If you still have money in Sui's DeFi but cannot withdraw it, don't panic
Sui is not undergoing a hard fork; @emanabio explained that this is part of Sui's mechanism. As long as the money can be frozen, it can definitely be recovered. Currently, at least 150 million of the 200 million affected funds have been frozen.
Funds deposited in lending-type protocols should currently be safe; it's more about playing defense now, preventing any undiscovered public facility vulnerabilities.
The vulnerability that was exploited in Cetus has already been fixed.
Stop laughing, I've recently been unlucky on the Solana chain, my PNL has completely collapsed, I've turned into idiot money, and I've been sent back to the contract battlefield.
On the contrary, Fourmeme on BSC, $B, has become the only survivor in my wallet. From now on, I am a B guardian (what does it mean when the situation is stronger than the person).
In my opinion, it’s better to seek certainty that cannot fail, rather than debating with the likes of Believe:
- Binance wants to create the USD1 narrative - The task has been assigned to BSC and Fourmeme - Fourmeme needs to establish a benchmark on BSC, where buying liquidity (not alpha volume) is not very sufficient.
So they created $B with the USD1 trading pair.
What is a benchmark?
If the USD1 concept doesn't get onto Binance Alpha/Perp, it cannot be considered a benchmark.
If this idea is correct, then USD1, Fourmeme, and even the subordinate accounts of BN should start promoting it. This is the current gaming point of this coin.
Total Supply of 1 Billion, with an Initial Circulation of 19.5%
- Ecological Incentives: 55% - Liquidity Fund: 10% - Investors: 15% - Team and Advisors: 20%
This section is quite standard, with no surprising elements.
However, the initial circulation section is written in great detail: - Sui Ecological Airdrop: 5% - Pre-TGE Event Airdrop: 2.2% - Listing Events: 1.8% - Initial Incentives (should refer to activities like exchange wealth management) 0.5% - Market Makers: 3% - Liquidity Management: 7%
With that said, Haedal has done well in providing sufficient returns in the Sui ecosystem. Interestingly, regarding the Pre-TGE and listing events, based on the announced projects, it seems that they might not need as much as indicated. So we can look forward to whether they will have a backup plan like some recently launched projects.
From what I understand, projects in the Sui ecosystem, except for those directly under Mysten Labs (such as DEEP WAL, etc.), have a “mutually low” valuation in the primary market, so the possibility of a relatively low opening is quite high; contract warriors should proceed with caution.
After the plane landed, I found I could check for $Haedal airdrop
Looking at it, it seems standard, not a small pig trotter rice
I am completely manual, two accounts, used leverage on Navi's lending warehouse. Because Sui subsidizes lending rates, the cash flow is positive, and there are not too many sunk costs (the opportunity cost of U staking does not count, as it is originally my inactive treasury). Manually staking HaSUI, deposited Navi Supply, and also deposited some haSui vault. One account forgot to do OKX
Basically, it is a sunlit airdrop, and after looking at the OKX event, it seems that just participating guarantees a basic income, which is quite conscientious
I also saw that a few brothers on-chain got nothing, probably the main reason is that you only deposited Sui to convert to HaSUI but didn't put it into DeFi
From a logistics perspective, LST is also a coin and can be transferred, so it cannot be counted separately; it must be placed in DeFi to count
Looking forward to tomorrow's opening, now it is Bybit + Binance Alpha, looking forward to it as it is the main infrastructure of Sui, maybe there will be more news
Missed out on NFTs, purely relying on Twitter's 'Don't want Agricultural Bank, want Construction Bank' and 'Governing the country and managing state affairs' to mix over 1300 times
Bloggers who produce currency should try not to create too many words to describe their own theoretical frameworks.
Even if they create words, they should have sufficient examples and reviews that are in line with the cognitive reality of the average secondary school education of Chinese netizens to concretize this abstract concept.
Otherwise, they will be accused of being pretentious.
This is the conclusion I came to after reviewing the portraits of several users who blocked my leeks.
Bloggers who produce currency should try not to make up too many words to describe themselves.
Even if they make up words, they should have sufficient examples and reviews that are in line with the average cognitive reality of Chinese netizens with a secondary school education or below to concretize this abstract concept.
Otherwise, they will be accused of being pretentious.
This is the conclusion I came to after reviewing the portraits of several users who blocked my leeks.
Two project parties that helped with the West Port market participated in the Hong Kong conference and privately messaged me asking about @KaiaChain. They have a GameFi project they want to migrate from BSC.
Considering that a year's plan starts in spring, the time cost of doing a market is precious. I said I would first tell you the downsides, and then the benefits, and you can see for yourself.
Firstly, Kaia's predecessor was the Klaytn and Line public chains. The Line public chain did not take off directly, and Klaytn was listed on Binance in the previous round, but as a public chain, the situation is not good, focusing on games and Kakao as an entry point. However, it is constrained by regulation (South Korea did not allow NFTs at that time) and the investment team had serious personnel selection errors.
Secondly, KAIA adopts a whitelist system for development, meaning that not everyone can deploy dapps. Although KAIA can connect directly to Line like a mini app, Line has different versions in each country. Line in Taiwan is for Taiwan, Thailand is for Thailand, and the app is not universal. Therefore, a @dapp_portal is needed for users to access DAPP, which is essentially a separate Web3 entry point that does not completely overlap with the Line App.
So what are the benefits? First, the GameFi or to C applications being developed at this point in time must rely on heavy models and deep market strategies. Liquidity will inevitably depend on ground promotion, ultimately forming a market narrative that the target of ground promotion can afford; the biggest pain point here is the cost of endorsement.
Originally, this market's base camp was BSC. Since 2023, especially after MVB emerged, without certain relationships, it has become unmanageable. This year BSC is reviving, but so far it has not provided any positive feedback to this basic market.
Solana is even less of an option, as it is known for being The Worst Kingmaker (not derogatory), and the EVM tech stack also does not support it. After a wave of intense coin listings on TON last year, the market has demystified the concept of mass adoption based on TG; it no longer recognizes that a large user base equals a large deposit amount. Therefore, KAIA has become the remaining option.
Firstly, Line's brand recognition is strong enough, better than Kakao as it covers both Japan and South Korea and Southeast Asia. However, the recognition in the deep market is not high, and there are narrative advantages. Dividing by country raises the recognition threshold and slows down the demystification process.
Japan and South Korea's market positions are strengthening in the rounds of markets, while Southeast Asia is the world’s largest Crypto-adopted-but-not-crypto-native market (adopted cryptocurrency but not crypto-native), those who understand, understand. If ground promotion is necessary, it will definitely be done in Southeast Asia, where LINE can be seen in every street and alley, making it easy to build trust.
Additionally, if exposure within the LINE APP is necessary, it is actually sufficient to find a small company in Southeast Asia (like Thailand) and place a front-end to attract traffic in Line for endorsement, which would be cost-effective.
Secondly, compared to the many peaks and the already somewhat successful TON, KAIA is relatively weak. It can still work by migrating Web2 projects to shell chains and cooperating with officials.
Thirdly, to promote market entry, it is necessary to first address stablecoins, as it is unlikely for this type of user to cross-chain deposit. It is said that Kaia has secured a major circulating stablecoin like SUI, and soon will also be able to withdraw from exchanges, which aligns perfectly with the timeline of development and beginning to promote market deposits.
Finally, regarding the issue of acquiring chips, KAIA has already explored ATL 0.09 and then formed a rounded bottom. The current cost of acquiring chips is relatively low, and if the project unexpectedly concludes, there could still be a profit.
I do not know what the final discussion's outcome will be. If there is a Line consensus conference in Phnom Penh and West Port around mid-year, that might be my small contribution to the Koreans.
Yesterday, I analyzed the exchange platform tokens with @cryptocishanjia, discussing that some platform tokens remain strong because of their strong meme attributes. When this platform consistently garners media attention, its token will maintain ongoing focus.
Today, the unknown little exchange @Ourbit_Official's official meme $Bitch pulled off a bullish candle that even major exchanges praised after a large-scale KOL airdrop.
Of course, it's too early to call it a success, but it has done a few things right, similar to $Hype: 1. A grand and targeted airdrop (influencer nodes and rebate nodes) 2. A meme strategy centered around attention (Ourbit follows a meme community integration path, with a substantial number of first-line trench warriors VS Hypeliquid's exposure relying on large on-chain traders opening/closing positions).
Platform tokens are a thing of the past. Learn memetic value.