ParvezMayar

Honestly… I kind of feel bad for $SUI right now. It really doesn’t deserve to be sitting under $2 with the ecosystem and utility it has.

But one thing I’m sure about, $SUI won’t stay below $2 for long. 💪🏻

If someone’s looking for a solid long-term hold, something you buy and forget for a while… $SUI makes a lot of sense.

Dear #followers 💛,
yeah… the market’s taking some heavy hits today. $BTC around $91k, $ETH under $3k, #SOL dipping below $130, it feels rough, I know.

But take a breath with me for a second. 🤗

Every time the chart looks like this, people panic fast… and then later say, “Wait, why was I scared?” The last big drawdown looked just as messy, and still, long-term wallets quietly stacked hundreds of thousands of $BTC while everyone else was stressing.

So is today uncomfortable? Of course.
Is it the kind of pressure we’ve seen before? Absolutely.

🤝 And back then, the people who stayed calm ended up thanking themselves.

No hype here, just a reminder, the screen looks bad, but the market underneath isn’t broken. Zoom out a little. Relax your shoulders. Breathe.

We’re still here.
We keep moving. 💞

#BTC90kBreakingPoint #MarketPullback

Walrus' Red Stuff doesn't try to look impressive. That is why it's easy to overlook.

On Walrus Protocol, repairs move in proportion to what's actually lost. Drop a few slivers... and only those slivers get rebuilt. No full re-upload. No whole network wide churn pretending to be "resilience".

That proportionality for @WalletConnect is the point. At scale, repair stops being an event and becomes routine maintenance. And storage systems that survive long-term usually feel boring exactly there.

#Walrus $WAL

$BIFI moved out of a long compression zone around the low-110s with a single, decisive expansion. That vertical push into the 300s wasn’t followed by a full unwind... instead, price gave back part of the move and started building again above prior ranges.

What stands out now is where it's holding. The pullback didn’t return to the origin of the breakout. It stabilized well above it, then pushed back toward the mid-250s with higher lows along the way. That’s not random volatility; it’s the market spending time at a new level.

The structure here looks more like digestion than distribution. Wide move first, then tighter candles, then a measured continuation attempt. No urgency, no panic on either side. Just price finding balance after a large repricing.

#Dusk $DUSK @Dusk

Interoperability in DeFi is usually framed as progress by default. For regulated assets, it's often the opposite. Every bridge strips context... and context is where enforceable rules live.

Dusk doesn't chase frictionless asset movement across environments that can't carry compliance state forward. Some instruments are designed to operate inside bounded systems where identity, permissions... and settlement rules remain intact. Move them freely and those guarantees start to fray.

This isn't anti-integration. It is selective integration by the way.
Assets that carry obligations don't travel well without their constraints.

$RIVER once again bouncing perfectly and looking all set for $20+ again ? 😉

Issuing an asset is straightforward. The real work starts once it has to exist in the world, through transfers, restructurings, compliance changes... and the occasional legal intervention no one plans for but everyone has to handle.

Dusk is designed for that long tail of assets and privacy. Corporate actions, permission updates, freezes or recalls can be executed without dragging every holder into public view. The asset continues to function while its rules evolve, which is how regulated instruments actually behave over time.

A lot of systems optimize for day one. On the other hand @Dusk optimize for long term.
Long-lived assets need control paths that stay quiet on day one thousand.

#Dusk $DUSK

On privacy focused L1 chain like Dusk foundation... privacy doesn't disappear into abstraction. It shows up as real work. additional computation, proof generation, tighter execution paths. The difference is that those costs are visible, not buried under vague claims about "secure defaults".

That visibility forces an honest choice. Teams have to price privacy instead of assuming it's free, and finance can model it like any other operating expense. Once costs are explicit... they can be optimized. When they are obscured, they tend to accumulate quietly.

Finance teams don't object to paying for privacy.
They object to finding out late. With @Dusk that's the actual trade though.

#Dusk $DUSK

Walrus native token $WAL is not just a pay token. On Walrus Protocol, storage fees aim for stable, fiat-like costs, paid upfront for a fixed window and streamed over time to operators and stakers.

The effect is intentionally boring for #Walrus ... storage stops tracking token charts and starts behaving like predictable infrastructure spend.

@Walrus 🦭/acc

$CLO has been climbing higher and higher with slow and steady moves 💪🏻

A continuous bullish momentum all the way from $0.26 to $0.8+ 😉

The clean trick in Walrus reconfiguration is restraint. Writes move to the new committee immediately, while reads keep flowing from the outgoing one. No read/write races though. No forced pauses during handoff. Rotation happens without becoming an event.

That kind of boring, deliberate separation is what keeps infra usable while the network quietly changes underneath. That's what Walrus Protocol aims to bring into Blob heavy storage systems.

@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL

I like one thing about #Walrus , that Walrus protocol doesn't pretend storage is "off-chain stuff". On Sui, metadata and proof-of-availability sit in the control plane, so blobs become something apps can reason about, not just fetch and hope for.

That basically shifts the whole thinking about how you design systems. With Walrus, storage stops being a side dependency and starts acting like a real primitive you can build around.

@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL

$1000WHY had a sharp expansion from the prior base around 0.000016–0.000018, then transitioned into a tight consolidation under 0.000028. That pause is constructive... price is not giving back much, which usually means supply is getting absorbed.

Dusk treats identity less like a login and more like a property right.
Instead of asking who is this wallet... the @Dusk system asks what rules does this asset carry. Simple logic right?

Access conditions live at the instrument level. Who can hold it, move it... or receive it is enforced by the asset itself, not patched in later through global allowlists or venue-specific checks. When assets move across applications or jurisdictions, those constraints move with assets too.

So that overall change from Dusk foundation becomes important operationally. Identity tied to accounts fragments as soon as assets leave their original context. Identity embedded in the asset remains coherent.

Assets remember their rules.
Wallets don't. #Dusk $DUSK

Many chains in DeFi, leak even when they claim privacy.
If it is not the payload that leaks, it's metadata. If not metadata, it's indexers... side channels or "helpful" analytics filling the gaps.

Dusk foundation draws a harder boundary around privacy claims. Data that isn't meant to be public does not quietly resurface through unofficial feeds or interpretive dashboards. With that @Dusk changes how market data forms around the chain... fewer shadow narratives, fewer inferred signals, fewer places where assumption gets mistaken for fact.

On the other hand, for institutions... excess data isn’t neutral.
It creates exposure before intent.

Deliberate silence, in this context,, is a control not an omission though.

#Dusk $DUSK

$HYPER after a massive bullish breakout, just holding calmly at $0.16 highs 😉

$DUSK has been impressive so far, but now it's all set for a dump and SHORT target is $0.055 😉

$HYPER moved after a long quiet base, jumped fast, and is now sitting just below the spike high... the pullback is shallow so far, more like price catching its breath than giving the move back.

Buddies.... $CHZ pushed out of its recent range in one clean move and is now sitting near the highs, with price holding rather than snapping back. After a long period of back-and-forth, this looks more like a reset higher than a rushed move. 💛

$GPS has dumped a -23% after some green breakouts 😉