傑羅姆·鮑威爾在一次歷史性的聲明中： “比特幣就像黃金，它被視爲數字黃金。” $BTC | 幣安廣場上的 Bluechip

書籤與點讚

創作者中心

--

傑羅姆·鮑威爾在一次歷史性的聲明中：“比特幣就像黃金，它被視爲數字黃金。”
$BTC 

免責聲明：包含來自第三方的見解。非財務建議。可能包含贊助內容。請參閱條款。

BTC

86,765.11

+2.71%

264

0

探索最新的加密貨幣新聞

⚡️ 參與加密貨幣領域的最新討論

💬 與您喜愛的創作者互動

👍 享受您感興趣的內容

電子郵件 / 電話號碼

相關創作者

@Bluechip

創作者的更多內容

THE TWELVE BILLION DOLLAR TRAP

--

$BTC Buyers outweighing sellers on this slow grind upwards. OI relatively flat, with the move being a short covering rally rather than genuine underlying demand. Typical weekend PA . Staircase up...

--

BITCOIN’S CAPITULATION TRANSFER: THE CHART NO ONE IS WATCHING This is not a breakdown. This is a balance sheet reset. STH MVRV just printed 0.85. That means every Bitcoin bought in the last 155 days is underwater by 15%. Not “slightly red.” Structurally capitulating We have seen this exact configuration twice before: November 2022 after FTX collapsed: MVRV hit 0.80, STH supply in loss reached 2.8M BTC, price $16K. What followed was a 300% rally over 12 months April 2025 local reset: MVRV bottomed at similar levels, launched the move from $60K to $126K all-time high by October Now look at the supply side mechanics: Exchange reserves: 2.39M BTC, down 8% year-over-year. Coins are leaving centralized venues even during a 32% drawdown. That is not distribution. That is absorption. ETF flows: $3.79B bled in November, then reversed with a $524M single-day inflow. Outflow climaxes look exactly like this at inflection points Miner reserves: 1.803M BTC, multi-year lows. Post-halving stress forced ~24K BTC in November sales. They are structurally weaker, not stronger. Issuance keeps falling Funding rates: 0.0071%, barely positive. Leverage has been flushed, not added. No euphoria, no excess On one side: short-term holders, retail panic, stressed miners, levered traders exiting at losses On the other: long-term holders controlling 75% of supply, spot ETFs treating dips as accumulation windows, corporates and sovereigns building strategic reserves, shrinking exchange balances, falling issuance This is not what tops look like. This is what finite supply meeting structural demand looks like when weak hands transfer coins to entities that never market-sell If you believe STH MVRV below 1.0, record-low exchange reserves, post-halving supply compression, and institutional bid reversion is bearish, you are betting this is the first cycle in Bitcoin’s history where capitulation plus structural accumulation does not resolve higher I will take the other side of that bet The asymmetry is not in the chart. It is in the ownership transfer happening beneath it $BTC

--

We were told to be worried at the bottom and now they're telling us not to be worried at all... Should we be worried?

--

--

實時新聞

ETH 跌破 2,800 USDT，24 小时涨幅收窄至1.59%

--

以太坊过去7日净供应量增加18,019枚

--

111.96 枚 BTC 转入 Cumberland DRW

--

美国财长称政府停摆对GDP造成110亿美元永久性打击

--

美国财长贝森特预计部分价格将在数周内下降

--

熱門文章

半夜接到 “浦東公安” 電話？數字資產玩家穩住！我教你 3 句話避坑

如果15年11月我这16个大饼不卖的话现在也能值一千多万了，当时我把BTC套现后梭哈了P2p盘子全部亏光了，这也是我人

說說大家最近關心的Alpha

原來都說美債要違約，美元要崩盤，爲什麼沒有發生？

人确实赚不到自己认知以外的钱，这句话现在算是真懂了。才玩一个半月，亏了 25w。不光亏钱，还把整个人的心态搞炸，负能量多

Katelynn Spielmann bkjb

Cookie 偏好設定

Cookie 偏好設定