The concept of destiny by birth has always existed, but it was proposed by Mr. Liu in the currency circle. I personally used it quite a lot before Bitcoin 21 years ago, and it was quite easy to use.
Theory of destiny from birth: The top or bottom originated from the driving wave will not deviate from the original destiny no matter how it is adjusted.
How to understand it? Let's make an assumption. Assuming there is one move that drives the attack upward, then there must be a third move that drives the attack upward.
The goal of the third drive upward is to break through the top of the first drive.
Assuming that the first wave is wave 1, the third wave 3 will only be formed when it breaks the top of wave 1.
Assuming that the first wave is wave A, then wave C will inevitably break the top of wave A. As for how far it can go after breaking, it needs to be decided by the market.
I think I have explained it clearly enough. If you don’t understand, you are either stupid or dumb.
Strange wave shape
Leading wedge: There is a phenomenon of overlapping of the top of wave 1 and the bottom of wave 4 in the guiding rules. It is called the expanding central structure in the previous article of the Chaos Theory. But to quote the Chaos Theory, it is simply that overlapping is allowed, but it cannot overlap by 38.2%. I forgot how much.
However, I think that only by breaking through the starting point of wave 3 can the possibility of guiding the trend be completely denied. This is the experience I have gained from working in the Bitcoin market for money over the years. The guiding wedge is also called an upward sloping triangle. It may also exist in a 3 3 3 3 3 structure, which is allowed by the market.
The leading wedge usually appears at the starting point of wave 1. Wave 1 is generally used as the stage of trend accumulation, so it will take a longer time.
Terminal wedge: The opposite is the terminal wedge. The terminal wave usually exists as a top, which is wave 5.
As for the three-tooth pattern, I personally always classify it as wave A or wave 1. It is mainly similar to the guide. When encountering this pattern in the adjustment wave, the differences in the market are generally quite serious. I don’t have a better solution at present.
My thoughts are for learning purposes only.
Specifically, in complex applications, complex wave trends will appear, so complex that I think neither the wave theory nor the entanglement theory can be interpreted.
The reason is still due to insufficient market liquidity.
For example, Bitcoin often fluctuates sideways after rising. The fluctuations are very strong, and you will find that there is no structure. It is completely sideways in a straight line. In this case, the waves cannot be explained. I personally divide it directly by the center.
These are basically the other forms I’ll talk about when I think of them.
