FIL and EOS: Can the fallen angels return to the cloud? A deep analysis of the redemption paths of these two cryptocurrencies.
I. From Peak to Valley: Project Dilemmas and Market Trust Collapse
FIL (Filecoin) and EOS were once star projects in the cryptocurrency market. FIL, as a leader in the distributed storage sector, saw its market cap briefly exceed $237 at its launch in 2020, being regarded as 'the future of decentralized storage'; EOS, with its high-performance label of 'Blockchain 3.0', had a market cap of over $40 billion at its mainnet launch in 2018, dubbed 'Ethereum killer.' However, the glory of both did not last: FIL's price fell to $2.66 (May 2025) due to insufficient storage demand, slow technological implementation, and token sell pressure, with a market cap shrinking by 98%; EOS's price dropped to $0.63, with a market cap evaporating over 99%, due to governance chaos, developer loss, and lack of ecological applications.
The market's trust crisis in both is due to multiple factors: FIL's storage market penetration is less than 1%, facing competition from permanent storage technologies like Arweave; EOS's high-performance advantage has been replaced by new public chains like Solana and Avalanche, with community activity remaining low.
II. FIL's Redemption: Technological Breakthrough and Ecological Reconstruction
1. Technological iteration and application scenario expansion
In 2025, FIL will make significant technological progress.
- FVM Upgrade: The Filecoin Virtual Machine (FVM) supports more programming languages and development tools, driving DeFi ecosystem growth, with daily on-chain activity exceeding 3 million transactions.
- Cross-chain and privacy technology: Achieve asset interoperability with mainstream chains like Ethereum and Cosmos through cross-chain technology, and introduce zero-knowledge proofs to protect user data privacy.
- Corporate cooperation: Partnering with tech giants like Amazon and Microsoft to provide decentralized storage solutions for healthcare, social media, and other fields.
2. Economic model optimization
FIL launched a collateral-backed stablecoin USDFC, allowing users to stake FIL to generate stablecoins, reducing volatility and enhancing liquidity. This innovation may attract more institutional funds into the ecosystem.
3. Market demand driven
The distributed storage market is expected to have a compound annual growth rate of 6.5% from 2025 to 2031. As data privacy regulations tighten and AI data storage demand surges, FIL's technological advantages may be reassessed.
III. EOS's Transformation: From Public Chain to Web3 Financial Services
1. Strategic shift and brand reshaping
In 2025, EOS announced its rebranding to Vaulta, transforming into a Web3 banking service platform, launching a new token, and planning to provide digital asset insurance, cross-chain lending, and other services. This strategy attempts to avoid the competition red ocean of public chains and tap into the blue ocean of financial services.
2. Technological integration and partnerships
Vaulta collaborates with Blockchain Insurance Inc. to provide asset insurance and partners with Spirit Blockchain to achieve tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). Additionally, EOS's high TPS and low fee characteristics may find new scenarios in the payment sector.
3. Governance reform and community activation
EOS introduced a banking advisory committee, attempting to enhance credibility through the participation of traditional financial experts. At the same time, it initiated a task-based reward activity to incentivize user participation in ecological construction.
IV. Possibility of Turnaround: Opportunities and Challenges Coexist
Key variables of FIL
- Opportunity: If the demand for distributed storage explodes, FIL may become an infrastructure-level project; the launch of USDFC may drive token demand.
- Risk: Arweave's permanent storage model has more cost advantages; FIL's token release mechanism may suppress prices.
Breakthrough point of EOS
- Opportunity: If Web3 financial services are implemented, they may attract traditional financial users; low fees and high TPS have potential in the payment sector.
- Risk: Doubts about the success of the transformation, facing competition from chains like Avalanche and BNB Chain.
V. Market Outlook: Trust Reconstruction and Industry Trends
The cryptocurrency market in 2025 may benefit from institutional adoption and regulatory clarity, but if FIL and EOS cannot solve core issues, a turnaround will still take time. FIL needs to prove the actual demand for its storage network, while EOS needs to validate the feasibility of Web3 financial services. Investors should focus on the progress of technological implementation, partner developments, and changes in market sentiment. Whether these two 'fallen angels' can return to the cloud depends on whether they can find new value anchors amid industry reshuffling.