Regarding Binance's recent actions, it is indeed a bit puzzling. Firstly, the 75-point new listing event has already deterred many users, as everyone is striving to accumulate points, but Binance unexpectedly launched an 80-point airdrop on the same day, providing an 'extra' benefit to those who meet the criteria. This approach not only frustrates users who have already missed the opportunity but also leaves those who barely meet the 75-point requirement feeling defeated. It's often said, 'You can't get on the bus without 80 points,' yet now 80 points has become the threshold, and the rules of the game have become so dramatic, making it feel like Binance is completely disregarding the feelings of ordinary users.

Furthermore, does this point accumulation operation imply that more and more activities in the future will set higher thresholds? From this perspective, it seems to mark the beginning of an internal competition, where an increasing number of users must continuously accumulate points just to participate in some basic activities. CZ seems to have a new understanding of this internal competition; he probably realizes that the ultimate beneficiaries are not the users, but the exchange itself. After all, such activities ultimately provide Binance with a large number of active users, rather than just those who meet the participation criteria. While this kind of play can boost the platform's activity level, it sacrifices the sense of fairness and participation for most users.

If this trend continues, it will ultimately lead to more users choosing to withdraw, and the platform's activity may be adversely affected. For Binance, whether such actions are a savvy strategy or digging their own grave is worth our deep reflection.