Someone invited me to a discussion. He claimed to be a programmer. But the way he showed evidence of vulnerabilities in $BOB as a token that could rugpull, I said it was the way of a layman, a non-programmer, because he used user friendly tools.
A characteristic of a smart contract programmer is that they never provide any proof or validation based on screenshots from other tools. Programmers always use direct blockchain data by providing the transaction hash from the source because not everyone understands programming languages. That’s why tools were made to help laypeople check vulnerabilities more easily. But again, you still have to look directly at the data on the blockchain explorer.
I asked that man to open his Binance Square experience badge on his profile because I wanted to verify, as he claimed to be very experienced. But after that, when I commented, everything was deleted and it seems he blocked me.
BOB haters have no idea who they’re up against in this debate, lol… Don’t hesitate, $BOB supporters. BOB is completely safe from developer manipulation. The developers of $BOB are not anonymous individuals hiding behind masks. The developer of BOB is Binance this is 100% valid. Once again, I say the developer of BOB is Binance. There’s no way Binance would commit a crime like rugpull BOB. Binance is already wealthy and doesn’t need riches from BOB. Because Binance purpose in creating BOB is to stay true to the mission of Build On BNB not to seek wealth.
Something intriguing has happened—my transferable balance has suddenly shifted back to unverified status, and with Pi Day just around the corner, the timing couldn’t be more curious. 🤔
I know I’m not alone in this, and like many others, I’m eagerly waiting for official clarification from the team. Hopefully, tomorrow brings the answers we’re all looking for!
What are your thoughts? Have you noticed any similar changes? Let’s discuss! 🔥👇