycles due to regulatory clarity and institutional adoption. Barclays now argues those tailwinds appear weaker going forward. Without fresh triggers, the crypto market outlook 2026 may remain challenging for risk assets.

CRYPTO WILL FACE A "DOWN YEAR" IN 2026 — BARCLAYSBanking giant Barclays says crypto could struggle next year without strong catalysts.Falling spot trading volumes and weak demand could keep prices under pressure. pic.twitter.com/0akJcl98jZ

— Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) December 15, 2025

Why Barclays Sees Limited Catalysts Ahead

According to analysts at Barclays, cryptocurrency markets are dependent on narrative and liquidity. Prior to previous rallies, event-driven demand was seen (i.e., ETF approvals, macro easing), however, as of now there are no comparable events seen within the foreseeable future by Barclays.

Although regulatory advancements are being made, they are not occurring at the speed that investors were anticipating; policymakers continue to be very conservative in their approach to innovation and financial stability, and that restricts the speculative inflows that previously created large movements in cryptocurrencies.

The bank also notes that macroeconomic conditions remain uncertain. Higher interest rates reduce appetite for volatile assets. That backdrop weighs heavily on the crypto market outlook 2026.

Falling Spot Trading Volumes Raise Red Flags

One of Barclays’ key concerns centers on spot trading volumes across major crypto exchanges. Lower volumes suggest traders show less conviction in current price levels. This behavior often leads to choppy markets and limited upside.

Spot trading volumes typically reflect organic market participation. When volumes fall, price rallies struggle to sustain momentum. Barclays believes this pattern could persist through much of next year.

Reduced activity also impacts market liquidity. Thinner liquidity increases volatility during sell offs. This dynamic reinforces Barclays’ cautious view on the crypto market outlook 2026.

Crypto Demand Slowdown Weighs on Price Momentum

Barclays also highlights a noticeable crypto demand slowdown across investor segments. Retail participation has not returned to previous cycle highs. Institutional flows remain selective rather than broad based.

Many investors now prefer yield generating assets over speculative exposure. Bonds and money market instruments attract capital due to stable returns. This shift reduces fresh inflows into digital assets. The crypto demand slowdown further limits upside potential. Without renewed enthusiasm, price recoveries may struggle to gain traction. Barclays sees this trend as central to the crypto market outlook 2026.

Macro Forces Add Another Layer of Pressure

Macroeconomic forces remain a major influence on digital asset prices. Central banks continue to prioritize inflation control over stimulus. Tight financial conditions reduce speculative capital availability.

Risk assets often struggle during periods of restrictive monetary policy. Crypto markets feel this pressure more acutely due to volatility. Barclays sees limited relief on this front in the near term. Until liquidity conditions improve, crypto markets may remain range bound. This reality plays a significant role in the crypto market outlook 2026.

What Could Change the Trajectory

Despite the cautious tone, Barclays does not rule out positive surprises. Major regulatory breakthroughs could attract institutional capital. Technological innovation could also renew interest.

A shift in global monetary policy could improve risk sentiment. Lower rates would likely support higher asset prices. However, Barclays sees these scenarios as uncertain rather than guaranteed. For now, the bank advises investors to temper expectations. Market conditions require patience and selectivity.

The post Barclays Warns of Pressure Building Across Crypto Markets appeared first on Coinfomania.

The Smarter Web Company has moved to reassure investors after confirming that no new shares were sold under its subscription agreement. In an official RNS update, the London-listed firm said its counterparty, Shard Merchant Capital Ltd, did not sell any ordinary shares. During the previous two-week period. 

The clarification matters. Subscription agreements often raise concerns about dilution and selling pressure. By confirming zero activity, Smarter Web aims to calm the market and remove speculation around recent price moves. The company also said it will now update the market weekly only if shares are actually sold. That change signals a push for cleaner and more relevant disclosures going forward.

What the Subscription Agreement Allows

The subscription agreement, announced on September 4. It gives Shard Merchant Capital the right to sell newly issued ordinary shares through its broker. However, it does not require sales to happen. The latest update confirms that Shard chose not to exercise that option in the last two weeks. This distinction is important. 

RNS Announcement: Subscription Agreement UpdateThe Smarter Web Company, a London-listed technology company and the UK’s largest publicly traded company holding Bitcoin on its balance sheet, announces that no Ordinary Shares were sold by Shard Merchant Capital Ltd, the Company’s… pic.twitter.com/uHGPxmKmRU

— The Smarter Web Company (@smarterwebuk) December 15, 2025

The presence of an agreement does not automatically mean dilution is taking place. In this case, no new supply entered the market during the period in question. By limiting future updates to weeks where sales actually occur, Smarter Web is also trying to reduce noise. Investors will only hear about the agreement when it has a real impact on the share count.

Bitcoin Treasury Strategy Still Front and Center

Smarter Web continues to position itself as the UK’s largest publicly traded company holding Bitcoin on its balance sheet. Since 2022, the firm has accepted Bitcoin as payment and now holds treasury reserves and surplus cash in BTC. The company remains clear about the risks. Bitcoin is unregulated in the UK and considered high risk by the Financial Conduct Authority. Smarter Web stresses that buying its shares is not the same as buying Bitcoin. 

Still, the firm openly acknowledges that its balance sheet is materially exposed to BTC price movements. Management frames this exposure as a long-term strategy. The company views Bitcoin as digital capital and a store of value that can support future growth. Transparency remains a core theme. Repeated risk disclosures show an effort to set realistic expectations for investors.

Core Business and Long-Term Growth Plans

Beyond Bitcoin, Smarter Web runs a traditional revenue-generating business. It provides web design, development, hosting and digital marketing services to clients in the UK and abroad. Customers typically pay upfront fees, annual hosting charges and optional monthly marketing costs. That recurring revenue base underpins the company’s broader strategy. 

Management continues to explore acquisitions that could expand its client base or boost predictable income. However, the board says it will only pursue deals when timing and conditions make sense. Currently, the latest update delivers a simple message. No shares were sold, no dilution occurred and the company plans to stay upfront about any changes. In a market that often reacts fast and asks questions later, that kind of clarity goes a long way.

The post Smarter Web Confirms No Share Sales Under Subscription Deal appeared first on Coinfomania.

Bitcoin investors have long believed in a familiar rhythm that shaped expectations and strategies across market cycles. For more than a decade, traders linked Bitcoin’s explosive rallies to halving events that reduced new supply and tightened issuance. These events created a narrative of predictable scarcity and delayed price appreciation. Each cycle reinforced the belief that halving mechanics sat at the core of Bitcoin’s long term market behavior. That belief shaped both retail enthusiasm and institutional positioning.

New research has shown that the assumptions about the 4-year cycles in Bitcoin are inaccurate, but the cycles themselves are still valid. The research, conducted by Markus Thielen, who is the Head of Research for 10x Research, indicates that while the Bitcoin cycles are still in place, the four-year cycle does not rely solely on halving events for their start. The timing of peak prices are becoming more closely aligned to political events and periods of increased liquidity.

The data compiled from historical periods suggests that Bitcoin prices are at their highest during US election cycles and do not correlate to the specific time frame after a halving event. This change in the relationship between Bitcoin and the traditional global financial system signals a significant change in how investors perceive (and interact with) Bitcoin and the traditional global financial systems.

The Bitcoin Four Year Cycle Still Exists but It Has Matured

The Bitcoin four year cycle continues to guide market structure, but its internal drivers have matured alongside the asset itself. Earlier cycles relied heavily on supply shocks created by halvings, which reduced block rewards and constrained miner selling pressure. Those reductions mattered when Bitcoin traded in smaller, less liquid markets. Today, Bitcoin supply inflation has already fallen significantly, reducing the relative impact of each halving event.

As Bitcoin markets deepened, demand forces gained dominance. Institutional capital now enters and exits based on macro conditions rather than blockchain schedules. Large investors react to rate expectations, fiscal policy, and political stability. These factors influence capital flows more aggressively than gradual issuance reductions. The Bitcoin four year cycle now reflects capital cycles rather than mining cycles.

Global Liquidity Now Controls Bitcoin Momentum

Global liquidity has emerged as the most powerful force shaping BTC price behavior. Central bank policies, interest rate decisions, and fiscal spending directly affect capital availability. When liquidity expands, investors increase exposure to growth assets. Bitcoin responds quickly due to its fixed supply narrative and high beta profile.

Liquidity contractions, however, suppress Bitcoin performance regardless of halving schedules. Higher rates and tighter financial conditions reduce leverage and speculative demand. Bitcoin struggles during these phases despite long term scarcity narratives. This reality highlights the growing influence of macroeconomic forces.

Institutional Capital Changed Bitcoin’s Market Behavior

Institutional adoption has transformed BTC from a niche asset into a macro relevant investment. Funds, asset managers, and corporations allocate based on economic signals rather than protocol mechanics. They monitor inflation, yields, and policy outlooks. Their participation increases BTC sensitivity to global liquidity shifts.

The introduction of spot Bitcoin ETFs accelerated this transformation. These products simplified access and funneled traditional capital into crypto markets. ETF flows respond instantly to policy headlines and political developments. This behavior reinforces liquidity driven price movements.

What Investors Should Watch in the Next Cycle

Investors can no longer rely solely on halving timelines to anticipate market peaks. Monitoring liquidity conditions provides clearer signals for trend strength. The US election cycle now plays a critical role in shaping market sentiment. Global liquidity indicators offer early warnings for momentum changes.

Bitcoin’s evolution strengthens its role within the financial system. The cycle survives but adapts to new realities. Investors who blend macro awareness with long term conviction gain strategic advantage. Markets reward flexibility, not rigid narratives.

The post Bitcoin’s Market Rhythm Is Shifting as Politics and Liquidity Take Control appeared first on Coinfomania.

It has taken two entire months since the crash of October 11 in the market. The crypto market is yet to recuperate that liquidity shock. This is where Addiction to Cyperspace creates the effect that ів brings about the weakness. There is hesitation in capital flows. Traders remain cautious. There is the lack of conviction in the market. The damage has not completely been mended by time. The liquidity situation remains to be stressful but not recovery-based.

Constant Underperforming Sentiment

On-chain activity and both exchange fund flows indicate the same. Investors remain defensive. Large reserves such as Bitcoin and Ethereum do not have a constant inflow. Movement of capital in the chain remains subdued. Money likes waiting rather than positioning. This action is not accumulative but rather uncertain. Players in the market still hedge capital rather than pursue upside.

The narrative is supported by the DefiLlama data. Binance documents about $2.8 billion of net outflows every month. Other large exchanges have flat or negative net flows. These figures indicate that there is a decreased trading appetite. Users withdraw assets rather than putting them in force. Liquidity fragmentation still exists. There has not been yet a general inflow trend.

HTX is an Exception that is Hard to Find

HTX is not a part of the bigger trend. The exchange records net inflows of 583.7 million during the 30 days before. It is ranked close to the top in a number of flow metrics in a month. The open interest in derivatives increases by 52% every year. This performance is very against the peer. General optimism is substituted by selective trust. Capital liquidity is not diffused among platforms.

The resilience of HTX is closely associated with transparency. The exchange has a record of 38 months of Merkle Tree Proof of Reserves. In case with major assets, the data of December 2025 confirms more than 100 percent coverage. USDC reserves nearly double. Such revelations give people confidence even at turbulent times. When sentiment becomes weak then trust becomes an advantage.

Recovery on Liquidity Flogs larger than Time

The healing of markets is automatic. The liquidity will only come back once confidence is regained. Being not panic-driven by fear but by hesitation is proven by current data. This distinction matters. Investors wait to be confirmed. They require transparency on macro parameters, regulation and risk appetite. Till that time, the process of recovery is uneven. Preferential power takes the place of wide momentum.

The post Two Months After the 10·11 Crash, Crypto Liquidity Still Shows No Real Recovery appeared first on Coinfomania.

Bitcoin markets have previously reacted mainly to stories in North America and Europe, but now, with a greater focus on events in the Middle East, there is another underlying trend emerging. Because of changing expectations in international energy markets, oil-exporting countries are beginning to reevaluate how they deploy capital throughout their economies. Therefore, nations and entities in the region are moving away from relying primarily on hydrocarbons to an emphasis on portfolio diversification. By doing so, they have also placed greater emphasis on the importance of including Bitcoin in the discussion of alternatives to traditional financial products.

Middle East Bitcoin liquidity now stands at the center of this transformation. Unlike speculative retail inflows, Gulf capital moves with long-term intent. Sovereign wealth funds control enormous balance sheets built for decades, not quarters. Even a small portfolio allocation can introduce meaningful depth into Bitcoin markets. That reality changes how traders and investors should view future cycles.

Bitcoin also aligns with regional goals around fintech leadership and financial modernization. The Gulf increasingly positions itself as a global financial innovation hub. Digital assets fit naturally into that vision. This alignment strengthens institutional confidence and supports sustainable capital inflows. Over time, liquidity reflects strategy rather than speculation.

Why Gulf Sovereign Wealth Funds Carry Outsized Influence

Gulf sovereign wealth funds rank among the most powerful financial entities globally. Funds from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait manage assets worth several trillion dollars. These institutions already invest heavily in technology, infrastructure, and alternative assets. Bitcoin now enters that same category as digital scarcity gains acceptance. This shift carries real market consequences.

These funds operate under mandates focused on stability and long-term value. They do not chase short-term price movements or leverage-driven returns. Bitcoin appeals as a store of value and diversification tool. That appeal supports strategic accumulation rather than trading. As a result, liquidity becomes deeper and more resilient.

Middle East Bitcoin liquidity benefits directly from this patient capital. Long holding periods reduce volatility during market stress. Order books thicken as large players absorb supply. This behavior contrasts sharply with retail-driven cycles. Over time, the market structure grows stronger.

Regulatory Alignment Strengthens Capital Confidence

Regulators across the Middle East increasingly integrate crypto into national financial strategies. Instead of restrictive policies, they prioritize clarity and oversight. Clear regulation reduces uncertainty for institutions. Reduced uncertainty unlocks capital deployment. Liquidity follows regulatory confidence.

The UAE sets global benchmarks for crypto regulation. Saudi Arabia explores blockchain adoption within its financial system. Qatar and Kuwait advance cautiously with strong institutional safeguards. This structured approach limits systemic risk. It also attracts international partnerships.

Oil Wealth Diversification Is Changing Bitcoin’s Market Structure

Oil no longer defines the future of Gulf economies. Governments actively diversify into technology, renewables, and digital finance. Bitcoin fits naturally into that diversification strategy. It offers exposure beyond traditional commodity cycles. This shift reflects long-term planning.

Oil-linked capital behaves differently from speculative investment flows. It values resilience, stability, and durability. When this capital enters Bitcoin markets, volatility patterns change. Price corrections become less severe. Liquidity improves across market phases.

MIDDLE EAST MONEY COULD BE THE NEXT BIG BITCOIN LIQUIDITY DRIVEROil-rich funds & Gulf capital aren’t just talking crypto — institutions in the UAE/Saudi/GCC are increasingly embracing digital assets as part of diversification away from oil-dependence, pushing real liquidity… pic.twitter.com/3hrE8vOaHU

— CryptosRus (@CryptosR_Us) December 15, 2025

What This Shift Means for Bitcoin’s Long-Term Trajectory

Bitcoin continues transitioning from speculative asset to macro allocation. Middle Eastern institutional capital accelerates this shift. Sovereign involvement reinforces Bitcoin’s legitimacy. This evolution attracts conservative global investors. Demand becomes structural rather than cyclical.

Middle East Bitcoin liquidity also diversifies geographic capital sources. Reliance on Western markets decreases. This decentralization strengthens Bitcoin’s global resilience. Policy changes in one region carry less impact. Independence improves market confidence.

The post Middle East Capital Is Quietly Reshaping Bitcoin’s Liquidity Landscape appeared first on Coinfomania.

Technology has always been the follower of marketing. Every significant communication innovation changed the patterns of the information dissemination and the means of influence. The mass literacy and newspapers became possible due to printing press. Telegraph systems made distance and time short. High-fidelity Radio brought about real-time broadcast influence. The internet opened forums and primal digital communities. Social media made people publishers. Institutions were substituted by content makers. Each phase moved to more personal and broader and faster channels. Every jump minimized tension between message and audience.

Social Media Reduced Attention to a Product

With the emergence of social platforms in the 2010s, everything has changed. Engagement became currency. Nonetheless, it relied on ads to be monetized. Platforms regulated payouts are also there. Bots diluted reach. False interaction perverted value. Focus became quantifiable yet not proportionately valued. The following shift is concerned with accuracy. AttentionFi considers attention as a monetary resource. AI is the analysis of content quality rather than raw measures. Models consider context, originality, sentiment and influence. Interaction is made realizable. Bots lose relevance. Spam loses profitability. Actual dialogues become more important. This system recognizes real impact, and not quantity. AttentionFi transforms the concept of marketing to intelligence.

AttentionFi Launches AI Impact Measurement

InfoFi transforms monetization in a different way. Producers do not use sponsorships or advertisements in platforms anymore. They make money directly out of information flow. A mere tweet generates an income. Information, knowledge and story become quantifiable. Audiences reward relevance. The attention is priced transparently in the markets. The product becomes information itself. This change eliminates tension between the creators and the revenues. It is matching incentives with honesty and quality.

Wallchain is the focal point in this change. The platform uses large language models to understand the engagement on X. It gauges authenticity, relevance and influence. Bots are automatically filtered in the system. It discourages agricultural spamming. It rewards creators fairly. The system described in wallchain documents places an emphasis on signal rather than noise. The model promotes sustainable creator economies. It will decrease reliance on centralized platforms. It harmonizes incentives among users, brands and networks.

Wallchain Uses the AttentionFi Model

The conventional advertising is under pressure. The opaque systems transfer over five hundred billion dollars each year. AttentionFi disputes this arrangement. The attribution courtesy of AI enhances transparency. Marketing changes to resonance as opposed to reach. Capital follows clarity. Artists are no longer promoters on their own. They turn out to be information assets. They have an effect on markets, narratives, and conduct. This role is formalized in AttentionFi. InfoFi monetizes it. The creator economy is shifting towards being platform-dependent to protocol-contributing.

The post Marketing Enters Its AttentionFi Era as AI and InfoFi Redefine Creator Monetization appeared first on Coinfomania.

There is a rapid transmission of extreme price predictions in crypto markets. William Logan singles out one such claim that has been circulating on X. YoungHoon Kim projects a figure of $100 in XRP by 2029. The prediction is quite different to the historical price pattern of XRP. XRP has been trading at less than $1 over the years but has recently reached almost the $2 mark. The difference between the present valuation and the projection breeds suspicion. The assertion is based on the shock value than on systematic financial modelling.

Suspicious Authority Standing behind the Prophecy

YoungHoon Kim positions himself as a brilliant market analyst. He claims an IQ score of 276. This statement is invalidated by independent studies. High-IQ organizations do not accept the fact of such a score. Another VICE report dated July 2025 reveals that there is no confirmation of the credentials of Kim. This is a deficiency in evidence that undermines his market projections. Experience is an issue in financial forecasting. Authority with no basis brings concerns.

Kim was an earlier proponent of Bitcoin maximalism. He suddenly changed his course to XRP advocacy on December 12, 2025. He did not provide any extensive valuation model and did not give any tokenomics breakdown. They did not give any adoption figures and income estimates. The pivot seems opportunistic. These changes are usually accompanied by the increase of social attention and not the emergence of new information.

XRP Fundamentals should be a Different Conversation

XRP is also developing without referring to viral predictions. Ripple increases cross-chain integrations. Wrapped XRP is being built on such networks as Solana. The institutional interest is enhanced gradually via institutional payment corridors. These advances favor incremental growth stories. They are not excusing math-free exponential price targets. Long term valuation is based on the use, liquidity and clarity of the regulations.

Markets in cryptography are rewarding to attention. Viral posts are intriguing. Tremendous figures produce clicks. Nonetheless, sustainable market movements are based on the basics. It is a risk of misleading retail investors by analysts who disregard credibility. The post by Logan points out doubtfulness, not the rejection of the XRP. The criticism is on unjustified theses, but not the prospects of the asset. Vigorous markets need rigorous examination.

Hype vs. Analysis of Cryptocurrency

Emotional responses are generated by bold projections. They encourage FOMO. They distort expectations. Investors have a positive impact of separating narrative and data. There is a possibility of a massive expansion of XRP. A valuation of 100 dollars involves unbelievable adoption, revenue acquisition and worldwide settlement domination. In the absence of it, speculations are guesses.

The post Viral XRP $100 Prediction Sparks Debate as Credibility Gaps Surface appeared first on Coinfomania.

Exor, the owner of Juventus Football Club, has officially rejected a $1 billion takeover offer from Tether. The decision sends a clear message, that the club’s values come first. CEO John Elkann stated, “Values are not for sale.”

Why Exor Said No

The offer from Tether was large, but Exor wanted to maintain control. They believe that money alone cannot replace the club’s history and identity. In addition, Juventus has faced financial scrutiny in recent years. Therefore, keeping control ensures stability and preserves the club’s long-term strategy.

Exor also wants to protect fans’ trust. Football supporters value the team’s tradition and culture. By rejecting Tether, Exor signals that these aspects are more important than a quick financial gain.

What Tether Was Looking For

Tether saw Juventus as a strategic opportunity. Football clubs attract millions of fans globally. Owning Juventus would give Tether exposure to a large audience and enhance its brand.

Moreover, the move reflects a broader trend. Crypto companies are increasingly trying to enter traditional industries. They have invested in sports through sponsorships, fan tokens, and stadium deals. Tether’s bid was a step further, aiming for full ownership.

The Growing Crypto-Sports Connection

This Juventus Tether bid shows how cryptocurrency and professional sports are intersecting. More clubs are collaborating with crypto companies. For example, some teams accept crypto for merchandise or ticket payments. Still, full ownership remains rare.

Exor’s rejection highlights the limits. While crypto has influence, traditional institutions may resist giving control to new digital players. The Juventus case demonstrates that financial offers are not always enough to sway decisions.

What This Means For Tether and the Market

For Juventus, the decision keeps leadership stable. Fans can trust that the club will follow its long-term plan.

For crypto investors, the Juventus Tether bid shows that owning major sports teams is difficult. Partnerships and sponsorships are easier paths than full acquisition.

Overall, Exor’s choice sets an example. It shows that values and tradition can outweigh even billion-dollar offers. At the same time, it signals that cryptocurrency will continue to try to find its place in sports.

Juventus remains under Exor’s guidance, balancing financial growth with the club’s heritage. Meanwhile, the world watches how crypto and traditional sports will work together in the future.

The post Juventus Tether Bid Rejected by Exor Amid $1 Billion Offer appeared first on Coinfomania.

A recent article brought to the limelight the undetected strata of the Pi ecosystem. The message put an emphasis on scale and preparation. It disapproved stereotypes regarding the preparedness of Pi. The author indicated the presence of companies and applications that were already inbuilt within the system. There was already structure and coordination of the ecosystem. Components constructed way before they became public. The post positioned the launch as an introduction and not revelation.

Pre-Authenticated Intermediaries Enhance Cohesiveness

Evidence of preparation was recorded in GitHub record various checked anchors in a directory file. These anchors consisted of money transfer services, wallets, and remittance. Some of the integrations were based on the Stellar infrastructure. The platforms such as Interstellar and Stronghold were visible. The services already supported BTC, ETH, USD and XRP. The preparation decreased scale friction.

Pi Network has chosen Stellar to be interoperable. This decision allowed settlement more expeditiously. It improved asset transfers. The creators made Pi compatible with financial rails. Payments became practical. Remittances became effective. Wallet compatibility extended. Exchanging between the chains was possible. The architecture used in the real world. The ecosystem has left behind the solitary settings. Experimentation is substituted with utility. Using infrastructure permitted instant scalability.

Introduction of Open Mainnet was a Structural Change

In February 2025, Pi Network opened its open mainnet. This was achieved after years of development, and verified users have been filtered through KYC. Phases of testnets optimized stability. Software developers were performance and security-oriented. The environment had hit an implementation stage. There was transactional freedom among the users. Confidence was developed in deployment by developers. The network grew to Layer-1 functionality.

KYC tools based on AI speeded up approvals. The rate of migration grew in regions. In December 2025, a hackathon event received more than two hundred applications. Constructors oriented towards business, utility, and services. Incentives were in line with long-term participation. These revisions attested intent on a production level.

Debuting in Public Only Gives the Superficial

The post was quite explicit in the expectations. There are already backend systems that are in place. Anchors remain prepared. Infrastructure is available to kick start. Decades of billing are now about to be revealed. The mere visibility of the early conceals preparation. The ecosystem sets itself at the scale level and not the hype level. There will be no experimentation, but there will be capability on the launch.

The post Pi Ecosystem Depth Emerges as Pre-Connected Infrastructure Comes Into Focus appeared first on Coinfomania.