USElections

Polymarket’s Total Value Locked (TVL) took a sharp 50% dip following the U.S. election results and warnings of a possible ban in France (after some major losses from those betting on Kamala Harris). 🤷

To counter the slump, the team is hinting at a potential future airdrop. 🤔
#PolymarketBanInFrance #uselections

As updated results from the 2024 U.S. election come in, Donald Trump has expanded his lead in key states, securing 198 electoral votes against Kamala Harris’s 109. States like Utah and Montana have been added to Trump’s tally, reflecting a continued trend of Republican strength in conservative-leaning regions. But what drives these consistent wins, and what does this updated map reveal about the U.S. political landscape?
Key Factors Behind Trump’s Success in These States
• Traditional Republican Strongholds: States like Utah, Montana, and South Dakota have a history of supporting Republican candidates. Voters in these areas generally align with conservative values, such as limited government intervention, traditional family structures, and a pro-business approach. Trump’s alignment with these priorities has helped him secure these states early on.
• Economic Policy Alignment: States with economies tied to energy, agriculture, and manufacturing often favor Trump’s deregulatory stance and support for fossil fuels. For instance, voters in energy-rich Utah and coal-producing Montana view Trump’s policies as beneficial to local industries, fearing that Democratic climate policies might threaten jobs in these sectors.
• Rural vs. Urban Divide: Trump’s support remains strong in rural America, where voters often feel overlooked by policies focused on urban centers. His message of decentralizing power and promoting state rights resonates well in these rural areas, reinforcing a political divide between rural and urban America.
• Conservative Social Values: Many of these states have deeply rooted conservative social values, from support for the Second Amendment to a preference for traditional religious values. Trump’s positions on these issues resonate strongly, enhancing his appeal in culturally conservative states.
Conclusion
Trump’s victories in these traditionally conservative and economically specific states underscore the importance of rural, economically driven, and socially conservative values in the 2024 election. His continued success in these areas not only reflects voter loyalty but also highlights America’s deepening rural-urban divide. As both candidates push forward, these results indicate that economic security, cultural values, and rural representation will shape the country’s political trajectory.
#uselections #USElectionResult

Currently, the President of United States of America, Joe Biden, has withdrawn from the election to be held in November 2024. Now it has to be seen who among them, Kamla Harris from the Democrat Party and Donald Trump, who is from the Republican Party, will win the election of 2024 November. Because recently a news has come that if Donald Trump wins the election then he will implement the PROJECT-2025 in America. It is being said that the PROJECT-2025 will bring dictatorship in America.
Project 2025: A wish list for a Trump presidency, explained
Ahead of each presidential election, many think tanks in Washington DC release policy wishlists. As the campaign heats up, these proposals can act as talking points for candidates, and perhaps even shape their official party platforms.
The Conservative Promise is one such policy wishlist, which lays out ambitious ideas for a prospective Trump presidency. It is published by Project 2025, which is “a broad coalition of conservative organisations that have come together to ensure a successful administration begins in January 2025”.
Project 2025 has also set up a personnel database which will help the future president make administrative appointments, a training programme to develop future conservative leaders, and “a 180-day playbook”, which presents a blueprint for the first six months of the next presidency.
“If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on day one of the next conservative administration. This is the goal of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project,” the project’s website reads.
In popular discourse, Project 2025 has been used interchangeably with The Conservative Promise.
Why is Project 2025 controversial?
Simply put, Project 2025’s policy agenda takes some extreme positions.
It advocates expanding the president’s powers, and concentrating decision-making authority in the White House. Conversely, it argues for drastically reducing the power, and cutting the funding, of various federal administrative departments. Among its notable recommendations is to “disband” the Department of Education.Project 2025 calls for the reclassification of tens of thousands of federal workers — possibly the most dramatic change in the federal workforce since the 1880s. This will allow the president to appoint loyalists who side with him, and his administration.The policy document calls for a “biblically based” definition of marriage and family, which it clarifies means “heterosexual, intact marriage”. It also pushes a number of anti-LGBTQ+ positions, such as rescinding federal anti-discrimination protections “on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, and sex characteristics”.On reproductive rights, Project 2025 advocates the prosecution of people who send abortion pills through the mail, the cancellation of the Food and Drug Authority’s two-decade-old approval of mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in medication abortion, and the federal tracking of abortion-seekers using “every available tool”.The policy document recommends “unwinding… the Biden Administration’s climate fanaticism”. For example, it recommends ending wind and solar power subsidies, scrapping energy-efficiency standards for appliances, prioritising the use of fossils, and dismantling the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Clean Energy Corps.Project 2025 calls to expand on Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration during his previous term. For instance, it advocates for higher thresholds for accepting immigrants and refugees, and increasing the amount of time undocumented children can spend in the detention centres.
Who is behind Project 2025?
Project 2025 is spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, a Washington DC-based conservative think tank. Heritage platforms researchers and analysts from a wide range of fields, who — according to the organisation’s website — seeks solutions to “protect America’s future”.
“From empowering parents in education, reversing growing spending and inflation, and protecting the unborn, to securing America’s borders, countering the threat of Communist China, holding Big Tech accountable, and ensuring free and fair elections — Heritage is on the front lines in the fight to help Americans thrive,” the foundation’s website says.
Heritage has been publishing the Mandate for Leadership series since 1981. Each publication coincides with a presidential election, and offers specific conservative policy recommendations for the federal government. From Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump, the Mandate series has been highly influential in guiding Republican presidents’ actions. According to Heritage’s website, Trump “embraced nearly two-thirds of Heritage’s proposals within just one year in office” including leaving the Paris Climate Accords, increasing military spending, and increasing off-shore drilling.
Project 2025 builds off Heritage’s Mandate series, collaborating with more than 100 other conservative organisations. These include the Center for Renewing America, a Christian nationalist policy think tank headed by Russel Vought; Moms for Liberty, which has vociferously advocated against school curricula that mention LGBTQ+ rights, race and ethnicity, critical race theory, and discrimination; and the National Rifle Association, gun rights lobbying and advocacy group.

Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Trump’s campaign has contingency plan for taking on HarrisHarris or other Democrats deprive Trump of age argument
Donald Trump, fresh off a convention where the Republican Party’s confidence in him was palpable, must now deal with a harsh reality: The 2024 race has gotten dramatically trickier to navigate with President Joe Biden’s decision to drop out.
Trump’s aides weren’t surprised by the exit on Sunday, and his campaign had been developing contingency plans to take on Vice President Kamala Harris since a disastrous performance by Biden in a late-June debate sparked calls for the president to abandon his reelection campaign.
Those plans, though, have to address some fresh challenges. For months, 78-year-old Trump has attacked 81-year-old Biden for being too old to effectively serve another term. But 59-year-old Harris — whom Biden has endorsed — or virtually every other Democrat who could end up atop the ticket would deprive Trump of the argument, and might even be able to turn the tables on him.
The campaign also risks losing traction with some key constituencies, including young people and voters of color, where it had made inroads with some who now might be receptive to Harris or another Democrat. One of the strategies Trump allies plan to employ against Harris — to paint her as less likable personally — holds particular risk of alienating suburban women and Black voters.
And while Trump has kneecapped rivals in the past with cutting insults and demeaning nicknames, his attacks on women candidates have sometimes veered into sexist or racist territory that threatens to turn some voters off. He has referred to Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren as “Pocahontas,” and called his Republican primary challenger Nikki Haley“birdbrain.”
A 2019 ad from Harris’ earlier presidential bid rocketed around social media over the weekend, offering a preview of how she might put Trump on the defensive: The spot dubbed Harris “the anti-Trump,” contrasting her background as a prosecutor with claims that Trump is “owned by the big banks.”

Immigration Focus
Trump allies and advisers have shrugged off Harris, appraising her as a weaker candidate than Biden who is worse at one-on-one interactions with everyday voters.
The campaign believes it can beat Harris by playing up her leading role tackling immigration policy in the Biden administration. Trump’s co-campaign manager, Chris LaCivita, has called Harris the “border czar,” and has said he would love to use that message against her. That description of her was used repeatedly at the Republican National Convention, hinting that the party views it as a potent attack.
Trump himself had prepared to potentially run against Harris. He outlined his thoughts on a Harris candidacy in an interview with Bloomberg on July 9, just days before a lone gunman attempted to assassinate him at a rally in Pennsylvania.
“I don’t think it would make much difference,” he said by phone. “I see the same basic level of competence, and I don’t think it would make much difference. I would define her in a very similar manner that I define” Biden.
Several polls since the debate have shown Harris trailing Trump either nationally or in key states. Some political strategists, though, don’t see that as predictive of how things will stack up if she is officially anointed the Democratic nominee. The party’s convention is set to begin Aug. 19 in Chicago.
David Axelrod, the former Obama White House adviser, said Sunday that the “election changed in a dramatic way” when Biden decided to stand down. Trump is “a vulnerable candidate and can be beaten,” Axelrod said on CNN.
Little Time
After Biden’s disastrous debate, Trump officials first made the argument that the incumbent had won nearly all of the Democratic delegates during the primary, and legally it was too late to shift them to another candidate.
That argument evolved over the week at the Republican National Convention. By Thursday, top officials like LaCivita publicly suggested that if Biden was too feeble to run for reelection, then he should not serve out the remainder of his term in the White House.
Now that Biden has made the decision, though, their focus is largely on figuring out how to best square off against his replacement. While the game plan is set for Harris, the plan for another potential Democrat is far murkier, said two people familiar with the campaign’s plans.
Two Trump advisers say the toughest presidential candidate to beat would be Michelle Obama, but there is no indication she would want to run and the former first lady has batted down any mention of a political career in the past.
The Democrats’ vice presidential nominee is also now a wild card. That complicates debate preparation for JD Vance, the Ohio senator just tapped as Donald Trump’s running mate.
And it has the potential to alter the ticket’s chances in key battleground states. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, an oft-mentioned name as a possible running mate for Harris, would complicate that state for the Republican, one Trump adviser says, but not push the swing state out of reach. Shapiro was quick to endorse Harris after Biden dropped out.
Trump allies and advisers privately think the sprint that Democrats are facing works in the GOP’s favor. The Democrats have very little time to coalesce behind a candidate and raise money before early voting starts in some states.

#kamalaHarris #uselections #donaldtrump

Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

The Election is also not yet finished !

Any posts or pictures claiming Kamala or Trump as the winner are fake!

Do not make any trades based on this false information. Please wait for the official results to be announced soon.

#uselections

If Donald Trump returns to the White House in 2024, it would mark a significant shift in U.S. politics and global relations. His leadership would likely introduce new policies, revive old ones, and impact both domestic and international landscapes. Here’s a look at the potential changes the U.S. and the world might experience under a second Trump presidency.
1. Domestic Policies
a) Immigration Trump’s tough stance on immigration was central to his first term. A second term would likely revive stricter border controls, including further development of the U.S.-Mexico border wall and heightened deportation measures. These policies could also restrict asylum seekers and make it harder for immigrants to gain legal status in the U.S.
b) Economy and Trade Expect a return to Trump’s protectionist trade policies. He would likely reintroduce tariffs on Chinese imports and renegotiate trade deals to favor U.S. industries. This could disrupt global trade relations while boosting domestic manufacturing. Additionally, Trump would likely push for more deregulation and corporate tax cuts, which could stimulate short-term economic growth but might increase wealth disparity.
c) Health Care Trump has long criticized the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and might make renewed efforts to dismantle or replace it. Millions of Americans who rely on the ACA for their health insurance could be affected, and the changes could lead to shifts in the cost and accessibility of healthcare nationwide.
d) Judicial Appointments During his first term, Trump appointed three conservative justices to the Supreme Court, shifting the balance of the judiciary. If given another opportunity, he could appoint more conservative judges to the federal bench, potentially shaping legal rulings on key issues like reproductive rights, voting laws, and gun control for decades.
2. Foreign Policy and Global Impacts
a) U.S.-China Relations Trump’s tough approach to China would likely continue, with renewed tariffs and efforts to counter China’s influence on the global stage. This could heighten economic and geopolitical tensions between the two countries, with global repercussions on trade, technology, and international diplomacy.
b) NATO and Alliances Trump has been critical of NATO and other multilateral organizations, often calling for increased defense spending by allies. His return could lead to strained relations with European allies and a more isolationist U.S. stance. However, his diplomatic efforts might focus on forging closer ties with countries like Russia and North Korea, further shifting global alliances.
c) Middle East Policy Trump’s Middle East policy focused on the Abraham Accords, normalizing relations between Israel and Arab nations. A second term could see more agreements of this kind, reshaping Middle Eastern politics. However, tensions with Iran could flare, especially if Trump doubles down on his previous decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.
d) Climate and Environment Trump has long been a critic of climate change initiatives, having previously withdrawn the U.S. from the Paris Agreement. A second term would likely prioritize fossil fuel production, while environmental regulations might be scaled back. This could hinder international efforts to combat climate change, particularly if the U.S. withdraws from global environmental leadership.
3. Social and Cultural Impact
a) Political Polarization Trump’s populist rhetoric has deepened political divisions in the U.S., and a second term could further polarize the country. His policies and communication style often appeal strongly to his base while alienating others, potentially leading to increased social unrest and even deeper societal divisions.
b) Media and Free Speech Trump’s fraught relationship with the media has been a hallmark of his political career. He has often labeled mainstream news outlets as “fake news” and could push for policies aimed at curbing media power. This could lead to increased reliance on alternative news sources and intensify debates over free speech and censorship, especially regarding social media platforms.
4. Economic Outlook: Growth or Risk?
Trump’s economic policies would likely prioritize tax cuts, deregulation, and boosting American industries. His supporters argue this could lead to job growth and a strong domestic economy. However, critics warn that his approach could lead to rising inequality, a ballooning national debt, and potential instability in global markets.
Global Economic Impact could include trade disruptions with key partners like China and the European Union. Protectionist policies might raise consumer costs, affect global supply chains, and create uncertainty in financial markets.
5. Tech and Innovation
a) Regulating Big Tech Trump has frequently clashed with big tech companies, accusing them of political bias and censorship. His return could bring about stricter regulations targeting companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, potentially reshaping the tech landscape in the U.S. and globally.
b) Space Policy Trump was an advocate of space exploration, spearheading the creation of the U.S. Space Force and increasing NASA’s budget. A second term could see more public-private partnerships in space exploration, with a focus on lunar missions, Mars exploration, and competition with nations like China in space development.
6. International Diplomacy: New Alliances or Isolationism?
Trump’s unique approach to international diplomacy, favoring bilateral agreements over multilateral ones, could lead to major shifts in global power dynamics. Traditional alliances with Europe might weaken, while countries like Russia and North Korea could see improved relations with the U.S. Trump's "America First" philosophy might result in the U.S. pulling back from international agreements and organizations, creating a power vacuum that other nations, like China, could fill.
Conclusion: A New Trump Era—Challenges and Opportunities
If Donald Trump wins the 2024 election, the U.S. and the world are likely to experience profound changes in policy, international relations, and societal dynamics. Supporters believe his return could bring economic strength, more robust national security, and a firmer stance on global trade. However, critics caution that his leadership could deepen social divides, increase global tensions, and lead to long-term challenges in climate and diplomacy. Whatever the outcome, a Trump return would undoubtedly leave a lasting mark on the future of both the U.S. and the world.#uselections $BTC

As the U.S. election season heats up, we’re seeing some tough headlines. Vice President Harris is gaining ground, and the crypto market is feeling the pressure. Bitcoin has recently fallen below $68,000, leading many to worry about a possible drop in value. Despite this negative sentiment, big investors and crypto enthusiasts are stepping in to buy during this dip.

Strong Inflows into Bitcoin ETFs

This week, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs reported impressive net inflows of $2.22 billion. This suggests that large players see this price drop as a good buying opportunity rather than a reason to panic. According to Farside Investors, this influx of cash tells a hopeful story for Bitcoin.

BlackRock’s IBIT attracted a staggering $2.1489 billion.

Fidelity’s FBTC fund also saw inflows of $89.8 million.

Institutional Confidence Despite Market Uncertainty

These numbers indicate that institutional investors still have faith in Bitcoin, even with the ongoing political drama and market ups and downs. But the big question remains: Are these investments a sign of strong belief in Bitcoin’s future, or just a reaction to current market volatility?

What’s Next?

As we look ahead, it’s important to watch whether these purchases lead to a new upward trend in Bitcoin prices or if they are just a temporary fix in a market that might face more declines.
#USElections2024Countdown #Elections2024 #uselections #CryptoAMA #TetherAEDLaunch
$BTC

Bitcoin critics have been attacking the network by claiming that bitcoin miners are inefficient and consume too much energy. These attacks are usually wrapped in faux concern for climate change, but they are almost always funded by competitive digital asset teams who are simply trying to gain an advantage through regulatory capture.

As you can imagine, the combination of money and virtue signaling can be a powerful force in the world of politics. Take the recent developments in the New York State Assembly — the politicians voted to ban bitcoin mining within the state.
While the stated goal is to remove the use of fossil fuels as an energy source, the politicians have decided to go after bitcoin miners. This is interesting because bitcoin miners, along with all data centers, have no emissions. Rather than attacking the problem from a first principles perspective, the legislation goes after the virtue signaling targeting.
Legislature haven’t gone after data centers, banks, the military, or other consumers of fossil fuel energy production. Instead, they have singled out a single industry, which happens to have the dual benefit of creating jobs and stabilizing the electrical grids, as they pursue what they believe will score political points.

But here is the interesting thing — even if you disagree with the theory that many of these attacks are being funded by competing digital asset projects, it is unequivocally true that the data disproves the logic backing these legal attacks.
The bitcoin mining council recently published their latest survey results and it found that the bitcoin network hashrate grew 23% over the last 12 months, yet energy consumption dropped 25% in the same time period. This means that the bitcoin network is becoming more efficient and continuing to refrain from any direct emissions from the bitcoin mining machines.

Whenever you hear politicians saying one thing, but the data is telling you a different story, it should peak your interest as to why there is such a disconnect.
New York State already made a major mistake in the creation of the Bitlicense, which drove businesses, jobs, and economic prosperity out of the state. By banning bitcoin mining, they are repeating the exact same mistake again. States like Texas and Florida are welcoming businesses, including bitcoin miners, with open arms. As jobs and prosperity flow to these business friendly states, it will become more obvious that the abrasive states like New York will take years to recover.

The bitcoin mining debate is no longer a debate. The network provides an ever-increasing efficiency improvement as it protects the purchasing power of hundreds of millions of people globally. Over 50% of energy used for mining is coming from renewables compared to industry averages of approximately 20% renewables in other major industries.

Bitcoin mining is winning. Politicians who don’t understand the technology or the users will complain. The entrepreneurs, investors, and operators will compete in the marketplace.

Compete, don’t complain. Build. Create. This is the way to a better future. The folks who are funding these bitcoin attacks will continue burning money while we push forward.

Hope each of you has a great day. Talk to you soon
#USA #bitcoin #uselections #Hamstercombo #binance