P2512
4 Following
27 Followers
24 Liked
0 Shared
See original
Don't copy news and create negative headlines just to attract viewers. Write professional news instead of becoming tabloid articles.
Crypto Economy
--
OKX Accuses Mantra of Making Major Changes to Tokenomics
TL;DR
Mantra’s OM token lost over 90% of its value within an hour, wiping out $5.5 billion in market capitalization after a suspicious transfer to OKX.
Coordinated movements from at least 17 wallets were detected before the crash, alongside recent changes in the token’s economic model.
Although OM rebounded 200% after the drop, experts warned it was a technical bounce with no solid foundation; OKX tightened controls and issued a risk warning.
Mantra’s OM token experienced one of the sharpest crashes of the year in the crypto market. In just one hour, it lost over 90% of its value, eliminating nearly $5.5 billion in capitalization.
The collapse began after a wallet, allegedly linked to the Mantra team, transferred 3.9 million tokens to the OKX platform. This immediately raised suspicions, as the team controls around 90% of the total token supply.
What Happened with Mantra (OM)?
The situation worsened when users discovered that at least 17 wallets, including two associated with Laser Digital, sent large amounts of OM to exchanges shortly before the crash. The high concentration of tokens held by the team and the lack of transparency regarding internal economic changes triggered widespread concern. OKX and Binance stated that automatic liquidations and modifications in token distribution were the main causes of the price drop.
Suspicious Movements and Changes in Tokenomics
Market behavior had shown warning signs prior to the incident. Since March, coordinated activity between several addresses had been observed. Meanwhile, OKX confirmed that major changes to OM’s tokenomics model had been introduced since October 2024. These alterations, combined with unusual transaction volumes, created a fragile and volatile environment.
After the collapse, the token rebounded 200% and reached a price of $1.10, though experts warned it was a technical recovery lacking solid fundamentals. They compared this bounce to what happened with LUNA in 2022, another project that briefly recovered before losing all value. According to data from CoinMarketCap, Mantra (OM) has fallen 90% in the past day, dropping from over $6 to just $0.586 per unit.
OKX responded by tightening its risk controls and adding a volatility warning to the token’s page. It also stated that it will continue monitoring the activity of related addresses and update its measures as events unfold. The platform advised users to operate with caution due to potential unexpected changes in supply. Although the Mantra team denied moving tokens during the crisis, user distrust remains
Mantra’s OM token lost over 90% of its value within an hour, wiping out $5.5 billion in market capitalization after a suspicious transfer to OKX.
Coordinated movements from at least 17 wallets were detected before the crash, alongside recent changes in the token’s economic model.
Although OM rebounded 200% after the drop, experts warned it was a technical bounce with no solid foundation; OKX tightened controls and issued a risk warning.
Mantra’s OM token experienced one of the sharpest crashes of the year in the crypto market. In just one hour, it lost over 90% of its value, eliminating nearly $5.5 billion in capitalization.
The collapse began after a wallet, allegedly linked to the Mantra team, transferred 3.9 million tokens to the OKX platform. This immediately raised suspicions, as the team controls around 90% of the total token supply.
What Happened with Mantra (OM)?
The situation worsened when users discovered that at least 17 wallets, including two associated with Laser Digital, sent large amounts of OM to exchanges shortly before the crash. The high concentration of tokens held by the team and the lack of transparency regarding internal economic changes triggered widespread concern. OKX and Binance stated that automatic liquidations and modifications in token distribution were the main causes of the price drop.
Suspicious Movements and Changes in Tokenomics
Market behavior had shown warning signs prior to the incident. Since March, coordinated activity between several addresses had been observed. Meanwhile, OKX confirmed that major changes to OM’s tokenomics model had been introduced since October 2024. These alterations, combined with unusual transaction volumes, created a fragile and volatile environment.
After the collapse, the token rebounded 200% and reached a price of $1.10, though experts warned it was a technical recovery lacking solid fundamentals. They compared this bounce to what happened with LUNA in 2022, another project that briefly recovered before losing all value. According to data from CoinMarketCap, Mantra (OM) has fallen 90% in the past day, dropping from over $6 to just $0.586 per unit.
OKX responded by tightening its risk controls and adding a volatility warning to the token’s page. It also stated that it will continue monitoring the activity of related addresses and update its measures as events unfold. The platform advised users to operate with caution due to potential unexpected changes in supply. Although the Mantra team denied moving tokens during the crisis, user distrust remains
See original
💸 Incident .... OM group got slapped (success should be protected by humility).
🤔 Now let's start over ...
📌 I am bottom fishing at $0.3, can I buy OM at this price?😮💨
🤔 Now let's start over ...
📌 I am bottom fishing at $0.3, can I buy OM at this price?😮💨
OM/USDT
Sell
Price/Amount
0.759284/100
See original
You should write information with more knowledgeable content and quality analysis. Comparing an RWA project to meme projects is truly meaningless.
MANTRA (OM) A big red flag?
Last night i made an article about $OM where i posted some wrongdoing of the team based on onchain analysis.
Some clown don't understand onchain analysis and keep barking in the comment section which i don't care a bit ☑️
Today i will give more explanation and some important news and scam i missed about this project
Let's dive in ✅
$OM price manipulation
$OM continiously manipulating the price by holding 90% supply of the token and i have provided onchain data about it in my last post.
@JP Mullin and his team member holds large amount of supply along with his team member which support them to manipulate governence proposals and that's one of the red flag in this project for that reason the real community memebers are mot getting any benefits
Thick liquidity and fdv
Despite the high marketcap of the project the liquidity is very thin and small and pretty small fdv which is a big red flag for any project.
This project don't have strong foundation support with it's ecosyatem the only support it got to push the price was the airdrop hype proposal announcement which push the price from 2$.
In a way the scammed the community 🤡
Continious delay in airdrop-
Despite using the hype of airdrop governence vote @JP Mullin changed the airdrop schedule 3 times by manipulating the votes as his team holds 90% of the supply
Endless Delays & Excuses:
❌ 1: Promised an airdrop to Testnet & Galxe users.
❌ 2: Once price pumped, they delayed the claiming process.
❌ 3: Forced users to bridge to OM chain (free liquidity grab).
❌ 4: Delayed vesting by 3 months—brought a proposal & approved it themselves (because most $OM supply is with the team & market makers).
❌ 5: Used "bot filtering" as an excuse to remove real contributors (removed ~120K wallets).
❌ 6: Another proposal, another delay.
I didn't participate in the airdrop and i don't care a bit ☑️
Now i will post the biggest red flag i see in the project
In this picture we can see total supply 1.81b$. But the total supply was below 1 billion $and they increased it without any drtails and that's a big red flag ❎
No trasnparency
And the reason for the price holding is simple because team is holding maximum of the supply
Sone project with holding maximum supply such as $TRUMP,$melania, $pi and many more and they are very risky to trade with
If we take trump then it dropped from 75$ to now 10$ and that's because team is holding most of the supply but in this regard there is good transparency on trump beacuse 75% supply is still locked.
Lastly there is no mention of max supply for OM and that's another big flag i don't remember correctly but they had 10 billion max supply and now it's infinite ❎
I have been hding $OM since bear market since the price was 0.01$ and sold at 3$.
But as the time goes they are showing scammy movements which i believe not gonna end well ☑️
Also 0.03% supply is unlocking everyday and that's a major concern ✅
Oncr the market makers started selling it's gonna crash hard it may pump towards 10$ for a fomo movement to gather the last % of retails before a crash though 🤣
But it's extremly risky to hold now.
That's all for now
What do u think about the current mantra ecosystem?
Comment below only usefull analysis don't post shits below on only sentimennt ☑️
Some clown don't understand onchain analysis and keep barking in the comment section which i don't care a bit ☑️
Today i will give more explanation and some important news and scam i missed about this project
Let's dive in ✅
$OM price manipulation
$OM continiously manipulating the price by holding 90% supply of the token and i have provided onchain data about it in my last post.
@JP Mullin and his team member holds large amount of supply along with his team member which support them to manipulate governence proposals and that's one of the red flag in this project for that reason the real community memebers are mot getting any benefits
Thick liquidity and fdv
Despite the high marketcap of the project the liquidity is very thin and small and pretty small fdv which is a big red flag for any project.
This project don't have strong foundation support with it's ecosyatem the only support it got to push the price was the airdrop hype proposal announcement which push the price from 2$.
In a way the scammed the community 🤡
Continious delay in airdrop-
Despite using the hype of airdrop governence vote @JP Mullin changed the airdrop schedule 3 times by manipulating the votes as his team holds 90% of the supply
Endless Delays & Excuses:
❌ 1: Promised an airdrop to Testnet & Galxe users.
❌ 2: Once price pumped, they delayed the claiming process.
❌ 3: Forced users to bridge to OM chain (free liquidity grab).
❌ 4: Delayed vesting by 3 months—brought a proposal & approved it themselves (because most $OM supply is with the team & market makers).
❌ 5: Used "bot filtering" as an excuse to remove real contributors (removed ~120K wallets).
❌ 6: Another proposal, another delay.
I didn't participate in the airdrop and i don't care a bit ☑️
Now i will post the biggest red flag i see in the project
In this picture we can see total supply 1.81b$. But the total supply was below 1 billion $and they increased it without any drtails and that's a big red flag ❎
No trasnparency
And the reason for the price holding is simple because team is holding maximum of the supply
Sone project with holding maximum supply such as $TRUMP,$melania, $pi and many more and they are very risky to trade with
If we take trump then it dropped from 75$ to now 10$ and that's because team is holding most of the supply but in this regard there is good transparency on trump beacuse 75% supply is still locked.
Lastly there is no mention of max supply for OM and that's another big flag i don't remember correctly but they had 10 billion max supply and now it's infinite ❎
I have been hding $OM since bear market since the price was 0.01$ and sold at 3$.
But as the time goes they are showing scammy movements which i believe not gonna end well ☑️
Also 0.03% supply is unlocking everyday and that's a major concern ✅
Oncr the market makers started selling it's gonna crash hard it may pump towards 10$ for a fomo movement to gather the last % of retails before a crash though 🤣
But it's extremly risky to hold now.
That's all for now
What do u think about the current mantra ecosystem?
Comment below only usefull analysis don't post shits below on only sentimennt ☑️
See original
You should write information with more substantive content and quality analysis. Comparing a project about RWA with meme projects is truly meaningless.
MANTRA (OM) A big red flag?
Last night i made an article about $OM where i posted some wrongdoing of the team based on onchain analysis.
Some clown don't understand onchain analysis and keep barking in the comment section which i don't care a bit ☑️
Today i will give more explanation and some important news and scam i missed about this project
Let's dive in ✅
$OM price manipulation
$OM continiously manipulating the price by holding 90% supply of the token and i have provided onchain data about it in my last post.
@JP Mullin and his team member holds large amount of supply along with his team member which support them to manipulate governence proposals and that's one of the red flag in this project for that reason the real community memebers are mot getting any benefits
Thick liquidity and fdv
Despite the high marketcap of the project the liquidity is very thin and small and pretty small fdv which is a big red flag for any project.
This project don't have strong foundation support with it's ecosyatem the only support it got to push the price was the airdrop hype proposal announcement which push the price from 2$.
In a way the scammed the community 🤡
Continious delay in airdrop-
Despite using the hype of airdrop governence vote @JP Mullin changed the airdrop schedule 3 times by manipulating the votes as his team holds 90% of the supply
Endless Delays & Excuses:
❌ 1: Promised an airdrop to Testnet & Galxe users.
❌ 2: Once price pumped, they delayed the claiming process.
❌ 3: Forced users to bridge to OM chain (free liquidity grab).
❌ 4: Delayed vesting by 3 months—brought a proposal & approved it themselves (because most $OM supply is with the team & market makers).
❌ 5: Used "bot filtering" as an excuse to remove real contributors (removed ~120K wallets).
❌ 6: Another proposal, another delay.
I didn't participate in the airdrop and i don't care a bit ☑️
Now i will post the biggest red flag i see in the project
In this picture we can see total supply 1.81b$. But the total supply was below 1 billion $and they increased it without any drtails and that's a big red flag ❎
No trasnparency
And the reason for the price holding is simple because team is holding maximum of the supply
Sone project with holding maximum supply such as $TRUMP,$melania, $pi and many more and they are very risky to trade with
If we take trump then it dropped from 75$ to now 10$ and that's because team is holding most of the supply but in this regard there is good transparency on trump beacuse 75% supply is still locked.
Lastly there is no mention of max supply for OM and that's another big flag i don't remember correctly but they had 10 billion max supply and now it's infinite ❎
I have been hding $OM since bear market since the price was 0.01$ and sold at 3$.
But as the time goes they are showing scammy movements which i believe not gonna end well ☑️
Also 0.03% supply is unlocking everyday and that's a major concern ✅
Oncr the market makers started selling it's gonna crash hard it may pump towards 10$ for a fomo movement to gather the last % of retails before a crash though 🤣
But it's extremly risky to hold now.
That's all for now
What do u think about the current mantra ecosystem?
Comment below only usefull analysis don't post shits below on only sentimennt ☑️
Some clown don't understand onchain analysis and keep barking in the comment section which i don't care a bit ☑️
Today i will give more explanation and some important news and scam i missed about this project
Let's dive in ✅
$OM price manipulation
$OM continiously manipulating the price by holding 90% supply of the token and i have provided onchain data about it in my last post.
@JP Mullin and his team member holds large amount of supply along with his team member which support them to manipulate governence proposals and that's one of the red flag in this project for that reason the real community memebers are mot getting any benefits
Thick liquidity and fdv
Despite the high marketcap of the project the liquidity is very thin and small and pretty small fdv which is a big red flag for any project.
This project don't have strong foundation support with it's ecosyatem the only support it got to push the price was the airdrop hype proposal announcement which push the price from 2$.
In a way the scammed the community 🤡
Continious delay in airdrop-
Despite using the hype of airdrop governence vote @JP Mullin changed the airdrop schedule 3 times by manipulating the votes as his team holds 90% of the supply
Endless Delays & Excuses:
❌ 1: Promised an airdrop to Testnet & Galxe users.
❌ 2: Once price pumped, they delayed the claiming process.
❌ 3: Forced users to bridge to OM chain (free liquidity grab).
❌ 4: Delayed vesting by 3 months—brought a proposal & approved it themselves (because most $OM supply is with the team & market makers).
❌ 5: Used "bot filtering" as an excuse to remove real contributors (removed ~120K wallets).
❌ 6: Another proposal, another delay.
I didn't participate in the airdrop and i don't care a bit ☑️
Now i will post the biggest red flag i see in the project
In this picture we can see total supply 1.81b$. But the total supply was below 1 billion $and they increased it without any drtails and that's a big red flag ❎
No trasnparency
And the reason for the price holding is simple because team is holding maximum of the supply
Sone project with holding maximum supply such as $TRUMP,$melania, $pi and many more and they are very risky to trade with
If we take trump then it dropped from 75$ to now 10$ and that's because team is holding most of the supply but in this regard there is good transparency on trump beacuse 75% supply is still locked.
Lastly there is no mention of max supply for OM and that's another big flag i don't remember correctly but they had 10 billion max supply and now it's infinite ❎
I have been hding $OM since bear market since the price was 0.01$ and sold at 3$.
But as the time goes they are showing scammy movements which i believe not gonna end well ☑️
Also 0.03% supply is unlocking everyday and that's a major concern ✅
Oncr the market makers started selling it's gonna crash hard it may pump towards 10$ for a fomo movement to gather the last % of retails before a crash though 🤣
But it's extremly risky to hold now.
That's all for now
What do u think about the current mantra ecosystem?
Comment below only usefull analysis don't post shits below on only sentimennt ☑️
See original
#OnChainInsights
In the volatile world of cryptocurrencies, Onchain is always the “golden data” that helps you make smart investment decisions. So what is On-chain?
On-chain is data including: wallet addresses, transactions, transaction times, the amount of cryptocurrency transferred or received, etc. stored directly on the blockchain. Based on this data, investors can easily analyze market trends, predict prices and identify the behavior of traders.
Remember that on-chain data cannot be changed or deleted by any individual or organization. At the same time, this data is also encrypted with cryptography, which helps to enhance security and protect the integrity of the data.
Therefore, analyzing on-chain data can help investors better understand the behavior of other investors and the factors that affect market fluctuations. This will help you identify new market trends, potential investment opportunities and assess risks to make smarter investment decisions.
Learning to analyze and invest in a calculated way will reduce risk than investing emotionally and be more effective
In the volatile world of cryptocurrencies, Onchain is always the “golden data” that helps you make smart investment decisions. So what is On-chain?
On-chain is data including: wallet addresses, transactions, transaction times, the amount of cryptocurrency transferred or received, etc. stored directly on the blockchain. Based on this data, investors can easily analyze market trends, predict prices and identify the behavior of traders.
Remember that on-chain data cannot be changed or deleted by any individual or organization. At the same time, this data is also encrypted with cryptography, which helps to enhance security and protect the integrity of the data.
Therefore, analyzing on-chain data can help investors better understand the behavior of other investors and the factors that affect market fluctuations. This will help you identify new market trends, potential investment opportunities and assess risks to make smarter investment decisions.
Learning to analyze and invest in a calculated way will reduce risk than investing emotionally and be more effective
My 30 Days' PNL
2025-01-24~2025-02-22
+$2,045.99
+8.08%
See original
#GasFeeImpact
The "gas-free" transaction is not actually free; rather, it is a smart strategy for projects to attract users, increase liquidity, and promote innovation in the cryptocurrency market. However, this model also carries risks such as the potential for abuse and transaction spam.
Therefore, do not be quick to judge a project favorably just because of a Gas Free model; this is merely a secondary factor.
The "gas-free" transaction is not actually free; rather, it is a smart strategy for projects to attract users, increase liquidity, and promote innovation in the cryptocurrency market. However, this model also carries risks such as the potential for abuse and transaction spam.
Therefore, do not be quick to judge a project favorably just because of a Gas Free model; this is merely a secondary factor.
Today's PNL
2025-02-22
+$96.11
+0.37%
See original
Gas Free - 'gas-free'
<t-22/>#GasFree Although the term Gas Free sounds appealing, the reality is that there is no such thing as a free lunch. So who actually pays the gas fee on your behalf when you make a 'gas-free' transaction?
#GasFeeImpact " data-hashtag="#GasFeeImpact " class="tag">#GasFeeImpact
You need to know the current forms of paying gas fees:
+ Paying fees with other tokens: Gas token model
+ Sponsorship from the project: Sponsored transactions model
+ Token holding requirement: Membership model
#GasFeeImpact " data-hashtag="#GasFeeImpact " class="tag">#GasFeeImpact
You need to know the current forms of paying gas fees:
+ Paying fees with other tokens: Gas token model
+ Sponsorship from the project: Sponsored transactions model
+ Token holding requirement: Membership model
See original
Everything has just begun and ultimately every project will only be considered valuable when backed by the project's BTC reserve fund.
Ram of Crypto
--
Biggest rug in history over $4.4 BILLION was wiped out Within 10 hours.
This is Javier Milei, the President of Argentina.
Today, he launched the $LIBRA memecoin.
Within 10 hours, over -$4.4 BILLION was wiped out, making it the biggest rug in history.
Here’s the untold story of what really happened ⬇️
On Feb 14, Javier Milei, the President of Argentina, posted on X about his own $LIBRA coin.
Despite concerns that his account might have been hacked, the coin quickly went viral.
Eventually, it turned out to be legit, as multiple Argentinian politicians reposted the news.
From the very beginning, many things seemed off about the project.
► The website was created just hours before the launch and redirected to a basic Google Form.
► There was no information about the owner, and the domain had only a 1-year registration period.
But if you dig a bit deeper, it actually gets worse.
► Unlike other top celebrity memes, there was no official tokenomics.
► 82% of the supply was held in fully unlocked wallets.
► Someone was adding one-sided liquidity on Meteora, meaning they can remove it at any time.
Following the success of $TRUMP — and despite all the red flags — many people went all-in, pumping the market cap to $4.5B.
At that very moment, the $LIBRA team and insiders began cashing out.
Minutes after launch, several large holders started liquidating millions of dollars worth of $LIBRA.
In just the first 3 hours, a single cluster of wallets cashed out a total of $87 million.
Remember the one-sided liquidity pools?
As soon as the dump started, the owners of those pools began removing $USDC and $SOL , essentially draining liquidity instead of selling on the open market.
In less than 60 minutes, $LIBRA crashed over 90%, wiping out $4B+ from the market.
Shortly after, Javier Milei deleted his $LIBRA post and tweeted that he "had no connection to the project" and that "once he learned the details, he decided to stop promoting it".
While many people are taking heavy losses on $LIBRA, the team and insiders are STILL cashing out.
For example, one cluster of wallets just made $107M by removing liquidity and claiming Meteora fees.
While the dump continues, many people are already calling it the biggest memecoin rug in history.
But one thing’s for sure—insiders made a fortune while retail got left with nothing.
What’s your take on Celebrity memecoins ? Stay away from this type of coins try to invest in big cap like #BTC ,ETH,SOL etc. and Comment your thoughts below ⬇️
That’s it for now!
If you found this Article helpful, don't forget to Like, Retweet, and Bookmark !
Follow @Ram of Crypto for more content like this.
Thanks 🙏
Today, he launched the $LIBRA memecoin.
Within 10 hours, over -$4.4 BILLION was wiped out, making it the biggest rug in history.
Here’s the untold story of what really happened ⬇️
On Feb 14, Javier Milei, the President of Argentina, posted on X about his own $LIBRA coin.
Despite concerns that his account might have been hacked, the coin quickly went viral.
Eventually, it turned out to be legit, as multiple Argentinian politicians reposted the news.
From the very beginning, many things seemed off about the project.
► The website was created just hours before the launch and redirected to a basic Google Form.
► There was no information about the owner, and the domain had only a 1-year registration period.
But if you dig a bit deeper, it actually gets worse.
► Unlike other top celebrity memes, there was no official tokenomics.
► 82% of the supply was held in fully unlocked wallets.
► Someone was adding one-sided liquidity on Meteora, meaning they can remove it at any time.
Following the success of $TRUMP — and despite all the red flags — many people went all-in, pumping the market cap to $4.5B.
At that very moment, the $LIBRA team and insiders began cashing out.
Minutes after launch, several large holders started liquidating millions of dollars worth of $LIBRA.
In just the first 3 hours, a single cluster of wallets cashed out a total of $87 million.
Remember the one-sided liquidity pools?
As soon as the dump started, the owners of those pools began removing $USDC and $SOL , essentially draining liquidity instead of selling on the open market.
In less than 60 minutes, $LIBRA crashed over 90%, wiping out $4B+ from the market.
Shortly after, Javier Milei deleted his $LIBRA post and tweeted that he "had no connection to the project" and that "once he learned the details, he decided to stop promoting it".
While many people are taking heavy losses on $LIBRA, the team and insiders are STILL cashing out.
For example, one cluster of wallets just made $107M by removing liquidity and claiming Meteora fees.
While the dump continues, many people are already calling it the biggest memecoin rug in history.
But one thing’s for sure—insiders made a fortune while retail got left with nothing.
What’s your take on Celebrity memecoins ? Stay away from this type of coins try to invest in big cap like #BTC ,ETH,SOL etc. and Comment your thoughts below ⬇️
That’s it for now!
If you found this Article helpful, don't forget to Like, Retweet, and Bookmark !
Follow @Ram of Crypto for more content like this.
Thanks 🙏
See original
Please keep 1000 OM in your account if possible and learn more about Real World Asset (RWA).
$OM
🔥 OM/USDT – Honest Opinion 🔥
This chart is parabolic 📈, but let’s break it down objectively:
---
📊 Key Observations:
✔ Massive Monthly Pump: Price has surged from $0.0172 to $8.20, a mind-blowing 47,500% increase in less than a year! 🚀
✔ RSI at 97.46: This is extreme overbought territory, meaning a retracement is highly likely. 📉
✔ MACD Still Bullish: Momentum is strong, but too steep. This could indicate bubble-like behavior.
---
⚠️ Potential Dangers:
🔹 Parabolic moves rarely last forever – what goes up, comes down. Expect a correction soon.
🔹 Tokenomics Warning: Binance has highlighted significant changes in supply. This could mean inflation risk, which might dump the price hard later.
🔹 No Healthy Pullbacks: A healthy bull run has corrections along the way. This one skyrocketed non-stop, making it fragile.
---
📌 Honest Take:
🔸 If you’re already in, consider taking profits at key levels.
🔸 If you’re thinking of buying, wait for a healthy retracement instead of FOMO-ing in.
🔸 If you're shorting, be careful – strong momentum can still push it higher before the crash.
🚨 Conclusion: This is looking like a classic blow-off top. The risk is very high. Either lock in profits or wait for a proper correction before re-entering.
What’s your plan? Buying, selling, or waiting? 👇
🔥 OM/USDT – Honest Opinion 🔥
This chart is parabolic 📈, but let’s break it down objectively:
---
📊 Key Observations:
✔ Massive Monthly Pump: Price has surged from $0.0172 to $8.20, a mind-blowing 47,500% increase in less than a year! 🚀
✔ RSI at 97.46: This is extreme overbought territory, meaning a retracement is highly likely. 📉
✔ MACD Still Bullish: Momentum is strong, but too steep. This could indicate bubble-like behavior.
---
⚠️ Potential Dangers:
🔹 Parabolic moves rarely last forever – what goes up, comes down. Expect a correction soon.
🔹 Tokenomics Warning: Binance has highlighted significant changes in supply. This could mean inflation risk, which might dump the price hard later.
🔹 No Healthy Pullbacks: A healthy bull run has corrections along the way. This one skyrocketed non-stop, making it fragile.
---
📌 Honest Take:
🔸 If you’re already in, consider taking profits at key levels.
🔸 If you’re thinking of buying, wait for a healthy retracement instead of FOMO-ing in.
🔸 If you're shorting, be careful – strong momentum can still push it higher before the crash.
🚨 Conclusion: This is looking like a classic blow-off top. The risk is very high. Either lock in profits or wait for a proper correction before re-entering.
What’s your plan? Buying, selling, or waiting? 👇
See original
When the last BTC is mined, nodes can simultaneously activate the quantum resistance code of BTC that Shatoshi left behind 🤔
Quantum computers will bring lost Bitcoin 'back into circulation'
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino stated that quantum computers will hack Bitcoin in "lost wallets" and bring it back into circulation — a move that a trader warns could pull Bitcoin back to the "Stone Age".
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino predicts that quantum computers will eventually hack inactive Bitcoin wallets, bringing the Bitcoin in those wallets back into circulation.
However, he mentioned that this is still a long way off.
Ardoino stated in a post on February 8 on X: "Any Bitcoin in lost wallets, including Satoshi's (if he is no longer alive), will be hacked and brought back into circulation".
Quantum computers will not soon break Bitcoin
He added: "Quantum computers are still a long way from posing a significant risk to break Bitcoin's encryption".
Quantum computers are new technology that can process multiple possibilities and solve complex problems using atomic-level phenomena, which conventional computers cannot handle.
Lost Bitcoin wallets are at higher risk as quantum computers advance because there is no one to protect or move the funds. In contrast, active wallets are more likely to implement quantum-resistant protection when it becomes available.
He explained that all Bitcoin wallets owned by individuals who are still alive and have access to their wallets will be transferred to new "quantum-resistant addresses".
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino stated that quantum computers will hack Bitcoin in "lost wallets" and bring it back into circulation — a move that a trader warns could pull Bitcoin back to the "Stone Age".
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino predicts that quantum computers will eventually hack inactive Bitcoin wallets, bringing the Bitcoin in those wallets back into circulation.
However, he mentioned that this is still a long way off.
Ardoino stated in a post on February 8 on X: "Any Bitcoin in lost wallets, including Satoshi's (if he is no longer alive), will be hacked and brought back into circulation".
Quantum computers will not soon break Bitcoin
He added: "Quantum computers are still a long way from posing a significant risk to break Bitcoin's encryption".
Quantum computers are new technology that can process multiple possibilities and solve complex problems using atomic-level phenomena, which conventional computers cannot handle.
Lost Bitcoin wallets are at higher risk as quantum computers advance because there is no one to protect or move the funds. In contrast, active wallets are more likely to implement quantum-resistant protection when it becomes available.
He explained that all Bitcoin wallets owned by individuals who are still alive and have access to their wallets will be transferred to new "quantum-resistant addresses".
Login to explore more contents