WIFL
11,264 views
26 Discussing
Hot
Latest
he move saw the crypto community form the narrative that the significant reduction in Coinbase’s XRP holdings was allegedly a sell-off in an attempt to intentionally push the price of XRP down.
card
Bill Morgan had taken to the media space to address the speculation while disputing the XRP manipulation claims. In his statement, Bill Morgan had argued that the price of XRP was only forming its regular pattern, which it had also formed at the time when Coinbase did not engage in any market activity but only delisted the token from its trading platform.
While Morgan further acknowledged Coinbase’s unwelcoming stance on XRP, he confirmed that the reduction in Coinbase's XRP holdings is not valid evidence that the exchange might be manipulating the price of the asset.
Following Morgan's advocacy for Coinbase on the issue, he has been wrongly identified as a Coinbase lawyer. Nonetheless, Morgan has cleared the air on the false identification. Morgan received the Coinbase tag as an insult he is not willing to tolerate, cautioning the crypto community to stay true to his actual identity.
#XRP
#BTC
#WIFL
#SOMİ
card
Bill Morgan had taken to the media space to address the speculation while disputing the XRP manipulation claims. In his statement, Bill Morgan had argued that the price of XRP was only forming its regular pattern, which it had also formed at the time when Coinbase did not engage in any market activity but only delisted the token from its trading platform.
While Morgan further acknowledged Coinbase’s unwelcoming stance on XRP, he confirmed that the reduction in Coinbase's XRP holdings is not valid evidence that the exchange might be manipulating the price of the asset.
Following Morgan's advocacy for Coinbase on the issue, he has been wrongly identified as a Coinbase lawyer. Nonetheless, Morgan has cleared the air on the false identification. Morgan received the Coinbase tag as an insult he is not willing to tolerate, cautioning the crypto community to stay true to his actual identity.
#XRP
#BTC
#WIFL
#SOMİ
See original
Revisiting old accounts! Will the 2017 'market crash drama' repeat? Can Sun Yuchen wash this away this time?
Back in 2017, Sun Yuchen was involved in a similar controversy. At that time, he and Martian Xu Zijing exchanged tokens for their respective projects TRX and HSR (later renamed HC), seemingly on good terms, but Sun Yuchen crashed HSR that very night. The next day, Martian was furious at the plummeting price and declared he would 'deal with' him, while Sun Yuchen retorted on Weibo, calling Martian a 'gangster'. Although there were numerous interests entangled behind the scenes, Sun Yuchen's crash of HSR was undoubtedly the catalyst for the conflict, which caused quite a stir back then, and Sun Yuchen even called the police.
The image that all the old investors are familiar with is a snapshot of the 2017 ICO era, and the figure lying on the ground represents Sun Yuchen.
Now this matter has resurfaced, and recently many have been 'cleaning the slate' for Sun Yuchen, claiming that the crash was caused by someone else; Sun Yuchen himself also defended the '20% high interest rate' issue on X. However, his response is quite subtle; it seems to distance himself from the situation, yet he has never directly answered whether he used users' coins to crash the market. More importantly, the articles defending him repeatedly emphasize that the on-chain transfer records all come from his own WLFI address, while the public's initial concern was whether he misused HTX users' deposited coins to crash the market—this is clearly shifting the focus of the conflict.
As I mentioned before in the square: on-chain addresses can indeed be traced, but centralized exchanges (CEX) function like 'manual mixers', and the specific operations of assets entering and exiting cannot be verified. Unless Sun Yuchen voluntarily discloses the internal wallet data of HTX, all his defenses are untenable.
Moreover, if Eric Trump had no reasonable basis, how could he arbitrarily freeze Sun Yuchen's wallet address? If Sun Yuchen really hadn't crashed the market, why rush to claim he would buy tens of millions of dollars' worth of WLFI?
#WIFL
Back in 2017, Sun Yuchen was involved in a similar controversy. At that time, he and Martian Xu Zijing exchanged tokens for their respective projects TRX and HSR (later renamed HC), seemingly on good terms, but Sun Yuchen crashed HSR that very night. The next day, Martian was furious at the plummeting price and declared he would 'deal with' him, while Sun Yuchen retorted on Weibo, calling Martian a 'gangster'. Although there were numerous interests entangled behind the scenes, Sun Yuchen's crash of HSR was undoubtedly the catalyst for the conflict, which caused quite a stir back then, and Sun Yuchen even called the police.
The image that all the old investors are familiar with is a snapshot of the 2017 ICO era, and the figure lying on the ground represents Sun Yuchen.
Now this matter has resurfaced, and recently many have been 'cleaning the slate' for Sun Yuchen, claiming that the crash was caused by someone else; Sun Yuchen himself also defended the '20% high interest rate' issue on X. However, his response is quite subtle; it seems to distance himself from the situation, yet he has never directly answered whether he used users' coins to crash the market. More importantly, the articles defending him repeatedly emphasize that the on-chain transfer records all come from his own WLFI address, while the public's initial concern was whether he misused HTX users' deposited coins to crash the market—this is clearly shifting the focus of the conflict.
As I mentioned before in the square: on-chain addresses can indeed be traced, but centralized exchanges (CEX) function like 'manual mixers', and the specific operations of assets entering and exiting cannot be verified. Unless Sun Yuchen voluntarily discloses the internal wallet data of HTX, all his defenses are untenable.
Moreover, if Eric Trump had no reasonable basis, how could he arbitrarily freeze Sun Yuchen's wallet address? If Sun Yuchen really hadn't crashed the market, why rush to claim he would buy tens of millions of dollars' worth of WLFI?
#WIFL
See original
#WIFL Is the yellow-haired one not going to expose the air force?
If the air force is not exposed, my hundred u war god will have to screw it up.
If the air force is not exposed, my hundred u war god will have to screw it up.
WLFIUSDT
Perp
20X
Opening Long
Unrealized PNL
-78.82USDT
See original
Recharge 3000 to get 6000+, today's profit doubling task has been completed (most withdrawals are for controlling hands, just leaving a little for building positions)! There are too many favorable factors, it feels a bit off, if there's going to be a pullback today, set up positions in advance for small entries (0.159, 0.167, 0.1782) just in case! #WIFL $BTC $ETH
B
WLFIUSDT
Perp
Closed
PNL
+185.81USDT
See original
Non-farm revisions, CPI coming, and Federal Reserve rate cuts imminent! How to position in this week's market turbulence?
This week's market core driving forces will revolve around liquidity adjustments and data validation:
1. Short-term risk: Significant fluctuations may occur tomorrow morning (Tuesday) between 4-5 AM, mainly due to the cleaning of high-leverage positions during periods of low liquidity. Be cautious of the risk of sharp price movements.
2. Data logic strengthening: The U.S. August Manufacturing PMI remains in the expansion range (52.3), weakening recession expectations; ADP employment figures exceeded expectations, suggesting the possibility of further upward revisions in tonight's non-farm data, supporting the resilience of the dollar.
3. Rhythm deduction:
· After sentiment recovery on Monday, there may be a continuation of oscillation and upward movement;
1. Short-term risk: Significant fluctuations may occur tomorrow morning (Tuesday) between 4-5 AM, mainly due to the cleaning of high-leverage positions during periods of low liquidity. Be cautious of the risk of sharp price movements.
2. Data logic strengthening: The U.S. August Manufacturing PMI remains in the expansion range (52.3), weakening recession expectations; ADP employment figures exceeded expectations, suggesting the possibility of further upward revisions in tonight's non-farm data, supporting the resilience of the dollar.
3. Rhythm deduction:
· After sentiment recovery on Monday, there may be a continuation of oscillation and upward movement;
See original
Sun Ge was blacklisted. The crypto world does not need such harvesters #WIFL
Recently, the Trump family's crypto project WLFI made a sudden move, blacklisting Sun Yuchen's wallet address and freezing nearly 3 billion worth of WLFI tokens he held, causing market turbulence. The project party stated that this move was due to a certain exchange using user tokens to manipulate the market, directly pointing the finger at HTX, associated with Sun Yuchen.
Previous on-chain data showed that Sun Yuchen had transferred 50 million WLFI (worth 9.12 million USD), and the market originally speculated that he would deposit the tokens into his own exchange. After the news broke, the price of WLFI rose nearly 10%, only to subsequently plummet over 20% along with the Trump concept coin ABTC.
Although top market maker Cumberland entered the market to receive 10 million WLFI (worth 2.05 million USD), and WLFI has gathered three major market makers, internal struggles still made it difficult for it to stabilize. The incident exposed the centralized nature of the crypto project 'decentralization' and warned investors: under the lack of regulation, the risks of projects relying on celebrity halos far exceed the returns.
Recently, the Trump family's crypto project WLFI made a sudden move, blacklisting Sun Yuchen's wallet address and freezing nearly 3 billion worth of WLFI tokens he held, causing market turbulence. The project party stated that this move was due to a certain exchange using user tokens to manipulate the market, directly pointing the finger at HTX, associated with Sun Yuchen.
Previous on-chain data showed that Sun Yuchen had transferred 50 million WLFI (worth 9.12 million USD), and the market originally speculated that he would deposit the tokens into his own exchange. After the news broke, the price of WLFI rose nearly 10%, only to subsequently plummet over 20% along with the Trump concept coin ABTC.
Although top market maker Cumberland entered the market to receive 10 million WLFI (worth 2.05 million USD), and WLFI has gathered three major market makers, internal struggles still made it difficult for it to stabilize. The incident exposed the centralized nature of the crypto project 'decentralization' and warned investors: under the lack of regulation, the risks of projects relying on celebrity halos far exceed the returns.
See original
The story of being battered and bruised by 【WLFI】👆
Guoge asks the entire internet to supervise and send 1000U again for wlfi!
Teaching people, but can't teach, teaching a thing to someone is enough once
Listen to the advice, listen to the advice👀
@Nuts坚果
9月4日 坚果直播回放
#WIFL #操作总结 #故事 #加密市场回调 #美联储降息预期 #现货黄金创历史新高 #九月加密市场能否突破？ #坚果直播 #坚果封神 #k线刺客猫女士
Guoge asks the entire internet to supervise and send 1000U again for wlfi!
Teaching people, but can't teach, teaching a thing to someone is enough once
Listen to the advice, listen to the advice👀
@Nuts坚果
9月4日 坚果直播回放
#WIFL #操作总结 #故事 #加密市场回调 #美联储降息预期 #现货黄金创历史新高 #九月加密市场能否突破？ #坚果直播 #坚果封神 #k线刺客猫女士
See original
Trading Diary 🗓0904
1. Summary of Yesterday
1. Profit Summary
Yesterday's initial: 1397.35 Today's initial: 1468.66[+71u]
Compared to the previous day's high point, equity balance +22u,
Maximum principal increased by +1.55%, rookie robot 🤖 keep it up
2. Implementation of Yesterday's Plan
Yesterday, I stuck to the plan and held onto the short position without moving, turning losses into profits. The downside is that I didn't hold on and sold off, but I executed according to yesterday's plan and I'm not upset. What matters is the iron discipline and brutal execution.
The trading robot showed its power, and although it was just a small test of 50u, it produced good results with 6.3u coming out. The first trade cleared 4.5, and I chased another trade in the evening for a profit of 1.8u. The annualized return for the day is close to 12%, mainly due to stability and controllable risk.
1. Profit Summary
Yesterday's initial: 1397.35 Today's initial: 1468.66[+71u]
Compared to the previous day's high point, equity balance +22u,
Maximum principal increased by +1.55%, rookie robot 🤖 keep it up
2. Implementation of Yesterday's Plan
Yesterday, I stuck to the plan and held onto the short position without moving, turning losses into profits. The downside is that I didn't hold on and sold off, but I executed according to yesterday's plan and I'm not upset. What matters is the iron discipline and brutal execution.
The trading robot showed its power, and although it was just a small test of 50u, it produced good results with 6.3u coming out. The first trade cleared 4.5, and I chased another trade in the evening for a profit of 1.8u. The annualized return for the day is close to 12%, mainly due to stability and controllable risk.
徐千里:
纯纯小白，跟姐姐学习🥺
See original
#ETH #WIFL Ethereum can be bought at a low around 4200-4150, still strong, with interest rate cut expectations remaining, a direct crash seems unlikely.
wifl can be bought long around 0.3-0.28, it's already at 0.36 now, by around 8 o'clock tomorrow it will be available on the spot market, I can't imagine how high it will soar.
wifl can be bought long around 0.3-0.28, it's already at 0.36 now, by around 8 o'clock tomorrow it will be available on the spot market, I can't imagine how high it will soar.
See original
Let me clarify the matter regarding the WLFI and Aave tokens.
In fact, there was indeed a proposal, and it was even approved at that time! I was pretty excited when I saw it, thinking that there was hope. However, later on, it was reported that the WLFI side had nullified this proposal, which really left people confused.
The key issue is that I couldn't find any formal governance process for this nullification; it just seemed to disappear quietly. To be honest, I don't want to dwell on this matter anymore, as the decision to grant tokens is entirely up to the project team, and we retail investors don't have much say.
The main reason I'm posting this is to clarify that the previous mention of giving Aave tokens was not something I made up; there was indeed such a proposal! It's not slander; it was something that actually existed. As for the current outcome, while it's a bit disappointing, we can only accept reality.
The project team can do whatever they want, after all, we can't control much. I just hope that such matters can be more transparent in the future, and not leave everyone guessing. #Wifl
In fact, there was indeed a proposal, and it was even approved at that time! I was pretty excited when I saw it, thinking that there was hope. However, later on, it was reported that the WLFI side had nullified this proposal, which really left people confused.
The key issue is that I couldn't find any formal governance process for this nullification; it just seemed to disappear quietly. To be honest, I don't want to dwell on this matter anymore, as the decision to grant tokens is entirely up to the project team, and we retail investors don't have much say.
The main reason I'm posting this is to clarify that the previous mention of giving Aave tokens was not something I made up; there was indeed such a proposal! It's not slander; it was something that actually existed. As for the current outcome, while it's a bit disappointing, we can only accept reality.
The project team can do whatever they want, after all, we can't control much. I just hope that such matters can be more transparent in the future, and not leave everyone guessing. #Wifl
Login to explore more contents