Binance Square

夜猫子520

Open Trade
BNB Holder
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
4.9 Months
1 Following
25 Followers
32 Liked
1 Shared
All Content
Portfolio
--
See original
Intensified Competition Among Token Launch Platforms#代币发射平台竞争加剧 The competition among current token launch platforms (especially MEME token launchers in the Solana ecosystem) has entered a heated phase, characterized by rapid market differentiation, highly competitive platform strategies, and significantly increased complexity in ecosystem games. The following analysis unfolds from three dimensions: competitive status, core contradictions, and future trends. I. Competitive status: The 'dual hegemony game' in the Solana ecosystem and market structure reconstruction. 1. The dominance of Pump.fun is challenged. As the 'kingmaker' of Solana MEME token launches, Pump.fun's market share has plummeted from a long-standing over 95% to 57.5%. Its core issue lies in the flaws of its incentive mechanism: despite introducing revenue sharing for creators (50% of transaction fees refunded), the community questions whether it truly benefits users, and it may even exacerbate developer rug risks. Moreover, Pump.fun's graduation rate (0.7%) is significantly lower than emerging platforms like Letsbonk.fun (1.7%) and LaunchLab (1.22%), reflecting the rapid increase in user recognition of new platforms.

Intensified Competition Among Token Launch Platforms

#代币发射平台竞争加剧 The competition among current token launch platforms (especially MEME token launchers in the Solana ecosystem) has entered a heated phase, characterized by rapid market differentiation, highly competitive platform strategies, and significantly increased complexity in ecosystem games. The following analysis unfolds from three dimensions: competitive status, core contradictions, and future trends.

I. Competitive status: The 'dual hegemony game' in the Solana ecosystem and market structure reconstruction.

1. The dominance of Pump.fun is challenged.
As the 'kingmaker' of Solana MEME token launches, Pump.fun's market share has plummeted from a long-standing over 95% to 57.5%. Its core issue lies in the flaws of its incentive mechanism: despite introducing revenue sharing for creators (50% of transaction fees refunded), the community questions whether it truly benefits users, and it may even exacerbate developer rug risks. Moreover, Pump.fun's graduation rate (0.7%) is significantly lower than emerging platforms like Letsbonk.fun (1.7%) and LaunchLab (1.22%), reflecting the rapid increase in user recognition of new platforms.
See original
Bitcoin Outflow Situation On May 13, Coinbase withdrew 9,739 Bitcoins worth over $1 billion from the exchange, the highest net outflow recorded in 2025. On May 14, there was no clear public data regarding the outflow of Bitcoin, but some data shows that over 76,179 Bitcoins flowed out from the two major cryptocurrency exchanges, Coinbase and Binance, within 44 days, valued at approximately $5.41 billion. However, this did not clearly indicate the outflow situation on May 14 itself. Overall, the recent large outflow of Bitcoin from the Coinbase platform has attracted widespread attention from the market, reflecting that institutional investors' demand for Bitcoin may be accelerating.
Bitcoin Outflow Situation
On May 13, Coinbase withdrew 9,739 Bitcoins worth over $1 billion from the exchange, the highest net outflow recorded in 2025.

On May 14, there was no clear public data regarding the outflow of Bitcoin, but some data shows that over 76,179 Bitcoins flowed out from the two major cryptocurrency exchanges, Coinbase and Binance, within 44 days, valued at approximately $5.41 billion. However, this did not clearly indicate the outflow situation on May 14 itself.

Overall, the recent large outflow of Bitcoin from the Coinbase platform has attracted widespread attention from the market, reflecting that institutional investors' demand for Bitcoin may be accelerating.
See original
#美国加征关税 The U.S. increase in tariffs is a means of implementing trade protectionism. Recent adjustments to U.S. tariffs on China According to an executive order issued by the White House on May 12, the U.S. has rescinded the total of 91% tariffs imposed on Chinese goods (including goods from the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Macao Special Administrative Region) under Executive Orders No. 14259 on April 8, 2025, and No. 14266 on April 9, 2025, at 00:01 Eastern Time on May 14. The U.S. has also modified the 34% reciprocal tariff measures imposed on Chinese goods under Executive Order No. 14257 on April 2, 2025, with 24% of the tariffs suspended for 90 days, while retaining the remaining 10%. Additionally, the U.S. has lowered or rescinded tariffs on small parcels from China, reducing the international mail value-added tax rate from 120% to 54%, and cancelling the measure that was originally set to increase the quantity tax from $100 to $200 per item starting June 1, 2025. In light of the U.S. adjustments, China has correspondingly adjusted relevant tariffs and non-tariff countermeasures against the U.S. Reasons for the U.S. tariff increase The U.S. claims that the increase in tariffs is to reduce the trade deficit, arguing that trade deficits with other countries are caused by those countries' restrictions on balancing trade through tariff and non-tariff factors. However, in reality, the main cause of the U.S. long-term trade deficit is the dollar's status as the international reserve currency, which gives the U.S. the power of “seigniorage,” boosts domestic demand, and has led it to transform from a trade surplus nation to a trade deficit nation. The U.S. attempts to decouple from other countries through tariff increases to address issues like industrial hollowing and social division brought about by globalization. Impact of U.S. tariff increases For the U.S. itself, while increasing tariffs can compress the trade deficit to some extent, it will impact its previously high-debt, high domestic demand growth model that relied on overseas savings, potentially triggering a disguised debt crisis. For the countries subjected to the tariff increases, such as China, external demand will be impacted, but it will also prompt China to address its insufficient domestic demand issue, enhancing economic resilience and striving for a more favorable position in the international economic and trade system. From a global perspective, the U.S. tariff increases have caused significant turmoil in global financial markets, undermining the international economic and trade order and the process of globalization.
#美国加征关税 The U.S. increase in tariffs is a means of implementing trade protectionism.

Recent adjustments to U.S. tariffs on China

According to an executive order issued by the White House on May 12, the U.S. has rescinded the total of 91% tariffs imposed on Chinese goods (including goods from the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Macao Special Administrative Region) under Executive Orders No. 14259 on April 8, 2025, and No. 14266 on April 9, 2025, at 00:01 Eastern Time on May 14. The U.S. has also modified the 34% reciprocal tariff measures imposed on Chinese goods under Executive Order No. 14257 on April 2, 2025, with 24% of the tariffs suspended for 90 days, while retaining the remaining 10%. Additionally, the U.S. has lowered or rescinded tariffs on small parcels from China, reducing the international mail value-added tax rate from 120% to 54%, and cancelling the measure that was originally set to increase the quantity tax from $100 to $200 per item starting June 1, 2025. In light of the U.S. adjustments, China has correspondingly adjusted relevant tariffs and non-tariff countermeasures against the U.S.

Reasons for the U.S. tariff increase

The U.S. claims that the increase in tariffs is to reduce the trade deficit, arguing that trade deficits with other countries are caused by those countries' restrictions on balancing trade through tariff and non-tariff factors. However, in reality, the main cause of the U.S. long-term trade deficit is the dollar's status as the international reserve currency, which gives the U.S. the power of “seigniorage,” boosts domestic demand, and has led it to transform from a trade surplus nation to a trade deficit nation. The U.S. attempts to decouple from other countries through tariff increases to address issues like industrial hollowing and social division brought about by globalization.

Impact of U.S. tariff increases

For the U.S. itself, while increasing tariffs can compress the trade deficit to some extent, it will impact its previously high-debt, high domestic demand growth model that relied on overseas savings, potentially triggering a disguised debt crisis. For the countries subjected to the tariff increases, such as China, external demand will be impacted, but it will also prompt China to address its insufficient domestic demand issue, enhancing economic resilience and striving for a more favorable position in the international economic and trade system. From a global perspective, the U.S. tariff increases have caused significant turmoil in global financial markets, undermining the international economic and trade order and the process of globalization.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Lasandra Cid Wr93
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs