Omfg_jackdaniels666

TO ALL THE USERS OF "XRP"
It is essential to avoid the narrative that XRP "won" its case against the SEC, as this interpretation misrepresents reality. If Ripple Labs had achieved an absolute victory, it would not have had to pay any fines. The fact that the company reached a financial settlement with the SEC implies a tacit acknowledgment of irregularities or liability, given that financial penalties are typically imposed when there is a partial or full admission of guilt in a legal dispute.

To put it into perspective with an everyday example: if a traffic officer fines you for speeding, it is because you broke the law. Similarly, if you fail to file your tax returns on time and receive a fine, it is because you violated the rules. This same principle applies to Ripple Labs: the settlement with the SEC reinforces the idea that there was a breach of established regulations.

This case also raises questions about the nature of XRP as a cryptocurrency. While many argue that cryptocurrencies should represent decentralization and transparency, the events surrounding Ripple Labs suggest otherwise.

🚨👁️🔎
**XRP is not decentralized**, as a significant portion of its total supply is concentrated in the hands of a few. Currently, around 50% of the circulating XRP is controlled by Ripple Labs and the company's original founders.

This concentration of power calls into question the reliability of XRP as an asset, especially after facing regulatory sanctions. Furthermore, it highlights that much of the control and benefits are in the hands of a small group of investors and financial elites.

In conclusion, it is crucial not to mislead the public by claiming that XRP emerged victorious in this case. The legal reality is clear: the payment of a fine for non-compliance with established rules speaks for itself.

TO ALL USERS OF "XRP"

It is essential to avoid the narrative that XRP "won" its case against the SEC, as this interpretation distorts reality. If Ripple Labs had achieved an absolute victory, it would not have had to pay any fines. The fact that the company reached a financial settlement with the SEC implies a tacit acknowledgment of irregularities or liability, given that economic sanctions are usually applied when there is a partial or total admission of guilt in a legal conflict.

To put it in perspective with an everyday example: if a traffic officer fines you for speeding, it is because you broke the law. Similarly, if you do not file your tax returns on time and receive a fine, it is because you violated the rules. This same principle applies to Ripple Labs: the settlement with the SEC reinforces the idea that there was a breach of established regulations.

This case also raises doubts about the nature of XRP as a cryptocurrency. Although many argue that cryptocurrencies should represent decentralization and transparency, the events related to Ripple Labs suggest otherwise.

🚨👁️🔎
**XRP is not decentralized**, as a large part of its total supply is concentrated in the hands of a few. Currently, around 50% of the circulating XRP is controlled by Ripple Labs and the original founders of the company.

This concentration of power questions the reliability of XRP as an asset, especially after facing regulatory sanctions. Furthermore, it evidences that a large part of the control and benefits is in the hands of a small group of investors and financial elites.

In conclusion, it is crucial not to mislead the public by claiming that XRP emerged victorious in this case. The legal reality is clear: the payment of a fine for violating established rules speaks for itself.

What word did they get today?

https://safu.im/Fb5E0DY0

Donald Trump looking at you as you expected him to mention crypto in his inauguration speech and now you are at zero because of the drop
#TRUMP

A whale with insider information was likely responsible for the 50% drop in the price of TRUMP, the official memecoin of Trump. At its peak, TRUMP seemed unstoppable, but a massive sell-off by a whale triggered the decline. According to Bubblemaps, the whale involved had accumulated the token before splitting its holdings into 10 new wallets, making profits of $85 million and retaining $75 million more in tokens.

The sale, which occurred shortly after the publication by Melania, caused the price of TRUMP to drop from over $72 to $40. Although the market partially recovered with the momentum of Bitcoin, the whale's behavior fueled suspicions of insider knowledge, as it appeared to have early access to the token.

The activity of the whale's wallet, which was linked to other tokens and quick sale strategies, sparked speculation about possible manipulation. Additionally, it is suspected that some members of the Solana ecosystem may have had prior knowledge of the launch of TRUMP. The addresses involved in the early purchase, such as ff.sol, were linked to other trending tokens, suggesting that these wallets were exploiting the trend of political tokens for quick profits.

Was it really wrong for Donald Trump not to mention cryptocurrencies in his inauguration?
The simple answer is no, just a few hours ago many buyers of token $TRUMP felt disappointed after the President of the United States' speech, which was probably the most correct action to avoid generating a high demand and increase in the value of all existing cryptos, as this could have caused a significant market drop resulting in losses of hundreds or thousands for users. If the value of $BTC $ETH and other coins had surpassed their maximum, whales would have sold at the highest point, which is why we would have seen significant drops in the following weeks.
The recommendation for now is to wait until the end of the day or the specified time to buy Tokens at their lowest value and wait for #elonkmusk #TRUMP to release some Tweet or the highly anticipated news from the crypto world.