Many folks saying top 25 is too small to incentivise for @stayloudio but they don't understand the idea here.
Think about it as two parties in the market: 1) Holders 2) KOLs
If the experiment works, there is a (3,3) relationship between these folks. You should imagine the prize to KOL as a "marketing budget" that Holders pay.
This generates a perpetual KOL incentivisation program, powered by a flywheel of traders and yappers thanks to Kaito.
The small list of 25 KOLs means that every KOL must try extra hard to climb, creating a rat race to the top. It also increases the prize if successful, making it attractive to even big KOLs.
Therefore, everyone can participate. If you can yap, yap. If you can try to yap, try. If you can't yap, then you benefit from everyone else yapping for your bags.
Of course, this is all a hyper-financialised experiment. @0x_ultra can probably adjust the exact mechanisms given feedback.
How many KOLs is necessary to have a successful project, even if there is no product? "Is attention all you need?"