Binance Square

华籍美芮

Crypto辣妹|daruiruiya888|关注推特@amruirui123 获取更多加密知识|币安长期反佣20邀请码: V9GR5NLW
8 Following
175 Followers
97 Liked
36 Shared
All Content
--
See original
Today is the 3rd, and there are 4 days left until the next alpha airdrop on the 7th! We've reserved plenty of time for everyone to catch up on their homework! However, the qualifications for the airdrop are getting higher each time. Can everyone guess what the cutoff score for the next airdrop will be? Will scoring 140 points be enough to pass?🤔 #alpha
Today is the 3rd, and there are 4 days left until the next alpha airdrop on the 7th!
We've reserved plenty of time for everyone to catch up on their homework!
However, the qualifications for the airdrop are getting higher each time.
Can everyone guess what the cutoff score for the next airdrop will be?
Will scoring 140 points be enough to pass?🤔
#alpha
See original
Why is DeSci+AI so popular?For the DeSci+AI track, of course, I am optimistic in the long term! Let's take a look at why AI+DeSci is so popular 🤔 ✅DeSci: The "decentralized revolution" in the scientific community DeSci uses blockchain technology to bring traditional science into the Web3 era, solving long-standing problems in the research community: 1. Data Sharing: Traditional research data is kept more secretively than gold, while DeSci uses decentralized platforms to make data public and transparent, accelerating the research process. 2. Funding Transparency: Research funds are often eaten away by "middlemen"; DeSci uses smart contracts to ensure every penny is spent clearly. 3. Community-Driven: Scientists, investors, and even ordinary users can participate, crowdfunding research projects and lowering the threshold.

Why is DeSci+AI so popular?

For the DeSci+AI track, of course, I am optimistic in the long term!
Let's take a look at why AI+DeSci is so popular 🤔
✅DeSci: The "decentralized revolution" in the scientific community
DeSci uses blockchain technology to bring traditional science into the Web3 era, solving long-standing problems in the research community:
1. Data Sharing: Traditional research data is kept more secretively than gold, while DeSci uses decentralized platforms to make data public and transparent, accelerating the research process.
2. Funding Transparency: Research funds are often eaten away by "middlemen"; DeSci uses smart contracts to ensure every penny is spent clearly.
3. Community-Driven: Scientists, investors, and even ordinary users can participate, crowdfunding research projects and lowering the threshold.
See original
How to play with Binance Alpha Points?It's getting started, Binance's airdrop is beginning to test now. Binance recently launched the Alpha Points system to evaluate user activity in Binance Alpha and Binance Wallet, which directly affects participation in TGE or Alpha token airdrops. The passing line for this period is 45 points. Did you pass? Let's take a look at how to earn points! 1. Points Rules: 1. Point Sources: Daily points = Balance points (holding spot + Alpha tokens) + Trading volume points (buying Alpha tokens). Balance Points: Holding spot + Alpha balance (100-1000U earns 1 point, 1k-1wu earns 2 points, 1w-10wu earns 3 points, more than 10wu earns 4 points).

How to play with Binance Alpha Points?

It's getting started, Binance's airdrop is beginning to test now. Binance recently launched the Alpha Points system to evaluate user activity in Binance Alpha and Binance Wallet, which directly affects participation in TGE or Alpha token airdrops. The passing line for this period is 45 points. Did you pass? Let's take a look at how to earn points!

1. Points Rules:
1. Point Sources: Daily points = Balance points (holding spot + Alpha tokens) + Trading volume points (buying Alpha tokens).
Balance Points: Holding spot + Alpha balance (100-1000U earns 1 point, 1k-1wu earns 2 points, 1w-10wu earns 3 points, more than 10wu earns 4 points).
See original
Although there were a few hiccups with this Binance new listing, the official response was quick and the issue was resolved within half an hour to restore subscriptions! I still got to enjoy the luxurious pig's trotter rice for 230u!! So delicious~ A blind guess for the next Alpha airdrop task is? 1. Trade Alpha ≥3 times in 7 days 2. Trade ≥5 types of Alpha tokens 3. Hold Alpha tokens for more than 7 days 4. Accumulate Alpha token trading volume to reach 100u 🤔 How many of the above can you accomplish, family?
Although there were a few hiccups with this Binance new listing, the official response was quick and the issue was resolved within half an hour to restore subscriptions! I still got to enjoy the luxurious pig's trotter rice for 230u!! So delicious~

A blind guess for the next Alpha airdrop task is?
1. Trade Alpha ≥3 times in 7 days
2. Trade ≥5 types of Alpha tokens
3. Hold Alpha tokens for more than 7 days
4. Accumulate Alpha token trading volume to reach 100u
🤔 How many of the above can you accomplish, family?
See original
The Wall Street Journal reveals that Trump is launching a new token at the end of the month, is it true? Earlier this year, the $TRUMP coin that Old Trump issued made a profit for him, and he probably wants to leverage his presidential status to make another profit. This time I feel it should be the same old routine: raising hype 👉 raising funds 👉 consolidating fans. After all, the combination of tariffs and interest rate cuts has already made the market anxious, and he urgently needs a new topic to divert attention, while conveniently painting a picture for his supporters. However, the market's enthusiasm for memes has cooled down, and the sharp decline of $TRUMP and $MELANIA has already awakened many. If the new token does not bring any innovation, the speculation space is likely to be limited. Additionally, Trump's issuance of coins has raised suspicions of using power for personal gain, which has already attracted criticism from ethics experts and regulatory agencies; the SEC may not remain blind to this forever. Essentially, it is about weaponizing cryptocurrency to serve personal political and economic interests. Furthermore, Wall Street is already furious about his tariff policy; if the new token further disrupts the financial market, it may be collectively dismissed by the big players. However, Trump launching a new token is mostly an attempt to replicate the traffic miracle of $TRUMP, taking advantage of his presidential status to hype it up quickly and make another profit while stabilizing his fan base. But the crypto community is not foolish, and the market is not a cash machine for anyone; whether this operation can succeed depends on whether retail investors are willing to take the bait this time. Hey Xiaoshuai, are you still going for it this round? Remember to call me. #特朗普施压鲍威尔
The Wall Street Journal reveals that Trump is launching a new token at the end of the month, is it true?

Earlier this year, the $TRUMP coin that Old Trump issued made a profit for him, and he probably wants to leverage his presidential status to make another profit. This time I feel it should be the same old routine: raising hype 👉 raising funds 👉 consolidating fans. After all, the combination of tariffs and interest rate cuts has already made the market anxious, and he urgently needs a new topic to divert attention, while conveniently painting a picture for his supporters.

However, the market's enthusiasm for memes has cooled down, and the sharp decline of $TRUMP and $MELANIA has already awakened many. If the new token does not bring any innovation, the speculation space is likely to be limited. Additionally, Trump's issuance of coins has raised suspicions of using power for personal gain, which has already attracted criticism from ethics experts and regulatory agencies; the SEC may not remain blind to this forever. Essentially, it is about weaponizing cryptocurrency to serve personal political and economic interests. Furthermore, Wall Street is already furious about his tariff policy; if the new token further disrupts the financial market, it may be collectively dismissed by the big players.

However, Trump launching a new token is mostly an attempt to replicate the traffic miracle of $TRUMP, taking advantage of his presidential status to hype it up quickly and make another profit while stabilizing his fan base. But the crypto community is not foolish, and the market is not a cash machine for anyone; whether this operation can succeed depends on whether retail investors are willing to take the bait this time. Hey Xiaoshuai, are you still going for it this round? Remember to call me.
#特朗普施压鲍威尔
See original
A Brief Analysis of the Causes of OM's Flash Crash: The Reappearance of a Luna-style Collapse? Five Major Reasons for a 90% Plunge 1. Suspected Team Sell-off + Large Holder Dumping A certain whale group transferred 14.27 million OM (approximately $91 million) to OKX three days before the crash, which is suspected to have triggered panic due to early sell-off. The team was revealed to control 90% of the token supply, with a single wallet holding 792 million OM, leading to a high degree of price manipulation. 2. Off-exchange OTC Triggering a Death Spiral It is rumored that the team sold to whales off-exchange at a 50% discount, causing the price to halve, leading to panic selling by OTC buyers and instant depletion of liquidity. 3. Avalanche Effect of Leveraged Liquidation The price drop triggered forced liquidations on CEXs, with a series of liquidations during low liquidity periods in Asia, resulting in over $68.5 million in liquidations within 24 hours. 4. Long-term Breakdown of Community Trust Airdrop rules repeatedly shrinking, governance voting being ineffective, and indefinite extensions of lock-up periods have made community grievances a trigger for collapse. 5. CEX Risk Control Negligence or Manipulation? MANTRA accused a certain exchange of 'reckless liquidation' leading to the flash crash, while Binance distanced itself, claiming to have implemented leverage restrictions early on. The team denied selling off, but on-chain data contradicts their response. In summary: High control + OTC + Leverage = Perfect Harvest. Beware of all 'Strong Whale Coins', who will be next?
A Brief Analysis of the Causes of OM's Flash Crash: The Reappearance of a Luna-style Collapse? Five Major Reasons for a 90% Plunge

1. Suspected Team Sell-off + Large Holder Dumping
A certain whale group transferred 14.27 million OM (approximately $91 million) to OKX three days before the crash, which is suspected to have triggered panic due to early sell-off. The team was revealed to control 90% of the token supply, with a single wallet holding 792 million OM, leading to a high degree of price manipulation.

2. Off-exchange OTC Triggering a Death Spiral
It is rumored that the team sold to whales off-exchange at a 50% discount, causing the price to halve, leading to panic selling by OTC buyers and instant depletion of liquidity.

3. Avalanche Effect of Leveraged Liquidation
The price drop triggered forced liquidations on CEXs, with a series of liquidations during low liquidity periods in Asia, resulting in over $68.5 million in liquidations within 24 hours.

4. Long-term Breakdown of Community Trust
Airdrop rules repeatedly shrinking, governance voting being ineffective, and indefinite extensions of lock-up periods have made community grievances a trigger for collapse.

5. CEX Risk Control Negligence or Manipulation?
MANTRA accused a certain exchange of 'reckless liquidation' leading to the flash crash, while Binance distanced itself, claiming to have implemented leverage restrictions early on. The team denied selling off, but on-chain data contradicts their response.

In summary: High control + OTC + Leverage = Perfect Harvest. Beware of all 'Strong Whale Coins', who will be next?
See original
🔍Recently, the Hong Kong Carnival has been very popular and has been trending online. Although I didn't attend, I have been keeping an eye on the updates and beautiful photos! However, I have also seen many families have mixed opinions about KOLs attending the event; some actively participate, while others want to block them? Why is that?! 🤔 Do you tirelessly attend various industry conferences? In Web3, offline meetings are essentially the core scenarios for industry resource integration, information dissemination, and ecological collaboration. KOLs frequently participate in industry activities, which is not only a real-time follow-up on industry dynamics but also an important means of establishing personal influence. The consensus conference is also widely regarded as a 'resource bridge' between project parties, exchanges, and communities, after all, many KOLs in the industry now have a voice that even replaces traditional VCs. ✅Here are some benefits of attending conferences that I believe in: 1. You can get first-hand information on hot topics, which can help fans avoid pitfalls. 2. Resource integration, project connections, networking, and money-making. 3. Without some offline social skills, why should you replace VCs as a resource bridge? 4. Attendance and speaking at various small and large meetings accelerate the enhancement of personal influence and visibility. ✖Drawbacks: 1. Selectively expressing opinions to obtain sponsorship or airdrops from project parties, leading to a decrease in the truthfulness of statements, with interests binding and content distortion. 2. A large amount of ineffective information piling up, content homogeneity, occupying public resources. 3. Some social scenarios like yacht parties and rooftop cocktail events are criticized as 'capital revelry,' which goes against the 'technology-oriented' advocacy of Web3. ⭕️Although attending conferences accelerates information flow, promotes ecological collaboration, and shapes industry trends, it also breeds interest binding, dilutes content depth, and exacerbates a superficial atmosphere. I believe that the matter of 'whether to attend or not' should still be viewed objectively. For KOLs, it is essential to find a balance between 'resource integration' and 'content independence,' clarify interest disclosures, delve into vertical fields, avoid being solely bound by interests, and not treat fans as mere resources! For users, it is necessary to establish diverse information channels and filter noise with 'critical thinking,' rather than completely denying the value of attending conferences. As the underlying logic of Web3 suggests: decentralization does not mean the absence of nodes but achieving system robustness through the diversity of nodes. 👏If there’s anything I haven’t mentioned about the pros and cons, feel free to add your thoughts!! Lastly, the reason I didn’t go is definitely not because I can't afford the plane ticket! 🤭
🔍Recently, the Hong Kong Carnival has been very popular and has been trending online. Although I didn't attend, I have been keeping an eye on the updates and beautiful photos!
However, I have also seen many families have mixed opinions about KOLs attending the event; some actively participate, while others want to block them?
Why is that?! 🤔
Do you tirelessly attend various industry conferences?

In Web3, offline meetings are essentially the core scenarios for industry resource integration, information dissemination, and ecological collaboration. KOLs frequently participate in industry activities, which is not only a real-time follow-up on industry dynamics but also an important means of establishing personal influence. The consensus conference is also widely regarded as a 'resource bridge' between project parties, exchanges, and communities, after all, many KOLs in the industry now have a voice that even replaces traditional VCs.

✅Here are some benefits of attending conferences that I believe in:
1. You can get first-hand information on hot topics, which can help fans avoid pitfalls.
2. Resource integration, project connections, networking, and money-making.
3. Without some offline social skills, why should you replace VCs as a resource bridge?
4. Attendance and speaking at various small and large meetings accelerate the enhancement of personal influence and visibility.

✖Drawbacks:
1. Selectively expressing opinions to obtain sponsorship or airdrops from project parties, leading to a decrease in the truthfulness of statements, with interests binding and content distortion.
2. A large amount of ineffective information piling up, content homogeneity, occupying public resources.
3. Some social scenarios like yacht parties and rooftop cocktail events are criticized as 'capital revelry,' which goes against the 'technology-oriented' advocacy of Web3.

⭕️Although attending conferences accelerates information flow, promotes ecological collaboration, and shapes industry trends, it also breeds interest binding, dilutes content depth, and exacerbates a superficial atmosphere.
I believe that the matter of 'whether to attend or not' should still be viewed objectively. For KOLs, it is essential to find a balance between 'resource integration' and 'content independence,' clarify interest disclosures, delve into vertical fields, avoid being solely bound by interests, and not treat fans as mere resources! For users, it is necessary to establish diverse information channels and filter noise with 'critical thinking,' rather than completely denying the value of attending conferences.
As the underlying logic of Web3 suggests: decentralization does not mean the absence of nodes but achieving system robustness through the diversity of nodes.
👏If there’s anything I haven’t mentioned about the pros and cons, feel free to add your thoughts!!

Lastly, the reason I didn’t go is definitely not because I can't afford the plane ticket! 🤭
赞成派:去!我是正经参会人!
25%
反对派:不去!关我屁事!
38%
动摇派:有帅哥/美女我就去
0%
武装派:一定要去!给v狗一个大比兜!
37%
8 votes • Voting closed
See original
Summary of the FDUSD Decoupling Incident#BSC链热浪来袭 Keeping up with current events, summary of the FDUSD decoupling incident 1. Why did Brother Sun suddenly explode with anger? 👉 Having been scammed $500 million by FDT (it is said that the money is stuck and not released), he tweeted that 'FDT is going to run away!' Sun Yuchen accused FDT, the issuer of FDUSD, of being insolvent, which immediately triggered market panic, causing FDUSD to decouple by 13%. But Brother Sun is not a naive rabbit either; as a competitor to Binance, is he protecting rights or creating trouble? To put it bluntly, Brother Sun may be both a victim and a manipulator of panic. Blindly guessing, as long as FDUSD collapses and FDT's funding chain issues are confirmed, his $500 million might be cashed out even faster. Additionally, as a partner of FDUSD, Binance might as well undermine the market confidence in its competitor's stablecoin.

Summary of the FDUSD Decoupling Incident

#BSC链热浪来袭 Keeping up with current events, summary of the FDUSD decoupling incident

1. Why did Brother Sun suddenly explode with anger?
👉 Having been scammed $500 million by FDT (it is said that the money is stuck and not released), he tweeted that 'FDT is going to run away!' Sun Yuchen accused FDT, the issuer of FDUSD, of being insolvent, which immediately triggered market panic, causing FDUSD to decouple by 13%.
But Brother Sun is not a naive rabbit either; as a competitor to Binance, is he protecting rights or creating trouble? To put it bluntly, Brother Sun may be both a victim and a manipulator of panic. Blindly guessing, as long as FDUSD collapses and FDT's funding chain issues are confirmed, his $500 million might be cashed out even faster. Additionally, as a partner of FDUSD, Binance might as well undermine the market confidence in its competitor's stablecoin.
See original
Family members participating in Binance $PARTI's new token launch, hurry and check your exchange wallet, you've received an airdrop! This wave has brought profits again! Not in the web3 wallet! In the exchange spot 👍
Family members participating in Binance $PARTI's new token launch, hurry and check your exchange wallet, you've received an airdrop! This wave has brought profits again!
Not in the web3 wallet! In the exchange spot
👍
See original
Today's Binance New Token Launch Activity Experience Report 💰Investment Cost: No BNB in the position, current price recharged 3B at an average price of $640 Staking Cost: $1,920 Time Taken: 10 minutes 📊Returns Airdrop Earnings: $50 $KILO Price Fluctuation: After the event, BNB dropped to $626 Asset Depreciation: 3×($640-$626)=$42 Actual Profit: $50-$42=$8 (≈0.4% return rate) 🔥Summary Today's new token launch was oversubscribed by many times, so compared to the previous three times, it has decreased significantly. (I didn't participate in the first time, but basically every time after that was one or two hundred U) ⚠️Beginner's Pitfall Avoidance: If you don't have BNB in hand and don't want to hold BNB, I don't recommend jumping in to farm just with this set ✅Correct Approach: Suitable for users already holding positions to arbitrage 💡Advanced Strategy: ▫️Early stage of the event release → Market FOMO → BNB rises → Open long position ▫️End node of the event → Selling pressure emerges → BNB falls → Open short position Over #币安挖矿 #空投
Today's Binance New Token Launch Activity Experience Report

💰Investment Cost:
No BNB in the position, current price recharged 3B at an average price of $640
Staking Cost: $1,920
Time Taken: 10 minutes

📊Returns
Airdrop Earnings: $50 $KILO
Price Fluctuation: After the event, BNB dropped to $626
Asset Depreciation: 3×($640-$626)=$42
Actual Profit: $50-$42=$8 (≈0.4% return rate)

🔥Summary
Today's new token launch was oversubscribed by many times, so compared to the previous three times, it has decreased significantly. (I didn't participate in the first time, but basically every time after that was one or two hundred U)
⚠️Beginner's Pitfall Avoidance: If you don't have BNB in hand and don't want to hold BNB, I don't recommend jumping in to farm just with this set
✅Correct Approach: Suitable for users already holding positions to arbitrage

💡Advanced Strategy:
▫️Early stage of the event release → Market FOMO → BNB rises → Open long position
▫️End node of the event → Selling pressure emerges → BNB falls → Open short position
Over

#币安挖矿 #空投
See original
Ramadan: He Yi and CZ are about to be ambushed againFrom a conspiracy theory perspective, the recent activities of Binance may make Ramadan a new battlefield for CZ and He Yi's 'cultural marketing'. Combining the recent intensive hype of Middle Eastern themed meme coins on BNB Chain (like $Mubarak $mashallah), and the controversies caused by the historical Neiro events, the following scenario can be speculated: 1. Cultural Symbol Scythe Packaging - Using Ramadan greetings like 'EDIMubarak' to build religious emotional ties, alienating cultural symbols into trading tools - Creating community festivities through regional memes like 'wearing a cloth on the head', completing the harvesting process. The conspiracy group has already taken control of several related terms.

Ramadan: He Yi and CZ are about to be ambushed again

From a conspiracy theory perspective, the recent activities of Binance may make Ramadan a new battlefield for CZ and He Yi's 'cultural marketing'.
Combining the recent intensive hype of Middle Eastern themed meme coins on BNB Chain (like $Mubarak $mashallah), and the controversies caused by the historical Neiro events, the following scenario can be speculated:

1. Cultural Symbol Scythe Packaging - Using Ramadan greetings like 'EDIMubarak' to build religious emotional ties, alienating cultural symbols into trading tools - Creating community festivities through regional memes like 'wearing a cloth on the head', completing the harvesting process. The conspiracy group has already taken control of several related terms.
See original
💰Opportunities for getting rich lost on the BSC chain in the past week 🔥1.MUBARAK Means "fortunate" in Arabic, mentioned by CZ on Twitter. Highest increase: 79890.88% 🔥2.TUT Testnet token, later became the mainnet AIAgent. Highest increase: 77077.99% 🔥3.BNB card Inspired by an "early construction card" image officially released by BNB. Highest increase: 19437.67% 🔥4.Mubarakah Derived from Mubarak, the female version of Mubarak. Highest increase: 39500.41% 🔥5.DDDD Mentioned in a tweet by He Yi about DDDD bringing along his brother; those who know, know. Highest increase: 16260.57% 🔥6.BNBXBT AI tool for the BNB chain. Highest increase: 16864.48% 🔥7.sheepcz Accompanying image from a post by He Yi, CZ muscular sheep image. Highest increase: 23157.56% 🔥8.Bambi Binance mascot little deer. Highest increase: 8909.24% 🔥9.QMubarak Derived from Mubarak, Queen He Yi. Highest increase: 82454.42% How many do you hold? 🤔#币安投票上币
💰Opportunities for getting rich lost on the BSC chain in the past week
🔥1.MUBARAK
Means "fortunate" in Arabic, mentioned by CZ on Twitter.
Highest increase: 79890.88%

🔥2.TUT
Testnet token, later became the mainnet AIAgent.
Highest increase: 77077.99%

🔥3.BNB card
Inspired by an "early construction card" image officially released by BNB.
Highest increase: 19437.67%

🔥4.Mubarakah
Derived from Mubarak, the female version of Mubarak.
Highest increase: 39500.41%

🔥5.DDDD
Mentioned in a tweet by He Yi about DDDD bringing along his brother; those who know, know.
Highest increase: 16260.57%

🔥6.BNBXBT
AI tool for the BNB chain.
Highest increase: 16864.48%

🔥7.sheepcz
Accompanying image from a post by He Yi, CZ muscular sheep image.
Highest increase: 23157.56%

🔥8.Bambi
Binance mascot little deer.
Highest increase: 8909.24%

🔥9.QMubarak
Derived from Mubarak, Queen He Yi.
Highest increase: 82454.42%

How many do you hold? 🤔#币安投票上币
See original
🔥【Trading Principles】3 Steps to Escape the Liquidation Trap | Patient Alchemy 💎Core Principle: "Patience with a Gun > Blind Actions with Bullets" 90% of losses in the crypto market stem from FOMO emotions; top traders lock in annual returns through "strategic dormancy" 🚨Deadly Trap Self-Check: ✅ Wanting to act upon seeing fluctuations ✅ Checking positions more than 3 times/hour ✅ Deceiving oneself with "small position trial trades" ⚡️Minimal Survival Guide: 1️⃣ Freeze Button Mechanism - Set a "maximum number of trades per day" (recommended ≤ 3 times) - Activate Binance's "read-only mode" to enforce calm when triggering signals 2️⃣ Sniper-style Opening Trades - Only act after meeting "triple verification": ① Multi-timeframe trend resonance ② Significant on-chain large transfers ③ Market Fear Index < 25 3️⃣ Automatic Insurance System - Immediately transfer 50% to Binance's Earn feature when profits exceed 20% - Trigger a 72-hour trading ban when losses reach 5% 🌰Blood and Tears Case Study: An institutional trader missed a 30% main upward wave of SOL by taking profits 5 minutes early #交易心态 #熊市生存指南
🔥【Trading Principles】3 Steps to Escape the Liquidation Trap | Patient Alchemy

💎Core Principle:
"Patience with a Gun > Blind Actions with Bullets"
90% of losses in the crypto market stem from FOMO emotions; top traders lock in annual returns through "strategic dormancy"

🚨Deadly Trap Self-Check:
✅ Wanting to act upon seeing fluctuations
✅ Checking positions more than 3 times/hour
✅ Deceiving oneself with "small position trial trades"

⚡️Minimal Survival Guide:
1️⃣ Freeze Button Mechanism
- Set a "maximum number of trades per day" (recommended ≤ 3 times)
- Activate Binance's "read-only mode" to enforce calm when triggering signals

2️⃣ Sniper-style Opening Trades
- Only act after meeting "triple verification":
① Multi-timeframe trend resonance
② Significant on-chain large transfers
③ Market Fear Index < 25

3️⃣ Automatic Insurance System
- Immediately transfer 50% to Binance's Earn feature when profits exceed 20%
- Trigger a 72-hour trading ban when losses reach 5%

🌰Blood and Tears Case Study: An institutional trader missed a 30% main upward wave of SOL by taking profits 5 minutes early

#交易心态 #熊市生存指南
See original
【In-Depth Analysis】Binance's Stablecoin Delisting Policy in the EU | A Must-Read Guide for Traders 📌Core Event: Binance has officially announced that in order to fully comply with the EU's Market in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), it will delist several non-compliant stablecoins in the EU/European Economic Area (EEA) starting March 31, 2024. The affected cryptocurrencies include: ▫️USDT (Tether) ▫️FDUSD ▫️TUSD ▫️USTC (formerly UST) ▫️DAI and a total of 9 major cryptocurrencies 🚨Urgent Timeline: - By March 31: All withdrawals of non-compliant stablecoins must be completed. - March 31, UTC+0: Related trading pairs (e.g., BTC/USDT) will be fully halted. - March 31, 2025, 03:00 UTC: Quantitative trading bot services for affected cryptocurrencies will be terminated. 💡User Response Guide: 1️⃣ Asset Conversion Recommendations • Immediately check for non-compliant stablecoins in your holdings. • Prioritize converting to compliant assets like EURⓂ️, BUSD using Binance's 'Automatic Exchange' feature. • Fiat currency channel users are advised to convert to euro reserves. 2️⃣ Adjusting Trading Strategies • Close relevant grid/quantitative bots in advance. • Pay attention to newly listed compliant stablecoin trading pairs. • Establish alternative trading pairs priced in euros. 3️⃣ Changes in Deposit and Withdrawal Channels • Retain compliant stablecoins like EURⓂ️ for daily trading. • Use SEPA channels for euro deposit and withdrawal alternatives. 🌐Industry Ripple Effect: • Multi-platform synchronized action: Coinbase, Crypto.com, and others have initiated similar delisting processes. • Rise of compliant stablecoins: Market shares of EURⓂ️, USDC, etc., are expected to grow significantly. • Derivatives market volatility: There may be abnormal fluctuations in funding rates for some perpetual contracts. ⚠️Special Reminder: This adjustment stems from the strict regulatory requirements of the EU MiCA legislation, which all exchanges operating in the EU must comply with. Assets not dealt with in a timely manner will face: ▫️Trading function freeze ▫️Inability to participate in new token mining ▫️Restrictions on wealth management services 🔮Future Outlook: Binance has launched the 'MiCA Compliance Plan' and is expected to introduce: • A brand new fiat-backed stablecoin • Regulatory-compliant DeFi products • Enhanced euro trading zone (This article does not constitute investment advice; please refer to official announcements for specific operations) #BinanceNewPolicy #MiCARegulation #StablecoinNewLandscape 📌Click to follow for real-time policy interpretation and operational tutorials!
【In-Depth Analysis】Binance's Stablecoin Delisting Policy in the EU | A Must-Read Guide for Traders

📌Core Event:
Binance has officially announced that in order to fully comply with the EU's Market in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), it will delist several non-compliant stablecoins in the EU/European Economic Area (EEA) starting March 31, 2024. The affected cryptocurrencies include:
▫️USDT (Tether)
▫️FDUSD
▫️TUSD
▫️USTC (formerly UST)
▫️DAI and a total of 9 major cryptocurrencies

🚨Urgent Timeline:
- By March 31: All withdrawals of non-compliant stablecoins must be completed.
- March 31, UTC+0: Related trading pairs (e.g., BTC/USDT) will be fully halted.
- March 31, 2025, 03:00 UTC: Quantitative trading bot services for affected cryptocurrencies will be terminated.

💡User Response Guide:
1️⃣ Asset Conversion Recommendations
• Immediately check for non-compliant stablecoins in your holdings.
• Prioritize converting to compliant assets like EURⓂ️, BUSD using Binance's 'Automatic Exchange' feature.
• Fiat currency channel users are advised to convert to euro reserves.

2️⃣ Adjusting Trading Strategies
• Close relevant grid/quantitative bots in advance.
• Pay attention to newly listed compliant stablecoin trading pairs.
• Establish alternative trading pairs priced in euros.

3️⃣ Changes in Deposit and Withdrawal Channels
• Retain compliant stablecoins like EURⓂ️ for daily trading.
• Use SEPA channels for euro deposit and withdrawal alternatives.

🌐Industry Ripple Effect:
• Multi-platform synchronized action: Coinbase, Crypto.com, and others have initiated similar delisting processes.
• Rise of compliant stablecoins: Market shares of EURⓂ️, USDC, etc., are expected to grow significantly.
• Derivatives market volatility: There may be abnormal fluctuations in funding rates for some perpetual contracts.

⚠️Special Reminder:
This adjustment stems from the strict regulatory requirements of the EU MiCA legislation, which all exchanges operating in the EU must comply with. Assets not dealt with in a timely manner will face:
▫️Trading function freeze
▫️Inability to participate in new token mining
▫️Restrictions on wealth management services

🔮Future Outlook:
Binance has launched the 'MiCA Compliance Plan' and is expected to introduce:
• A brand new fiat-backed stablecoin
• Regulatory-compliant DeFi products
• Enhanced euro trading zone

(This article does not constitute investment advice; please refer to official announcements for specific operations)

#BinanceNewPolicy #MiCARegulation #StablecoinNewLandscape

📌Click to follow for real-time policy interpretation and operational tutorials!
See original
RWA Deep Dive: From Farmers' Houses to Charging Piles, How to Connect Trillions of Yuan in Virtual and Real Assets? 💡 🔥 What is RWA? RWA (Real World Asset) refers to the tokenization of real assets, dividing physical assets (real estate, equipment, etc.) into tradable tokens on the blockchain. Traditional asset monetization requires collateral or IPOs, while RWA allows assets to be 'fragmented for financing' without going public. 🌰 Example: A second-generation Shenzhen resident owns a farmers' house generating 5 million yuan in annual rent and wants to raise 30 million yuan for a startup. By using RWA, he divides 1/3 of the property rights into 10,000 tokens, each representing 0.0033% of property rights and corresponding rental income. Investors can buy tokens on the exchange to enjoy dividends, greatly enhancing asset liquidity. 🚀 Three Core Values of RWA 1️⃣ Barrier-Breaking Financing: BCG predicts that by 2028, the RWA market size will reach 16 trillion dollars, as the liquidity of physical assets on-chain breaks geographical limitations. 2️⃣ Cost Reduction and Efficiency Improvement: Ant Group and Langxin Technology have tokenized thousands of charging piles, raising 100 million yuan in Hong Kong, with IoT devices uploading data in real-time to ensure credibility. 3️⃣ Derivative Innovation: RWA assets can develop financial products like leverage and futures, and even provide underlying asset support for the metaverse economy. 🔧 Ant Group's "Two Chains and One Bridge" Solution | Asset Chain | Physical assets on-chain → Verify value/ownership → Generate standardized tokens | Trading Chain | Global investors trading in real-time → Enhance secondary market liquidity | Cross-chain Bridge | Through cryptographic technology + compliance review, connect the mainland asset chain with the Hong Kong trading chain ⚠️ Fatal Risk Warnings 1️⃣ Valuation Black Hole: Is the property valued at 100 million or 300 million? Lack of an authoritative pricing system can easily create a breeding ground for air coins. 2️⃣ Data Fraud: Is the rent 5 million or 1 million? Real-time monitoring with IoT + digital twins is needed to prevent tampering. 3️⃣ Compliance Minefield: Cross-border asset flows involve foreign exchange controls and tax compliance, and Ant's solution has integrated KYC/AML mechanisms. 🌐 Future Imagination Space When Tesla factories, cultural relics from the Forbidden City, and even personal IPs are tokenized as RWA, the boundaries between traditional finance and DeFi will completely disappear. However, in the current stage, two types of projects should be approached with caution: ✅ Pragmatists: Such as Ant's charging pile RWA, binding physical data + strong compliance 🚫 Dream Sellers: 'Air RWA' with no IoT support and vague valuations #RWA
RWA Deep Dive: From Farmers' Houses to Charging Piles, How to Connect Trillions of Yuan in Virtual and Real Assets? 💡

🔥 What is RWA?
RWA (Real World Asset) refers to the tokenization of real assets, dividing physical assets (real estate, equipment, etc.) into tradable tokens on the blockchain. Traditional asset monetization requires collateral or IPOs, while RWA allows assets to be 'fragmented for financing' without going public.

🌰 Example:
A second-generation Shenzhen resident owns a farmers' house generating 5 million yuan in annual rent and wants to raise 30 million yuan for a startup. By using RWA, he divides 1/3 of the property rights into 10,000 tokens, each representing 0.0033% of property rights and corresponding rental income. Investors can buy tokens on the exchange to enjoy dividends, greatly enhancing asset liquidity.

🚀 Three Core Values of RWA
1️⃣ Barrier-Breaking Financing: BCG predicts that by 2028, the RWA market size will reach 16 trillion dollars, as the liquidity of physical assets on-chain breaks geographical limitations.
2️⃣ Cost Reduction and Efficiency Improvement: Ant Group and Langxin Technology have tokenized thousands of charging piles, raising 100 million yuan in Hong Kong, with IoT devices uploading data in real-time to ensure credibility.
3️⃣ Derivative Innovation: RWA assets can develop financial products like leverage and futures, and even provide underlying asset support for the metaverse economy.

🔧 Ant Group's "Two Chains and One Bridge" Solution
| Asset Chain | Physical assets on-chain → Verify value/ownership → Generate standardized tokens
| Trading Chain | Global investors trading in real-time → Enhance secondary market liquidity
| Cross-chain Bridge | Through cryptographic technology + compliance review, connect the mainland asset chain with the Hong Kong trading chain

⚠️ Fatal Risk Warnings
1️⃣ Valuation Black Hole: Is the property valued at 100 million or 300 million? Lack of an authoritative pricing system can easily create a breeding ground for air coins.
2️⃣ Data Fraud: Is the rent 5 million or 1 million? Real-time monitoring with IoT + digital twins is needed to prevent tampering.
3️⃣ Compliance Minefield: Cross-border asset flows involve foreign exchange controls and tax compliance, and Ant's solution has integrated KYC/AML mechanisms.

🌐 Future Imagination Space
When Tesla factories, cultural relics from the Forbidden City, and even personal IPs are tokenized as RWA, the boundaries between traditional finance and DeFi will completely disappear. However, in the current stage, two types of projects should be approached with caution:
✅ Pragmatists: Such as Ant's charging pile RWA, binding physical data + strong compliance
🚫 Dream Sellers: 'Air RWA' with no IoT support and vague valuations
#RWA
See original
🚀 Binance Tests Pre-Launch Trading "Limit Up Mechanism": RED Rises Up to 400% in Three Days, Controversy and Opportunity Coexist On February 25, Binance announced that it would test the "Limit Up Mechanism" in pre-launch trading on Launchpool, applied for the first time to the RedStone (RED) token. This mechanism will limit the price increase of new tokens within 72 hours before their launch, gradually easing the restrictions in phases: 200% price increase limit (February 28, 18:00 - March 1, 17:59) 300% price increase limit (March 1, 18:00 - March 2, 17:59) 400% price increase limit (March 2, 18:00 - March 3, 17:59) After that, trading will be completely open. Purpose of the mechanism: To reduce extreme price fluctuations of new tokens and enhance market controllability. RED, as a cross-chain oracle project, has a total supply of 1 billion tokens and an initial circulating supply of 280 million tokens. Users can participate in Launchpool mining by staking BNB, FDUSD, and USDC. Points of Controversy 1. Supporters: Believe the mechanism can curb speculation, reduce extreme volatility, and provide a "cooling-off period" for the market. 2. Opponents: Violates the "decentralization" principle of the crypto market, and the presence of multiple platforms may intensify arbitrage. Only limits price increases, with no limit on price drops, making the rule design unbalanced (as per Geight16's viewpoint). The 72-hour price limit period is too long, and if the opening price is set too low, it may artificially create a "trading halt" effect (questioned by DeFi small miners). Historical Comparison After the "3·12 Crash" in 2020, Huobi attempted a circuit breaker mechanism, but it was not widely adopted due to the nature of free markets. Binance's former CEO, Zhao Changpeng, also stated that a circuit breaker mechanism only applies to monopolized markets and its compatibility with the crypto ecosystem is questionable. Future Outlook: Binance's current test may provide new directions for exploring market stability, but whether it can be implemented long-term remains to be seen. Do you support Binance's "Limit Up Mechanism"? 👉 Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments! #CryptoInnovation #MarketMechanism #REDToken
🚀 Binance Tests Pre-Launch Trading "Limit Up Mechanism": RED Rises Up to 400% in Three Days, Controversy and Opportunity Coexist

On February 25, Binance announced that it would test the "Limit Up Mechanism" in pre-launch trading on Launchpool, applied for the first time to the RedStone (RED) token. This mechanism will limit the price increase of new tokens within 72 hours before their launch, gradually easing the restrictions in phases:
200% price increase limit (February 28, 18:00 - March 1, 17:59)
300% price increase limit (March 1, 18:00 - March 2, 17:59)
400% price increase limit (March 2, 18:00 - March 3, 17:59)
After that, trading will be completely open.

Purpose of the mechanism: To reduce extreme price fluctuations of new tokens and enhance market controllability. RED, as a cross-chain oracle project, has a total supply of 1 billion tokens and an initial circulating supply of 280 million tokens. Users can participate in Launchpool mining by staking BNB, FDUSD, and USDC.

Points of Controversy
1. Supporters: Believe the mechanism can curb speculation, reduce extreme volatility, and provide a "cooling-off period" for the market.
2. Opponents:
Violates the "decentralization" principle of the crypto market, and the presence of multiple platforms may intensify arbitrage.
Only limits price increases, with no limit on price drops, making the rule design unbalanced (as per Geight16's viewpoint).
The 72-hour price limit period is too long, and if the opening price is set too low, it may artificially create a "trading halt" effect (questioned by DeFi small miners).

Historical Comparison
After the "3·12 Crash" in 2020, Huobi attempted a circuit breaker mechanism, but it was not widely adopted due to the nature of free markets. Binance's former CEO, Zhao Changpeng, also stated that a circuit breaker mechanism only applies to monopolized markets and its compatibility with the crypto ecosystem is questionable.

Future Outlook: Binance's current test may provide new directions for exploring market stability, but whether it can be implemented long-term remains to be seen.

Do you support Binance's "Limit Up Mechanism"?
👉 Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments!

#CryptoInnovation #MarketMechanism #REDToken
See original
【Cryptocurrency Market 24H Report】Battle for Key Support Level After Plunge 📉 Total market value evaporated by $188 billion in a single day • Total cryptocurrency market value fell below the critical support of $3 trillion (currently reported at $2.95 trillion) • BTC tests the death line at $87,041 (current price $89,907) • Altcoins face a massacre: HYPE plummeted 17.5% to $19.16 🔥 Core Battlefield Interpretation 1. If BTC loses $87k, it may drop to $85k 2. If HYPE holds at $19.16, it may rebound to $23.2 3. $3 trillion becomes the critical threshold for market confidence recovery 💥 Breaking News • OKX pays $504 million to settle with the U.S. Department of Justice • MicroStrategy purchases an additional 20,356 BTC (stock price remains under pressure) ⚠ Warning Signals BTC has continuously fallen below key trend lines, institutional buying has failed to boost the market, and tight liquidity may trigger a chain reaction. Currently, all rebounds need to be based on regaining a market value of $3 trillion; investors please fasten your seatbelts.
【Cryptocurrency Market 24H Report】Battle for Key Support Level After Plunge

📉 Total market value evaporated by $188 billion in a single day
• Total cryptocurrency market value fell below the critical support of $3 trillion (currently reported at $2.95 trillion)
• BTC tests the death line at $87,041 (current price $89,907)
• Altcoins face a massacre: HYPE plummeted 17.5% to $19.16

🔥 Core Battlefield Interpretation
1. If BTC loses $87k, it may drop to $85k
2. If HYPE holds at $19.16, it may rebound to $23.2
3. $3 trillion becomes the critical threshold for market confidence recovery

💥 Breaking News
• OKX pays $504 million to settle with the U.S. Department of Justice
• MicroStrategy purchases an additional 20,356 BTC (stock price remains under pressure)

⚠ Warning Signals
BTC has continuously fallen below key trend lines, institutional buying has failed to boost the market, and tight liquidity may trigger a chain reaction. Currently, all rebounds need to be based on regaining a market value of $3 trillion; investors please fasten your seatbelts.
See original
Bybit's $1.46 billion theft hacker case review 1. Incident trigger On February 21, the chain detective ZachXBT detected an abnormal transfer of $1.46 billion in assets (mETH/stETH) from Bybit's cold wallet, which was converted into ETH through DEX, becoming the largest single theft in the history of encryption, with an amount exceeding 10 times the DAO incident in 2016. 2. Attack logic: social engineering + contract vulnerability double kill 1. Malicious contract usurpation: The attacker forged the signature interface, induced Bybit's multi-signature auditor to sign the transaction, used `delegatecall` to tamper with the Safe contract storage slot, hijacked the control of funds, and called the backdoor to clear the assets. 2. APT-level penetration: Hackers have long lurked in multi-signature administrator devices, and concealed the real transaction instructions by forging the official domain name interface. They only need to break through one signer to succeed, exposing the fatal flaws of the traditional multi-signature solution. 3. Emergency assistance from the industry - Exchange transfusion: Binance, Bitget, etc. supported Bybit with more than 50,000 ETH (about 125 million US dollars). Bitget said that user assets were not affected and Bybit's annual profit could cover the losses. - Market shock: The related stablecoin protocol USDe was once de-anchored to 0.96 US dollars, and the issuer Ethena urgently clarified that the assets were not stored in the exchange. 4. Security warning 1. Institutional-level defense is imminent: Security agencies call for the adoption of custody solutions with behavior monitoring. The traditional hardware wallet + multi-signature model is difficult to resist the targeted attacks of national hackers (such as the North Korean Lazarus organization). 2. Fork controversy re-emerged: The history of the DAO incident fork was re-mentioned, and the community heatedly discussed whether to roll back the transaction. Coinbase and BitMEX executives spoke out and debated the immutability of the chain. 5. Subsequent response - Bybit suspended the wallet involved, activated the $20 billion asset management scale and bridge loan to cope with the pressure of withdrawal; - The Safe team suspended the function to cooperate with the investigation, Binance CZ, SlowMist and others joined the on-chain tracking, and the flow of funds has been marked for monitoring. Core reflection This incident exposed the shortcomings of institutions in fighting APT attacks, and may promote the industry to establish new standards such as hardware isolation and real-time threat detection. As of now, Bybit has joined forces with global law enforcement agencies to track down funds, and the follow-up of the incident may affect regulatory policies and market confidence.
Bybit's $1.46 billion theft hacker case review

1. Incident trigger
On February 21, the chain detective ZachXBT detected an abnormal transfer of $1.46 billion in assets (mETH/stETH) from Bybit's cold wallet, which was converted into ETH through DEX, becoming the largest single theft in the history of encryption, with an amount exceeding 10 times the DAO incident in 2016.

2. Attack logic: social engineering + contract vulnerability double kill

1. Malicious contract usurpation: The attacker forged the signature interface, induced Bybit's multi-signature auditor to sign the transaction, used `delegatecall` to tamper with the Safe contract storage slot, hijacked the control of funds, and called the backdoor to clear the assets.
2. APT-level penetration: Hackers have long lurked in multi-signature administrator devices, and concealed the real transaction instructions by forging the official domain name interface. They only need to break through one signer to succeed, exposing the fatal flaws of the traditional multi-signature solution.

3. Emergency assistance from the industry
- Exchange transfusion: Binance, Bitget, etc. supported Bybit with more than 50,000 ETH (about 125 million US dollars). Bitget said that user assets were not affected and Bybit's annual profit could cover the losses.
- Market shock: The related stablecoin protocol USDe was once de-anchored to 0.96 US dollars, and the issuer Ethena urgently clarified that the assets were not stored in the exchange.

4. Security warning
1. Institutional-level defense is imminent: Security agencies call for the adoption of custody solutions with behavior monitoring. The traditional hardware wallet + multi-signature model is difficult to resist the targeted attacks of national hackers (such as the North Korean Lazarus organization).
2. Fork controversy re-emerged: The history of the DAO incident fork was re-mentioned, and the community heatedly discussed whether to roll back the transaction. Coinbase and BitMEX executives spoke out and debated the immutability of the chain.

5. Subsequent response
- Bybit suspended the wallet involved, activated the $20 billion asset management scale and bridge loan to cope with the pressure of withdrawal;
- The Safe team suspended the function to cooperate with the investigation, Binance CZ, SlowMist and others joined the on-chain tracking, and the flow of funds has been marked for monitoring.

Core reflection
This incident exposed the shortcomings of institutions in fighting APT attacks, and may promote the industry to establish new standards such as hardware isolation and real-time threat detection. As of now, Bybit has joined forces with global law enforcement agencies to track down funds, and the follow-up of the incident may affect regulatory policies and market confidence.
See original
Argentine President "endorses" $LIBRA: The leeks-cutting trap behind the $107 million cash-out 🚨 💥The core of the incident On February 15, the official X account of Argentine President Javier Milei announced the launch of MEME coin LIBRA, and the market value soared to $4 billion before crashing. The team was exposed to have removed the $87 million liquidity pool, and the president urgently deleted the tweet to distance himself from the matter. This farce exposed the insider trading and liquidity manipulation in the crypto market. 🕒A quick look at the timeline of leeks-cutting 1️⃣ Insider sniping - At 6 a.m.: Milei released the LIBRA contract address, and 3 insider addresses cashed out $20.18 million within 1 hour. - Typical operation: A certain address ambushed 1 million USDC before the tweet, and sold at a high point to make a profit of $8.58 million (8.5 times). 2️⃣ Team Pool Draw - 10 am: The project party withdrew the liquidity pool (87M USDC+SOL) within 4 hours, and the coin price crashed from $4.61 to $0.5. - On-chain data: 82% of tokens are controlled by a single entity, and there is no disclosure of token economics. 3️⃣ Emergency Cut - 11:30: Milei deleted the tweet saying "being used"; KIP Protocol stated that the president was not involved in the development. - 14:00: KIP co-founder Julian argued that he only managed fund allocation and there was no pre-sale of tokens. 4️⃣ On-chain Harvest - The team-related wallet cashed out $107 million (57.6 million USDC+249,000 SOL). - The total profit from insider trading exceeded $30 million, and a whale cashed out $6.72 million in a single transaction. 📉Tearful loss record - 24 traders lost more than one million US dollars, and the largest single-account loss was 5.17 million US dollars💔. - The Solayer team revealed that they lost 2 million, and pointed out that the KIP Protocol members were "hackers"👾. - Typical case: an investor entered the market with 2.85 million US dollars, and only 780,000 was left after 2 hours. ⚠️Deep-seated contradictions and investment warnings 1️⃣ Economic difficulties breed speculation Argentina's inflation rate is 277%, and the currency has depreciated by 1500:1. LIBRA exposes policy contradictions and regulatory vacuums. 2️⃣ Celebrity token trust crisis From Trump's TRUMP coin to LIBRA, politician-endorsed projects have become systematic harvesting tools. 3️⃣ Liquidity manipulation risks Unilateral fund pool, team control of more than 80%, second-level withdrawal of pools, ordinary investors have become lambs to be slaughtered. 📖Summary: Be wary of politicians' concept coins without physical support, and stay away from projects that do not disclose token economic models🚩. The crypto market needs to establish a more transparent insider trading supervision mechanism, otherwise the LIBRA-style farce will be repeated.
Argentine President "endorses" $LIBRA: The leeks-cutting trap behind the $107 million cash-out 🚨

💥The core of the incident
On February 15, the official X account of Argentine President Javier Milei announced the launch of MEME coin LIBRA, and the market value soared to $4 billion before crashing. The team was exposed to have removed the $87 million liquidity pool, and the president urgently deleted the tweet to distance himself from the matter. This farce exposed the insider trading and liquidity manipulation in the crypto market.

🕒A quick look at the timeline of leeks-cutting
1️⃣ Insider sniping
- At 6 a.m.: Milei released the LIBRA contract address, and 3 insider addresses cashed out $20.18 million within 1 hour.
- Typical operation: A certain address ambushed 1 million USDC before the tweet, and sold at a high point to make a profit of $8.58 million (8.5 times).

2️⃣ Team Pool Draw
- 10 am: The project party withdrew the liquidity pool (87M USDC+SOL) within 4 hours, and the coin price crashed from $4.61 to $0.5.
- On-chain data: 82% of tokens are controlled by a single entity, and there is no disclosure of token economics.

3️⃣ Emergency Cut
- 11:30: Milei deleted the tweet saying "being used"; KIP Protocol stated that the president was not involved in the development.
- 14:00: KIP co-founder Julian argued that he only managed fund allocation and there was no pre-sale of tokens.

4️⃣ On-chain Harvest
- The team-related wallet cashed out $107 million (57.6 million USDC+249,000 SOL).
- The total profit from insider trading exceeded $30 million, and a whale cashed out $6.72 million in a single transaction.

📉Tearful loss record
- 24 traders lost more than one million US dollars, and the largest single-account loss was 5.17 million US dollars💔.
- The Solayer team revealed that they lost 2 million, and pointed out that the KIP Protocol members were "hackers"👾.
- Typical case: an investor entered the market with 2.85 million US dollars, and only 780,000 was left after 2 hours.

⚠️Deep-seated contradictions and investment warnings
1️⃣ Economic difficulties breed speculation
Argentina's inflation rate is 277%, and the currency has depreciated by 1500:1. LIBRA exposes policy contradictions and regulatory vacuums.

2️⃣ Celebrity token trust crisis
From Trump's TRUMP coin to LIBRA, politician-endorsed projects have become systematic harvesting tools.

3️⃣ Liquidity manipulation risks
Unilateral fund pool, team control of more than 80%, second-level withdrawal of pools, ordinary investors have become lambs to be slaughtered.

📖Summary: Be wary of politicians' concept coins without physical support, and stay away from projects that do not disclose token economic models🚩. The crypto market needs to establish a more transparent insider trading supervision mechanism, otherwise the LIBRA-style farce will be repeated.
--
Bullish
See original
BNB Chain makes a strong comeback! 2025 roadmap revealed🚀 Recently, the meme coin $TST surged dramatically, bringing BNB Chain back into the spotlight🔥! On February 9th, the number of independent addresses on BNB Chain surpassed 500 million, becoming the leading EVM chain in transaction volume over the past 30 days. With the release of the 2025 roadmap and the pause in SEC litigation, the enthusiasm for the BNB Chain ecosystem has skyrocketed! Key Highlights✨: 1️⃣ Transaction Speed Boost: Block generation time reduced from 3 seconds to under 1 second, allowing DeFi and AI applications to respond faster! 2️⃣ Gas-Free Transactions: Supports any BEP-20 token for Gas payment, lowering user barriers and promoting Web3 adoption💡. 3️⃣ Anti-MEV Protection: Hides transaction details to combat front-running bots and protect retail investors' rights🛡️. 4️⃣ Smart Wallet Upgrade: Supports batch transactions and will include AI assistants in the future, providing an experience comparable to traditional payments💳. 5️⃣ AI-First Strategy: Promotes deep integration of AI and Web3 through code assistants, data DAOs, and more🤖. 6️⃣ Meme Ecosystem Support: Launching no-code issuance tools to embrace retail trends and reduce risks🎉. Summary: BNB Chain is gearing up to compete with Solana through technological upgrades, user experience optimization, and AI innovation, with a promising future ahead! Yesterday, I bought a fake dog $PERRY At that time, the market cap was 13 million dollars Now it has fallen to 300 thousand dollars After my brother called it out, he directly drained the liquidity from the BSC chain Yesterday, BSC users voted and $PERRY had the highest support Shouldn't a meme be the consensus of retail investors? In the end, did it just become CZ's personal showcase? Now over 9,160 users are stuck at the peak with PERRY It's also among the top ten of many local coins on the BSC chain (🥦 excluded) The pool has 432K worth of undervalued assets, family, let's go for it! 🌟 #BNBChain
BNB Chain makes a strong comeback! 2025 roadmap revealed🚀

Recently, the meme coin $TST surged dramatically, bringing BNB Chain back into the spotlight🔥! On February 9th, the number of independent addresses on BNB Chain surpassed 500 million, becoming the leading EVM chain in transaction volume over the past 30 days. With the release of the 2025 roadmap and the pause in SEC litigation, the enthusiasm for the BNB Chain ecosystem has skyrocketed!

Key Highlights✨:
1️⃣ Transaction Speed Boost: Block generation time reduced from 3 seconds to under 1 second, allowing DeFi and AI applications to respond faster!
2️⃣ Gas-Free Transactions: Supports any BEP-20 token for Gas payment, lowering user barriers and promoting Web3 adoption💡.
3️⃣ Anti-MEV Protection: Hides transaction details to combat front-running bots and protect retail investors' rights🛡️.
4️⃣ Smart Wallet Upgrade: Supports batch transactions and will include AI assistants in the future, providing an experience comparable to traditional payments💳.
5️⃣ AI-First Strategy: Promotes deep integration of AI and Web3 through code assistants, data DAOs, and more🤖.
6️⃣ Meme Ecosystem Support: Launching no-code issuance tools to embrace retail trends and reduce risks🎉.

Summary: BNB Chain is gearing up to compete with Solana through technological upgrades, user experience optimization, and AI innovation, with a promising future ahead!

Yesterday, I bought a fake dog $PERRY
At that time, the market cap was 13 million dollars
Now it has fallen to 300 thousand dollars
After my brother called it out, he directly drained the liquidity from the BSC chain
Yesterday, BSC users voted and $PERRY had the highest support
Shouldn't a meme be the consensus of retail investors?
In the end, did it just become CZ's personal showcase?
Now over 9,160 users are stuck at the peak with PERRY
It's also among the top ten of many local coins on the BSC chain (🥦 excluded)
The pool has 432K worth of undervalued assets, family, let's go for it!

🌟 #BNBChain
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Crypto Nate
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs