In a move that has sparked serious attention across the crypto industry, Ripple—the company behind XRP—reportedly made an acquisition offer for Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin. This isn’t your average merger buzz; it’s a major strategic play.
Ripple has been actively growing its influence. In the latter part of 2024, it introduced a new stablecoin called RLUSD. Though it has already amassed a market cap of $316.9 million, that figure pales in comparison to USDC’s $61.7 billion dominance. Ripple knows that gaining scale quickly is essential—not just to expand, but to accelerate its position in the market.
This bold offer comes on the heels of Ripple’s $1.25 billion purchase of Hidden Road, a prime brokerage platform. That deal showed Ripple’s clear intention to stretch beyond crypto and firmly plant itself within traditional financial systems. Acquiring Circle could have instantly made Ripple a heavyweight in the global stablecoin race.
Why Circle Might Have Considered the Offer
From Circle’s point of view, Ripple’s $5 billion proposal wasn’t easy to ignore. Such a large capital infusion could have significantly advanced Circle’s global efforts—enabling deeper R&D, broader strategic alliances, and faster market penetration, particularly in regions where digital finance is still taking shape.
There was also strong synergy potential. Ripple brings regulatory expertise and a proven blockchain infrastructure, while Circle has already mastered stablecoin operations at scale. Together, the two might have pioneered new types of digital financial products, ranging from tokenized payments to next-gen cross-border payment systems and DeFi-TradFi hybrids.
Geography also matters. Ripple’s business is largely international—reportedly 90% of its revenue comes from outside the U.S. That worldwide reach could have supercharged USDC’s presence in emerging stablecoin markets where adoption is just beginning to rise.
Why Circle Turned It Down
Despite the upside, Circle rejected Ripple’s offer. Three key reasons likely shaped that decision: valuation, strategic direction, and regulatory alignment.
First, the price tag. With USDC commanding over $61 billion in market cap and Circle advancing toward an IPO, a $5 billion bid might have appeared undervalued. Circle isn’t seeking a buyout—it’s positioning for a long-term public journey. The offer likely didn’t reflect Circle’s current strength or its strategic future in the digital currency space.
Second, Circle’s mission may have clashed with the idea of merging with a direct rival. While both firms operate in the stablecoin sector, their philosophies, governance, and expansion strategies aren’t identical. A merger could have forced a reshuffling of priorities, possibly watering down Circle’s goal of building an open, inclusive financial system.
Finally, there’s the regulatory angle. Both firms navigate global compliance differently, and blending their frameworks might have introduced unnecessary complexity at a time when regulation is tightening.