Bit_boy

Development of quantum computing might kill the Bitcoin network
I researched all the data and learn everything about it.
/➮ Recently, BlackRock warned us about potential risks to the Bitcoin network
🕷 All due to the rapid progress in the field of quantum computing.
🕷 I’ll add their report at the end - but for now, let’s break down what this actually means.
/➮ Bitcoin's security relies on cryptographic algorithms, mainly ECDSA
🕷 It safeguards private keys and ensures transaction integrity
🕷 Quantum computers, leveraging algorithms like Shor's algorithm, could potentially break ECDSA
/➮ How? By efficiently solving complex mathematical problems that are currently infeasible for classical computers
🕷 This will would allow malicious actors to derive private keys from public keys
Compromising wallet security and transaction authenticity
/➮ So BlackRock warns that such a development might enable attackers to compromise wallets and transactions
🕷 Which would lead to potential losses for investors
🕷 But when will this happen and how can we protect ourselves?
/➮ Quantum computers capable of breaking Bitcoin's cryptography are not yet operational
🕷 Experts estimate that such capabilities could emerge within 5-7 yeards
🕷 Currently, 25% of BTC is stored in addresses that are vulnerable to quantum attacks
/➮ But it's not all bad - the Bitcoin community and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem are already exploring several strategies:
- Post-Quantum Cryptography
- Wallet Security Enhancements
- Network Upgrades
/➮ However, if a solution is not found in time, it could seriously undermine trust in digital assets
🕷 Which in turn could reduce demand for BTC and crypto in general
🕷 And the current outlook isn't too optimistic - here's why:
/➮ Google has stated that breaking RSA encryption (tech also used to secure crypto wallets)
🕷 Would require 20x fewer quantum resources than previously expected
🕷 That means we may simply not have enough time to solve the problem before it becomes critical
/➮ For now, I believe the most effective step is encouraging users to transfer funds to addresses with enhanced security,
🕷 Such as Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash (P2PKH) addresses, which do not expose public keys until a transaction is made
🕷 Don’t rush to sell all your BTC or move it off wallets - there is still time
🕷 But it's important to keep an eye on this issue and the progress on solutions
Report: sec.gov/Archives/edgar…
➮ Give some love and support
🕷 Follow for even more excitement!
🕷 Remember to like, retweet, and drop a comment.
#TrumpMediaBitcoinTreasury #Bitcoin2025 $BTC

Candlestick patterns are a powerful tool in technical analysis, offering insights into market sentiment and potential price movements. By recognizing and interpreting these patterns, traders can make informed decisions and increase their chances of success. In this article, we'll explore 20 essential candlestick patterns, providing a comprehensive guide to help you enhance your trading strategy and potentially earn $1000 a month.
Understanding Candlestick Patterns
Before diving into the patterns, it's essential to understand the basics of candlestick charts. Each candle represents a specific time frame, displaying the open, high, low, and close prices. The body of the candle shows the price movement, while the wicks indicate the high and low prices.
The 20 Candlestick Patterns
1. Doji: A candle with a small body and long wicks, indicating indecision and potential reversal.
2. Hammer: A bullish reversal pattern with a small body at the top and a long lower wick.
3. Hanging Man: A bearish reversal pattern with a small body at the bottom and a long upper wick.
4. Engulfing Pattern: A two-candle pattern where the second candle engulfs the first, indicating a potential reversal.
5. Piercing Line: A bullish reversal pattern where the second candle opens below the first and closes above its midpoint.
6. Dark Cloud Cover: A bearish reversal pattern where the second candle opens above the first and closes below its midpoint.
7. Morning Star: A three-candle pattern indicating a bullish reversal.
8. Evening Star: A three-candle pattern indicating a bearish reversal.
9. Shooting Star: A bearish reversal pattern with a small body at the bottom and a long upper wick.
10. Inverted Hammer: A bullish reversal pattern with a small body at the top and a long lower wick.
11. Bullish Harami: A two-candle pattern indicating a potential bullish reversal.
12. Bearish Harami: A two-candle pattern indicating a potential bearish reversal.
13. Tweezer Top: A two-candle pattern indicating a potential bearish reversal.
14. Tweezer Bottom: A two-candle pattern indicating a potential bullish reversal.
15. Three White Soldiers: A bullish reversal pattern with three consecutive long-bodied candles.
16. Three Black Crows: A bearish reversal pattern with three consecutive long-bodied candles.
17. Rising Three Methods: A continuation pattern indicating a bullish trend.
18. Falling Three Methods: A continuation pattern indicating a bearish trend.
19. Marubozu: A candle with no wicks and a full-bodied appearance, indicating strong market momentum.
20. Belt Hold Line: A single candle pattern indicating a potential reversal or continuation.
Applying Candlestick Patterns in Trading
To effectively use these patterns, it's essential to:
- Understand the context in which they appear
- Combine them with other technical analysis tools
- Practice and backtest to develop a deep understanding
By mastering these 20 candlestick patterns, you'll be well on your way to enhancing your trading strategy and potentially earning $1000 a month. Remember to stay disciplined, patient, and informed to achieve success in the markets.
#CandleStickPatterns
#tradingStrategy
#TechnicalAnalysis
#DayTradingTips
#tradingforbeginners

When I think about Walrus, what stands out to me is how quietly practical it is. For years, data storage in crypto felt like something that mostly worked until it didn’t. Files loaded, backups existed somewhere, but the reality was that our work often lived on someone else’s computer—and they got the final say. That’s the problem Walrus is trying to fix.
It doesn’t try to be flashy or fast for the sake of attention. It’s built around a simple principle: data should be reliable, verifiable, and resilient. Instead of putting whole files in one place, it breaks them into pieces and spreads them across independent nodes. Even if some nodes go offline, the file can be rebuilt. It’s a bit like giving puzzle pieces to different neighbors—you don’t lose the picture if a few move away.
The network runs on Sui, which keeps things efficient, and the WAL token has a straightforward purpose: pay for storage, reward reliability, and penalize failure. Privacy is baked in by default—fragments are encrypted, so no single node can see meaningful data on its own. Trust isn’t assumed; it’s earned over time through consistent operation.
I also recognize that this isn’t easy. Decentralized storage is more complex than familiar cloud solutions. Incentives, coordination, and adoption all carry friction. WAL’s value and governance matter, and operators need to stay committed. But that’s exactly what makes the system honest.
What makes Walrus interesting to me isn’t hype or big claims. It’s a quiet, thoughtful layer that fills a real gap. If it succeeds, most people won’t notice it—their data just works, their apps stay functional, and their memories don’t vanish. In a world full of noise and short-term thinking, that kind of steady reliability feels almost human.
#walrus $WAL @WalrusProtocol

When I look at Plasma, I see an infrastructure project that’s trying to solve a real Web3 problem instead of chasing hype. Scalability has always been a bottleneck, and Plasma approaches it from a practical angle by focusing on execution first. By using a Layer-2 design, it increases throughput and lowers fees without sacrificing the security and decentralization people expect from blockchain.
What matters to me is how this translates into real usage. Apps can actually run without worrying about congestion, unpredictable costs, or broken user experiences. Whether it’s DeFi, NFTs, gaming, or more data-heavy applications, Plasma feels built for production, not just testing ideas.
From a builder’s perspective, the tooling and execution environment seem designed for long-term use, not quick experiments. The $XPL token also makes sense here, aligning validators, developers, and users around keeping the network healthy. Overall, Plasma feels focused on making blockchain execution reliable enough for real adoption, not just impressive demos.
@Plasma $XPL #Plasma

When I look at Walrus, I don’t see another flashy crypto project trying to compete for attention. I see something much more practical, and honestly, more necessary. Blockchains love to talk about decentralization, but most of the data they rely on still lives on centralized servers. NFTs, app media, AI datasets, even entire websites are often stored on Web2 infrastructure. That creates hidden points of failure, and I think this is a problem the space has been avoiding for too long.
Walrus makes sense to me because it doesn’t try to replace blockchains. It accepts a simple reality: blockchains are not good at storing large amounts of data. Instead of forcing them to do something they weren’t built for, Walrus separates storage from coordination. The actual data lives off-chain across decentralized storage providers, while Sui handles ownership, availability proofs, and payments on-chain. That feels practical rather than ideological.
What I like is that off-chain here doesn’t mean untrusted. Data is broken into fragments and spread across many nodes, so even if some fail, the data can still be recovered. It’s cheaper, more resilient, and relies on math instead of brute-force replication. Sui’s role stays small but critical, acting as an accountability layer so apps can reference large data without slowing everything down.
The WAL token also feels purpose-driven. It’s used to pay for storage, reward providers who actually store and prove data, and allow staking and governance. Incentives are tied to reliability, not hype. Governance is slow and imperfect, but I’d rather see that than quiet control by a single entity.
Most Walrus use cases are not exciting, and that’s a good thing. Media storage, archives, decentralized websites, AI datasets. These are boring until they break, and then they matter a lot. I don’t see Walrus as a project that will trend daily. I see it as infrastructure people won’t notice until they really need it. If it executes well, it could become one of those layers everyone relies on without knowing its name, and in crypto, that’s usually a sign something was built right.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus

When I look at Plasma, I don’t see another blockchain trying to do everything at once. I see a network that made a very deliberate choice: focus on one thing and do it properly. Payments. Not trading, not NFTs, not speculation cycles, just moving digital dollars in a way that feels normal to everyday people.
Most blockchains were never designed for ordinary users. To send a small amount, you usually have to buy a volatile token just to pay fees, understand wallets and gas, and then wait an unpredictable amount of time for confirmation. For something as simple as sending five dollars, that friction is enough to make people give up. I think Plasma starts from a much more realistic question: what if sending digital dollars felt as easy as using PayPal or Venmo?
What stands out to me is that Plasma puts stablecoins at the center instead of treating them as a side feature. People think in dollars. They earn in dollars, spend in dollars, and want to move in and out of dollars without worrying about price swings. By building around stablecoins like USDT, Plasma removes the biggest mental barrier in crypto: volatility. It stops being about speculation and starts feeling like a utility network where money just works.
Another thing I find important is how Plasma handles fees. Fees still exist, of course, but users don’t have to think about them. Apps or merchants can sponsor transactions, or fees can be abstracted so users pay in the same asset they’re sending. There’s no need to hold a special gas token just to move money. That’s how Web2 works today. When I send money through a banking app, I don’t see server costs or settlement fees, and Plasma tries to recreate that same invisible experience on-chain.
Speed also matters for real payments. Plasma settles transactions in a couple of seconds using proof-of-stake, which makes it usable for things like retail payments, transfers, or even payroll. At the same time, it doesn’t ignore long-term trust. By anchoring its history to Bitcoin through checkpoints, Plasma borrows security from the most battle-tested blockchain we have. To me, it feels like a balance between moving fast for daily use and recording history on the most trusted ledger over time.
From a developer’s point of view, Plasma doesn’t force a fresh start. It stays compatible with the EVM, so existing Ethereum tools and contracts can be used without major rewrites. With a high-performance Rust-based execution client and native support for fee abstraction using stablecoins, developers can build payment apps, remittance tools, or subscriptions without pushing crypto complexity onto users. That’s a big deal if we actually want adoption.
What I appreciate most is that Plasma doesn’t sell a dream of instant wealth. It feels more like real infrastructure. It’s designed for merchants who need smooth payments, apps that want seamless in-app transactions, and users who simply want their money to work without friction. It treats finance as something reliable and boring in a good way, not as a playground for speculation.
The XPL token fits into this logic as well. It’s there for staking, validation, and governance. Early on, emissions help bootstrap the network, but over time the token’s value depends on real usage. The more stablecoins flow through Plasma, the more the network is used, and the more XPL is tied to actual economic activity. If Plasma succeeds as a payment network, the token naturally matters. If it doesn’t, there’s no artificial value propping it up.
For me, Plasma is built on a simple idea that many projects forget: people don’t want to learn how blockchains work just to send money. They want speed, simplicity, and trust. By hiding complexity, anchoring security to Bitcoin, and giving developers familiar tools, Plasma tries to bridge the gap between Web2 usability and Web3 infrastructure. If digital dollars are going to go mainstream, they need invisible rails. Plasma feels like an honest attempt to build exactly that.
@Plasma
$XPL
#Plasma