$ADA founder Charles Hoskinson has proposed using 140M ADA (~$100M) from the treasury to boost DeFi growth by purchasing BTC and Cardano-native stablecoins (USDM, USDA, IUSD). ADA dropped 6% following the announcement, as the community remains divided. Some see it as a bold step toward ecosystem maturity, while others argue it’s risky given market conditions and governance concerns.
💬 What’s your take on this proposal? How would this move affect long-term ADA value?
👉 Complete daily tasks on Task Center to earn Binance Points: • Create a post using #CardanoDebate , or the $ADA cashtag • Share your Trader’s Profile, • Or share a trade using the widget to earn 5 points! (Tap the “+” on the Binance App
#CardanoDebate founder Charles Hoskinson has proposed using 140M ADA (~$100M) from the treasury to boost DeFi growth by purchasing BTC and Cardano-native stablecoins (USDM, USDA, IUSD). ADA dropped 6% following the announcement, as the community remains divided. Some see it as a bold step toward ecosystem maturity, while others argue it’s risky given market conditions and governance concerns.
💬 What’s your take on this proposal? How would this move affect long-term ADA value?
👉 Complete daily tasks on Task Center to earn Binance Points: • Create a post using #CardanoDebate , or the $ADA cashtag • Share your Trader’s Profile, • Or share a trade using the widget to earn 5 points! (Tap the “+” on the Binance App
$BTC Iran Warns: "Israel and America Will Pay a Very Heavy Price"* In the wake of Israel's large-scale military operation, "Operation Rising Lion," which targeted over 100 sites in Iran—including nuclear facilities and military installations—Iran has issued a stern warning to both Israel and the United States. The operation resulted in the deaths of several high-ranking Iranian officials, including Gen. Hossein Salami and Gen. Mohammad Bagheri. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has vowed retaliation against its "sworn enemies," asserting that Israel will pay a heavy price for the incursion. Furthermore, Iran holds the United States accountable for any ensuing consequences, citing its support and foreknowledge of the Israeli attacks. In response to the Israeli strikes, Iran launched over 100 drones targeting Israel, prompting both nations to close their airspace. The escalation has led to widespread international concern, with global leaders urging restraint to prevent further deterioration of regional stability. *Market Reactions:*
$ETH Iran Warns: "Israel and America Will Pay a Very Heavy Price"* In the wake of Israel's large-scale military operation, "Operation Rising Lion," which targeted over 100 sites in Iran—including nuclear facilities and military installations—Iran has issued a stern warning to both Israel and the United States. The operation resulted in the deaths of several high-ranking Iranian officials, including Gen. Hossein Salami and Gen. Mohammad Bagheri. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has vowed retaliation against its "sworn enemies," asserting that Israel will pay a heavy price for the incursion. Furthermore, Iran holds the United States accountable for any ensuing consequences, citing its support and foreknowledge of the Israeli attacks. In response to the Israeli strikes, Iran launched over 100 drones targeting Israel, prompting both nations to close their airspace. The escalation has led to widespread international concern, with global leaders urging restraint to prevent further deterioration of regional stability. *Market Reactions:*
#IsraelIranConflict Iran Warns: "Israel and America Will Pay a Very Heavy Price"* In the wake of Israel's large-scale military operation, "Operation Rising Lion," which targeted over 100 sites in Iran—including nuclear facilities and military installations—Iran has issued a stern warning to both Israel and the United States. The operation resulted in the deaths of several high-ranking Iranian officials, including Gen. Hossein Salami and Gen. Mohammad Bagheri. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has vowed retaliation against its "sworn enemies," asserting that Israel will pay a heavy price for the incursion. Furthermore, Iran holds the United States accountable for any ensuing consequences, citing its support and foreknowledge of the Israeli attacks. In response to the Israeli strikes, Iran launched over 100 drones targeting Israel, prompting both nations to close their airspace. The escalation has led to widespread international concern, with global leaders urging restraint to prevent further deterioration of regional stability. *Market Reactions:*
$BTC According to Jinshi Data, President Trump announced plans to impose additional tariffs on countries that tax U.S. exports. He also stated that Congress is close to passing the largest tax cut bill in U.S. history, calling it a “rocket” for the U.S. economy. The combination of tax cuts and new trade measures could lead to stronger domestic growth and investor confidence—but may also introduce global trade uncertainty and inflationary risks. 💬 Do you think these policies will boost markets, or trigger more global volatility? How do you see this impacting crypto and broader risk assets?
👉 Create a post with #TrumpTariffs or the $BTC cashtag, or share your trader’s profile and insights to earn Binance points! (Press the “+” on the App homepage and click on Task Center)
#TrumpTariffs According to Jinshi Data, President Trump announced plans to impose additional tariffs on countries that tax U.S. exports. He also stated that Congress is close to passing the largest tax cut bill in U.S. history, calling it a “rocket” for the U.S. economy. The combination of tax cuts and new trade measures could lead to stronger domestic growth and investor confidence—but may also introduce global trade uncertainty and inflationary risks. 💬 Do you think these policies will boost markets, or trigger more global volatility? How do you see this impacting crypto and broader risk assets?
👉 Create a post with #TrumpTariffs or the $BTC cashtag, or share your trader’s profile and insights to earn Binance points! (Press the “+” on the App homepage and click on Task Center)
$ETH At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#CryptoRoundTableRemarks At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
#TradingTools101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#CryptoCharts101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#TradingMistakes101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#CryptoFees101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#CryptoSecurity101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#TradingPairs101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#TradingPairs101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#Liquidity101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#OrderTypes101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#OrderTypes101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the
#CEXvsDEX101 At the latest SEC crypto roundtable, major voices weighed in on DeFi, code, and regulation: • SEC Chair Atkins: “Engineers shouldn’t be held liable for how others use their code.” • Hester Peirce: “Code is protected speech under the First Amendment.” • Erik Voorhees: “Smart contracts are a step function improvement over human regulators.” • Others argued that decentralization isn't lawless — it's transparent, predictable, and user-driven.
💬 What’s your take on these remarks? Should DeFi devs be protected like open-source builders — or held accountable like financial intermediaries? How should regulation evolve as finance becomes more code-driven?
👉 Create a post using #CryptoRoundTableRemarks , the