TheAtk

#CryptoFees101 Commissions in the crypto world are more than just small discounts: they are strategic variables that directly impact your profitability. Their structure varies depending on the environment in which you operate. In centralized exchanges, trading fees are usually calculated as a percentage of the trading volume, with progressive discounts for frequent users or those who hold the platform's native tokens. These commissions cover order matching, custody, and access to liquid markets.

When operating on decentralized platforms, you encounter two key costs. First, network fees, paid to miners or validators of the blockchain for processing and securing your transaction. In networks like Ethereum, these vary depending on network congestion, spiking during times of high demand. Second, liquidity fees in DEX pools, where a percentage of each exchange is distributed among liquidity providers.

Wallets also apply particular dynamics. When transferring assets between chains or through bridges, additional fees arise for conversion and cross-validation. In staking or farming, platforms often charge commissions on the rewards generated, while withdrawals in fiat may include hidden banking fees.

To minimize their impact, experienced traders employ tactics such as trading during low congestion hours on PoS networks like Solana or BSC, where fees are just cents. They prioritize exchanges with tiered fee programs and accumulate tokens like BNB or FTT to reduce costs. In DeFi, they compare net profitability of pools in advance after deducting compound fees. Ignoring these details turns winning trades into net losses.

#BigTechStablecoin The entry of tech giants like Apple, Google, X (Twitter), and Airbnb into the world of stablecoins is redefining the rules of the financial game. These companies seek to integrate stablecoins into their ecosystems to streamline global payments, reduce transaction costs, and capture new markets. Apple is exploring enhancing Apple Pay with stablecoins like USDC; Google Cloud already accepts payments in stable assets; while X is developing its own payment platform with crypto support. Airbnb, for its part, is testing its use for international transfers to hosts in emerging economies.

The appeal is clear: stablecoins offer permanent liquidity, commissions up to 80% lower than traditional systems, and access to millions of unbanked people. Their transaction volume already surpasses that of networks like Visa, making them strategic tools for monetizing massive audiences. The Big Tech companies are not only seeking efficiency: they aspire to create closed economic circuits where stable tokens act as financial blood within their platforms.

However, the path is filled with challenges. Regulators in the United States and Europe are debating laws that could limit tech companies from issuing or controlling these currencies, arguing risks of monopoly and systemic instability. There are concerns that these companies, managing trillion-dollar flows, could displace traditional banks or manipulate markets. Meanwhile, established players like Tether and global banks are reorganizing: some are launching their own alternatives, while others invest in diversifying their reserves.

This clash has three fronts: tech companies driving efficiency and global reach; banks defending their territory with hybrid solutions; and regulators trying to balance innovation with control. The outcome will shape the future of digital money: if Big Tech succeeds, you will pay with stablecoins integrated into your phone; if restrictions prevail, we will see a mosaic of regional currencies.

#CryptoSecurity101 La seguridad en el mundo criptográfico es una responsabilidad compartida entre usuarios, plataformas y la tecnología misma. Comienza con la arquitectura de las blockchains: su naturaleza descentralizada distribuye la información entre miles de nodos, haciendo casi imposible alterar transacciones ya validadas. La criptografía actúa como el primer muro de defensa, donde las claves privadas —similares a llaves únicas e intransferibles— protegen el acceso a los fondos. Perderlas o exponerlas equivale a entregar la bóveda de activos a un extraño.

Sin embargo, las amenazas son persistentes y evolutivas. El phishing lidera los riesgos: sitios falsos que imitan exchanges o wallets legítimos engañan a usuarios incautos para robar sus credenciales. Los ataques a plataformas centralizadas también persisten, aprovechando vulnerabilidades en sistemas de custodia o errores humanos. Incluso las blockchains pueden sufrir intentos de manipulación, como el ataque del 51%, donde un minero con poder computacional mayoritario intenta revertir transacciones.

Para los usuarios, la autocustodia en wallets frías —dispositivos físicos desconectados de internet— es la opción más segura, aunque exige gestionar personalmente las claves de recuperación. En exchanges, medidas como la autenticación en dos pasos y las listas blancas para retiros añaden capas de protección. Las auditorías regulares a contratos inteligentes previenen fallos que podrían drenar fondos, mientras las regulaciones locales buscan estandarizar prácticas de seguridad, como verificaciones de identidad para servicios custodios.

El eslabón más vulnerable sigue siendo el factor humano: contraseñas débiles, redes públicas sin protección o la ingenuidad ante ofertas fraudulentas. Por eso, la educación constante es el escudo definitivo: reconocer estafas como esquemas piramidales o tokens falsos evita pérdidas irreversibles. En un ecosistema sin reversas ni intermediarios, la prevención no es opcional: es la moneda que preserva tu soberanía financiera.

#TradingPairs101 Trading pairs are the fundamental architecture upon which all exchanges in crypto assets are built. They represent the value relationship between two assets: the first is the one you buy or sell, the second is the reference currency. A pair like BTC/USDT means you are exchanging Bitcoin for Tether, where the price reflects how many USDT are equivalent to 1 BTC. This structure defines not only how you operate, but also your exposure to risk and opportunities.

There are three key categories. Fiat-crypto pairs, like EUR/BTC, connect traditional currencies with digital assets and are the gateway for new investors. Crypto-crypto pairs, like ETH/BNB, allow the exchange of digital assets without going through fiat, optimizing costs but exposing to double volatility. Finally, pairs with stablecoins, like SOL/USDC, offer a temporary refuge against market volatility, using stable currencies as a common denominator.

The choice of pairs directly affects your strategy. Pairs with high liquidity like BTC/USDT ensure quick executions and reduced spreads, while emerging pairs like APT/TUSD may offer higher profits with elevated slippage risk. Experienced traders monitor historical correlations: when Bitcoin falls, pairs like ETH/BTC often show relative strength, revealing opportunities. In DeFi, pairs in liquidity pools like UNI/ETH generate passive fees, but carry the risk of impermanent loss if the assets diverge.

Mastering pairs means understanding their liquidity, inherent volatility, and role in arbitrage between exchanges. They are more than tools: they are the language in which market opportunities are written.

#Liquidity101 La liquidez es el elemento invisible que determina la salud real de cualquier activo financiero. Se refiere a la facilidad con que un activo puede comprarse o venderse sin impactar significativamente su precio. En términos prácticos, los mercados con alta liquidez muestran spreads ajustados entre oferta y demanda, ejecuciones rápidas de órdenes y estabilidad ante operaciones de gran volumen. Por el contrario, activos con baja liquidez sufren deslizamientos de precio abruptos, spreads amplios que encarecen el trading y vulnerabilidad a movimientos manipulativos.

En el ecosistema crypto, la liquidez opera en dos dimensiones clave. Primero, en exchanges centralizados como Binance, depende del volumen diario de transacciones y la profundidad del libro de órdenes, donde grandes paredes de compra/venta actúan como amortiguadores. Segundo, en plataformas descentralizadas como Uniswap, la liquidez nace de los pools automatizados donde proveedores depositan pares de tokens a cambio de fees, creando reservas que permiten intercambios instantáneos. Aquí, el riesgo de pérdida impermanente aparece cuando los precios de los activos en el pool divergen bruscamente.

Para traders, la liquidez es un filtro esencial: activos con volumen sostenido bajo son trampas de volatilidad donde órdenes grandes pueden hundir o inflar precios artificialmente. Los inversores institucionales monitorean indicadores como el volumen de 24h, el libro de órdenes o el TVL en DEXs antes de entrar. En cripto, donde nuevos proyectos emergen diariamente, distinguir entre liquidez real y inflada es la línea entre oportunidades genuinas y espejismos.

#OrderTypes101 Mastering the types of orders is the foundation of professional trading. A market order* is the most direct: you execute at the available price instantly, ideal for liquid assets but risky in extreme volatility, where slippage can eat away at profits. Its antithesis is the limit order*: you set a specific entry or exit price, controlling costs but without a guarantee of execution if the market does not reach your target. Here, patience is key, especially in support/resistance zones.

To manage risks, stop-loss orders are essential shields. Activated when the price breaks a predetermined level, they limit losses in adverse trends. Combined with -take-profit- which automatically closes in profit— they form strategies like "OCO" (One Cancels the Other), where one order cancels its counterpart when executed. In sideways markets, the stop-limit order adds precision: after the stop is triggered, it converts to a limit to avoid slippage in liquidity gaps.

Each type serves a purpose: market orders prioritize speed; limit orders, control; stop orders, protection. Your choice depends on your strategy: Are you scalping? Speed is vital. Are you swing trading? Price control wins. In crypto, where 10% volatility is common, mastering these tools separates the novice from the expert.

#CEXvsDEX101 En el corazón de las finanzas descentralizadas late una disyuntiva crítica: exchanges centralizados (CEX) versus descentralizados (DEX). Los CEX, como Binance o Coinbase, operan como intermediarios custodios: gestionan tus activos, simplifican el acceso con fiat y ofrecen liquidez masiva gracias a su infraestructura centralizada. Esta eficiencia tiene costos: expones tus datos a regulaciones estrictas, cedes el control de tus claves y asumes riesgos históricos como hackeos o colapsos operativos, ejemplificados en casos como FTX o Mt. Gox. La sombra regulatoria es otra carga; agencias como la SEC presionan para clasificar criptos como valores, forzando a los CEX a batallas legales que limitan su oferta.

Frente a este modelo, los DEX —Uniswap, PancakeSwap— encarnan la filosofía "be your own bank". Operan mediante contratos inteligentes en blockchains como Ethereum o Solana, donde tú conservas la custodia total de tus fondos desde wallets privadas. Aquí no hay KYC: el acceso es global, resistente a censuras y privado. Pero la autonomía tiene desafíos: la liquidez depende de proveedores descentralizados (LPs), lo que puede generar deslizamientos de precio en operaciones grandes, y los errores en transacciones son irreversibles. Además, la ausencia de soporte técnico obliga a un conocimiento avanzado para navegar riesgos como contratos maliciosos o pools de liquidez no auditados.

La elección entre ambos define prioridades: los CEX ofrecen velocidad y facilidad para principiantes o traders institucionales, mientras los DEX priorizan soberanía y transparencia inmunes a fallos centralizados. En 2025, esta coexistencia refleja la esencia misma de la revolución crypto: eficiencia versus autonomía, regulación versus libertad.

#TradingTypes101 In financial markets, your trading approach defines your category as a trader. Scalping represents the ultimate expression of speed: it is based on executing dozens of trades in minutes or even seconds, capturing microscopic price movements. This style demands constant connection to the charts, ultra-low commissions, and nerves of steel, as a split-second error can wipe out hours of profit.

Those seeking a less accelerated pace often adopt day trading. Here, positions are opened and closed within the same day, using timeframes of 15 minutes to 4 hours. The key advantage is avoiding the risks of overnight gaps, but it requires mastery in reading indicators like volume or RSI to identify precise entries and exits.

Swing trading attracts patient strategists. It operates in trends that last days or weeks, combining technical analysis like price channels or moving averages with fundamental catalysts. Although it reduces time spent in front of screens, it demands tolerance for sharp corrections without falling into panic. A step further is position trading, where trades last months or years. These investors ignore market noise and focus on macro factors: institutional adoption, technological cycles, or regulations.

In the crypto ecosystem, a unique profile stands out: the HODLer. Their philosophy is to accumulate assets with long-term conviction, considering downturns as opportunities. It is not passivity, but a psychological bet where patience outweighs volatility. Each style has distinct tools, timelines, and risks. The key is to choose the one that aligns with your capital, your available time, and your emotional temperament.

#TrumpVsMusk The recent and public confrontation between Donald Trump and Elon Musk has generated a financial earthquake that extends into the crypto world. What began as a strategic alliance in 2024 abruptly fractured when Musk labeled a Trump bill as a "disgusting abomination," to which the former president replied by accusing Musk of going "crazy" and threatening to withdraw million-dollar government contracts from companies like Tesla and SpaceX. This exchange, visible on platforms like X and Truth Social, included serious accusations — Musk linked Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, while the latter hinted at cuts to subsidies for SpaceX — and culminated in a poll by Musk promoting a "new political party."

The impact on the markets was immediate: Bitcoin fell by 4%, breaking the key support of $101K, and the CoinDesk 20 index plummeted by 5% amidst massive liquidations totaling over $324 million in long positions. The meme coin $TRUMP, a symbol of the previous alliance, sank by 10%, evidencing how political volatility transmits to digital assets. Tesla, for its part, closed down 14%, dragging down stocks related to the crypto ecosystem like Coinbase.

This clash not only reflects a personal rift but also a systemic risk: Musk was a key advisor on technology policies for the Trump administration, and his exit creates uncertainty about the regulatory future of crypto assets and subsidies for clean energy. Additionally, his influence as a "beacon" of investor sentiment in crypto — visible in previous movements with Dogecoin or Bitcoin — amplifies the effect. Analysts warn that the dispute could slow down progress in legal frameworks for cryptocurrencies or even reverse tacit support, while "whales" take advantage of the panic to liquidate positions. In a market where narrative moves mountains, this battle between titans is a reminder that tweets can be as decisive as fundamentals.

Reward for the Pizza Day activity on Telegram ✌🏻💪🏻