ISCOBYNOOBY

Tether’s Bitcoin holdings top 92,000 BTC, making it the sixth largest single-wallet holder. Its Q1 purchases reflect a growing corporate strategy to use Bitcoin as a treasury reserve.
Tether Becomes Sixth Largest Bitcoin Holder, Reaches over 92,000 BTC in Treasury Strategy

Tether’s Bitcoin holdings top 92,000 BTC, making it the sixth largest single-wallet holder. Its Q1 purchases reflect a growing corporate strategy to use Bitcoin as a treasury reserve.
Tether Crosses 92,000 BTC Mark, Cements Role in Corporate Bitcoin Strategy
Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin issuer, has officially become one of the most significant institutional holders of Bitcoin. With its most recent purchase of almost 9,000 BTC on April 1, the company’s total Bitcoin holdings have risen to 0ver 92,000 BTC—worth approximately $8 billion at current prices.
This milestone places Tether in sixth position among single-wallet Bitcoin holders. It now sits behind industry giants such as Binance and Bitfinex, but ahead of hundreds of institutions that have joined the trend of integrating Bitcoin into corporate treasuries.
The company’s most recent acquisition aligns with its ongoing quarterly Bitcoin purchase strategy.
 

Tether’s Bitcoin Strategy: Consistency and Scale
Tether’s approach to Bitcoin investment is not new. In May 2023, the company publicly committed to allocating 15% of its quarterly profits to Bitcoin acquisitions. Unlike speculative trades or short-term arbitrage strategies, this plan is centered around long-term treasury diversification. Each purchase is timed and spread across the quarter, with consolidation occurring near the end.
The strategy reflects a broader shift in how fintech and crypto-native companies manage capital. Rather than relying solely on traditional fiat instruments or stablecoin supply control, Tether is anchoring a portion of its reserves to Bitcoin—an asset it does not directly issue.
This model, inspired by Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), has gained adoption among public and private firms. Tether’s presence among the top Bitcoin-holding entities underscores the scale and seriousness with which it views the asset’s role in long-term financial infrastructure.
 
Behind the Wallets: Who Holds the Most Bitcoin?
With Tether now confirmed as the sixth-largest holder in a single wallet, the current leaderboard of corporate or institutional Bitcoin holdings is more transparent than ever.
At the top of the list sits Binance, with its cold wallet containing approximately 248,597 BTC. Bitfinex follows with around 156,010 BTC. 
 

Tether’s 92,646 BTC puts it in league with these major custodians. 
This concentrated allocation positions Tether differently from most stablecoin issuers, which tend to focus on short-term securities, commercial paper, or fiat reserves to back their assets.
 
Bitcoin's Price: Institutional Buying Meets Market Resistance
Despite large-scale purchases from institutions like Tether and Strategy, Bitcoin’s price performance in Q1 2025 has been underwhelming. The asset fell more than 12% over the quarter, making it the weakest first-quarter performance in seven years.
This price drop occurred even as billions flowed into Bitcoin from corporate treasuries. Strategy, one of the most aggressive buyers in the space, added over $4 billion worth of BTC in the same three-month window.
Tether’s own Q1 purchase allowed the stablecoin issuer to join a wave of accumulation by companies betting on long-term appreciation. Still, the market response remains muted, leaving analysts to question the relationship between spot demand and pricing dynamics.
 
The Rise of “Paper Bitcoin” Debate
The disconnect between heavy accumulation and price stagnation has revived discussions around the concept of "paper Bitcoin." The term refers to Bitcoin derivative products—like futures contracts or exchange-traded products—that do not necessarily involve actual BTC transfers or custody.
Supporters of this theory argue that derivative-heavy trading creates price pressure that’s disconnected from on-chain movement. They suggest that supply remains constrained, but paper contracts allow for synthetic exposure that waters down the impact of real demand.
Others view this as an overstatement. They argue that Bitcoin’s decentralized structure, combined with global trading conditions and macroeconomic factors, can account for recent price weakness without invoking large-scale manipulation.
Whether or not paper Bitcoin has tangible effects, the debate highlights growing concerns about transparency and asset-backed credibility in crypto markets.
 
Fintech and Bitcoin: A Converging Strategy
Tether’s position in the Bitcoin market also reflects larger trends in fintech. As financial platforms evolve beyond simple transactional models, they increasingly adopt multi-asset strategies to reinforce reserve strength and investor confidence.
What began with cash-backed stablecoins is now expanding to include blockchain-based reserves and store-of-value assets. In this context, Bitcoin functions not as a speculative asset but as a central reserve layer within a broader financial model.
For Tether, the integration of Bitcoin into its reserve mix aligns with a desire for more resilient backing, especially during periods of fiat volatility or rising regulatory scrutiny. It also allows the company to position itself as more than just an issuer—it becomes a capital allocator with a thesis.
The move is being watched closely by other fintech platforms that offer stablecoins or money movement services. As these firms assess their treasury frameworks, Tether’s example may serve as a reference point for how digital-native businesses can merge cash flow with crypto reserves.
 
The Bigger Picture: Institutional Demand vs. Market Behavior
As of now, more than 90 publicly traded companies hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets. Some, like Strategy and Tether, follow systematic accumulation plans. Others take opportunistic positions based on market sentiment.
The difference in approach affects not only market supply but also perceptions of Bitcoin’s role in institutional portfolios. When companies allocate consistent portions of their profits to Bitcoin, they help validate its status as a strategic reserve asset, even during volatile periods.
But even as demand from large holders grows, price patterns suggest that short-term movements remain vulnerable to broader market forces. Global interest rates, macroeconomic uncertainty, and regulatory posture all weigh on crypto markets regardless of treasury activity.
For companies like Tether, the long game is more important than daily price changes. The logic is simple: Bitcoin’s limited supply and deflationary nature make it an appealing hedge against dilution—especially in an environment where traditional currencies continue to face inflationary pressure.
 
Conclusion: Tether’s Growing Footprint in Bitcoin Reserves
The stablecoin issuer is now among the largest Bitcoin holders in the world, managing a treasury more diversified and crypto-heavy than most of its competitors.
With an established buying strategy, a growing balance sheet, and a clear belief in Bitcoin’s long-term role in finance, Tether is shaping the conversation around what corporate treasuries can look like in the crypto era.
As the market adjusts to this growing demand, the effects may take time to materialize. But the pattern is becoming clearer: Bitcoin is becoming a core part of financial infrastructure, from fintech balance sheets to global investment strategies.
 

The SEC allows the fast food giant to sidestep a Bitcoin treasury assessment proposal from a shareholder.

This year, the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) — a D.C.-based group and McDonald's shareholder known for asking companies like Microsoft and Amazon to adopt Bitcoin — asked McDonald’s to consider adding Bitcoin to its treasury during its 2025 annual shareholders’ meeting, set for next month.
"McDonald’s seems to have long ago understood what many other corporations have yet to: that a company’s value, especially during inflationary times, is measured not only by how profitable its primary business is, but also by how wisely it invests its assets and protects its profits from debasement," the NCPPR said.
The NCPPR added that companies like MicroStrategy, now known as Strategy, have seen massive growth since adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets, claiming that Strategy's stock has surged 2,360% more than McDonald's across the past 60 months.
However, lawyers for McDonald’s reached out to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a letter to confirm that they could exclude the proposal from the annual shareholders’ meeting without triggering an enforcement action. McDonald's lawyers asserted that the Bitcoin proposal fell under ordinary business operations, or investment strategies that were best-suited to a decision by the board, not shareholders.
The SEC agreed. “There appears to be some basis for your view that the company may exclude the proposal," the SEC said in late March. "In our view, the proposal relates to the company’s ordinary business operations. Accordingly, we will not recommend enforcement action to the commission if the company omits the proposal.”
Last December, the NCPPR has also pursued a similar initiative asking e-commerce juggernaut Amazon to allocate 5% of its portfolio to Bitcoin. In that case, the group argued, “Though Bitcoin is currently a volatile asset – as Amazon stock has been at times throughout its history – corporations have a responsibility to maximize shareholder value over the long-term as well as the short-term.”
Overall, the NCPPR's shareholder activism to promote Bitcoin has gained limited traction. Last December, Microsoft’s shareholders rejected a similar proposal to invest in Bitcoin from the NCPPR. The Microsoft board cited the cryptocurrency’s volatility as a major deterrent, and highlighted the importance of “stable and predictable investments to ensure liquidity and operational funding." 
Follow For More Content
#Binance #BinanceSquareTalks #BinanceNews #NewsAboutCrypto