Rafvfc
0 Following
17 Followers
17 Liked
0 Shared
If you don't need the money, don't sell. be alert. resilient and patience. #MarketPullback $BTC #don'tpanic #BitcoinVsTariffs
They arent companies. They're like numbers in a casino roulette. In average, people bet on them by how much extra money they have. and BTC is the main indicator on when to bet.
Can you please explain why the curves are almost the same for all charts?
Trump will have ups and downs like any business. That what it is. Some times you win, some times you lose. Only smart and experience traders will make money with this one.
Who else is holding onto $TRUMP in their wallet? Let’s hear it.
I personally grabbed 10 units for $67 each, and now I’m sitting on a hefty loss. The big question is—do you sell and cut your losses or wait it out, hoping for a miracle?
The situation isn’t looking great. Even with breaking news, $TRUMP hasn’t moved, and $BTC isn’t doing any better.
Here’s the scoop: Former President Donald Trump has begun signing cryptocurrency-related decrees, fulfilling promises made during his election campaign. According to Reuters, a working group on alternative monetary resources is in motion, and CoinDesk reports plans to establish a national cryptocurrency reserve.
However, Bitcoin’s (BTC) reaction has been anything but positive. On January 24 at 12:02 AM Moscow time, BTC plummeted to $102,800—down over 1.1% in just 24 hours. Within a single hour, it shed $1,500 in value, as per Binance exchange data.
Are we headed for a bounce-back or deeper waters?
#BinanceAlphaAlert #VeThorOnBinance #ETHProspects #Write2Earn #TrendingTopic
I personally grabbed 10 units for $67 each, and now I’m sitting on a hefty loss. The big question is—do you sell and cut your losses or wait it out, hoping for a miracle?
The situation isn’t looking great. Even with breaking news, $TRUMP hasn’t moved, and $BTC isn’t doing any better.
Here’s the scoop: Former President Donald Trump has begun signing cryptocurrency-related decrees, fulfilling promises made during his election campaign. According to Reuters, a working group on alternative monetary resources is in motion, and CoinDesk reports plans to establish a national cryptocurrency reserve.
However, Bitcoin’s (BTC) reaction has been anything but positive. On January 24 at 12:02 AM Moscow time, BTC plummeted to $102,800—down over 1.1% in just 24 hours. Within a single hour, it shed $1,500 in value, as per Binance exchange data.
Are we headed for a bounce-back or deeper waters?
#BinanceAlphaAlert #VeThorOnBinance #ETHProspects #Write2Earn #TrendingTopic
This mean that if you don't pay taxes over your crypto or show and demonstrate you have a legal business they can just take your crypto away.
🚨 Trump Scams the Crypto Community AGAIN: Here’s the Ugly Truth 🚨
Donald Trump has once again stirred up the crypto community. First, he launched his memecoin dubbed a "shitcoin" by many and dumped it. Now, the actual text of his cryptocurrency executive order reveals a national digital asset stockpile might be built from seized cryptocurrencies, not fresh BTC purchases. Here's what you need to know:
💡 Key Takeaways from the Executive Order:
What it really says:
The U.S. government may establish a "digital asset stockpile" using cryptocurrencies seized through law enforcement actions (think confiscated assets from illegal activities).
This is not equivalent to the government actively buying Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies on the open market.
What it doesn't mean:
The U.S. government isn’t planning to pour money into Bitcoin or any other crypto asset to "stack Satoshis."
This isn’t a bullish signal for Bitcoin adoption by the government, despite the hype in some crypto circles.
Seizures, not accumulation:
The U.S. already holds substantial BTC from law enforcement actions like the Silk Road bust. This directive simply proposes keeping it instead of auctioning it off (as has been done historically).
🛑 Why This Matters:
The narrative that the U.S. is secretly bullish on Bitcoin because of this stockpile is misleading.
Speculators hyping this idea are ignoring the clear language of the executive order. It’s more about regulatory control than crypto adoption.
🔎 Pro tip: Always dig into the fine print before jumping on the hype train. Not everything is as bullish as it sounds!
👉 What’s your take? Do you think this is a sneaky way for the U.S. to accumulate crypto dominance, or just more regulatory noise? Let’s discuss below! Don’t forget to like, share, or drop a tip! 🚀
Donald Trump has once again stirred up the crypto community. First, he launched his memecoin dubbed a "shitcoin" by many and dumped it. Now, the actual text of his cryptocurrency executive order reveals a national digital asset stockpile might be built from seized cryptocurrencies, not fresh BTC purchases. Here's what you need to know:
💡 Key Takeaways from the Executive Order:
What it really says:
The U.S. government may establish a "digital asset stockpile" using cryptocurrencies seized through law enforcement actions (think confiscated assets from illegal activities).
This is not equivalent to the government actively buying Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies on the open market.
What it doesn't mean:
The U.S. government isn’t planning to pour money into Bitcoin or any other crypto asset to "stack Satoshis."
This isn’t a bullish signal for Bitcoin adoption by the government, despite the hype in some crypto circles.
Seizures, not accumulation:
The U.S. already holds substantial BTC from law enforcement actions like the Silk Road bust. This directive simply proposes keeping it instead of auctioning it off (as has been done historically).
🛑 Why This Matters:
The narrative that the U.S. is secretly bullish on Bitcoin because of this stockpile is misleading.
Speculators hyping this idea are ignoring the clear language of the executive order. It’s more about regulatory control than crypto adoption.
🔎 Pro tip: Always dig into the fine print before jumping on the hype train. Not everything is as bullish as it sounds!
👉 What’s your take? Do you think this is a sneaky way for the U.S. to accumulate crypto dominance, or just more regulatory noise? Let’s discuss below! Don’t forget to like, share, or drop a tip! 🚀
Login to explore more contents