When open source projects are asked “why do people contribut | JosephJacks_ på Binance Square

Populära artiklar

Bokmärk och gillad

--

When open source projects are asked “why do people contribute ?”, they almost always answer “they just do!”. Intrinsics.
When Bittensor subnets are asked “how do miners solve your 🧩?”,  … “no clue! but they do it better than we could have ever predicted!”. Extrinsics.

Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Kan innehålla sponsrat innehåll. Se användarvillkor.

TAO

459,6

-2.66%

1

0

Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna

⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto

💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer

👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig

E-post/telefonnummer

Relevant kreatör

@JosephJacks_

Utforska mer från Creator

"Today’s compute owners are highly capital inefficient (see Lambda Labs’ $500M debt facility, rumored 15% interest rate), and we believe Targon (Bittensor Subnet 4) can play an important role in reducing many of the inefficiencies that exist today." 🔥🔥🔥

--

In the same way that there are no “good” or “bad” open source projects … There is no such thing as “good” or “bad” incentive mechanisms (IM) on Bittensor. Subnet IMs are either effective or ineffective at continuously producing a given useful computational commodity. Correspondingly— The big fundamental difference between an IM and a conventional startup business model (BM) is that BMs require attachment to fiat as the representation of value capture (and focus on the input of work that is measured as the cost basis for a market to then price) — whereas value creation is never represented anywhere and always subjective. IMs, OTOH, focus only on measuring and rewarding the OUTPUT of a useful work, not its input. This allows for representing both value capture AND value creation in the currency of the subnet. This is nuanced and counterintuitive for most to understand. But it is extremely profound. And it will upgrade and transform all of capitalism. Slowly. Then all at once.

--

There is so such thing as “good” or “bad” incentive mechanisms (IM) on Bittensor. Subnet IMs are either effective or ineffective at continuously producing a given useful computational commodity. The big fundamental difference between an IM and a conventional startup business model (BM) is that BMs require attachment to fiat as the representation of value capture (and focus on the input of work that is measured as the cost basis for a market to then price) — whereas value creation is never represented anywhere and always subjective. IMs, OTOH, focus only on measuring and rewarding the OUTPUT of a useful work, not its input. This allows for representing both value capture AND value creation in the currency of the subnet. This is nuanced and counterintuitive for most to understand. But it is extremely profound. And it will upgrade and transform all of capitalism. Slowly. Then all at once.

--

It’s called $TAO, @demishassabis. You are describing Bittensor. I am staking my entire reputation on Bittensor to solve this immense challenge for humanity — and I do not remotely consider myself a “crypto person”, fwiw.

--

On Bitcoin, miners compute high levels of SHA-256. On Bittensor, miners compute high levels of digital intelligence.

--

Senaste nytt

U.S. Pressures EU for Unilateral Tariff Reductions Amid Trade Talks

--

Bitcoin's Surge Shifts Market Focus to XRP and SOL

--

Ethereum Establishes Strong Support at $2,370, Analyst Reports

--

Cybercriminals Exploit Fake Ledger Live Apps to Target macOS Users' Crypto

--

Binance Futures to Launch SOONUSDT Perpetual Contract With 50x Leverage on May 23

--

Cookie-inställningar

Plattformens villkor

Plattformens villkor

Cookie-inställningar