Muhammad Irshad B
1 تتابع
3 المتابعون
15 إعجاب
0 تمّت مُشاركتها
منشورات
الكل
اقتباسات
عرض الترجمة
The rails that win aren’t the ones people speculate on — they’re the ones people don’t even think about. When you tap a card or send money digitally, you’re not evaluating consensu
Plasma: The Underrated Stablecoin Chain Set to Dominate Payments by 2026
This “boring” stablecoin chain might quietly take over payments by 2026—and honestly, there’s more to Plasma than most people notice.
If you just skim headlines, Plasma looks like another Layer 1 blockchain. But dig a little deeper and you see what it’s really built for: stablecoin payments at internet scale. Suddenly, it stops feeling like a crypto side project and more like actual payments infrastructure—just happens to use blockchain under the hood. The kind of system that doesn’t need hype because it wins by being invisible, fast, and reliable.
And here’s the kicker: the best payment rails don’t feel like crypto. They just feel like sending a message.
So, let’s break down why Plasma works the way it does, what’s going on under the hood, and why the token ($XPL) matters—without turning every transaction into a “hold the native gas token or get stuck” headache.
The real problem Plasma wants to solve (and why most chains just can’t do it)
Stablecoins are basically crypto’s most useful product right now. People use them for everything—remittances, savings, payroll, merchant payments, cross-border transfers. Plasma’s theory is pretty simple: if stablecoins are money, then the chain itself should act like money infrastructure.
So what does that mean?
Transfers? They should be almost instant.
Costs? Predictable, not a guessing game.
User experience? Nobody should have to learn weird crypto rituals.
The network? It’s got to handle payment-level traffic, not just one-off spikes like “NFT mint day.”
Plasma’s not trying to be a do-everything-for-everyone chain. It’s focused: a high-performance Layer 1, purpose-built for stablecoins—especially for USD₮. No distractions.
Zero-fee stablecoin transfers aren’t just a nice meme—they’re a game-changer
One of Plasma’s smartest moves is zero-fee USD₮ transfers. Not just “cheap gas”—literally zero. It’s not about flexing on price; it’s about solving crypto’s worst onboarding problem: “Wait, I can’t send money unless I have another token for gas?”
With Plasma, sending stablecoins feels normal. I have dollars, I send dollars. That’s it.
And that “little” change? It’s huge. It takes stablecoins from being a power-user tool and makes them something any mainstream app can add—no need to turn every user into a crypto nerd.
The tech: EVM-compatible, but tuned for payments
Plasma is EVM-compatible, which is a big deal for builders. You can use the same tools and smart contract patterns you already know. But Plasma’s architecture doesn’t chase every possible use case. It’s all about high payment throughput and rock-solid settlement.
A few core pillars you keep seeing in Plasma docs and ecosystem posts:
1) PlasmaBFT finality—payments need certainty, not “maybe it’s final later.” You want that “transaction’s done” feeling, and PlasmaBFT delivers fast.
2) Custom gas tokens—apps can set their own fee strategies. That means more Web2-like pricing: subscriptions, sponsored fees, app-controlled costs.
3) Confidential payments—privacy is built in, not bolted on. Payments are sensitive, and Plasma knows it. Confidential payments are a real feature here.
The Bitcoin bridge is a bigger deal than it looks
Plasma’s ecosystem also talks about a trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge. The idea: bring BTC into smart contracts without relying on fragile, wrapped tokens. Even if you don’t care about bridging, this really matters:
Stablecoin economies want BTC liquidity close by.
Payments rails get stronger with deeper, global collateral options.
“Trust-minimized” is the line between real finance and play money.
Honestly, it’s one of those features that seems extra—until you realize how many payment products want to be right next to Bitcoin liquidity, but without bridge risk.
Ecosystem: chain abstraction, and why NEAR Intents is a big deal
Payments at scale can’t look like “bridge here, swap there, sign five times.” Plasma’s NEAR Intents integration aims to make cross-network moves feel like one action. You set your intent, and it happens. No more step-by-step micromanagement.
If you want to build for regular people, intent-based UX is a huge upgrade. Users don’t want to think about “bridging” or “signing” or any of that. They just want to send, buy, pay.
So the ecosystem’s pretty clear on direction: make things simpler, boost completion rates.
The real role of $XPL (and why it doesn’t wreck the user experience)
Quick reality check on the token. Plasma’s docs say is the native currency for transactions and rewards for validators and network support—the classic security and incentive stuff. But here’s where it gets interesting.@Plasma
If you just skim headlines, Plasma looks like another Layer 1 blockchain. But dig a little deeper and you see what it’s really built for: stablecoin payments at internet scale. Suddenly, it stops feeling like a crypto side project and more like actual payments infrastructure—just happens to use blockchain under the hood. The kind of system that doesn’t need hype because it wins by being invisible, fast, and reliable.
And here’s the kicker: the best payment rails don’t feel like crypto. They just feel like sending a message.
So, let’s break down why Plasma works the way it does, what’s going on under the hood, and why the token ($XPL) matters—without turning every transaction into a “hold the native gas token or get stuck” headache.
The real problem Plasma wants to solve (and why most chains just can’t do it)
Stablecoins are basically crypto’s most useful product right now. People use them for everything—remittances, savings, payroll, merchant payments, cross-border transfers. Plasma’s theory is pretty simple: if stablecoins are money, then the chain itself should act like money infrastructure.
So what does that mean?
Transfers? They should be almost instant.
Costs? Predictable, not a guessing game.
User experience? Nobody should have to learn weird crypto rituals.
The network? It’s got to handle payment-level traffic, not just one-off spikes like “NFT mint day.”
Plasma’s not trying to be a do-everything-for-everyone chain. It’s focused: a high-performance Layer 1, purpose-built for stablecoins—especially for USD₮. No distractions.
Zero-fee stablecoin transfers aren’t just a nice meme—they’re a game-changer
One of Plasma’s smartest moves is zero-fee USD₮ transfers. Not just “cheap gas”—literally zero. It’s not about flexing on price; it’s about solving crypto’s worst onboarding problem: “Wait, I can’t send money unless I have another token for gas?”
With Plasma, sending stablecoins feels normal. I have dollars, I send dollars. That’s it.
And that “little” change? It’s huge. It takes stablecoins from being a power-user tool and makes them something any mainstream app can add—no need to turn every user into a crypto nerd.
The tech: EVM-compatible, but tuned for payments
Plasma is EVM-compatible, which is a big deal for builders. You can use the same tools and smart contract patterns you already know. But Plasma’s architecture doesn’t chase every possible use case. It’s all about high payment throughput and rock-solid settlement.
A few core pillars you keep seeing in Plasma docs and ecosystem posts:
1) PlasmaBFT finality—payments need certainty, not “maybe it’s final later.” You want that “transaction’s done” feeling, and PlasmaBFT delivers fast.
2) Custom gas tokens—apps can set their own fee strategies. That means more Web2-like pricing: subscriptions, sponsored fees, app-controlled costs.
3) Confidential payments—privacy is built in, not bolted on. Payments are sensitive, and Plasma knows it. Confidential payments are a real feature here.
The Bitcoin bridge is a bigger deal than it looks
Plasma’s ecosystem also talks about a trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge. The idea: bring BTC into smart contracts without relying on fragile, wrapped tokens. Even if you don’t care about bridging, this really matters:
Stablecoin economies want BTC liquidity close by.
Payments rails get stronger with deeper, global collateral options.
“Trust-minimized” is the line between real finance and play money.
Honestly, it’s one of those features that seems extra—until you realize how many payment products want to be right next to Bitcoin liquidity, but without bridge risk.
Ecosystem: chain abstraction, and why NEAR Intents is a big deal
Payments at scale can’t look like “bridge here, swap there, sign five times.” Plasma’s NEAR Intents integration aims to make cross-network moves feel like one action. You set your intent, and it happens. No more step-by-step micromanagement.
If you want to build for regular people, intent-based UX is a huge upgrade. Users don’t want to think about “bridging” or “signing” or any of that. They just want to send, buy, pay.
So the ecosystem’s pretty clear on direction: make things simpler, boost completion rates.
The real role of $XPL (and why it doesn’t wreck the user experience)
Quick reality check on the token. Plasma’s docs say is the native currency for transactions and rewards for validators and network support—the classic security and incentive stuff. But here’s where it gets interesting.@Plasma
عرض الترجمة
That’s the right framing. The real test for any chain isn’t how decentralized it is or how fast it claims to be
Is Vanar actually building for anything beyond crypto? That’s the real question—not just what’s on their roadmap or who they’ve partnered with, but what they actually expect people to use this stuff for.
If Vanarchain was only chasing crypto users, there’d be no need to talk up their off-chain angle. Hardcore crypto folks will put up with clunky UX, slow speeds, and high fees as long as everything’s open and on-chain. But Vanar’s doing the opposite. They’re aiming for something more like what you see in gaming, entertainment, digital content, or even payments. Those users don’t care what blockchain is under the hood—they just want things to work, no hiccups or headaches.
Of course, just because you build for these “real-world” use cases doesn’t mean people will show up. That’s the real risk: if the product isn’t compelling, nobody’s coming.
Still, you have to give Vanar credit. They’re not trying to make blockchain the star of the show. They’re building it so it fades into the background, powering everything without demanding attention.$VANRY @Vanarchain #Vanar
If Vanarchain was only chasing crypto users, there’d be no need to talk up their off-chain angle. Hardcore crypto folks will put up with clunky UX, slow speeds, and high fees as long as everything’s open and on-chain. But Vanar’s doing the opposite. They’re aiming for something more like what you see in gaming, entertainment, digital content, or even payments. Those users don’t care what blockchain is under the hood—they just want things to work, no hiccups or headaches.
Of course, just because you build for these “real-world” use cases doesn’t mean people will show up. That’s the real risk: if the product isn’t compelling, nobody’s coming.
Still, you have to give Vanar credit. They’re not trying to make blockchain the star of the show. They’re building it so it fades into the background, powering everything without demanding attention.$VANRY @Vanarchain #Vanar
عرض الترجمة
This hits on the quiet frustration a lot of long-time crypto users feel but rarely articulate well
The crypto market’s right back to its old tricks—prices swinging all over the place, new stories popping up and fading fast, and everyone glued to charts like prices and TVL. After years of hearing “blockchain will change the world,” I can’t help but wonder:has anything really changed for regular people,or are we just building shinier dashboards?
DeFi was supposed to make things open to everyone.But once you dive in,it’s just this tangled mess that keeps getting worse. Every month,there’s more complexity—more chains, more silos,capital chasing whatever yield pops up instead of real use.If you’re a normal person, you’re slammed with wallets,bridges,swaps, endless confirmations.The tech that was supposed to set people free now expects you to learn its entire language just to keep up.
The real issue isn’t just risk or security.It’s about how data and money actually move.DeFi feels like plumbing thrown together in a hurry—some spots are under insane pressure, others get clogged, and capital just jumps around with no memory or commitment. Incentives show up, money floods in.Take them away, and it disappears just as fast.There’s no real stability.
That kind of burnout is what pushed me toward Plasma.I started poking around,a little skeptical but curious.Plasma cares less about hype and more about keeping things flowing.It watches the signals most people ignore—swaps, deposits, pool changes,sudden slippage—and looks for patterns.You can actually see demand pulsing through the system.
Programmable Liquidity takes this a step further. The system watches,then decides what to do. Vanilla Assets stay simple and easy to use. maAssets become these tailored blocks that fit what people need,without chopping things up even more.It’s like the whole thing’s alive—liquidity moves where it’s needed,flows back when things change and the system learns as it goes.
EOL brings some much-needed toughness, soaking up shocks when “rented” liquidity bails during downturns.That way,the system can bounce back instead of breaking.
$XPL @Plasma #plasma
DeFi was supposed to make things open to everyone.But once you dive in,it’s just this tangled mess that keeps getting worse. Every month,there’s more complexity—more chains, more silos,capital chasing whatever yield pops up instead of real use.If you’re a normal person, you’re slammed with wallets,bridges,swaps, endless confirmations.The tech that was supposed to set people free now expects you to learn its entire language just to keep up.
The real issue isn’t just risk or security.It’s about how data and money actually move.DeFi feels like plumbing thrown together in a hurry—some spots are under insane pressure, others get clogged, and capital just jumps around with no memory or commitment. Incentives show up, money floods in.Take them away, and it disappears just as fast.There’s no real stability.
That kind of burnout is what pushed me toward Plasma.I started poking around,a little skeptical but curious.Plasma cares less about hype and more about keeping things flowing.It watches the signals most people ignore—swaps, deposits, pool changes,sudden slippage—and looks for patterns.You can actually see demand pulsing through the system.
Programmable Liquidity takes this a step further. The system watches,then decides what to do. Vanilla Assets stay simple and easy to use. maAssets become these tailored blocks that fit what people need,without chopping things up even more.It’s like the whole thing’s alive—liquidity moves where it’s needed,flows back when things change and the system learns as it goes.
EOL brings some much-needed toughness, soaking up shocks when “rented” liquidity bails during downturns.That way,the system can bounce back instead of breaking.
$XPL @Plasma #plasma
عرض الترجمة
A lot of chains still design for crypto-native users who tolerate friction because they understand it
Vanar: The Blockchain That Works So Well, You Forget It's
When I first checked out Vanar, it wasn’t the speed or the tech flex that grabbed me. Honestly, it just felt like walking into a place where everything works the way it should. You don’t notice the wiring or the AC when they’re working, but the second they break, it ruins your whole experience. That’s Vanar’s vibe: if you’re always aware you’re on a blockchain, something’s off.
You start to get why when you look at where Vanar’s team comes from. They’re not just crypto folks or pure academics—they’ve spent real time in games, entertainment, and brand work. Those worlds run on user patience, and it’s always in short supply. Gamers don’t care about the reason behind price spikes; they just know it sucks when it costs more to do something today than yesterday. And brands? The last thing they want is to explain gas fees when someone’s trying to redeem a loyalty reward. Vanar went for stable, fixed fees, and honestly, that feels less like blockchain magic and more like practical thinking borrowed from real life.
Take the fee model. Instead of bragging about “market-driven” gas like it’s a feature, Vanar treats fee swings as a bug. They try to keep transaction costs steady in dollars, even if the token price wobbles. That puts real pressure on the protocol and foundation to keep things above board, but it lines up with how people actually expect payments to work. Nobody checks exchange rates when buying coffee—they just want to pay what’s on the sign.
On-chain numbers tell a similar story. Vanar isn’t empty. The network sees a ton of transactions and wallets moving through. Sure, big numbers don’t guarantee long-term fans—games can pump those stats fast—but they do show the chain handles real, messy traffic. It’s more like a packed train station than a perfect showroom. Noisy, crowded, but it works.
What’s interesting is how Vanar’s positioning has shifted. It’s not just “the gaming chain” anymore. Now, you hear talk about AI, data, and real-world assets. At first, it sounds like another buzzword chase, but the pitch is actually pretty grounded. Big consumer apps—games, brand programs, whatever—crank out a ton of data that needs to be searched, checked, and reused. Vanar’s aiming for a chain that doesn’t just store receipts but actually lets you ask smart questions of that data later. That’s tough, but it fits with entertainment and brand ecosystems that already deal with stuff like identities, inventory, and rep.
On the technical side, Vanar plays it safe where it matters. EVM compatibility isn’t sexy, but it’s what devs want. Nobody wants to relearn everything just to ship a game or app. If you want to onboard millions by powering products they already like, making it easy for devs is a must. Familiar tools, familiar code, same old bugs. That’s how you actually get things live.
The VANRY token fits right into this. It pays for transactions, gets staked, gives you governance rights, and there’s a wrapped version for hopping between ecosystems. Nothing earth-shattering there, but because fees are stable, the token usually fades into the background. If fees get weird, though, VANRY suddenly becomes everyone’s problem. That’s a risky position, but at least it’s honest.
Staking and validation are where Vanar really shows its hand. Validators are picked by the foundation, and the community just delegates stake—they can’t spin up nodes whenever they want. Crypto purists hate this, but from a business angle, it makes sense. Big partners want reliability, not wild-west decentralization, especially at the start. The real question is whether Vanar will loosen up this control as it grows, or if it sticks with the current setup. That’ll reveal a lot about how they balance control and openness down the line.
Vanar’s ties to gaming—stuff like Virtua and the VGN network—make their priorities pretty clear. Those environments need transactions that are fast, cheap, and basically invisible. Players don’t want to “do crypto”—they want to play, trade, collect, and move on. If Vanar keeps that experience smooth, they don’t need to shout about it. Usage speaks louder than any marketing.
Zooming out, Vanar doesn’t seem obsessed with being the center of attention. It wants to fade into the background and let the products shine. In a space where everyone’s chasing hype and token price graphs, that’s kind of refreshing. If people stop arguing about Vanar and just use it without even noticing, that’s probably the win.@Vanar
You start to get why when you look at where Vanar’s team comes from. They’re not just crypto folks or pure academics—they’ve spent real time in games, entertainment, and brand work. Those worlds run on user patience, and it’s always in short supply. Gamers don’t care about the reason behind price spikes; they just know it sucks when it costs more to do something today than yesterday. And brands? The last thing they want is to explain gas fees when someone’s trying to redeem a loyalty reward. Vanar went for stable, fixed fees, and honestly, that feels less like blockchain magic and more like practical thinking borrowed from real life.
Take the fee model. Instead of bragging about “market-driven” gas like it’s a feature, Vanar treats fee swings as a bug. They try to keep transaction costs steady in dollars, even if the token price wobbles. That puts real pressure on the protocol and foundation to keep things above board, but it lines up with how people actually expect payments to work. Nobody checks exchange rates when buying coffee—they just want to pay what’s on the sign.
On-chain numbers tell a similar story. Vanar isn’t empty. The network sees a ton of transactions and wallets moving through. Sure, big numbers don’t guarantee long-term fans—games can pump those stats fast—but they do show the chain handles real, messy traffic. It’s more like a packed train station than a perfect showroom. Noisy, crowded, but it works.
What’s interesting is how Vanar’s positioning has shifted. It’s not just “the gaming chain” anymore. Now, you hear talk about AI, data, and real-world assets. At first, it sounds like another buzzword chase, but the pitch is actually pretty grounded. Big consumer apps—games, brand programs, whatever—crank out a ton of data that needs to be searched, checked, and reused. Vanar’s aiming for a chain that doesn’t just store receipts but actually lets you ask smart questions of that data later. That’s tough, but it fits with entertainment and brand ecosystems that already deal with stuff like identities, inventory, and rep.
On the technical side, Vanar plays it safe where it matters. EVM compatibility isn’t sexy, but it’s what devs want. Nobody wants to relearn everything just to ship a game or app. If you want to onboard millions by powering products they already like, making it easy for devs is a must. Familiar tools, familiar code, same old bugs. That’s how you actually get things live.
The VANRY token fits right into this. It pays for transactions, gets staked, gives you governance rights, and there’s a wrapped version for hopping between ecosystems. Nothing earth-shattering there, but because fees are stable, the token usually fades into the background. If fees get weird, though, VANRY suddenly becomes everyone’s problem. That’s a risky position, but at least it’s honest.
Staking and validation are where Vanar really shows its hand. Validators are picked by the foundation, and the community just delegates stake—they can’t spin up nodes whenever they want. Crypto purists hate this, but from a business angle, it makes sense. Big partners want reliability, not wild-west decentralization, especially at the start. The real question is whether Vanar will loosen up this control as it grows, or if it sticks with the current setup. That’ll reveal a lot about how they balance control and openness down the line.
Vanar’s ties to gaming—stuff like Virtua and the VGN network—make their priorities pretty clear. Those environments need transactions that are fast, cheap, and basically invisible. Players don’t want to “do crypto”—they want to play, trade, collect, and move on. If Vanar keeps that experience smooth, they don’t need to shout about it. Usage speaks louder than any marketing.
Zooming out, Vanar doesn’t seem obsessed with being the center of attention. It wants to fade into the background and let the products shine. In a space where everyone’s chasing hype and token price graphs, that’s kind of refreshing. If people stop arguing about Vanar and just use it without even noticing, that’s probably the win.@Vanar
عرض الترجمة
Early Plasma’s weakness wasn’t tech — it was gravity. Liquidity came in, but it didn’t circulate. A payments-focused L1 can’t afford to feel like a closed ecosystem
Plasma made two big integration moves in January of 2026. NEAR Intents went live on 23rd and connected XPL and USDT0 to 125+ assets on 25+ chains. CoW Swap was released on the 12th with the addition of DEX execution on-chain. Then MassPay introduced indigenous USDT payment rails. Three integrations within one month. The pattern here is obvious: Plasma is fixing its greatest weakness at the beginning of its development, isolation. A stablecoin chain only works if there is no friction in capital flowing in and out of the chain. These bridges do exactly this.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
عرض الترجمة
That’s a sharp observation. One thing many L1s underestimate is how powerful narrative clarity is in the early years. When a chain launches as “general purpose
One thing I do see with Vanar Chain is the emphasis on entertainment and gaming right from the beginning. Most L1s get off to a start and scramble to find a niche. Vanar picked theirs early. The chain already on-boarded mainstream brands and IP holder to build on the network. VANRY staking allows fixing the chain while holding the fees low (close to zero) to the end users. Listed in Binance with sector focus. L1s with identity have a tendency to live longer than the generic ones.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
عرض الترجمة
Strong breakdown. The part that really stands out to me is the disconnect between liquidity and usage. Plasma clearly proved it can attract capital — $6B+ TVL in week one isn’t normal
Where Plasma is at Five Months In: On-Chain Figures, Token Unlocks and What the Data Says
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
I got in with Plasma right around the mainnet launch back in Sept 25. The hype was enormous. Billions in liquidity coming in day one, Aave going live on the network in the first week and XPL going past $1.60. Five months later the token has declined to the neighborhood of $0.08. A 95% drawdown off the all-time high of $1.68 was observed on September 28. I want to deconstruct what happened what were, on-chain numbers like right now and what does the token unlock schedule means for anybody paying attention to this network.
First the basics for the new comers. Plasma is a Layer 1 blockchain platform and has been built from the top for stablecoin payments. Zero Fee transfers of USDT, EVM compatible, sub-second finality using PlasmaBFT consensus. The team have backgrounds at Apple, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, Imperial College London and Los Alamos National Lab. Tether are backing the project directly, which is significant as the whole value proposition is making USDT the native currency of an entire blockchain. The public sale has raised $ 50Million, 1Billion tokens at $0.05/token. Total supply is 10 billion XPL with about 1.8 billion in circulation at the moment. So in effect there is around 18% of total supply out there at the moment. Keep that number in mind because things are about to change when it comes to that float.
This is where the on-chain story comes in interesting. At peak Plasma TVL passed $6.4 billion in a week of mainnet and was the 5th largest DFi chain overnight. Aave on Plasma alone brought $6.6 billion in deposits with $1.58 billion in active borrowing. The supply of stablecoins on the network reached a stable point of $2.1 billion. But here is the gap, the chain was designed for 1000 transactions per second and at its low points, it was going at 14.9 TPS. Daily fees peaked at $4,200. So you had billions that were sitting on the chain and mostly it was sitting in lending vaults getting yield and then thin activity outside of that. The network had liquidity but not use the way that a payments chain needs to show. Incentives drew capital. Organic transaction demand was slow to keep pace. Since then DeFi protocols have been going from strength to strength. Pendle is projected for launch on Plasma in October of 2025. Coinbase added XPL to its list on 2nd December. Kraken enabled USDT0 deposits and withdrawals on December 10th. And in January of 2026, Plasma became integrated with NEAR Intents that was connecting XPL and USDT0 to a cross-chain liquidity pool of 25+ assets across 25 blockchains. The Aave v3.6 upgrade proposal of Plasma went to on-chain voting on 17th January. These are actual integrations and not vapor. The question is whether they translate into the kind of sustained volume of transactions that result in organic demand of XPL.
Now the part that everybody need to understand, unlock schedule. Right now the rate of ecosystem allocations are currently unlocking at a rate of about 88.9 million XPL per month. That is about 2.22% of the whole supply that is dropped to the market every 30 days. The bigger event is July 28, 2026 when the 2.5 billion tokens that are allocated to the US public sale participants are unlocked all at once. These buyers paid $0.05 per token. Even at the current price, of about $0.08, they are sitting on a 60% gain. The question is simple, how many of those holders sell once they get access? That one unlock will more than double the amount of supply in circulation. Team and investor tokens have their own schedule which include one year cliff, and monthly vesting for 2 years after. Plasma has an EIP-1559 style burn mechanism as well as proof-of-stake inflation beginning at 5% annually, and reduce 0.5% annually to a floor of 3%. A staked delegation system is coming up in Q1 2026 to stimulate locking tokens and remove sell pressure from the system. If the staking were to come live prior to July, some that supply shock may be absorbed. If the staking is late in the launching, the July unlock comes to a market without any mechanism for absorption.
I continue to follow the Plasma, as the thesis behind the project makes a lot of sense. Stablecoins see $22 trillion+ in volume transactions in 2024 on the blockchain. Tron dominated that space for years with $6.1 billion in TVL at the time Plasma was launched. A special purpose chain for stablecoins payments with the direct backing of Tether, is not a small idea. The currently in the works Bitcoin bridge would bring the liquidity of BTC into the ecosystem in the form of collateral. Confidential payment features are ahead selective transaction private. The Plasma One neobank product is targeted at real world payments in regions in which there is high demand for remittances. All these are promising things on paper. But, it's the network that has to fill in the void between capital we park in the DeFi vaults, and people sending stablecoins for groceries, rent and cross-border transfers. The infrastructural is going under. Not there for the metrics on adoption. For the time being, I am tracking three things every week: How many active transactions are made on Plasmascan on a daily basis, What the unlock impact on circulating supply will be on a monthly basis and the stablecoin transfer volume outside of DeFi lending loops. Those 3 data-points will have more information on where Plasma is going than any chart pattern or sentiment post.
I got in with Plasma right around the mainnet launch back in Sept 25. The hype was enormous. Billions in liquidity coming in day one, Aave going live on the network in the first week and XPL going past $1.60. Five months later the token has declined to the neighborhood of $0.08. A 95% drawdown off the all-time high of $1.68 was observed on September 28. I want to deconstruct what happened what were, on-chain numbers like right now and what does the token unlock schedule means for anybody paying attention to this network.
First the basics for the new comers. Plasma is a Layer 1 blockchain platform and has been built from the top for stablecoin payments. Zero Fee transfers of USDT, EVM compatible, sub-second finality using PlasmaBFT consensus. The team have backgrounds at Apple, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, Imperial College London and Los Alamos National Lab. Tether are backing the project directly, which is significant as the whole value proposition is making USDT the native currency of an entire blockchain. The public sale has raised $ 50Million, 1Billion tokens at $0.05/token. Total supply is 10 billion XPL with about 1.8 billion in circulation at the moment. So in effect there is around 18% of total supply out there at the moment. Keep that number in mind because things are about to change when it comes to that float.
This is where the on-chain story comes in interesting. At peak Plasma TVL passed $6.4 billion in a week of mainnet and was the 5th largest DFi chain overnight. Aave on Plasma alone brought $6.6 billion in deposits with $1.58 billion in active borrowing. The supply of stablecoins on the network reached a stable point of $2.1 billion. But here is the gap, the chain was designed for 1000 transactions per second and at its low points, it was going at 14.9 TPS. Daily fees peaked at $4,200. So you had billions that were sitting on the chain and mostly it was sitting in lending vaults getting yield and then thin activity outside of that. The network had liquidity but not use the way that a payments chain needs to show. Incentives drew capital. Organic transaction demand was slow to keep pace. Since then DeFi protocols have been going from strength to strength. Pendle is projected for launch on Plasma in October of 2025. Coinbase added XPL to its list on 2nd December. Kraken enabled USDT0 deposits and withdrawals on December 10th. And in January of 2026, Plasma became integrated with NEAR Intents that was connecting XPL and USDT0 to a cross-chain liquidity pool of 25+ assets across 25 blockchains. The Aave v3.6 upgrade proposal of Plasma went to on-chain voting on 17th January. These are actual integrations and not vapor. The question is whether they translate into the kind of sustained volume of transactions that result in organic demand of XPL.
Now the part that everybody need to understand, unlock schedule. Right now the rate of ecosystem allocations are currently unlocking at a rate of about 88.9 million XPL per month. That is about 2.22% of the whole supply that is dropped to the market every 30 days. The bigger event is July 28, 2026 when the 2.5 billion tokens that are allocated to the US public sale participants are unlocked all at once. These buyers paid $0.05 per token. Even at the current price, of about $0.08, they are sitting on a 60% gain. The question is simple, how many of those holders sell once they get access? That one unlock will more than double the amount of supply in circulation. Team and investor tokens have their own schedule which include one year cliff, and monthly vesting for 2 years after. Plasma has an EIP-1559 style burn mechanism as well as proof-of-stake inflation beginning at 5% annually, and reduce 0.5% annually to a floor of 3%. A staked delegation system is coming up in Q1 2026 to stimulate locking tokens and remove sell pressure from the system. If the staking were to come live prior to July, some that supply shock may be absorbed. If the staking is late in the launching, the July unlock comes to a market without any mechanism for absorption.
I continue to follow the Plasma, as the thesis behind the project makes a lot of sense. Stablecoins see $22 trillion+ in volume transactions in 2024 on the blockchain. Tron dominated that space for years with $6.1 billion in TVL at the time Plasma was launched. A special purpose chain for stablecoins payments with the direct backing of Tether, is not a small idea. The currently in the works Bitcoin bridge would bring the liquidity of BTC into the ecosystem in the form of collateral. Confidential payment features are ahead selective transaction private. The Plasma One neobank product is targeted at real world payments in regions in which there is high demand for remittances. All these are promising things on paper. But, it's the network that has to fill in the void between capital we park in the DeFi vaults, and people sending stablecoins for groceries, rent and cross-border transfers. The infrastructural is going under. Not there for the metrics on adoption. For the time being, I am tracking three things every week: How many active transactions are made on Plasmascan on a daily basis, What the unlock impact on circulating supply will be on a monthly basis and the stablecoin transfer volume outside of DeFi lending loops. Those 3 data-points will have more information on where Plasma is going than any chart pattern or sentiment post.
عرض الترجمة
Strong breakdown. The part that really stands out to me is the disconnect between liquidity and usage. Plasma clearly proved it can attract capital — $6B+ TVL in week one isn’t
Where Plasma is at Five Months In: On-Chain Figures, Token Unlocks and What the Data Says
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
I got in with Plasma right around the mainnet launch back in Sept 25. The hype was enormous. Billions in liquidity coming in day one, Aave going live on the network in the first week and XPL going past $1.60. Five months later the token has declined to the neighborhood of $0.08. A 95% drawdown off the all-time high of $1.68 was observed on September 28. I want to deconstruct what happened what were, on-chain numbers like right now and what does the token unlock schedule means for anybody paying attention to this network.
First the basics for the new comers. Plasma is a Layer 1 blockchain platform and has been built from the top for stablecoin payments. Zero Fee transfers of USDT, EVM compatible, sub-second finality using PlasmaBFT consensus. The team have backgrounds at Apple, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, Imperial College London and Los Alamos National Lab. Tether are backing the project directly, which is significant as the whole value proposition is making USDT the native currency of an entire blockchain. The public sale has raised $ 50Million, 1Billion tokens at $0.05/token. Total supply is 10 billion XPL with about 1.8 billion in circulation at the moment. So in effect there is around 18% of total supply out there at the moment. Keep that number in mind because things are about to change when it comes to that float.
This is where the on-chain story comes in interesting. At peak Plasma TVL passed $6.4 billion in a week of mainnet and was the 5th largest DFi chain overnight. Aave on Plasma alone brought $6.6 billion in deposits with $1.58 billion in active borrowing. The supply of stablecoins on the network reached a stable point of $2.1 billion. But here is the gap, the chain was designed for 1000 transactions per second and at its low points, it was going at 14.9 TPS. Daily fees peaked at $4,200. So you had billions that were sitting on the chain and mostly it was sitting in lending vaults getting yield and then thin activity outside of that. The network had liquidity but not use the way that a payments chain needs to show. Incentives drew capital. Organic transaction demand was slow to keep pace. Since then DeFi protocols have been going from strength to strength. Pendle is projected for launch on Plasma in October of 2025. Coinbase added XPL to its list on 2nd December. Kraken enabled USDT0 deposits and withdrawals on December 10th. And in January of 2026, Plasma became integrated with NEAR Intents that was connecting XPL and USDT0 to a cross-chain liquidity pool of 25+ assets across 25 blockchains. The Aave v3.6 upgrade proposal of Plasma went to on-chain voting on 17th January. These are actual integrations and not vapor. The question is whether they translate into the kind of sustained volume of transactions that result in organic demand of XPL.
Now the part that everybody need to understand, unlock schedule. Right now the rate of ecosystem allocations are currently unlocking at a rate of about 88.9 million XPL per month. That is about 2.22% of the whole supply that is dropped to the market every 30 days. The bigger event is July 28, 2026 when the 2.5 billion tokens that are allocated to the US public sale participants are unlocked all at once. These buyers paid $0.05 per token. Even at the current price, of about $0.08, they are sitting on a 60% gain. The question is simple, how many of those holders sell once they get access? That one unlock will more than double the amount of supply in circulation. Team and investor tokens have their own schedule which include one year cliff, and monthly vesting for 2 years after. Plasma has an EIP-1559 style burn mechanism as well as proof-of-stake inflation beginning at 5% annually, and reduce 0.5% annually to a floor of 3%. A staked delegation system is coming up in Q1 2026 to stimulate locking tokens and remove sell pressure from the system. If the staking were to come live prior to July, some that supply shock may be absorbed. If the staking is late in the launching, the July unlock comes to a market without any mechanism for absorption.
I continue to follow the Plasma, as the thesis behind the project makes a lot of sense. Stablecoins see $22 trillion+ in volume transactions in 2024 on the blockchain. Tron dominated that space for years with $6.1 billion in TVL at the time Plasma was launched. A special purpose chain for stablecoins payments with the direct backing of Tether, is not a small idea. The currently in the works Bitcoin bridge would bring the liquidity of BTC into the ecosystem in the form of collateral. Confidential payment features are ahead selective transaction private. The Plasma One neobank product is targeted at real world payments in regions in which there is high demand for remittances. All these are promising things on paper. But, it's the network that has to fill in the void between capital we park in the DeFi vaults, and people sending stablecoins for groceries, rent and cross-border transfers. The infrastructural is going under. Not there for the metrics on adoption. For the time being, I am tracking three things every week: How many active transactions are made on Plasmascan on a daily basis, What the unlock impact on circulating supply will be on a monthly basis and the stablecoin transfer volume outside of DeFi lending loops. Those 3 data-points will have more information on where Plasma is going than any chart pattern or sentiment post.
I got in with Plasma right around the mainnet launch back in Sept 25. The hype was enormous. Billions in liquidity coming in day one, Aave going live on the network in the first week and XPL going past $1.60. Five months later the token has declined to the neighborhood of $0.08. A 95% drawdown off the all-time high of $1.68 was observed on September 28. I want to deconstruct what happened what were, on-chain numbers like right now and what does the token unlock schedule means for anybody paying attention to this network.
First the basics for the new comers. Plasma is a Layer 1 blockchain platform and has been built from the top for stablecoin payments. Zero Fee transfers of USDT, EVM compatible, sub-second finality using PlasmaBFT consensus. The team have backgrounds at Apple, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, Imperial College London and Los Alamos National Lab. Tether are backing the project directly, which is significant as the whole value proposition is making USDT the native currency of an entire blockchain. The public sale has raised $ 50Million, 1Billion tokens at $0.05/token. Total supply is 10 billion XPL with about 1.8 billion in circulation at the moment. So in effect there is around 18% of total supply out there at the moment. Keep that number in mind because things are about to change when it comes to that float.
This is where the on-chain story comes in interesting. At peak Plasma TVL passed $6.4 billion in a week of mainnet and was the 5th largest DFi chain overnight. Aave on Plasma alone brought $6.6 billion in deposits with $1.58 billion in active borrowing. The supply of stablecoins on the network reached a stable point of $2.1 billion. But here is the gap, the chain was designed for 1000 transactions per second and at its low points, it was going at 14.9 TPS. Daily fees peaked at $4,200. So you had billions that were sitting on the chain and mostly it was sitting in lending vaults getting yield and then thin activity outside of that. The network had liquidity but not use the way that a payments chain needs to show. Incentives drew capital. Organic transaction demand was slow to keep pace. Since then DeFi protocols have been going from strength to strength. Pendle is projected for launch on Plasma in October of 2025. Coinbase added XPL to its list on 2nd December. Kraken enabled USDT0 deposits and withdrawals on December 10th. And in January of 2026, Plasma became integrated with NEAR Intents that was connecting XPL and USDT0 to a cross-chain liquidity pool of 25+ assets across 25 blockchains. The Aave v3.6 upgrade proposal of Plasma went to on-chain voting on 17th January. These are actual integrations and not vapor. The question is whether they translate into the kind of sustained volume of transactions that result in organic demand of XPL.
Now the part that everybody need to understand, unlock schedule. Right now the rate of ecosystem allocations are currently unlocking at a rate of about 88.9 million XPL per month. That is about 2.22% of the whole supply that is dropped to the market every 30 days. The bigger event is July 28, 2026 when the 2.5 billion tokens that are allocated to the US public sale participants are unlocked all at once. These buyers paid $0.05 per token. Even at the current price, of about $0.08, they are sitting on a 60% gain. The question is simple, how many of those holders sell once they get access? That one unlock will more than double the amount of supply in circulation. Team and investor tokens have their own schedule which include one year cliff, and monthly vesting for 2 years after. Plasma has an EIP-1559 style burn mechanism as well as proof-of-stake inflation beginning at 5% annually, and reduce 0.5% annually to a floor of 3%. A staked delegation system is coming up in Q1 2026 to stimulate locking tokens and remove sell pressure from the system. If the staking were to come live prior to July, some that supply shock may be absorbed. If the staking is late in the launching, the July unlock comes to a market without any mechanism for absorption.
I continue to follow the Plasma, as the thesis behind the project makes a lot of sense. Stablecoins see $22 trillion+ in volume transactions in 2024 on the blockchain. Tron dominated that space for years with $6.1 billion in TVL at the time Plasma was launched. A special purpose chain for stablecoins payments with the direct backing of Tether, is not a small idea. The currently in the works Bitcoin bridge would bring the liquidity of BTC into the ecosystem in the form of collateral. Confidential payment features are ahead selective transaction private. The Plasma One neobank product is targeted at real world payments in regions in which there is high demand for remittances. All these are promising things on paper. But, it's the network that has to fill in the void between capital we park in the DeFi vaults, and people sending stablecoins for groceries, rent and cross-border transfers. The infrastructural is going under. Not there for the metrics on adoption. For the time being, I am tracking three things every week: How many active transactions are made on Plasmascan on a daily basis, What the unlock impact on circulating supply will be on a monthly basis and the stablecoin transfer volume outside of DeFi lending loops. Those 3 data-points will have more information on where Plasma is going than any chart pattern or sentiment post.
عرض الترجمة
emission-driven rewards to fee-driven sustainability. If gaming adoption delivers consistent transaction flow, the validator model could prove far more resilient than many newer L1s that rely heavily on inflation. The next 12–24 months
Validator Economics of Vanar Chain: What the Numbers Say about Network Security
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
It has been several weeks, and I have been following the validator structure of Vanar Chain and the economics here is under-rewarded compared to what it is receiving. The majority of the population discusses Layer 1s in generalities. However, when you get down to the process of paying validators and how they stay honest you will begin to see why some chains develop a long term security and some do not.
Vanar is based on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism which has 32 active validators at a point of time. They are not just random participants. All the validators must stake VANRY tokens to give them the privilege to mint blocks and verify transaction. The entry barrier of 1 million VANRY is quite significant, as it poses a real barrier. This isn't about gatekeeping. The presence of high skin in the game by the validators makes them hesitate to act contrary to the interests of the network. This is imposed by the mechanism of slashing. When a validator attempts to sign two blocks or misses long durations, he/she loses part of the staked tokens. Monetary fines are more effective than trust in getting a blockchain.
The delegation model is one of the things that distinguish Vanar among some newer chains. The token holders that do not wish to operate validator infrastructure also engage in network security by delegating their VANRY to existing validators. The combined stake rewards the validator and he or she shares a percentage with delegators. The rate of commission applied among validators is normally 5 to 15 percent. This brings rivalry between validators to provide more favorable terms and ensure a high uptime. Upon a look at the delegation patterns, I will see that delegated stake tends to be attracted more towards validators with consistent performance and lower commission rates, as time passes. This is automatically sorted out in the market.
The main part of a validator income is made up of block rewards. Each block that is produced has new minted VANRY and transaction fees being generated by that block. At Vanar's planned block times of 5 seconds, the validators bring in approximately 17 280 blocks a day when all is going well. The emission plan is phased such that the new issuance of tokens decreases over time, this implies that validators will have to depend more on transaction fees in the future as the network matures. The change is important since it links the validator income with the use of networks. The low activity chain finds it difficult to maintain the validator interest after the block rewards have been reduced. Vanar will target the entertainment and metaverse application to spur steady transaction volumes. Gaming transactions are more likely to be more frequent and lower in value, and this is likely to produce a constant flow of fees in case the adoption increases.
Another dimension to validator economics is the rotation mechanism. Vanar is not keeping the same 32 validators fixed. The system ranks the validators by the total stake such as delegations and changes the active set once in a while. This implies that the validators do not only compete based on commission rates, but on reputation creation and gaining more delegated stake. When your validator falls below the top 32 in total stake, then you lose your slot, and do not receive rewards until you climb up again. The competition makes validators accountable to the delegators and avoid complacency. Certain chains have difficulties with the validator centralization where a small number of initial players own the majority of slots. The rotation system created by Vanar works against that disposition.
The costs of conducting transactions on Vanar are low in comparison to Ethereum or even other EVM-compatible chains. Normal network conditions are an average of a few cents per transaction. Free fees assist in adoption by users but it also implies that validators require high transaction throughput in order to earn significant fee income. Current market depth and liquidity can be viewed on the trade widget displayed on the platform showing VANRY trading activity. The volume patterns in these regions tend to indicate wider workings in the network because traders transfer the tokens prior to applying them in programs.
In the future, a tightening of the emission schedule will be a challenge to validator economics, who will have to prove themselves. Chains which developed actual usage pass this transformation. Chains that were built on large block rewards to entice validators with no matching transaction volume reckon with each other. The number of validators and the total value of the stakes of Vanar has not experienced significant changes in the past several months, indicating that the existing reward system is effective at the moment. The actual test will be in 12-24 months when the emissions will be dropped and the network will require organic fee creation in order to keep the interest of validators. The emphasis on gaming and virtual worlds would be rational in this case as these industries create repeat relationships, as opposed to one-time ones. Time will determine whether the application layer will be developed in a manner that will address that need.
It has been several weeks, and I have been following the validator structure of Vanar Chain and the economics here is under-rewarded compared to what it is receiving. The majority of the population discusses Layer 1s in generalities. However, when you get down to the process of paying validators and how they stay honest you will begin to see why some chains develop a long term security and some do not.
Vanar is based on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism which has 32 active validators at a point of time. They are not just random participants. All the validators must stake VANRY tokens to give them the privilege to mint blocks and verify transaction. The entry barrier of 1 million VANRY is quite significant, as it poses a real barrier. This isn't about gatekeeping. The presence of high skin in the game by the validators makes them hesitate to act contrary to the interests of the network. This is imposed by the mechanism of slashing. When a validator attempts to sign two blocks or misses long durations, he/she loses part of the staked tokens. Monetary fines are more effective than trust in getting a blockchain.
The delegation model is one of the things that distinguish Vanar among some newer chains. The token holders that do not wish to operate validator infrastructure also engage in network security by delegating their VANRY to existing validators. The combined stake rewards the validator and he or she shares a percentage with delegators. The rate of commission applied among validators is normally 5 to 15 percent. This brings rivalry between validators to provide more favorable terms and ensure a high uptime. Upon a look at the delegation patterns, I will see that delegated stake tends to be attracted more towards validators with consistent performance and lower commission rates, as time passes. This is automatically sorted out in the market.
The main part of a validator income is made up of block rewards. Each block that is produced has new minted VANRY and transaction fees being generated by that block. At Vanar's planned block times of 5 seconds, the validators bring in approximately 17 280 blocks a day when all is going well. The emission plan is phased such that the new issuance of tokens decreases over time, this implies that validators will have to depend more on transaction fees in the future as the network matures. The change is important since it links the validator income with the use of networks. The low activity chain finds it difficult to maintain the validator interest after the block rewards have been reduced. Vanar will target the entertainment and metaverse application to spur steady transaction volumes. Gaming transactions are more likely to be more frequent and lower in value, and this is likely to produce a constant flow of fees in case the adoption increases.
Another dimension to validator economics is the rotation mechanism. Vanar is not keeping the same 32 validators fixed. The system ranks the validators by the total stake such as delegations and changes the active set once in a while. This implies that the validators do not only compete based on commission rates, but on reputation creation and gaining more delegated stake. When your validator falls below the top 32 in total stake, then you lose your slot, and do not receive rewards until you climb up again. The competition makes validators accountable to the delegators and avoid complacency. Certain chains have difficulties with the validator centralization where a small number of initial players own the majority of slots. The rotation system created by Vanar works against that disposition.
The costs of conducting transactions on Vanar are low in comparison to Ethereum or even other EVM-compatible chains. Normal network conditions are an average of a few cents per transaction. Free fees assist in adoption by users but it also implies that validators require high transaction throughput in order to earn significant fee income. Current market depth and liquidity can be viewed on the trade widget displayed on the platform showing VANRY trading activity. The volume patterns in these regions tend to indicate wider workings in the network because traders transfer the tokens prior to applying them in programs.
In the future, a tightening of the emission schedule will be a challenge to validator economics, who will have to prove themselves. Chains which developed actual usage pass this transformation. Chains that were built on large block rewards to entice validators with no matching transaction volume reckon with each other. The number of validators and the total value of the stakes of Vanar has not experienced significant changes in the past several months, indicating that the existing reward system is effective at the moment. The actual test will be in 12-24 months when the emissions will be dropped and the network will require organic fee creation in order to keep the interest of validators. The emphasis on gaming and virtual worlds would be rational in this case as these industries create repeat relationships, as opposed to one-time ones. Time will determine whether the application layer will be developed in a manner that will address that need.
عرض الترجمة
emission-driven rewards to fee-driven sustainability. If gaming adoption delivers consistent transaction flow, the validator model could prove far more resilien
Validator Economics of Vanar Chain: What the Numbers Say about Network Security
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
It has been several weeks, and I have been following the validator structure of Vanar Chain and the economics here is under-rewarded compared to what it is receiving. The majority of the population discusses Layer 1s in generalities. However, when you get down to the process of paying validators and how they stay honest you will begin to see why some chains develop a long term security and some do not.
Vanar is based on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism which has 32 active validators at a point of time. They are not just random participants. All the validators must stake VANRY tokens to give them the privilege to mint blocks and verify transaction. The entry barrier of 1 million VANRY is quite significant, as it poses a real barrier. This isn't about gatekeeping. The presence of high skin in the game by the validators makes them hesitate to act contrary to the interests of the network. This is imposed by the mechanism of slashing. When a validator attempts to sign two blocks or misses long durations, he/she loses part of the staked tokens. Monetary fines are more effective than trust in getting a blockchain.
The delegation model is one of the things that distinguish Vanar among some newer chains. The token holders that do not wish to operate validator infrastructure also engage in network security by delegating their VANRY to existing validators. The combined stake rewards the validator and he or she shares a percentage with delegators. The rate of commission applied among validators is normally 5 to 15 percent. This brings rivalry between validators to provide more favorable terms and ensure a high uptime. Upon a look at the delegation patterns, I will see that delegated stake tends to be attracted more towards validators with consistent performance and lower commission rates, as time passes. This is automatically sorted out in the market.
The main part of a validator income is made up of block rewards. Each block that is produced has new minted VANRY and transaction fees being generated by that block. At Vanar's planned block times of 5 seconds, the validators bring in approximately 17 280 blocks a day when all is going well. The emission plan is phased such that the new issuance of tokens decreases over time, this implies that validators will have to depend more on transaction fees in the future as the network matures. The change is important since it links the validator income with the use of networks. The low activity chain finds it difficult to maintain the validator interest after the block rewards have been reduced. Vanar will target the entertainment and metaverse application to spur steady transaction volumes. Gaming transactions are more likely to be more frequent and lower in value, and this is likely to produce a constant flow of fees in case the adoption increases.
Another dimension to validator economics is the rotation mechanism. Vanar is not keeping the same 32 validators fixed. The system ranks the validators by the total stake such as delegations and changes the active set once in a while. This implies that the validators do not only compete based on commission rates, but on reputation creation and gaining more delegated stake. When your validator falls below the top 32 in total stake, then you lose your slot, and do not receive rewards until you climb up again. The competition makes validators accountable to the delegators and avoid complacency. Certain chains have difficulties with the validator centralization where a small number of initial players own the majority of slots. The rotation system created by Vanar works against that disposition.
The costs of conducting transactions on Vanar are low in comparison to Ethereum or even other EVM-compatible chains. Normal network conditions are an average of a few cents per transaction. Free fees assist in adoption by users but it also implies that validators require high transaction throughput in order to earn significant fee income. Current market depth and liquidity can be viewed on the trade widget displayed on the platform showing VANRY trading activity. The volume patterns in these regions tend to indicate wider workings in the network because traders transfer the tokens prior to applying them in programs.
In the future, a tightening of the emission schedule will be a challenge to validator economics, who will have to prove themselves. Chains which developed actual usage pass this transformation. Chains that were built on large block rewards to entice validators with no matching transaction volume reckon with each other. The number of validators and the total value of the stakes of Vanar has not experienced significant changes in the past several months, indicating that the existing reward system is effective at the moment. The actual test will be in 12-24 months when the emissions will be dropped and the network will require organic fee creation in order to keep the interest of validators. The emphasis on gaming and virtual worlds would be rational in this case as these industries create repeat relationships, as opposed to one-time ones. Time will determine whether the application layer will be developed in a manner that will address that need.
It has been several weeks, and I have been following the validator structure of Vanar Chain and the economics here is under-rewarded compared to what it is receiving. The majority of the population discusses Layer 1s in generalities. However, when you get down to the process of paying validators and how they stay honest you will begin to see why some chains develop a long term security and some do not.
Vanar is based on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism which has 32 active validators at a point of time. They are not just random participants. All the validators must stake VANRY tokens to give them the privilege to mint blocks and verify transaction. The entry barrier of 1 million VANRY is quite significant, as it poses a real barrier. This isn't about gatekeeping. The presence of high skin in the game by the validators makes them hesitate to act contrary to the interests of the network. This is imposed by the mechanism of slashing. When a validator attempts to sign two blocks or misses long durations, he/she loses part of the staked tokens. Monetary fines are more effective than trust in getting a blockchain.
The delegation model is one of the things that distinguish Vanar among some newer chains. The token holders that do not wish to operate validator infrastructure also engage in network security by delegating their VANRY to existing validators. The combined stake rewards the validator and he or she shares a percentage with delegators. The rate of commission applied among validators is normally 5 to 15 percent. This brings rivalry between validators to provide more favorable terms and ensure a high uptime. Upon a look at the delegation patterns, I will see that delegated stake tends to be attracted more towards validators with consistent performance and lower commission rates, as time passes. This is automatically sorted out in the market.
The main part of a validator income is made up of block rewards. Each block that is produced has new minted VANRY and transaction fees being generated by that block. At Vanar's planned block times of 5 seconds, the validators bring in approximately 17 280 blocks a day when all is going well. The emission plan is phased such that the new issuance of tokens decreases over time, this implies that validators will have to depend more on transaction fees in the future as the network matures. The change is important since it links the validator income with the use of networks. The low activity chain finds it difficult to maintain the validator interest after the block rewards have been reduced. Vanar will target the entertainment and metaverse application to spur steady transaction volumes. Gaming transactions are more likely to be more frequent and lower in value, and this is likely to produce a constant flow of fees in case the adoption increases.
Another dimension to validator economics is the rotation mechanism. Vanar is not keeping the same 32 validators fixed. The system ranks the validators by the total stake such as delegations and changes the active set once in a while. This implies that the validators do not only compete based on commission rates, but on reputation creation and gaining more delegated stake. When your validator falls below the top 32 in total stake, then you lose your slot, and do not receive rewards until you climb up again. The competition makes validators accountable to the delegators and avoid complacency. Certain chains have difficulties with the validator centralization where a small number of initial players own the majority of slots. The rotation system created by Vanar works against that disposition.
The costs of conducting transactions on Vanar are low in comparison to Ethereum or even other EVM-compatible chains. Normal network conditions are an average of a few cents per transaction. Free fees assist in adoption by users but it also implies that validators require high transaction throughput in order to earn significant fee income. Current market depth and liquidity can be viewed on the trade widget displayed on the platform showing VANRY trading activity. The volume patterns in these regions tend to indicate wider workings in the network because traders transfer the tokens prior to applying them in programs.
In the future, a tightening of the emission schedule will be a challenge to validator economics, who will have to prove themselves. Chains which developed actual usage pass this transformation. Chains that were built on large block rewards to entice validators with no matching transaction volume reckon with each other. The number of validators and the total value of the stakes of Vanar has not experienced significant changes in the past several months, indicating that the existing reward system is effective at the moment. The actual test will be in 12-24 months when the emissions will be dropped and the network will require organic fee creation in order to keep the interest of validators. The emphasis on gaming and virtual worlds would be rational in this case as these industries create repeat relationships, as opposed to one-time ones. Time will determine whether the application layer will be developed in a manner that will address that need.
عرض الترجمة
Vanar’s validator design shows that security isn’t just about having nodes — it’s about aligning incentives over time. The real differentiator will be how smoothly the network
Validator Economics of Vanar Chain: What the Numbers Say about Network Security
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
It has been several weeks, and I have been following the validator structure of Vanar Chain and the economics here is under-rewarded compared to what it is receiving. The majority of the population discusses Layer 1s in generalities. However, when you get down to the process of paying validators and how they stay honest you will begin to see why some chains develop a long term security and some do not.
Vanar is based on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism which has 32 active validators at a point of time. They are not just random participants. All the validators must stake VANRY tokens to give them the privilege to mint blocks and verify transaction. The entry barrier of 1 million VANRY is quite significant, as it poses a real barrier. This isn't about gatekeeping. The presence of high skin in the game by the validators makes them hesitate to act contrary to the interests of the network. This is imposed by the mechanism of slashing. When a validator attempts to sign two blocks or misses long durations, he/she loses part of the staked tokens. Monetary fines are more effective than trust in getting a blockchain.
The delegation model is one of the things that distinguish Vanar among some newer chains. The token holders that do not wish to operate validator infrastructure also engage in network security by delegating their VANRY to existing validators. The combined stake rewards the validator and he or she shares a percentage with delegators. The rate of commission applied among validators is normally 5 to 15 percent. This brings rivalry between validators to provide more favorable terms and ensure a high uptime. Upon a look at the delegation patterns, I will see that delegated stake tends to be attracted more towards validators with consistent performance and lower commission rates, as time passes. This is automatically sorted out in the market.
The main part of a validator income is made up of block rewards. Each block that is produced has new minted VANRY and transaction fees being generated by that block. At Vanar's planned block times of 5 seconds, the validators bring in approximately 17 280 blocks a day when all is going well. The emission plan is phased such that the new issuance of tokens decreases over time, this implies that validators will have to depend more on transaction fees in the future as the network matures. The change is important since it links the validator income with the use of networks. The low activity chain finds it difficult to maintain the validator interest after the block rewards have been reduced. Vanar will target the entertainment and metaverse application to spur steady transaction volumes. Gaming transactions are more likely to be more frequent and lower in value, and this is likely to produce a constant flow of fees in case the adoption increases.
Another dimension to validator economics is the rotation mechanism. Vanar is not keeping the same 32 validators fixed. The system ranks the validators by the total stake such as delegations and changes the active set once in a while. This implies that the validators do not only compete based on commission rates, but on reputation creation and gaining more delegated stake. When your validator falls below the top 32 in total stake, then you lose your slot, and do not receive rewards until you climb up again. The competition makes validators accountable to the delegators and avoid complacency. Certain chains have difficulties with the validator centralization where a small number of initial players own the majority of slots. The rotation system created by Vanar works against that disposition.
The costs of conducting transactions on Vanar are low in comparison to Ethereum or even other EVM-compatible chains. Normal network conditions are an average of a few cents per transaction. Free fees assist in adoption by users but it also implies that validators require high transaction throughput in order to earn significant fee income. Current market depth and liquidity can be viewed on the trade widget displayed on the platform showing VANRY trading activity. The volume patterns in these regions tend to indicate wider workings in the network because traders transfer the tokens prior to applying them in programs.
In the future, a tightening of the emission schedule will be a challenge to validator economics, who will have to prove themselves. Chains which developed actual usage pass this transformation. Chains that were built on large block rewards to entice validators with no matching transaction volume reckon with each other. The number of validators and the total value of the stakes of Vanar has not experienced significant changes in the past several months, indicating that the existing reward system is effective at the moment. The actual test will be in 12-24 months when the emissions will be dropped and the network will require organic fee creation in order to keep the interest of validators. The emphasis on gaming and virtual worlds would be rational in this case as these industries create repeat relationships, as opposed to one-time ones. Time will determine whether the application layer will be developed in a manner that will address that need.
It has been several weeks, and I have been following the validator structure of Vanar Chain and the economics here is under-rewarded compared to what it is receiving. The majority of the population discusses Layer 1s in generalities. However, when you get down to the process of paying validators and how they stay honest you will begin to see why some chains develop a long term security and some do not.
Vanar is based on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism which has 32 active validators at a point of time. They are not just random participants. All the validators must stake VANRY tokens to give them the privilege to mint blocks and verify transaction. The entry barrier of 1 million VANRY is quite significant, as it poses a real barrier. This isn't about gatekeeping. The presence of high skin in the game by the validators makes them hesitate to act contrary to the interests of the network. This is imposed by the mechanism of slashing. When a validator attempts to sign two blocks or misses long durations, he/she loses part of the staked tokens. Monetary fines are more effective than trust in getting a blockchain.
The delegation model is one of the things that distinguish Vanar among some newer chains. The token holders that do not wish to operate validator infrastructure also engage in network security by delegating their VANRY to existing validators. The combined stake rewards the validator and he or she shares a percentage with delegators. The rate of commission applied among validators is normally 5 to 15 percent. This brings rivalry between validators to provide more favorable terms and ensure a high uptime. Upon a look at the delegation patterns, I will see that delegated stake tends to be attracted more towards validators with consistent performance and lower commission rates, as time passes. This is automatically sorted out in the market.
The main part of a validator income is made up of block rewards. Each block that is produced has new minted VANRY and transaction fees being generated by that block. At Vanar's planned block times of 5 seconds, the validators bring in approximately 17 280 blocks a day when all is going well. The emission plan is phased such that the new issuance of tokens decreases over time, this implies that validators will have to depend more on transaction fees in the future as the network matures. The change is important since it links the validator income with the use of networks. The low activity chain finds it difficult to maintain the validator interest after the block rewards have been reduced. Vanar will target the entertainment and metaverse application to spur steady transaction volumes. Gaming transactions are more likely to be more frequent and lower in value, and this is likely to produce a constant flow of fees in case the adoption increases.
Another dimension to validator economics is the rotation mechanism. Vanar is not keeping the same 32 validators fixed. The system ranks the validators by the total stake such as delegations and changes the active set once in a while. This implies that the validators do not only compete based on commission rates, but on reputation creation and gaining more delegated stake. When your validator falls below the top 32 in total stake, then you lose your slot, and do not receive rewards until you climb up again. The competition makes validators accountable to the delegators and avoid complacency. Certain chains have difficulties with the validator centralization where a small number of initial players own the majority of slots. The rotation system created by Vanar works against that disposition.
The costs of conducting transactions on Vanar are low in comparison to Ethereum or even other EVM-compatible chains. Normal network conditions are an average of a few cents per transaction. Free fees assist in adoption by users but it also implies that validators require high transaction throughput in order to earn significant fee income. Current market depth and liquidity can be viewed on the trade widget displayed on the platform showing VANRY trading activity. The volume patterns in these regions tend to indicate wider workings in the network because traders transfer the tokens prior to applying them in programs.
In the future, a tightening of the emission schedule will be a challenge to validator economics, who will have to prove themselves. Chains which developed actual usage pass this transformation. Chains that were built on large block rewards to entice validators with no matching transaction volume reckon with each other. The number of validators and the total value of the stakes of Vanar has not experienced significant changes in the past several months, indicating that the existing reward system is effective at the moment. The actual test will be in 12-24 months when the emissions will be dropped and the network will require organic fee creation in order to keep the interest of validators. The emphasis on gaming and virtual worlds would be rational in this case as these industries create repeat relationships, as opposed to one-time ones. Time will determine whether the application layer will be developed in a manner that will address that need.
عرض الترجمة
Most chains are still sprinting in circles, optimizing TPS, while Vanar figured out the real bottleneck
AI’s real problem isn’t about speed. It’s about memory—AI just keeps forgetting. Vanar Chain steps in here. With Neutron’s semantic memory layer, it turns raw data into these ‘Seeds’ that actually keep the context, so the AI doesn’t lose track of what matters. Then there’s Kayon, the on-chain reasoning engine. With it, apps can keep making smarter decisions, no need for constant restarts or resets. They’ve expanded to Base too, which means you get smooth, cross-chain access and, honestly, that’s powering more than 190 million transactions out in the wild. If you’re a Web3 builder, $VANRY gives you that adaptive edge.@Vanar #Vanar
عرض الترجمة
This is the kind of write-up that separates “AI slapped on a chain” from actual AI-native infrastructure
Why Vanar Chain Is Quietly Changing the AI Game in Blockchain – And It's Already Here
Let’s just get right to it: While most blockchains are still obsessed with speed and scalability like it’s some race from three years ago, Vanar Chain takes a different route. It weaves intelligence straight into its core. This isn’t just another fast, cheap modular Layer 1. Vanar is smart from the start, built to handle real AI workloads powering the next wave of onchain innovation. I’ve spent enough time in crypto to spot the difference between projects chasing empty hype and those actually solving problems. Vanar stands out because it’s already rolling out AI-native features that make Web3 a real option for enterprises, agents, and regular creators.
At its core, Vanar is a carbon-neutral Layer 1 launched in 2023, backed by a team of 51 to 200 people who know games, entertainment, and brand ecosystems inside out. This isn’t vaporware. Vanar aims for mainstream adoption—bridging the gap to bring the next three billion people into Web3. What makes it different? A five-layer architecture built specifically for AI, starting with a secure, EVM-compatible base layer. That means cheap transactions and plenty of throughput, without the awkward retrofits you see elsewhere. Vanar bakes AI logic in at the protocol level, so you get onchain reasoning, data compression, and automation that old-school chains just can’t deliver without patching things on top.
Let’s get into the stack, because this is where it gets interesting. It all starts with Vanar’s modular Layer 1, powering everything from PayFi to tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). Above that sits Neutron, their semantic memory layer—it’s like a brain’s long-term storage, compressing huge amounts of data into “Seeds” that AI can tap into without losing context. This solves the “amnesia” issue with most AI systems: models forget, can’t build on their previous work, and end up making poor decisions. CEO Jawad Ashraf nailed it recently—systems that forget can’t explain their choices or handle real pressure. Vanar fixes that with persistent, onchain memory.
Next up is Kayon, the contextual AI reasoning engine. It brings explainability and validation on-chain, running logic for predictions and compliance without relying on external oracles. Imagine AI agents making their own decisions—validating trades, triggering models—while keeping it all transparent and trustworthy. This isn’t just theory. It’s live. Developers can build apps where intelligence is built in, not bolted on. And with Axon (for smart automations) and Flows (industry-specific apps) on the horizon, Vanar’s gearing up to be the go-to chain for sectors where AI actually drives economic value.
What really gets me is how Vanar ties this into entertainment and beyond. With roots in gaming and the metaverse, they’ve already launched stuff like Virtua Metaverse and the VGN games network. Here, AI actually improves user experiences without all the usual blockchain headaches. Picture immersive worlds where assets are tokenized RWAs, and AI agents run everything—from in-game economies to personalized content. And it’s all on a carbon-neutral chain, which brands that care about the environment love. Their cross-chain move to Base opens up even more ecosystems and users, but still keeps intelligence—not just speed—at the center.
Then there’s payments. Vanar’s push into agentic payments is honestly something different. Through partnerships like Worldpay (showcased at Abu Dhabi Finance Week in late 2025), they’re building global settlement rails for AI agents to handle real-world transactions. Forget wallet UX pain—think seamless integration into what businesses already do. COO Ash Mohammed recently put it bluntly: traditional blockchains hit a wall because they don’t have memory or reasoning. Vanar builds for continuity, so agents can act safely and explain themselves, even when they’re fully autonomous.
For builders, Vanar is that quiet piece of infrastructure that just works and, before you know it, you can’t live without it. Whether you’re in finance, AI, or entertainment, the focus stays on real data, real apps, and real adoption. Their on-chain AI for RWAs, for example, lets you tokenize assets with intelligence built in—programmable deeds or records that still move fast. This isn’t just for crypto die-hards. It’s for enterprises who want a way into Web3 that doesn’t require a PhD.
To sum it up, Vanar isn’t sitting around waiting for AI to catch up. It’s already out in front, building a stack ready for agents, enterprises, and the future of intelligent Web3. If you care about where blockchain and AI actually meet, keep an eye on Vanar. It’s not the loudest project out there—but in the ecosystems that count, it’s becoming impossible to ignore.$VANRY @Vanar #Vanar
At its core, Vanar is a carbon-neutral Layer 1 launched in 2023, backed by a team of 51 to 200 people who know games, entertainment, and brand ecosystems inside out. This isn’t vaporware. Vanar aims for mainstream adoption—bridging the gap to bring the next three billion people into Web3. What makes it different? A five-layer architecture built specifically for AI, starting with a secure, EVM-compatible base layer. That means cheap transactions and plenty of throughput, without the awkward retrofits you see elsewhere. Vanar bakes AI logic in at the protocol level, so you get onchain reasoning, data compression, and automation that old-school chains just can’t deliver without patching things on top.
Let’s get into the stack, because this is where it gets interesting. It all starts with Vanar’s modular Layer 1, powering everything from PayFi to tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). Above that sits Neutron, their semantic memory layer—it’s like a brain’s long-term storage, compressing huge amounts of data into “Seeds” that AI can tap into without losing context. This solves the “amnesia” issue with most AI systems: models forget, can’t build on their previous work, and end up making poor decisions. CEO Jawad Ashraf nailed it recently—systems that forget can’t explain their choices or handle real pressure. Vanar fixes that with persistent, onchain memory.
Next up is Kayon, the contextual AI reasoning engine. It brings explainability and validation on-chain, running logic for predictions and compliance without relying on external oracles. Imagine AI agents making their own decisions—validating trades, triggering models—while keeping it all transparent and trustworthy. This isn’t just theory. It’s live. Developers can build apps where intelligence is built in, not bolted on. And with Axon (for smart automations) and Flows (industry-specific apps) on the horizon, Vanar’s gearing up to be the go-to chain for sectors where AI actually drives economic value.
What really gets me is how Vanar ties this into entertainment and beyond. With roots in gaming and the metaverse, they’ve already launched stuff like Virtua Metaverse and the VGN games network. Here, AI actually improves user experiences without all the usual blockchain headaches. Picture immersive worlds where assets are tokenized RWAs, and AI agents run everything—from in-game economies to personalized content. And it’s all on a carbon-neutral chain, which brands that care about the environment love. Their cross-chain move to Base opens up even more ecosystems and users, but still keeps intelligence—not just speed—at the center.
Then there’s payments. Vanar’s push into agentic payments is honestly something different. Through partnerships like Worldpay (showcased at Abu Dhabi Finance Week in late 2025), they’re building global settlement rails for AI agents to handle real-world transactions. Forget wallet UX pain—think seamless integration into what businesses already do. COO Ash Mohammed recently put it bluntly: traditional blockchains hit a wall because they don’t have memory or reasoning. Vanar builds for continuity, so agents can act safely and explain themselves, even when they’re fully autonomous.
For builders, Vanar is that quiet piece of infrastructure that just works and, before you know it, you can’t live without it. Whether you’re in finance, AI, or entertainment, the focus stays on real data, real apps, and real adoption. Their on-chain AI for RWAs, for example, lets you tokenize assets with intelligence built in—programmable deeds or records that still move fast. This isn’t just for crypto die-hards. It’s for enterprises who want a way into Web3 that doesn’t require a PhD.
To sum it up, Vanar isn’t sitting around waiting for AI to catch up. It’s already out in front, building a stack ready for agents, enterprises, and the future of intelligent Web3. If you care about where blockchain and AI actually meet, keep an eye on Vanar. It’s not the loudest project out there—but in the ecosystems that count, it’s becoming impossible to ignore.$VANRY @Vanar #Vanar
عرض الترجمة
This is the kind of write-up that separates “AI slapped on a chain” from actual AI-native infrastructure
Why Vanar Chain Is Quietly Changing the AI Game in Blockchain – And It's Already Here
Let’s just get right to it: While most blockchains are still obsessed with speed and scalability like it’s some race from three years ago, Vanar Chain takes a different route. It weaves intelligence straight into its core. This isn’t just another fast, cheap modular Layer 1. Vanar is smart from the start, built to handle real AI workloads powering the next wave of onchain innovation. I’ve spent enough time in crypto to spot the difference between projects chasing empty hype and those actually solving problems. Vanar stands out because it’s already rolling out AI-native features that make Web3 a real option for enterprises, agents, and regular creators.
At its core, Vanar is a carbon-neutral Layer 1 launched in 2023, backed by a team of 51 to 200 people who know games, entertainment, and brand ecosystems inside out. This isn’t vaporware. Vanar aims for mainstream adoption—bridging the gap to bring the next three billion people into Web3. What makes it different? A five-layer architecture built specifically for AI, starting with a secure, EVM-compatible base layer. That means cheap transactions and plenty of throughput, without the awkward retrofits you see elsewhere. Vanar bakes AI logic in at the protocol level, so you get onchain reasoning, data compression, and automation that old-school chains just can’t deliver without patching things on top.
Let’s get into the stack, because this is where it gets interesting. It all starts with Vanar’s modular Layer 1, powering everything from PayFi to tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). Above that sits Neutron, their semantic memory layer—it’s like a brain’s long-term storage, compressing huge amounts of data into “Seeds” that AI can tap into without losing context. This solves the “amnesia” issue with most AI systems: models forget, can’t build on their previous work, and end up making poor decisions. CEO Jawad Ashraf nailed it recently—systems that forget can’t explain their choices or handle real pressure. Vanar fixes that with persistent, onchain memory.
Next up is Kayon, the contextual AI reasoning engine. It brings explainability and validation on-chain, running logic for predictions and compliance without relying on external oracles. Imagine AI agents making their own decisions—validating trades, triggering models—while keeping it all transparent and trustworthy. This isn’t just theory. It’s live. Developers can build apps where intelligence is built in, not bolted on. And with Axon (for smart automations) and Flows (industry-specific apps) on the horizon, Vanar’s gearing up to be the go-to chain for sectors where AI actually drives economic value.
What really gets me is how Vanar ties this into entertainment and beyond. With roots in gaming and the metaverse, they’ve already launched stuff like Virtua Metaverse and the VGN games network. Here, AI actually improves user experiences without all the usual blockchain headaches. Picture immersive worlds where assets are tokenized RWAs, and AI agents run everything—from in-game economies to personalized content. And it’s all on a carbon-neutral chain, which brands that care about the environment love. Their cross-chain move to Base opens up even more ecosystems and users, but still keeps intelligence—not just speed—at the center.
Then there’s payments. Vanar’s push into agentic payments is honestly something different. Through partnerships like Worldpay (showcased at Abu Dhabi Finance Week in late 2025), they’re building global settlement rails for AI agents to handle real-world transactions. Forget wallet UX pain—think seamless integration into what businesses already do. COO Ash Mohammed recently put it bluntly: traditional blockchains hit a wall because they don’t have memory or reasoning. Vanar builds for continuity, so agents can act safely and explain themselves, even when they’re fully autonomous.
For builders, Vanar is that quiet piece of infrastructure that just works and, before you know it, you can’t live without it. Whether you’re in finance, AI, or entertainment, the focus stays on real data, real apps, and real adoption. Their on-chain AI for RWAs, for example, lets you tokenize assets with intelligence built in—programmable deeds or records that still move fast. This isn’t just for crypto die-hards. It’s for enterprises who want a way into Web3 that doesn’t require a PhD.
To sum it up, Vanar isn’t sitting around waiting for AI to catch up. It’s already out in front, building a stack ready for agents, enterprises, and the future of intelligent Web3. If you care about where blockchain and AI actually meet, keep an eye on Vanar. It’s not the loudest project out there—but in the ecosystems that count, it’s becoming impossible to ignore.$VANRY @Vanar #Vanar
At its core, Vanar is a carbon-neutral Layer 1 launched in 2023, backed by a team of 51 to 200 people who know games, entertainment, and brand ecosystems inside out. This isn’t vaporware. Vanar aims for mainstream adoption—bridging the gap to bring the next three billion people into Web3. What makes it different? A five-layer architecture built specifically for AI, starting with a secure, EVM-compatible base layer. That means cheap transactions and plenty of throughput, without the awkward retrofits you see elsewhere. Vanar bakes AI logic in at the protocol level, so you get onchain reasoning, data compression, and automation that old-school chains just can’t deliver without patching things on top.
Let’s get into the stack, because this is where it gets interesting. It all starts with Vanar’s modular Layer 1, powering everything from PayFi to tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). Above that sits Neutron, their semantic memory layer—it’s like a brain’s long-term storage, compressing huge amounts of data into “Seeds” that AI can tap into without losing context. This solves the “amnesia” issue with most AI systems: models forget, can’t build on their previous work, and end up making poor decisions. CEO Jawad Ashraf nailed it recently—systems that forget can’t explain their choices or handle real pressure. Vanar fixes that with persistent, onchain memory.
Next up is Kayon, the contextual AI reasoning engine. It brings explainability and validation on-chain, running logic for predictions and compliance without relying on external oracles. Imagine AI agents making their own decisions—validating trades, triggering models—while keeping it all transparent and trustworthy. This isn’t just theory. It’s live. Developers can build apps where intelligence is built in, not bolted on. And with Axon (for smart automations) and Flows (industry-specific apps) on the horizon, Vanar’s gearing up to be the go-to chain for sectors where AI actually drives economic value.
What really gets me is how Vanar ties this into entertainment and beyond. With roots in gaming and the metaverse, they’ve already launched stuff like Virtua Metaverse and the VGN games network. Here, AI actually improves user experiences without all the usual blockchain headaches. Picture immersive worlds where assets are tokenized RWAs, and AI agents run everything—from in-game economies to personalized content. And it’s all on a carbon-neutral chain, which brands that care about the environment love. Their cross-chain move to Base opens up even more ecosystems and users, but still keeps intelligence—not just speed—at the center.
Then there’s payments. Vanar’s push into agentic payments is honestly something different. Through partnerships like Worldpay (showcased at Abu Dhabi Finance Week in late 2025), they’re building global settlement rails for AI agents to handle real-world transactions. Forget wallet UX pain—think seamless integration into what businesses already do. COO Ash Mohammed recently put it bluntly: traditional blockchains hit a wall because they don’t have memory or reasoning. Vanar builds for continuity, so agents can act safely and explain themselves, even when they’re fully autonomous.
For builders, Vanar is that quiet piece of infrastructure that just works and, before you know it, you can’t live without it. Whether you’re in finance, AI, or entertainment, the focus stays on real data, real apps, and real adoption. Their on-chain AI for RWAs, for example, lets you tokenize assets with intelligence built in—programmable deeds or records that still move fast. This isn’t just for crypto die-hards. It’s for enterprises who want a way into Web3 that doesn’t require a PhD.
To sum it up, Vanar isn’t sitting around waiting for AI to catch up. It’s already out in front, building a stack ready for agents, enterprises, and the future of intelligent Web3. If you care about where blockchain and AI actually meet, keep an eye on Vanar. It’s not the loudest project out there—but in the ecosystems that count, it’s becoming impossible to ignore.$VANRY @Vanar #Vanar
عرض الترجمة
🔻 LEARN THESE BEARISH CANDLE PATTERNS TO AVOID BIG LOSSES IN CRYPTO! ☠️👇 Spot these early & protec
1️⃣ Evening Star
🧠 What it shows:
A 3-candle pattern:
Green candle ➡️ Small-bodied candle ➡️ Strong red candle.
Signals exhaustion of buyers and start of a downtrend.
📊 Where it shines:
Best on 4H or Daily timeframes near resistance levels.
---
2️⃣ Shooting Star
🧠 What it shows:
A single candle with a small body at the bottom and a long upper wick.
Buyers pushed price up, but sellers took over by close.
📊 Perfect entry:
Use in uptrends to catch tops—combine with RSI divergence.
---
3️⃣ Bearish Engulfing
🧠 What it shows:
A red candle completely engulfs the previous green one.
Strong sign that sellers are gaining control.
📊 Pro tip:
Look for increased volume to validate the pattern.
---
4️⃣ Gravestone Doji
🧠 What it shows:
Open, low, and close are all near each other with a long upper wick.
Bulls tried but failed—momentum is shifting bearish.
📊 When to act:
Use at resistance zones or supply levels for short entries.
---
5️⃣ Dark Cloud Cover
🧠 What it shows:
Red candle opens above green close but closes deep inside it.
Signals strong rejection of higher prices.
📊 Key insight:
The deeper the red candle closes into the green, the stronger the reversal.
---
6️⃣ Three Black Crows
🧠 What it shows:
3 strong bearish candles in a row.
A textbook pattern of trend reversal from bullish to bearish.
📊 Best setup:
After overbought conditions or failed breakout attempts.
---
7️⃣ Hanging Man
🧠 What it shows:
Looks like a hammer but appears at the top of an uptrend.
Small body + long lower wick = buyer weakness.
📊 Use this:
At resistance with bearish RSI divergence or MACD cross.
---
8️⃣ Descending Hawk (Rare but powerful)
🧠 What it shows:
A newer bearish variation where each candle opens slightly higher but closes significantly lower.
📊 When to trust:
In high-volume environments after pump-and-dump events.
---
🔁 How to Use These on Binance
📌 Apply patterns on:
✅ Binance Spot
✅ Binance Futures
✅ Mobile or Web
🛠️ Pair with:
RSI Divergence
Volume Spikes
Key Supply Zones
EMA 50 or 200 Crossovers
✅ Always wait for confirmation candles.
✅ Use tight stop-losses above the wick or resistance zone.
---
📉🔴 Candle Pattern Image Below for Quick Save 👇
📸 (Insert image here if needed)
---
💬 Final Words
These bearish patterns are your defense against fake breakouts, bull traps, and emotional trading.
Recognize them, respect them, and trade smarter every time.
---
👉 If this saved you money:
👍 Like it
📢 Repost for others
💬 Comment: Which bearish pattern burns you the most?
🔔 Follow for daily market psychology breakd
owns on Binance Square!
#BinanceTraderTips #CryptoBearTrap #BearishPatterns #RiskManagement #BTC #ETH #BinanceTraderTips #CryptoBearTrap #BearishPatterns #RiskManagement #BTC #ETH #CryptoEducation
$SOL $OM $DOGE
🧠 What it shows:
A 3-candle pattern:
Green candle ➡️ Small-bodied candle ➡️ Strong red candle.
Signals exhaustion of buyers and start of a downtrend.
📊 Where it shines:
Best on 4H or Daily timeframes near resistance levels.
---
2️⃣ Shooting Star
🧠 What it shows:
A single candle with a small body at the bottom and a long upper wick.
Buyers pushed price up, but sellers took over by close.
📊 Perfect entry:
Use in uptrends to catch tops—combine with RSI divergence.
---
3️⃣ Bearish Engulfing
🧠 What it shows:
A red candle completely engulfs the previous green one.
Strong sign that sellers are gaining control.
📊 Pro tip:
Look for increased volume to validate the pattern.
---
4️⃣ Gravestone Doji
🧠 What it shows:
Open, low, and close are all near each other with a long upper wick.
Bulls tried but failed—momentum is shifting bearish.
📊 When to act:
Use at resistance zones or supply levels for short entries.
---
5️⃣ Dark Cloud Cover
🧠 What it shows:
Red candle opens above green close but closes deep inside it.
Signals strong rejection of higher prices.
📊 Key insight:
The deeper the red candle closes into the green, the stronger the reversal.
---
6️⃣ Three Black Crows
🧠 What it shows:
3 strong bearish candles in a row.
A textbook pattern of trend reversal from bullish to bearish.
📊 Best setup:
After overbought conditions or failed breakout attempts.
---
7️⃣ Hanging Man
🧠 What it shows:
Looks like a hammer but appears at the top of an uptrend.
Small body + long lower wick = buyer weakness.
📊 Use this:
At resistance with bearish RSI divergence or MACD cross.
---
8️⃣ Descending Hawk (Rare but powerful)
🧠 What it shows:
A newer bearish variation where each candle opens slightly higher but closes significantly lower.
📊 When to trust:
In high-volume environments after pump-and-dump events.
---
🔁 How to Use These on Binance
📌 Apply patterns on:
✅ Binance Spot
✅ Binance Futures
✅ Mobile or Web
🛠️ Pair with:
RSI Divergence
Volume Spikes
Key Supply Zones
EMA 50 or 200 Crossovers
✅ Always wait for confirmation candles.
✅ Use tight stop-losses above the wick or resistance zone.
---
📉🔴 Candle Pattern Image Below for Quick Save 👇
📸 (Insert image here if needed)
---
💬 Final Words
These bearish patterns are your defense against fake breakouts, bull traps, and emotional trading.
Recognize them, respect them, and trade smarter every time.
---
👉 If this saved you money:
👍 Like it
📢 Repost for others
💬 Comment: Which bearish pattern burns you the most?
🔔 Follow for daily market psychology breakd
owns on Binance Square!
#BinanceTraderTips #CryptoBearTrap #BearishPatterns #RiskManagement #BTC #ETH #BinanceTraderTips #CryptoBearTrap #BearishPatterns #RiskManagement #BTC #ETH #CryptoEducation
$SOL $OM $DOGE
عرض الترجمة
Some people think i should leave America for good
Do you agree with them?
#CryptoScamSurge
#AmericaAIActionPlan
#TrumpBitcoinEmpire
$ETH
$XRP
A. YES
B. NO
Do you agree with them?
#CryptoScamSurge
#AmericaAIActionPlan
#TrumpBitcoinEmpire
$ETH
$XRP
A. YES
B. NO
عرض الترجمة
$OM
what do you know about Sidra coin
#BNBBreaksATH #ETHBreaks3700 #StablecoinLaw
$XRP $BNB $SOL
#BNBBreaksATH #ETHBreaks3700 #StablecoinLaw
$XRP $BNB $SOL
عرض الترجمة
عرض الترجمة
🟢 Powell Opens the Door for Banks to Embrace Crypto🔹 “Banks are free to offer financial services to crypto firms and engage in digital asset activities,” he stated. 🏦🔹 This is a highly positive signal, paving the way for deeper integration between traditional banking and the blockchain space.A bold step that could reshape the balance of power between banks and crypto on a global scale.#pawell #BTC110KToday? #BinanceAlphaAlert $BTC $ETH $XRP
عرض الترجمة
🔥 Sun vs. Musk: Battle for Trump’s Backing Heats Up in Crypto Power Play!Justin Sun of Tron (TRX) has aggressively entered the political crypto sector, competing with SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Sun invested $100 million in the Official Trump (TRUMP) meme currency to demonstrate support for US President Donald Trump, potentially to challenge Musk's expanding influence in crypto and politics. Musk is challenged by Sun for Trump supportSun is becoming one of Trump's biggest personal financial donors, competing with Musk, who has supported Trump both before and after the January election. The Tron founder's last TronDAO contribution highlighted this competition. Sun eagerly revealed his $100 million investment in the $TRUMP meme currency on X, claiming Tron and Official Trump are the future of crypto. He said the investment shows Tron's commitment to cross-ecosystem cooperation to grow crypto alongside groups like “GetTrumpMemes.” He also called Trump on Tron MAGA money, referring the US President's political catchphrase. Sun's $100 million $TRUMP buy follows his $75 million WLFI token purchase for Trump's initial DeFi project. Sun's big financing efforts may be a planned move to outpace Musk in Trump's crypto orbit and establish his position in the expanding political meme currency market. Sun has been rewarded for sponsoring Trump's crypto projects. The Tron pioneer received a gold watch from the US president for holding the most $TRUMP meme coins. After investing $30 million in crypto, Sun became an adviser at Trump's World Liberty Financial. Musk allegedly donated $288 million before Trump's re-election, while Sun's newest gift to the Official Trump meme currency sparked crypto debates. More importantly, unlike Musk's conventional investments, Sun's token purchases preserve market value, allowing the Tron creator to benefit from his backing.#TrumpTariffs #TRUMP #ElonMusk #JustinSun @Justin Sun孙宇晨 $BTC $ETH
سجّل الدخول لاستكشاف المزيد من المُحتوى