tmel0211
0 Following
1 Followers
0 Liked
0 Shared
Posts
See original
Recently, the launch of Binance on @SpaceandTimeDB has sparked widespread discussion in the market, igniting the previously relatively niche narrative of 'ZK data infrastructure.' As a bridge connecting smart contracts and off-chain data, $SXT is attempting to address a more fundamental pain point in the on-chain world: the trustworthy execution and verification of data. Next, let me share my observations:
1) Essentially, Space and Time is a decentralized layer one blockchain (SXT Chain), but its core value lies not in building a general-purpose smart contract platform, but in taking a different path to focus on solving a specific problem: achieving trustworthy data processing under zero-knowledge proofs. Its killer feature, Proof of SQL, makes tamper-proof data tables no longer just theoretical, achieving double insurance of verifiability of queries and integrity of data through ZK technology.
From another perspective, this completely overturns the inherent thinking of handling data in the blockchain world: in the past, smart contracts either had to endure exorbitant Gas costs for on-chain storage, or were forced to trust centralized APIs and oracles. SXT provides a third path: building a dedicated decentralized data layer that combines on-chain cryptographic commitments and off-chain SQL execution, making data processing both secure and trustworthy, as well as efficient and low-cost.
2) From a technical architecture perspective, the SXT network consists of three key components:
1. Indexer Nodes: acting as data collectors, responsible for obtaining real-time and historical data from mainstream blockchains and converting it into SQL relational format;
2. Prover Nodes: acting as the computational engine, handling query requests, executing ZK-proven SQL queries on tamper-proof tables, and generating sub-second ZK proofs;
3. SXT Chain Validators: serving as data notaries, maintaining network integrity, handling data insertion, and collectively endorsing on-chain cryptographic commitments through BFT consensus.
This architecture allows on-chain storage to only retain cryptographic commitments (similar to data fingerprints), rather than complete data, significantly reducing on-chain storage costs. More importantly, these commitments are updatable/homomorphic, meaning that when updating data, there is no need to recompute the fingerprint of the entire data set, only to overlay changes on the original fingerprint—this is the key move to solving the performance bottleneck encountered by traditional ZK solutions in big data processing.
3) SXT's Proof of SQL is not just a technical innovation but also solves the core pain points of current ZK proof systems when dealing with large-scale data:
1. Scalability: Traditional ZK proofs are inefficient when handling large datasets, while SXT claims to achieve millisecond-level ZK proof generation, and if on-chain verification Gas consumption is as low as 150k, it is a significant breakthrough in the entire ZK Prove field;
2. Developer Friendliness: providing developers with a familiar SQL interface rather than complex ZK circuit programming, significantly lowering the development threshold;
3. Universality: applicable not only to SXT's own decentralized database but also to traditional databases (such as PostgreSQL, Snowflake), expanding the technological applicability.
From an abstract perspective: SXT is essentially creating a 'trusted data computing platform' for the blockchain world, breaking through the inherent data blind spots of smart contracts, allowing on-chain applications to no longer be data islands. It is like a 'query co-processor' that resolves the inherent limitations of smart contracts in directly accessing historical on-chain data, cross-chain data, off-chain data, or complex aggregated data.
4) Setting aside the technical narrative, SXT's commercial value may deserve more attention. Its application scenarios almost cover all current hot topics in Web3:
1. ZK-Rollups/L2 Optimization: as an L2 data layer, reducing Gas costs and enhancing scalability; 2. Cross-chain Secure Bridging: providing multi-chain data verification, enhancing the security of bridges; 3. Decentralized DApp Backend: replacing traditional centralized backends, providing verifiable data services; in addition, it includes data-driven DeFi, RWA, GameFi, and SocialFI, among all applications facing on-chain storage bottlenecks.
5) Finally, let’s take a look at the design of SXT's token economic model, which I find quite reminiscent of traditional POS + data market:
1. Validators: stake SXT to participate in network security, earning network fees and token emission rewards; 2. Table Owners: create and maintain tamper-proof data tables, profiting through insertion fees and query fees; 3. Users: pay query fees to use network services.
The most brilliant aspect of this model is the division of 'query fees' between data providers and validators, forming a self-driven data market ecosystem—the more valuable the data, the larger the query volume, the more all parties benefit, thus attracting more high-quality data into the ecosystem, completing a positive cycle.
In summary, the greatest innovative value of $SXT lies in creating a solution that combines the traditional database tool SQL with the Web3 zero-trust architecture, enabling the blockchain ecosystem to handle more complex data logic. This not only addresses the 'inherent data shortcomings' of smart contracts but also provides a feasible path for enterprise applications with strict requirements on data quality and processing capabilities to go on-chain.
With the project's deep binding to leading ecosystems like zkSync, Avalanche, and Chainlink, coupled with the prestigious Binance brand, SXT has indeed secured a 'ticket' to challenge mainstream infrastructure. Of course, challenges are also evident, as the technical implementation still needs to overcome the inherent contradictions between decentralization and performance, and market education and developer adoption will take time.
1) Essentially, Space and Time is a decentralized layer one blockchain (SXT Chain), but its core value lies not in building a general-purpose smart contract platform, but in taking a different path to focus on solving a specific problem: achieving trustworthy data processing under zero-knowledge proofs. Its killer feature, Proof of SQL, makes tamper-proof data tables no longer just theoretical, achieving double insurance of verifiability of queries and integrity of data through ZK technology.
From another perspective, this completely overturns the inherent thinking of handling data in the blockchain world: in the past, smart contracts either had to endure exorbitant Gas costs for on-chain storage, or were forced to trust centralized APIs and oracles. SXT provides a third path: building a dedicated decentralized data layer that combines on-chain cryptographic commitments and off-chain SQL execution, making data processing both secure and trustworthy, as well as efficient and low-cost.
2) From a technical architecture perspective, the SXT network consists of three key components:
1. Indexer Nodes: acting as data collectors, responsible for obtaining real-time and historical data from mainstream blockchains and converting it into SQL relational format;
2. Prover Nodes: acting as the computational engine, handling query requests, executing ZK-proven SQL queries on tamper-proof tables, and generating sub-second ZK proofs;
3. SXT Chain Validators: serving as data notaries, maintaining network integrity, handling data insertion, and collectively endorsing on-chain cryptographic commitments through BFT consensus.
This architecture allows on-chain storage to only retain cryptographic commitments (similar to data fingerprints), rather than complete data, significantly reducing on-chain storage costs. More importantly, these commitments are updatable/homomorphic, meaning that when updating data, there is no need to recompute the fingerprint of the entire data set, only to overlay changes on the original fingerprint—this is the key move to solving the performance bottleneck encountered by traditional ZK solutions in big data processing.
3) SXT's Proof of SQL is not just a technical innovation but also solves the core pain points of current ZK proof systems when dealing with large-scale data:
1. Scalability: Traditional ZK proofs are inefficient when handling large datasets, while SXT claims to achieve millisecond-level ZK proof generation, and if on-chain verification Gas consumption is as low as 150k, it is a significant breakthrough in the entire ZK Prove field;
2. Developer Friendliness: providing developers with a familiar SQL interface rather than complex ZK circuit programming, significantly lowering the development threshold;
3. Universality: applicable not only to SXT's own decentralized database but also to traditional databases (such as PostgreSQL, Snowflake), expanding the technological applicability.
From an abstract perspective: SXT is essentially creating a 'trusted data computing platform' for the blockchain world, breaking through the inherent data blind spots of smart contracts, allowing on-chain applications to no longer be data islands. It is like a 'query co-processor' that resolves the inherent limitations of smart contracts in directly accessing historical on-chain data, cross-chain data, off-chain data, or complex aggregated data.
4) Setting aside the technical narrative, SXT's commercial value may deserve more attention. Its application scenarios almost cover all current hot topics in Web3:
1. ZK-Rollups/L2 Optimization: as an L2 data layer, reducing Gas costs and enhancing scalability; 2. Cross-chain Secure Bridging: providing multi-chain data verification, enhancing the security of bridges; 3. Decentralized DApp Backend: replacing traditional centralized backends, providing verifiable data services; in addition, it includes data-driven DeFi, RWA, GameFi, and SocialFI, among all applications facing on-chain storage bottlenecks.
5) Finally, let’s take a look at the design of SXT's token economic model, which I find quite reminiscent of traditional POS + data market:
1. Validators: stake SXT to participate in network security, earning network fees and token emission rewards; 2. Table Owners: create and maintain tamper-proof data tables, profiting through insertion fees and query fees; 3. Users: pay query fees to use network services.
The most brilliant aspect of this model is the division of 'query fees' between data providers and validators, forming a self-driven data market ecosystem—the more valuable the data, the larger the query volume, the more all parties benefit, thus attracting more high-quality data into the ecosystem, completing a positive cycle.
In summary, the greatest innovative value of $SXT lies in creating a solution that combines the traditional database tool SQL with the Web3 zero-trust architecture, enabling the blockchain ecosystem to handle more complex data logic. This not only addresses the 'inherent data shortcomings' of smart contracts but also provides a feasible path for enterprise applications with strict requirements on data quality and processing capabilities to go on-chain.
With the project's deep binding to leading ecosystems like zkSync, Avalanche, and Chainlink, coupled with the prestigious Binance brand, SXT has indeed secured a 'ticket' to challenge mainstream infrastructure. Of course, challenges are also evident, as the technical implementation still needs to overcome the inherent contradictions between decentralization and performance, and market education and developer adoption will take time.
See original
With the upgrade of the Alpenglow protocol on @solana, reducing transaction confirmation time to an astonishing 100-150 milliseconds, this marks a new stage in the competition between the two giants of public chains, Solana and Ethereum: it is no longer just a race in technical metrics, but a true test of business models and application implementation.
Solana's challenge: Having achieved millisecond-level confirmation speed, Solana faces an ecological landing challenge similar to that once faced by Ethereum. When your engine is already faster than the demands of the track, what should come next?
Solana needs to prove to the market what truly revolutionary applications can be brought by millisecond-level confirmations, aside from MEME. Currently, most DeFi and NFT applications are running well in sub-second confirmation environments, making it difficult to fully utilize Solana's technical strengths. It needs to innovate categories of applications that can only be realized with millisecond-level confirmations; otherwise, its technological advantage will be greatly underestimated.
Ethereum's challenge: With the Layer2 ecosystem taking shape and performance bottlenecks gradually alleviated, Ethereum needs to more strongly demonstrate the actual value of its decentralization and security advantages in terms of institutional adoption. How much is the consensus on decentralization and security really worth?
Ethereum needs to prove that its security and decentralization are not just technical concepts, but core competitive advantages that can translate into real commercial value. Especially in the fields of stablecoins, DeFi, and RWA (real-world assets), Ethereum needs to accelerate the integration of traditional financial institutions.
A symbiotic and prosperous outcome is that the two will no longer fight to the death, but instead will have functional division of labor: Solana is likely to become the preferred platform for 'performance-intensive' applications, while Ethereum consolidates its position as the 'value storage layer.' For the entire industry, this competition will drive blockchain technology towards a more diverse and mature future.
Solana's challenge: Having achieved millisecond-level confirmation speed, Solana faces an ecological landing challenge similar to that once faced by Ethereum. When your engine is already faster than the demands of the track, what should come next?
Solana needs to prove to the market what truly revolutionary applications can be brought by millisecond-level confirmations, aside from MEME. Currently, most DeFi and NFT applications are running well in sub-second confirmation environments, making it difficult to fully utilize Solana's technical strengths. It needs to innovate categories of applications that can only be realized with millisecond-level confirmations; otherwise, its technological advantage will be greatly underestimated.
Ethereum's challenge: With the Layer2 ecosystem taking shape and performance bottlenecks gradually alleviated, Ethereum needs to more strongly demonstrate the actual value of its decentralization and security advantages in terms of institutional adoption. How much is the consensus on decentralization and security really worth?
Ethereum needs to prove that its security and decentralization are not just technical concepts, but core competitive advantages that can translate into real commercial value. Especially in the fields of stablecoins, DeFi, and RWA (real-world assets), Ethereum needs to accelerate the integration of traditional financial institutions.
A symbiotic and prosperous outcome is that the two will no longer fight to the death, but instead will have functional division of labor: Solana is likely to become the preferred platform for 'performance-intensive' applications, while Ethereum consolidates its position as the 'value storage layer.' For the entire industry, this competition will drive blockchain technology towards a more diverse and mature future.
Login to explore more contents