Zelenskyy

🔹 Trump declared in The Hague that Spain will pay double in trade talks

🔹 Madrid rejected NATO's 5% GDP defense spending target, saying it can fulfill commitments without it

🔹 Macron criticizes Trump: "We can't be allies and wage a trade war at the same time"

Donald Trump has once again stirred the international scene—this time with a statement at the NATO summit in The Hague, where he threatened Spain with trade sanctions for rejecting the alliance's new ambitious goal: spending 5% of GDP on defense.
The former U.S. president, who still holds significant influence in American foreign policy, stated:

“Their decision is terrible. We’re negotiating a trade deal with Spain—and we’ll make them pay twice as much.”
The statement raised eyebrows, as Spain, like other EU members, does not conduct individual trade negotiations with the U.S.—these matters are handled by the European Commission on behalf of all 27 member states. Therefore, if Trump truly wanted to impose such a “penalty,” he would have to embed it in a broader trade deal with the entire European Union—something that would almost certainly meet strong resistance, especially in Brussels.

Trump Praises Himself, Says NATO Leaders Call Him “Dad”
Instead of focusing solely on Spain’s refusal, Trump spent much of the summit highlighting his own influence.

“They said: ‘You did it, sir, you did it,’” Trump recalled with a smile, clearly enjoying the attention. Jokingly, he added that NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called him “dad”—“very lovingly,” he clarified. Standing beside him, Marco Rubio struggled to keep a straight face.
This NATO gathering was notably calmer than those during Trump’s first term, when the alliance was tense over his doubts about Article 5 and collective defense. This time, however, Trump stated:

“NATO is not a scam. I left with respect—these people really love their countries. We’re here to help them protect their nations.”

Macron: Allies Shouldn’t Threaten Each Other with Trade Wars
French President Emmanuel Macron responded sharply to Trump’s remarks. After the summit, he said:

“We cannot, as allies, say that we need to spend more and then wage a trade war at the same time. We must return to what should be the rule among allies—real trade peace.”
Macron was also the only leader to openly criticize Trump for his decision to strike Iran last week.

Trump Compares Iran Strike to Hiroshima, Claims U.S. Destroyed a Nuclear Weapon
At a press conference, Trump declared that the U.S. strike on Iran had been “very, very successful—total destruction” and compared it to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

“We used bunker-busting bombs and destroyed their nuclear weapon. It’s blown up... the birth of a new kingdom,” he said dramatically.
Trump added that U.S. intelligence agencies assessed the strike as highly effective. He accused CNN and The New York Times of “disrespecting” American soldiers through their reporting.

“We hit them so fast they didn’t have time to move,” he claimed.

Trump Meets Zelensky, Says Putin Must End the War
Before stepping on stage, Trump met privately with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for nearly an hour. He described Zelensky as “very nice” and praised the courage of the Ukrainian people. When asked whether he would approve more defense aid, Trump answered vaguely: “We’ll see what happens.”
A Ukrainian journalist mentioned her husband is serving in the military. Trump responded directly:

“Vladimir Putin really must end this war.”
At the end of the press conference, Trump was asked why he believed the latest ceasefire between Iran and Israel would last. He answered simply:

“They’re both tired, exhausted. Both were happy to go home and walk away.”

🔻 Summary
Once again, Trump stirs the waters of international diplomacy—this time with threats against Spain, dramatic praise of NATO, and bold declarations about Iran. While some European leaders seek calm and unity, Trump continues his signature blend of bravado and controversy.

#TRUMP , #Zelenskyy , #Geopolitics , #TradeWars , #USPolitics

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

$TRUMP
Hi, I'm Javeria, and I'm here to break down the shocking recent meeting between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House, which ended in a dramatic and public display of disagreement, sparking widespread diplomatic repercussions ¹.Tensions between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy reached a boiling point during their recent meeting at the White House on February 28, 2025. The highly contentious bilateral meeting, televised live from the Oval Office, ended abruptly without a clear resolution or the expected signing of the Ukraine–United States Mineral Resources Agreement ¹.

The meeting began cordially, but roughly 40 minutes in, the conversation took a confrontational turn. Trump and U.S. Vice President JD Vance criticized Zelenskyy, at times drowning out his voice, over Ukraine's handling of the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War. Zelenskyy firmly defended Ukraine's position, highlighting the country's continued need for Western backing against Russian aggression ¹.

The Trump administration's stance on the conflict has been a point of contention, with Trump expressing willingness to negotiate an agreement with Russia to end the war. However, Zelenskyy has been wary of Russia's commitment to abide by its agreements, seeking instead security guarantees against future Russian aggression ¹.

*Key Takeaways from the Meeting:*

- *No Clear Resolution:* The meeting ended without a clear resolution or the expected signing of the Ukraine–United States Mineral Resources Agreement.
- *Confrontational Tone:* Trump and Vance's criticism of Zelenskyy marked a confrontational tone, with the Ukrainian president firmly defending his country's position.
- *Diverging Views on Russia:* The Trump administration's willingness to negotiate with Russia contrasts with Zelenskyy's skepticism towards Russia's commitment to its agreements.

The incident has sparked widespread criticism, with many global leaders expressing support for Zelenskyy and condemning Trump's confrontational approach. The aftermath of the meeting has seen a significant escalation in tensions between the two leaders, with the Trump administration ultimately asking Zelenskyy to leave the White House ¹.#TRUMP #Zelenskyy #trumpcoin #DonaldTrump

History
The first instance of Ukraine as an independent state came in 1917-1921 during the Ukrainian People's Republic (UPR) and other short-lived Ukrainian states after the Russian Revolution.
Ukraine declared independence in 1918, but it faced significant challenges from both Soviet Russia and Poland, and after several conflicts, it was absorbed into the Soviet Union.

Ukraine regained independence in 1991, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, marking the establishment of the modern Ukrainian state.

United States (U.S.) and European Union (EU) support
The support it has received from the U.S. and the EU has been pivotal.

What if Ukraine had received no support from the U.S., and only the EU had been involved?
The consequences would have been severe in several areas:
1. Military Struggles:
Increased Vulnerability: Without U.S. support, Ukraine would have been unable to counter Russia’s military might as effectively. U.S. advanced weaponry, training, and intelligence-sharing have been crucial in leveling the playing field.Prolonged Conflict: Ukraine might have struggled to maintain its defense, prolonging the war and possibly leading to territorial losses.
2. Economic Hardship:
Deeper Crisis: Without U.S. financial aid and loans, Ukraine's economy, already strained, would have faced even steeper challenges. EU assistance alone would not have been enough to mitigate the war's impact.Weakened Recovery: The absence of Western recovery funds would have delayed reconstruction, worsening the economic crisis and leaving Ukraine vulnerable to collapse.
3. Diplomatic Isolation:
Limited Global Support: Without U.S. backing, Ukraine would have found it harder to rally international support. Russia might have faced fewer sanctions, reducing the pressure on its economy and military.Internal Divisions: The lack of support could have led to greater internal political divisions, weakening Ukraine’s unity and resolve.
4. Weakened Morale:
Public Confidence: Western backing has bolstered morale, but without it, Ukraine could have faced a loss of hope, increasing calls for negotiations or surrender.Loss of Unity: Internal factions might have seen the lack of Western support as abandonment, fracturing the nation’s resolve.
5. Possible Russian Domination:
Russian Victory: Without external support, Ukraine might have succumbed to Russia’s territorial ambitions, potentially becoming a satellite state or losing its sovereignty entirely.Historical Precedent: Like many former Soviet states, Ukraine could have been absorbed into Russia or manipulated into a pro-Russian government.
The Impact on the EU:
1. Economic Strain:
Greater Burden: The EU would have shouldered a larger share of Ukraine's military and economic recovery, stretching its resources, especially given the war's impact on Europe’s energy supplies and inflation.
2. Internal EU Unity:
Potential Divisions: Without U.S. leadership, EU member states with differing views on defense and foreign policy might have struggled to reach consensus on military and economic support for Ukraine.
3. Security and Global Influence:
Weakened Defense Capabilities: Without the U.S., the EU would have had to dramatically increase defense spending, creating a less unified defense posture. The EU’s global influence would have been diminished without U.S. support in shaping international diplomacy and countering Russia.
Conclusion:
Without support from both the U.S. and EU, Ukraine would likely have been in a far more precarious situation.
The lack of military, financial, and diplomatic backing would have left the nation more vulnerable to Russian dominance.
The EU itself would have faced greater economic and political strain, potentially fragmenting its unity and reducing its ability to act decisively on the global stage.
In this hypothetical scenario, Ukraine could have ceased to exist as an independent state, either fully absorbed into Russia.
The importance of international support from the U.S. and EU cannot be overstated in securing Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
So YES, #Zelenskyy should be humble, not arrogant and thank U. S. for support
#TRUMP #ukraine $TRUMP

In a shocking and unexpected turn of events, President Donald Trump kicked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy out of the White House on February 28, 2025, after a heated argument.

The clash, which started over disagreements about U.S. support for Ukraine and peace talks with Russia, has sent waves through the world’s political circles.

The Showdown
What was meant to be a simple meeting about a deal for the U.S. to access Ukraine’s rare minerals quickly turned into a major disagreement. Trump, visibly frustrated, told Zelenskyy that he wasn’t showing enough gratitude for the U.S. military and financial help, saying, “You’re not acting at all thankful.”

He also warned that rejecting a U.S.-led peace deal with Russia could lead to “World War III.”

Vice President JD Vance also sided with Trump, saying Zelenskyy wasn’t recognizing America’s efforts. But Zelenskyy stood firm, pushing back against the U.S. stance on Russian President Vladimir Putin and emphasizing that Ukraine still needs strong support against Russian aggression.

Europe’s Alarm
The fallout has left European leaders worried about the future of the West’s united front against Russia. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas expressed her disappointment, saying, “Today, it became clear that the free world needs a new leader. It’s up to us, Europeans, to take on this challenge.”

Her comments show growing frustration with the changing U.S. foreign policy under Trump’s leadership.

What Does This Mean for Global Relations?
This public argument highlights the fragile nature of global diplomacy and alliances. With Ukraine still fighting in its war, the incident raises tough questions about America’s commitment to its allies and the future of Western unity against Russia.

Will Europe take on a bigger leadership role? How will Ukraine change its strategy moving forward? These are questions the world will be watching closely in the coming days.
As tensions rise globally, one thing is for sure—this dramatic White House moment will have big effects on international relations in 2025 and beyond.

#TRUMP #Zelenskyy #BinanceAlphaAlert #BTC

#PRUMPTUTIN ↑#ZELENSKYY ↑#Econom25 |
#Politic25 | #SuperAI |#jdvance • #donaldtrump |
P U T I N .. V l A D I M I R .. V L A D I M I R → VOR → not law → Воровство — это противоправное тайное или открытое завладение чужим имуществом с целью обогащения. Оно является одним из древнейших преступлений, известных человечеству, и наносит значительный ущерб как отдельным лицам, так и обществу в целом.
Виды воровства
* Кража: тайное хищение чужого имущества.
* Грабеж: открытое хищение чужого имущества.
* Разбой: нападение с целью хищения чужого имущества, совершенное с применением насилия, опасного для жизни или здоровья, либо с угрозой применения такого насилия.
* Мошенничество: хищение чужого имущества или приобретение права на чужое имущество путем обмана или злоупотребления доверием.
* Карманная кража: кража личного имущества из карманов, сумок и других мест, где оно находится при человеке.
* Клептомания: патологическое влечение к воровству, не связанное с материальной выгодой.
Причины воровства
* Социально-экономические факторы: бедность, безработица, неравенство.
* Психологические факторы: низкая самооценка, импульсивность, зависимость от азартных игр или наркотиков.
* Влияние окружения: принадлежность к криминальной среде, подражание другим.
* Отсутствие моральных устоев: пренебрежение общепринятыми нормами поведения.
Последствия воровства
* Для жертвы: материальный ущерб, психологическая травма, потеря доверия к окружающим.
* Для преступника: уголовное наказание, социальная изоляция, чувство вины и стыда.
* Для общества: рост преступности, снижение уровня доверия, экономические потери.
Профилактика воровства
* Социально-экономические меры: борьба с бедностью и безработицей, обеспечение равных возможностей.
* Правоохранительные меры: усиление контроля за соблюдением закона, повышение эффективности работы правоохранительных органов.
* Воспитательные меры: формирование у граждан уважения к чужой собственности, развитие моральных качеств.
* Технические меры: установка систем видеонаблюдения, сигнализации, использование средств защиты от краж.
* Повышение осведомленности: информирование граждан о способах защиты от воровства.
Уголовная ответственность
В большинстве стран воровство является уголовным преступлением и влечет за собой наказание в виде штрафа, исправительных работ или лишения свободы. Степень наказания зависит от тяжести преступления, размера ущерба и других обстоятельств. #СУПЕРШІ