Recently, many have been pessimistic about the 'Luo Mao' party, and when one can no longer endure, there is no need to endure any longer:
① Binance Alpha has pioneered a new token distribution method, bridging on-chain and off-chain, allowing exchange users to quickly acquire low-priced chips in the current environment of insufficient liquidity, which is undeniable.
② Binance Alpha has solved the current issue of liquidity exit for VC tokens, but has not addressed the fundamental problem of insufficient liquidity. It may be sustainable in the short term, but in the long run, decentralization is the future.
③ Binance Alpha will not replace the airdrop track; on the contrary, it will extend into new directions for 'Luo Mao'. The studio I know is already automating Alpha trades in bulk, and the ultimate big winners will still be the 'Luo Mao' party.
④ Binance Alpha is suitable for some projects, but definitely not all. If project parties view Alpha as the ultimate goal, it only indicates their lack of capability, and they will not achieve anything in the industry.
⑤ Encourage project parties to allocate their chips to Alpha users instead of taking parts that originally belong to the community to 'offer up'. This behavior is a betrayal of early users, akin to burning bridges after crossing, and I suggest @CZ @Yi He improve the Alpha rules: project parties must not dilute community chips.
⑥ Without on-chain users providing data to project parties, they wouldn't even qualify for Alpha. You are even less likely to get something for nothing, so don't take advantage and then act innocent; such behavior is too young, too simple.
⑦ There is no disconnect between Binance users and on-chain users; most people will choose to sell as soon as they receive an airdrop. No one is more noble than anyone else, and those black-and-white statements are akin to sitting in a well and watching the sky.
