Binance Square

WhaleMilker

Open Trade
Frequent Trader
4 Months
I just milk whales
0 Following
15 Followers
25 Liked
1 Shared
All Content
Portfolio
--
Seeking Alpha on BTC (+750% Alpha vs Hold), roast me :) (NFA | Quant Strategy Backtest on CorrAI)GM, girls and boys I’ve been exploring a long-only alpha-generating strategy comparing Triple Exponential Moving Average (TEMA) and Time Series Forecast (TSF) using 6 years of BTC data. So far, it has shown +750% outperformance over simple BTC holding. Disclaimer: This post is not financial advice. It is shared purely for academic discussion and quantitative research purposes. Indicators: TSF (Time Series Forecast) A moving linear regression using least-squares fit per bar. Similar in smoothness to moving averages but includes trend. Good for forecasting and momentum-style entries. TEMA (Triple Exponential Moving Average) Attempts to reduce lag by using multiple EMAs: TEMA = 3×EMA - 3×EMA(EMA) + EMA(EMA(EMA)) More reactive to price changes than TSF or traditional EMAs. This is exactly the kind of indicator logic I’m testing with CorrAI, a no-code quantitative strategy builder that helps backtest and optimize trading strategies using Binance spot data, including BTC/USDT. With CorrAI, I can iterate on TSF vs. TEMA logic in seconds without writing a single line of code. Strategy Logic (1h timeframe, BTC/USDT) Return Distribution Using KDE, the mode of returns is slightly below 0%, meaning the core distribution is mildly negative. Profitability depends on fat-tail events—any dampening there reduces alpha. Extreme-loss events are too rare to evaluate cleanly (sample size limitation). Risk Metrics UPI: 4.51 VaR: -7.36% CVaR: -8.73% Entropic Risk: 2.63 Rachev Ratio: 3.18 CVaR is close to VaR, indicating few heavy-loss events—I didn’t proceed with Conditional Fail Expectation (CFE) or Conditional CFE. The strong Rachev Ratio is a positive, especially since this version doesn’t yet use any dynamic risk adjustment or side constraints. While the Rachev Ratio looks promising (even without dynamic risk filters), the MDD over 40% is a concern. I’m seeking improvements that could bring MDD under 10% so that the strategy becomes safer for leverage. CorrAI could help further experiment with stop-loss variants or exposure timing to address this. Would love to hear your thoughts on: Any ways to improve fat-tail capture or optimize the hold/exposure timingWhether this logic could be extended to LTF (low-timeframe) or multi-asset strategies Also, if you're into backtesting BTC strategies or building algo-trading logic without writing code, you might want to check out CorrAI. It’s made for exactly this kind of exploration—combining statistical intuition, quant tools, and performance analytics, all through a visual drag-and-drop interface. Also, I'd love to have your support in my participation in the CorrAI's focus on your trading inspiration event. Cheers!

Seeking Alpha on BTC (+750% Alpha vs Hold), roast me :) (NFA | Quant Strategy Backtest on CorrAI)

GM, girls and boys
I’ve been exploring a long-only alpha-generating strategy comparing Triple Exponential Moving Average (TEMA) and Time Series Forecast (TSF) using 6 years of BTC data. So far, it has shown +750% outperformance over simple BTC holding.
Disclaimer: This post is not financial advice. It is shared purely for academic discussion and quantitative research purposes.

Indicators:
TSF (Time Series Forecast)
A moving linear regression using least-squares fit per bar.
Similar in smoothness to moving averages but includes trend.
Good for forecasting and momentum-style entries.
TEMA (Triple Exponential Moving Average)
Attempts to reduce lag by using multiple EMAs: TEMA = 3×EMA - 3×EMA(EMA) + EMA(EMA(EMA))
More reactive to price changes than TSF or traditional EMAs.
This is exactly the kind of indicator logic I’m testing with CorrAI, a no-code quantitative strategy builder that helps backtest and optimize trading strategies using Binance spot data, including BTC/USDT. With CorrAI, I can iterate on TSF vs. TEMA logic in seconds without writing a single line of code.
Strategy Logic (1h timeframe, BTC/USDT)

Return Distribution
Using KDE, the mode of returns is slightly below 0%, meaning the core distribution is mildly negative.
Profitability depends on fat-tail events—any dampening there reduces alpha.
Extreme-loss events are too rare to evaluate cleanly (sample size limitation).

Risk Metrics
UPI: 4.51
VaR: -7.36%
CVaR: -8.73%
Entropic Risk: 2.63
Rachev Ratio: 3.18
CVaR is close to VaR, indicating few heavy-loss events—I didn’t proceed with Conditional Fail Expectation (CFE) or Conditional CFE. The strong Rachev Ratio is a positive, especially since this version doesn’t yet use any dynamic risk adjustment or side constraints.
While the Rachev Ratio looks promising (even without dynamic risk filters), the MDD over 40% is a concern.
I’m seeking improvements that could bring MDD under 10% so that the strategy becomes safer for leverage. CorrAI could help further experiment with stop-loss variants or exposure timing to address this.
Would love to hear your thoughts on:
Any ways to improve fat-tail capture or optimize the hold/exposure timingWhether this logic could be extended to LTF (low-timeframe) or multi-asset strategies
Also, if you're into backtesting BTC strategies or building algo-trading logic without writing code, you might want to check out CorrAI. It’s made for exactly this kind of exploration—combining statistical intuition, quant tools, and performance analytics, all through a visual drag-and-drop interface.
Also, I'd love to have your support in my participation in the CorrAI's focus on your trading inspiration event.

Cheers!
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

eniac500
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs