Binance Square

Vincent W

Open Trade
BNB Holder
BNB Holder
Occasional Trader
7.5 Years
Welcome to my X: https://x.com/dangxiawww (Provide for one’s family)
16 Following
134 Followers
382 Liked
36 Shared
All Content
Portfolio
--
See original
I have been researching new projects on the BNB chain these days and found that most new meme coins are currently launched on BNB. The transaction fees are low, the on-chain activity is high, and the atmosphere is really vibrant. The older coins have mostly sunk, and unless there's a new narrative or a big player involved, there's basically no chance. As for inscriptions, they are gradually cooling down; it feels like the phase of easy profits is over, and unless there's a new way to play, the potential for explosive growth is limited. So I plan to change my strategy: I'm preparing to spread my net and buy 20 new meme coins, investing 500 U each, not going for heavy positions, just betting on potential breakout points. The main criteria I'm looking for are: recently launched, the community is extremely excited, has some humor or irony, and the contracts aren't too dodgy. In simple terms, it's a bet on short-term sentiment and narrative. Guys, do you have any recent projects you are optimistic about?
I have been researching new projects on the BNB chain these days and found that most new meme coins are currently launched on BNB. The transaction fees are low, the on-chain activity is high, and the atmosphere is really vibrant. The older coins have mostly sunk, and unless there's a new narrative or a big player involved, there's basically no chance. As for inscriptions, they are gradually cooling down; it feels like the phase of easy profits is over, and unless there's a new way to play, the potential for explosive growth is limited. So I plan to change my strategy: I'm preparing to spread my net and buy 20 new meme coins, investing 500 U each, not going for heavy positions, just betting on potential breakout points. The main criteria I'm looking for are: recently launched, the community is extremely excited, has some humor or irony, and the contracts aren't too dodgy. In simple terms, it's a bet on short-term sentiment and narrative. Guys, do you have any recent projects you are optimistic about?
See original
The current world order is really chaotic to the point of absurdity. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has been going on for two years without a ceasefire, the Middle East is seeing back-and-forth exchanges between Israel and the Houthis, and Pakistan and India are also testing each other at the border. Looking at China and the United States, they are not only fighting a trade war, but also a technological war, a financial war, and a struggle for discourse power. Some say a world war could break out at any moment; it sounds like a conspiracy theory, but when you see global hotspots rising and falling, it’s hard to completely rule out that possibility. Who will lead the world in the future? Perhaps it won’t be a specific country, but rather those who hold the technological high ground. AI, biotechnology, brain-machine interfaces, interstellar exploration—these directions could fundamentally change the fate of humanity. Will our generation have the chance for immortality? Don't say we won't; what Musk, OpenAI, and DeepMind are working on might one day truly crack aging and death. And can BTC last through the ages? If it can really become a value anchor of global consensus, like digital gold, living for a few hundred years is not impossible. The future is uncertain, but at least we are living in the most transformative era.
The current world order is really chaotic to the point of absurdity. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has been going on for two years without a ceasefire, the Middle East is seeing back-and-forth exchanges between Israel and the Houthis, and Pakistan and India are also testing each other at the border. Looking at China and the United States, they are not only fighting a trade war, but also a technological war, a financial war, and a struggle for discourse power. Some say a world war could break out at any moment; it sounds like a conspiracy theory, but when you see global hotspots rising and falling, it’s hard to completely rule out that possibility. Who will lead the world in the future? Perhaps it won’t be a specific country, but rather those who hold the technological high ground. AI, biotechnology, brain-machine interfaces, interstellar exploration—these directions could fundamentally change the fate of humanity. Will our generation have the chance for immortality? Don't say we won't; what Musk, OpenAI, and DeepMind are working on might one day truly crack aging and death. And can BTC last through the ages? If it can really become a value anchor of global consensus, like digital gold, living for a few hundred years is not impossible. The future is uncertain, but at least we are living in the most transformative era.
See original
I heard that Singapore is going to clean up the unlicensed Web3 groups this time. All crypto companies registered in Singapore, even those that only serve overseas clients, must obtain a Digital Token Service Provider (DTSP) license by June 30, or they will face fines of up to 250,000 Singapore dollars and a maximum of three years in prison, with no transition period. For legitimate projects, this may just mean going through a few more processes, but for those teams that come specifically to exploit others, the costs have suddenly increased, and they may have to start 'shifting their positions' again. Currently, places like Hong Kong, Dubai, Tokyo, Kuala Lumpur, and Bangkok are actively attracting these businesses. As for when China will officially embrace blockchain, although it has been quietly laying the groundwork, from the national chain, BSN, to digital renminbi, the free market has not yet been opened. If policies loosen, which of the domestic internet giants wouldn't want to get in on some 'big business'? Once they take action, the industry landscape could be reshuffled in an instant. And while BTC at 1 million and ETH at 10,000 sounds like a dream, if global asset digitization truly becomes mainstream and institutions enter the market on a large scale, it’s not completely impossible. The key will still depend on whether Web3 can truly get on the 'right track' after this wave of global regulation. In summary, under the regulatory storm, the future of Web3 is full of uncertainties, but it also harbors new opportunities.
I heard that Singapore is going to clean up the unlicensed Web3 groups this time. All crypto companies registered in Singapore, even those that only serve overseas clients, must obtain a Digital Token Service Provider (DTSP) license by June 30, or they will face fines of up to 250,000 Singapore dollars and a maximum of three years in prison, with no transition period. For legitimate projects, this may just mean going through a few more processes, but for those teams that come specifically to exploit others, the costs have suddenly increased, and they may have to start 'shifting their positions' again. Currently, places like Hong Kong, Dubai, Tokyo, Kuala Lumpur, and Bangkok are actively attracting these businesses. As for when China will officially embrace blockchain, although it has been quietly laying the groundwork, from the national chain, BSN, to digital renminbi, the free market has not yet been opened. If policies loosen, which of the domestic internet giants wouldn't want to get in on some 'big business'? Once they take action, the industry landscape could be reshuffled in an instant. And while BTC at 1 million and ETH at 10,000 sounds like a dream, if global asset digitization truly becomes mainstream and institutions enter the market on a large scale, it’s not completely impossible. The key will still depend on whether Web3 can truly get on the 'right track' after this wave of global regulation. In summary, under the regulatory storm, the future of Web3 is full of uncertainties, but it also harbors new opportunities.
See original
I heard that Musk is going to create a 'Tech American Party' this time and has secured 80% of the support votes. Once this happens, both the Republican and Democratic parties will probably be in a panic. A wealthy, influential tech mogul who can also set the agenda entering the political arena means that the attention of Silicon Valley and Wall Street is now at the doorstep of the White House. Does Musk have a chance to become president? To be honest, given his current influence and fan base, it can't be said that it's impossible, especially with the support from young people, the tech community, and the crypto community; if they unite, their power is considerable. And if his favorite Dogecoin (DOGE) really becomes part of national strategy, it could truly 'dance' into a new spring. As for whether he can revive America, Musk has always been the kind of person who dares to think and act; he has ventured into rockets, brain-computer interfaces, autonomous driving, and AI. If he is really given the weapon of the national machinery, who knows, America might just come up with some new tricks. The only question now is: does Musk really want to step into this murky political water?
I heard that Musk is going to create a 'Tech American Party' this time and has secured 80% of the support votes. Once this happens, both the Republican and Democratic parties will probably be in a panic. A wealthy, influential tech mogul who can also set the agenda entering the political arena means that the attention of Silicon Valley and Wall Street is now at the doorstep of the White House. Does Musk have a chance to become president? To be honest, given his current influence and fan base, it can't be said that it's impossible, especially with the support from young people, the tech community, and the crypto community; if they unite, their power is considerable. And if his favorite Dogecoin (DOGE) really becomes part of national strategy, it could truly 'dance' into a new spring. As for whether he can revive America, Musk has always been the kind of person who dares to think and act; he has ventured into rockets, brain-computer interfaces, autonomous driving, and AI. If he is really given the weapon of the national machinery, who knows, America might just come up with some new tricks. The only question now is: does Musk really want to step into this murky political water?
See original
Talking about alpha (BNB): Long-time users of BNB should have a deep understanding that this year BNB's static earnings are only about thirty percent of last year's. Of course, there are many reasons behind this, such as the decline in coin prices, the diversion of users and projects, etc. However, in the long run, I believe this is actually beneficial for the development of BNB, especially with the recent explosion of Alpha, which has brought unprecedented prosperity to BNB and finally shaken off the nickname of 'zombie chain'. A large number of ecological applications have emerged on-chain, coupled with the meme frenzy, which has completely raised the heat. The move to waive fees is very correct; the ecosystem needs to be activated first before we can talk about the value of fees. Back then, ride-hailing platforms also relied on hundreds of millions in daily subsidies to gain traction. If Binance is also willing to allocate part of its revenue to support the BNB ecosystem, it may just be a matter of time before BNB surpasses ETH. What do you think about the future development of BNB?
Talking about alpha (BNB): Long-time users of BNB should have a deep understanding that this year BNB's static earnings are only about thirty percent of last year's. Of course, there are many reasons behind this, such as the decline in coin prices, the diversion of users and projects, etc. However, in the long run, I believe this is actually beneficial for the development of BNB, especially with the recent explosion of Alpha, which has brought unprecedented prosperity to BNB and finally shaken off the nickname of 'zombie chain'. A large number of ecological applications have emerged on-chain, coupled with the meme frenzy, which has completely raised the heat. The move to waive fees is very correct; the ecosystem needs to be activated first before we can talk about the value of fees. Back then, ride-hailing platforms also relied on hundreds of millions in daily subsidies to gain traction. If Binance is also willing to allocate part of its revenue to support the BNB ecosystem, it may just be a matter of time before BNB surpasses ETH. What do you think about the future development of BNB?
See original
Yesterday I sold some ETH at 2680, and just now I saw it has dropped below 2600. Should I consider buying back at this point? Personally, I think it’s possible to do some swing trading in this range and make appropriate purchases. After all, the increase in ETH is far from over, and the market is still full of opportunities. For me, I still have dreams in my heart~ I believe the 2800 range might be challenged continuously 3 to 5 times, and there could be significant volatility and opportunities here in the short term. So, it might be a good idea to do some short-term operations during the fluctuations to capture profit opportunities. What do you think?
Yesterday I sold some ETH at 2680, and just now I saw it has dropped below 2600. Should I consider buying back at this point? Personally, I think it’s possible to do some swing trading in this range and make appropriate purchases. After all, the increase in ETH is far from over, and the market is still full of opportunities. For me, I still have dreams in my heart~ I believe the 2800 range might be challenged continuously 3 to 5 times, and there could be significant volatility and opportunities here in the short term. So, it might be a good idea to do some short-term operations during the fluctuations to capture profit opportunities. What do you think?
See original
Is RDAC a 'killer' coin? In my opinion, it seems a bit like consuming everyone's points to achieve certain goals. Recently, I participated in a lucky number event on Binance, and I found out that when I hit the number, not only were my points deducted, but I only earned $20. This made me wonder whether the quality of this project is lacking, resulting in the shrinkage of the reward amount, or if there is actually some kind of 'killing' behavior behind it? When we participate in such activities, we originally hope to receive certain returns, especially when it involves lucky numbers, everyone is filled with anticipation. However, the result is disappointing—not only is the reward amount low, but it also feels like being manipulated by a 'killer', with points being directly deducted. Is this due to the project's poor performance, or is there some hidden manipulation behind it? If there are problems with the project itself, it undoubtedly represents unfairness to the participants, but if this is indeed a deliberate 'killing behavior', then Binance and the project parties may face more user dissatisfaction and a crisis of trust. Regardless of the situation, it is evident that user experience is compromised, and I hope the platform can further clarify the rules to ensure fairness in activities, so that everyone's points and expectations are not wasted.
Is RDAC a 'killer' coin? In my opinion, it seems a bit like consuming everyone's points to achieve certain goals. Recently, I participated in a lucky number event on Binance, and I found out that when I hit the number, not only were my points deducted, but I only earned $20. This made me wonder whether the quality of this project is lacking, resulting in the shrinkage of the reward amount, or if there is actually some kind of 'killing' behavior behind it?

When we participate in such activities, we originally hope to receive certain returns, especially when it involves lucky numbers, everyone is filled with anticipation. However, the result is disappointing—not only is the reward amount low, but it also feels like being manipulated by a 'killer', with points being directly deducted. Is this due to the project's poor performance, or is there some hidden manipulation behind it?

If there are problems with the project itself, it undoubtedly represents unfairness to the participants, but if this is indeed a deliberate 'killing behavior', then Binance and the project parties may face more user dissatisfaction and a crisis of trust. Regardless of the situation, it is evident that user experience is compromised, and I hope the platform can further clarify the rules to ensure fairness in activities, so that everyone's points and expectations are not wasted.
See original
I hit a lucky number '7', but I only won 20 dollars, which feels a bit disappointing. The threshold is really high now, and the chances of winning are low; this income really isn't enough to cover the GAS fees. Making money is getting harder, and I feel a bit frustrated. Should I wait a few more days to see if there's a chance for a slight increase? If the funds can rise a bit, it would at least offset some of the transaction costs. If the market doesn't change much, it might be difficult to have a significant increase in the short term. However, if I have confidence to wait a bit longer, maybe there will be an opportunity. Otherwise, selling now could also avoid greater risks. In any case, I need to be flexible in responding to market changes! The empowerment of BNB feels like it's decreasing more and more!
I hit a lucky number '7', but I only won 20 dollars, which feels a bit disappointing. The threshold is really high now, and the chances of winning are low; this income really isn't enough to cover the GAS fees. Making money is getting harder, and I feel a bit frustrated. Should I wait a few more days to see if there's a chance for a slight increase? If the funds can rise a bit, it would at least offset some of the transaction costs. If the market doesn't change much, it might be difficult to have a significant increase in the short term. However, if I have confidence to wait a bit longer, maybe there will be an opportunity. Otherwise, selling now could also avoid greater risks. In any case, I need to be flexible in responding to market changes! The empowerment of BNB feels like it's decreasing more and more!
See original
ETH has broken through 2600, and everyone's expectations have risen along with it! Will the next target of 3000 be achieved this month? Personally, I think that as market sentiment warms up, ETH's upward momentum is very likely to break through this important threshold in the short term. After all, ETH's application ecosystem is steadily expanding, especially with the heat driven by DeFi and NFTs; more demand injection may help it achieve greater breakthroughs. As for BNB, it is not only the king of platform tokens but also a leader in smart chains, with a wide range of application scenarios and huge development potential. Its strong performance currently leads investors to have higher expectations for its future. After breaking through the new high of 800, whether it can welcome a new milestone and even break through 2000 dollars is entirely possible! After all, BNB's advantages in multiple areas are not limited to exchanges and DeFi; its ecosystem has gradually occupied a central position, providing strong support for its rise. Whether it's ETH or BNB, both have a great chance to break historical highs in a bull market. Stay tuned and seize the opportunities in market fluctuations; anything is possible! 💥🚀 #ETH #BNB #Crypto #牛市
ETH has broken through 2600, and everyone's expectations have risen along with it! Will the next target of 3000 be achieved this month? Personally, I think that as market sentiment warms up, ETH's upward momentum is very likely to break through this important threshold in the short term. After all, ETH's application ecosystem is steadily expanding, especially with the heat driven by DeFi and NFTs; more demand injection may help it achieve greater breakthroughs.

As for BNB, it is not only the king of platform tokens but also a leader in smart chains, with a wide range of application scenarios and huge development potential. Its strong performance currently leads investors to have higher expectations for its future. After breaking through the new high of 800, whether it can welcome a new milestone and even break through 2000 dollars is entirely possible! After all, BNB's advantages in multiple areas are not limited to exchanges and DeFi; its ecosystem has gradually occupied a central position, providing strong support for its rise.

Whether it's ETH or BNB, both have a great chance to break historical highs in a bull market. Stay tuned and seize the opportunities in market fluctuations; anything is possible! 💥🚀 #ETH #BNB #Crypto #牛市
See original
Pancake's decentralized dream is likely to collapse. After the release of the CAKE Tokenomics 3.0 proposal, the community's feedback has been a stir. This proposal, seemingly 'for the benefit of token holders,' actually exposes the project's corruption and centralization trends, with a plethora of issues: Unfair voting process: Voting has been accused of manipulation, and the community questions the fairness of governance. How can something like this, where 'the persona collapses,' be called decentralized? Shifting responsibility, changing positions: The initially proposed veCAKE mechanism has been overturned. Does the team really not trust their own design? This is simply irresponsible to investors. Neglecting veCAKE value: Low trading volume pools can receive more emissions, but the 'benefit transfer' behind this is gone, and the team has not provided an alternative plan, directly raising doubts about where their confidence in the BNB Chain ecosystem has gone. Radical reforms lack cushioning: The buyback and burn mechanism immediately replaces profit-sharing. Such drastic reforms, without a gradual transition, pose foreseeable risks. Complete control of emission rights: The so-called 'market adaptability' is essentially about wanting to firmly hold the emission rights of CAKE in their own hands. What else is this if not centralization? Collapse of long-term incentive system: The original veCAKE mechanism aligned the interests of long-term supporters with the Pancake protocol. Now, with the removal of staking requirements, the advantages of short-term capital have instantly overwhelmed loyal supporters. Deflation target cannot be explained: They say 4% annual deflation, but what is the basis for the calculation of a 20% supply reduction? How long can the buyback and burn last? It's completely the team's wishful thinking. This proposal fundamentally throws the ideals of decentralization out the window, heading towards a more corrupt and centralized direction. If the team continues like this, the future of Pancake is truly concerning, and investor trust will vanish.
Pancake's decentralized dream is likely to collapse. After the release of the CAKE Tokenomics 3.0 proposal, the community's feedback has been a stir. This proposal, seemingly 'for the benefit of token holders,' actually exposes the project's corruption and centralization trends, with a plethora of issues:

Unfair voting process: Voting has been accused of manipulation, and the community questions the fairness of governance. How can something like this, where 'the persona collapses,' be called decentralized?

Shifting responsibility, changing positions: The initially proposed veCAKE mechanism has been overturned. Does the team really not trust their own design? This is simply irresponsible to investors.

Neglecting veCAKE value: Low trading volume pools can receive more emissions, but the 'benefit transfer' behind this is gone, and the team has not provided an alternative plan, directly raising doubts about where their confidence in the BNB Chain ecosystem has gone.

Radical reforms lack cushioning: The buyback and burn mechanism immediately replaces profit-sharing. Such drastic reforms, without a gradual transition, pose foreseeable risks.

Complete control of emission rights: The so-called 'market adaptability' is essentially about wanting to firmly hold the emission rights of CAKE in their own hands. What else is this if not centralization?

Collapse of long-term incentive system: The original veCAKE mechanism aligned the interests of long-term supporters with the Pancake protocol. Now, with the removal of staking requirements, the advantages of short-term capital have instantly overwhelmed loyal supporters.

Deflation target cannot be explained: They say 4% annual deflation, but what is the basis for the calculation of a 20% supply reduction? How long can the buyback and burn last? It's completely the team's wishful thinking.

This proposal fundamentally throws the ideals of decentralization out the window, heading towards a more corrupt and centralized direction. If the team continues like this, the future of Pancake is truly concerning, and investor trust will vanish.
See original
Binance's airdrop rules are like the college entrance examination, emphasizing fairness and transparency. The rules of the college entrance examination are public, and everyone strives for a good score through hard work. Although the competition is fierce, it is a 'reasonable competition.' This airdrop event by Binance also follows similar principles, announcing the points rules only 2 hours before the airdrop to avoid meaningless competition of early point accumulation, ensuring that every participant competes on equal footing. Just as everyone is studying hard before the college entrance examination, the rules are set, and the final score is determined by effort. In this event, Binance not only maintained fairness but also leveraged the role of BNB and the activity of the BNB chain to promote trading and user engagement on the platform. BNB, as an important component of the Binance ecosystem, plays a role in facilitating trading, paying transaction fees, and enhancing platform activity, while the activity of the BNB chain provides strong support for these activities. Although the points rules were not announced in advance, the final airdrop rewards are based on fair competition; those who can earn rewards through effort under this mechanism are the true lucky ones. By implementing these fair competition rules, Binance allows everyone to strive for opportunities within a reasonable framework, while also increasing platform interactivity and user participation.
Binance's airdrop rules are like the college entrance examination, emphasizing fairness and transparency. The rules of the college entrance examination are public, and everyone strives for a good score through hard work. Although the competition is fierce, it is a 'reasonable competition.' This airdrop event by Binance also follows similar principles, announcing the points rules only 2 hours before the airdrop to avoid meaningless competition of early point accumulation, ensuring that every participant competes on equal footing. Just as everyone is studying hard before the college entrance examination, the rules are set, and the final score is determined by effort. In this event, Binance not only maintained fairness but also leveraged the role of BNB and the activity of the BNB chain to promote trading and user engagement on the platform. BNB, as an important component of the Binance ecosystem, plays a role in facilitating trading, paying transaction fees, and enhancing platform activity, while the activity of the BNB chain provides strong support for these activities. Although the points rules were not announced in advance, the final airdrop rewards are based on fair competition; those who can earn rewards through effort under this mechanism are the true lucky ones. By implementing these fair competition rules, Binance allows everyone to strive for opportunities within a reasonable framework, while also increasing platform interactivity and user participation.
See original
I received my salary today and I'm torn on how to spend it. Should I buy some 'extinct' inscriptions, or play it safe and buy some ETH? Or should I consider the Web3 alpha coins, which seem to have some potential, or just buy some community coins, like zoo coins (chicken, duck, fish, bird, elephant, turtle), and see if I can dig up some opportunities? 😂 There are so many projects out there right now, each of which could spark a conversation, but it feels like no one can really predict what the future holds. Inscriptions seem to have 'retired', ETH has been fluctuating, Web3 alpha coins feel like a rising force, and although zoo coins are cute, can they really make it in this market? I want to ask everyone’s opinion: what do you think is worth buying right now? Are there any obscure coins that could make a name for themselves in this market? Any big shots willing to give some advice? #投资选择 #社区币 #加密市场
I received my salary today and I'm torn on how to spend it. Should I buy some 'extinct' inscriptions, or play it safe and buy some ETH? Or should I consider the Web3 alpha coins, which seem to have some potential, or just buy some community coins, like zoo coins (chicken, duck, fish, bird, elephant, turtle), and see if I can dig up some opportunities? 😂

There are so many projects out there right now, each of which could spark a conversation, but it feels like no one can really predict what the future holds. Inscriptions seem to have 'retired', ETH has been fluctuating, Web3 alpha coins feel like a rising force, and although zoo coins are cute, can they really make it in this market?

I want to ask everyone’s opinion: what do you think is worth buying right now? Are there any obscure coins that could make a name for themselves in this market? Any big shots willing to give some advice? #投资选择 #社区币 #加密市场
See original
The rise of decentralized exchanges (DEX) in the cryptocurrency field has become an undeniable trend. Compared to traditional centralized exchanges (CEX), DEX offers higher security, transparency, and user control, avoiding the risks of single points of failure and fund centralization. In today's market environment, the advantages of DEX are becoming increasingly prominent, with emerging platforms such as Degate, KiloEx, Backpack, and Aster_DEX springing up, among which Degate stands out with its aggregation of L2 technology and smooth user experience. Although CEX still occupies a significant share of the market, the rise of DEX has put considerable pressure on it, especially Degate, which has truly mastered the art of “competition.” Degate not only utilizes L2 aggregation to enhance efficiency technically but also makes the trading experience feel like wearing “slippery shoes,” with low costs and high efficiency making it irresistible. The founder, Gulu, as the Chinese translator of the ETH white paper, adds a considerable amount of credibility to the technology. Binance's investment in multiple DEXs clearly sees their potential, perhaps it foresees the birth of the “competition king.” In the future competition of DEXs, who will come out on top will depend on who can navigate the “competition” the best, and Degate is, at least for now, the “slipperiest” one. Which one do you like the most?
The rise of decentralized exchanges (DEX) in the cryptocurrency field has become an undeniable trend. Compared to traditional centralized exchanges (CEX), DEX offers higher security, transparency, and user control, avoiding the risks of single points of failure and fund centralization. In today's market environment, the advantages of DEX are becoming increasingly prominent, with emerging platforms such as Degate, KiloEx, Backpack, and Aster_DEX springing up, among which Degate stands out with its aggregation of L2 technology and smooth user experience.

Although CEX still occupies a significant share of the market, the rise of DEX has put considerable pressure on it, especially Degate, which has truly mastered the art of “competition.” Degate not only utilizes L2 aggregation to enhance efficiency technically but also makes the trading experience feel like wearing “slippery shoes,” with low costs and high efficiency making it irresistible. The founder, Gulu, as the Chinese translator of the ETH white paper, adds a considerable amount of credibility to the technology.

Binance's investment in multiple DEXs clearly sees their potential, perhaps it foresees the birth of the “competition king.” In the future competition of DEXs, who will come out on top will depend on who can navigate the “competition” the best, and Degate is, at least for now, the “slipperiest” one.

Which one do you like the most?
Degate
67%
KiloEx
0%
Backpack
33%
Aster
0%
6 votes • Voting closed
See original
Alpaca $ALPACA Incident: Market Manipulation and the Silent Struggle of InvestorsRecently, the delisting incident of Alpaca $ALPACA has attracted wide attention. This incident occurred very suddenly, with intense market fluctuations, and short-selling sentiment in the contract market exploded instantaneously, leading a large number of investors to rush in, resulting in a surge in positions. As a result, market manipulators opened long contracts, frantically pushing up the spot prices, using unlimited funding from the funding rates to continuously support themselves, ultimately reaping huge profits. Those investors who did not notice the market changes in time became the victims of market manipulation, lost in the collapse that followed the high position 'pump'. Investors were continuously pushed up and then brought down, going through one 'loop' after another. This manipulation profoundly highlights that without transparent rules and effective regulation, the market is prone to manipulation, and ultimately, investors can only suffer in these 'traps', incurring significant losses.

Alpaca $ALPACA Incident: Market Manipulation and the Silent Struggle of Investors

Recently, the delisting incident of Alpaca $ALPACA has attracted wide attention. This incident occurred very suddenly, with intense market fluctuations, and short-selling sentiment in the contract market exploded instantaneously, leading a large number of investors to rush in, resulting in a surge in positions. As a result, market manipulators opened long contracts, frantically pushing up the spot prices, using unlimited funding from the funding rates to continuously support themselves, ultimately reaping huge profits. Those investors who did not notice the market changes in time became the victims of market manipulation, lost in the collapse that followed the high position 'pump'. Investors were continuously pushed up and then brought down, going through one 'loop' after another. This manipulation profoundly highlights that without transparent rules and effective regulation, the market is prone to manipulation, and ultimately, investors can only suffer in these 'traps', incurring significant losses.
See original
Yua Mitsuki has released tokens, $MIKAMI is launching on the Solana chain, the style remains Japanese, and fans are still crazy. But upon closer inspection, the project is not open to Japan—Japanese fans have been supporting her for ten years in tears, and now they can't even buy a token? There's an old saying in China: 'A heartless person is not without reason.' The reality is like 'using the body to harvest global chives,' continuing to reap traffic in a different way. The project team boasts extravagantly: locked until 2069, plans for a DAO, AI, interactive peripherals... It sounds like a metaverse harem but is more like a rebranded 'celebrity coin scam.' 50% is locked for her personal use; if this 'locks' for ten years, who knows if there will be a comeback album. The entertainment industry has been trying to harvest the crypto community's chives for a long time, but this time it’s from an AV background. Fans really buy into this—support has shifted from hard drives to wallet support, even the way of supporting has evolved. Unfortunately, the crypto world doesn’t care about sentiment, only about selling pressure. Let’s not forget, the crypto world is not short of sentimental harvesting projects. Wouldn't it be better to buy ETH, BTC, and BNB? 🤔
Yua Mitsuki has released tokens, $MIKAMI is launching on the Solana chain, the style remains Japanese, and fans are still crazy. But upon closer inspection, the project is not open to Japan—Japanese fans have been supporting her for ten years in tears, and now they can't even buy a token? There's an old saying in China: 'A heartless person is not without reason.' The reality is like 'using the body to harvest global chives,' continuing to reap traffic in a different way.

The project team boasts extravagantly: locked until 2069, plans for a DAO, AI, interactive peripherals... It sounds like a metaverse harem but is more like a rebranded 'celebrity coin scam.' 50% is locked for her personal use; if this 'locks' for ten years, who knows if there will be a comeback album.

The entertainment industry has been trying to harvest the crypto community's chives for a long time, but this time it’s from an AV background. Fans really buy into this—support has shifted from hard drives to wallet support, even the way of supporting has evolved. Unfortunately, the crypto world doesn’t care about sentiment, only about selling pressure. Let’s not forget, the crypto world is not short of sentimental harvesting projects.

Wouldn't it be better to buy ETH, BTC, and BNB? 🤔
See original
Just checked out @bubbnb and found that this BUBB coin style is way too '2D underground band', really interesting 😂 Contract: 0xd5369a3cac0f4448a9a96bb98af9c887c92fc37b Current market value is only 1.44 million USD, hidden like it's in a hole, but the trading volume is already 4 million USD/day, definitely an 'eye-catching package in the crypto world'. 📌 Binance Alpha even wrote an introduction, saying BUBB is 'active on the BNB chain with artistic comic style'—this description is indeed full marks for artistic flair. However, I checked, and their official comic has not updated for 22 days. Did the promoters dump their holdings and run, or are they just preparing a big move? Do you think it's 'building momentum' or 'style run away'? I simply like their quirky comic style; who knows, they might really be able to create a cultural IP in the future. If BUBB were an anime character, do you think he would be a villain, an eccentric madman, or the comic relief? See you in the comments 📉📈
Just checked out @bubbnb and found that this BUBB coin style is way too '2D underground band', really interesting 😂

Contract: 0xd5369a3cac0f4448a9a96bb98af9c887c92fc37b

Current market value is only 1.44 million USD, hidden like it's in a hole, but the trading volume is already 4 million USD/day, definitely an 'eye-catching package in the crypto world'.

📌 Binance Alpha even wrote an introduction, saying BUBB is 'active on the BNB chain with artistic comic style'—this description is indeed full marks for artistic flair.

However, I checked, and their official comic has not updated for 22 days. Did the promoters dump their holdings and run, or are they just preparing a big move?

Do you think it's 'building momentum' or 'style run away'?

I simply like their quirky comic style; who knows, they might really be able to create a cultural IP in the future.

If BUBB were an anime character, do you think he would be a villain, an eccentric madman, or the comic relief? See you in the comments 📉📈
See original
The state of inscriptions can now be described as 'building high towers, hosting guests, and the towers have collapsed.' In the early stages of the bull market, inscriptions once flourished due to their topicality and scarcity narrative, with leading assets like Sats and Ordi becoming stars pursued by many. At its peak, the market cap of Sats approached $2 billion, with high hopes placed on it to become the gas token for the UniSat platform, even aiming for a market cap target of $100 billion. However, as market sentiment waned and the bubble burst, the overall ecological environment of inscriptions cooled rapidly, with Sats experiencing several halving events; its market cap has even fallen below $10 million. What is even more lamentable is that not only inscriptions, but the entire Bitcoin ecosystem has fallen into a state of silence. Aside from a few struggling L2 projects, others are like pyramids in a desert—imposing yet isolated, with nothing growing around them. Some say Sats and Ordi are the weeds in the cracks—alive but hard to thrive. While this metaphor is painful, it is not without reason. Inscriptions, as an attempt, have brought the possibility of NFTs and inscriptions expansion to Bitcoin; it is a decentralized cultural experiment. But as the hype dissipates, the real value support appears weak, and the ecosystem lacks sustained self-sustaining capability. As for whether I am optimistic about inscriptions? To be honest, it is currently 'cautiously observing.' Inscriptions rely more on narratives rather than utility-driven factors. To turn things around in the future, there needs to be new application scenarios, development support, and capital patience. Whether to continue holding inscriptions depends on whether you are a speculator or a believer.
The state of inscriptions can now be described as 'building high towers, hosting guests, and the towers have collapsed.' In the early stages of the bull market, inscriptions once flourished due to their topicality and scarcity narrative, with leading assets like Sats and Ordi becoming stars pursued by many. At its peak, the market cap of Sats approached $2 billion, with high hopes placed on it to become the gas token for the UniSat platform, even aiming for a market cap target of $100 billion. However, as market sentiment waned and the bubble burst, the overall ecological environment of inscriptions cooled rapidly, with Sats experiencing several halving events; its market cap has even fallen below $10 million.

What is even more lamentable is that not only inscriptions, but the entire Bitcoin ecosystem has fallen into a state of silence. Aside from a few struggling L2 projects, others are like pyramids in a desert—imposing yet isolated, with nothing growing around them. Some say Sats and Ordi are the weeds in the cracks—alive but hard to thrive. While this metaphor is painful, it is not without reason. Inscriptions, as an attempt, have brought the possibility of NFTs and inscriptions expansion to Bitcoin; it is a decentralized cultural experiment. But as the hype dissipates, the real value support appears weak, and the ecosystem lacks sustained self-sustaining capability.

As for whether I am optimistic about inscriptions? To be honest, it is currently 'cautiously observing.' Inscriptions rely more on narratives rather than utility-driven factors. To turn things around in the future, there needs to be new application scenarios, development support, and capital patience. Whether to continue holding inscriptions depends on whether you are a speculator or a believer.
See original
Regarding Binance's recent actions, it is indeed a bit puzzling. Firstly, the 75-point new listing event has already deterred many users, as everyone is striving to accumulate points, but Binance unexpectedly launched an 80-point airdrop on the same day, providing an 'extra' benefit to those who meet the criteria. This approach not only frustrates users who have already missed the opportunity but also leaves those who barely meet the 75-point requirement feeling defeated. It's often said, 'You can't get on the bus without 80 points,' yet now 80 points has become the threshold, and the rules of the game have become so dramatic, making it feel like Binance is completely disregarding the feelings of ordinary users. Furthermore, does this point accumulation operation imply that more and more activities in the future will set higher thresholds? From this perspective, it seems to mark the beginning of an internal competition, where an increasing number of users must continuously accumulate points just to participate in some basic activities. CZ seems to have a new understanding of this internal competition; he probably realizes that the ultimate beneficiaries are not the users, but the exchange itself. After all, such activities ultimately provide Binance with a large number of active users, rather than just those who meet the participation criteria. While this kind of play can boost the platform's activity level, it sacrifices the sense of fairness and participation for most users. If this trend continues, it will ultimately lead to more users choosing to withdraw, and the platform's activity may be adversely affected. For Binance, whether such actions are a savvy strategy or digging their own grave is worth our deep reflection. {spot}(BNBUSDT)
Regarding Binance's recent actions, it is indeed a bit puzzling. Firstly, the 75-point new listing event has already deterred many users, as everyone is striving to accumulate points, but Binance unexpectedly launched an 80-point airdrop on the same day, providing an 'extra' benefit to those who meet the criteria. This approach not only frustrates users who have already missed the opportunity but also leaves those who barely meet the 75-point requirement feeling defeated. It's often said, 'You can't get on the bus without 80 points,' yet now 80 points has become the threshold, and the rules of the game have become so dramatic, making it feel like Binance is completely disregarding the feelings of ordinary users.

Furthermore, does this point accumulation operation imply that more and more activities in the future will set higher thresholds? From this perspective, it seems to mark the beginning of an internal competition, where an increasing number of users must continuously accumulate points just to participate in some basic activities. CZ seems to have a new understanding of this internal competition; he probably realizes that the ultimate beneficiaries are not the users, but the exchange itself. After all, such activities ultimately provide Binance with a large number of active users, rather than just those who meet the participation criteria. While this kind of play can boost the platform's activity level, it sacrifices the sense of fairness and participation for most users.

If this trend continues, it will ultimately lead to more users choosing to withdraw, and the platform's activity may be adversely affected. For Binance, whether such actions are a savvy strategy or digging their own grave is worth our deep reflection.
See original
ETH is back around 1800, and the pressure at 1820 is significant. Can't break through? Then we might face a decline again... But can it really 'rise up' this time? After all, ETH's price is no longer a novelty; it has been consolidating around this level for years. As the most decentralized 'underdog', its infrastructure is also solid. Today's ETH is not the 'wild' currency it used to be! Do you think ETH has a chance to break the ceiling and reach $10,000 in the future? Although this goal seems a bit far off, it is not impossible. The future is promising; it all depends on how this market plays out! #加密货币 #去中心化 #数字资产
ETH is back around 1800, and the pressure at 1820 is significant. Can't break through? Then we might face a decline again... But can it really 'rise up' this time? After all, ETH's price is no longer a novelty; it has been consolidating around this level for years. As the most decentralized 'underdog', its infrastructure is also solid. Today's ETH is not the 'wild' currency it used to be! Do you think ETH has a chance to break the ceiling and reach $10,000 in the future? Although this goal seems a bit far off, it is not impossible. The future is promising; it all depends on how this market plays out! #加密货币 #去中心化 #数字资产
See original
🎯 Binance Alpha Points Practical Guide: Short-term sprint to 60 points, long-term lock at 150 points, win at the airdrop starting line When conducting actual operations, special attention needs to be paid to the methods of buying and selling. Buying must be done through immediate execution (market orders or taking orders); placing limit orders for buying will not count towards trading points. Selling operations can reasonably utilize limit orders, which can reduce sell slippage and ensure that the completed transactions are fully recorded. The optimal process is: immediate buying → limit selling. By operating this way, you can save on trading costs and maximize point earnings. When choosing the daily trading amount, it is also advisable to arrange it rationally. $64, $128, and $256 are currently more cost-effective trading ranges. Amounts that are too small will accumulate points too slowly; amounts that are too large may incur unnecessary losses due to slippage and fees. Finding a method that suits your own pace is more important than blindly pursuing quantity. Taking the #SIGN Protocol airdrop on April 28 as an example, the threshold point is 65 points. This indicates that the short-term goal should be set between 60 to 80 points to ensure an advantage in most early TGE and airdrop projects. In the long run, as the number of users in the Alpha system increases, the point threshold will likely gradually rise to 100 points or even higher. Therefore, if conditions permit, it is recommended to plan for a 15-day cycle, sprinting to above 100 points. If you can stabilize at 150 points, you will essentially be able to cover most Alpha activities and reduce participation risks. In the future, Alpha points will not only affect TGE airdrops but may also influence more wallet incentives, opportunities for observing token listings, and even priority rights on the main board. Through this points system, Binance is filtering out early users who truly support the ecosystem while laying the foundation for the large-scale expansion of the Web3 world. For users who seriously implement strategies and accumulate points at a steady pace, now is the best participation window. Binance Alpha is not just a points system; it is the first door to the future Web3 world. #空投发现指南
🎯 Binance Alpha Points Practical Guide: Short-term sprint to 60 points, long-term lock at 150 points, win at the airdrop starting line

When conducting actual operations, special attention needs to be paid to the methods of buying and selling. Buying must be done through immediate execution (market orders or taking orders); placing limit orders for buying will not count towards trading points. Selling operations can reasonably utilize limit orders, which can reduce sell slippage and ensure that the completed transactions are fully recorded. The optimal process is: immediate buying → limit selling. By operating this way, you can save on trading costs and maximize point earnings.

When choosing the daily trading amount, it is also advisable to arrange it rationally. $64, $128, and $256 are currently more cost-effective trading ranges. Amounts that are too small will accumulate points too slowly; amounts that are too large may incur unnecessary losses due to slippage and fees. Finding a method that suits your own pace is more important than blindly pursuing quantity.

Taking the #SIGN Protocol airdrop on April 28 as an example, the threshold point is 65 points. This indicates that the short-term goal should be set between 60 to 80 points to ensure an advantage in most early TGE and airdrop projects. In the long run, as the number of users in the Alpha system increases, the point threshold will likely gradually rise to 100 points or even higher. Therefore, if conditions permit, it is recommended to plan for a 15-day cycle, sprinting to above 100 points. If you can stabilize at 150 points, you will essentially be able to cover most Alpha activities and reduce participation risks.

In the future, Alpha points will not only affect TGE airdrops but may also influence more wallet incentives, opportunities for observing token listings, and even priority rights on the main board. Through this points system, Binance is filtering out early users who truly support the ecosystem while laying the foundation for the large-scale expansion of the Web3 world. For users who seriously implement strategies and accumulate points at a steady pace, now is the best participation window.

Binance Alpha is not just a points system; it is the first door to the future Web3 world.

#空投发现指南
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Crypto Nate
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs