《Port3 Airdrop Fraud, Token Mystery, Binance Alpha Screening Mechanism is a Farce?》

Port3 - a project with fraudulent financing data, broken airdrop promises, and a murky token flow, can it really appear on Binance Alpha with such audacity?

Is this truly Binance's "strict selection of quality projects", or another stage of interest exchange where "whoever can pay the protection fee gets on the list"?

Let's first review what Port3 has done:

__________________

1. Financing Amount Fraud: Is it tens of millions of dollars or just a few million?

Port3 claimed early on to have "completed financing of tens of millions of dollars", which was a key point in their external promotion. Strangely, recent third-party databases show their actual financing amount to be only a few million dollars (see the comparison in the image below).

Theoretically, the financing data from third-party platforms should also come from the project party. So the question arises:

Either they exaggerated from the beginning, or there were withdrawals during the financing process, and they never actively disclosed this change.

Whichever it is, it means the project party intentionally "packaged" or even "deceived" the market. More ironically, did Binance Alpha really have no awareness of this basic information issue?

__________________

2. Four Months of Airdrop "System Upgrade"? Or Token Substitution?

Port3's airdrop has almost no integrity, severely backstabbing the community. From the initial promise of "all airdrops released in the first quarter, users can claim immediately", to users later discovering they couldn't claim at all, to the "second quarter airdrop distribution in December" being postponed to January, and finally just throwing out a "system upgrade" to gloss over everything (see the timeline in the image below).

Image 1: Team members claimed it could be claimed by the end of 2024

Image 2: In January 2025, users discovered they couldn't claim

Image 3: In February 2025, announced system upgrade

Since January 15, 2025, the first-quarter airdrop claiming has completely stagnated, dragging on for over four months without announcements, explanations, compensations, or even the most basic respect.

Is it your system upgrade, or are you secretly transferring tokens? This is evidenced by the contract address from which the airdrop was to be claimed.

__________________

3. 70 Million Airdrop Promise Only Half Received? Where Did the Rest Go?

Port3 once promised a total airdrop amount of 3.5% of the total supply, which is 70 million tokens. However, to date, only half, 35 million tokens, have entered the airdrop contract address.

So, where did the other half go?

The contract address is as follows: https://t.co/bVMCoKzFhL

Is it reserved for the team and insiders’ hidden profits?

Or is it used for "settling relationships"?

If this is a genuine "community incentive airdrop", why does the amount in the airdrop contract not match?

__________________

4. You stare into the abyss, and the abyss stares back at you - what is the trust bottom line of Binance Alpha?

A series of actions by Port3 is not just a simple incident of backlash; it feels more like a naked probe:

How much wrongdoing can the community tolerate? In this context, there are only two possibilities:

1. The project and Binance wallet engage in interest exchange and collude to harvest?

2. The project acts maliciously while Binance does not investigate at all?

Whichever it is, it is chilling. More seriously: if even a project like Port3 can easily make the list, has Binance Alpha's screening mechanism completely devolved into a performance?

In today's rapid expansion of Alpha and intensifying competition within the points system, users are not just being guided to participate in distribution, but are also voting for the platform's "credibility".

We call for Binance to immediately review and explain the issues of Port3's fraudulent financing, airdrop fraud, and unclear token whereabouts.

No one will refuse Binance Alpha providing benefits to everyone, but that does not mean the community should be backstabbed, deceived, and have their trust trampled repeatedly.

Listing can have no threshold, but the platform cannot have no bottom line!