Abdulrehmanmemon03

$BTC

The China–US trade war began in 2018 during the Trump administration, when the United States imposed tariffs on Chinese goods worth billions of dollars. The stated goals were to reduce the trade deficit, combat intellectual property theft, and pressure China to change unfair trade practices. In retaliation, China imposed its own tariffs on American products, especially targeting agricultural goods, creating tensions that severely impacted global trade flows.

As the conflict escalated, businesses in both countries and around the world experienced higher costs, disrupted supply chains, and market uncertainty. US farmers, manufacturers, and tech firms faced losses, while Chinese exporters dealt with declining US demand. The World Trade Organization became less effective as disputes piled up.

In January 2020, the two nations signed a “Phase One” agreement. China promised to buy more US goods and improve IP protections, while the US paused further tariff increases. However, most tariffs remained in place, and broader issues—such as tech dominance, national security, and influence in Asia—continued under the Biden administration.

The trade war exposed the fragility of global economic interdependence and encouraged countries to diversify their supply chains. It marked a shift from free trade toward strategic competition between superpowers.

⸻

Let me know if you want a shorter version (e.g., 100 or 150 words).

#CEXvsDEX101 5 Cybersecurity Red Flags You Shouldn’t Ignore in 2025”

🚨 Cyber attacks aren’t coming. They’re already here.

Here are 5 red flags you need to watch for:
1. 🔗 Unfamiliar wallet connection requests
2. 📧 Emails with slightly altered domain names (e.g. amaz0n.com)
3. 📦 Free airdrops asking for your private key
4. 🧪 Projects without verifiable smart contract audits
5. 👤 Fake team profiles with no LinkedIn presence

✅ Tip: Always use a hardware wallet + check blockchain explorers to verify transactions.

Web3 is powerful — but only if you protect your side of the chain.

— abdulrehmanads

#Cybersecurity #Web3Safety #CryptoScams #BlockchainSecurity

#TradingTypes101 5 Cybersecurity Red Flags You Shouldn’t Ignore in 2025”

🚨 Cyber attacks aren’t coming. They’re already here.

Here are 5 red flags you need to watch for:
1. 🔗 Unfamiliar wallet connection requests
2. 📧 Emails with slightly altered domain names (e.g. amaz0n.com)
3. 📦 Free airdrops asking for your private key
4. 🧪 Projects without verifiable smart contract audits
5. 👤 Fake team profiles with no LinkedIn presence

✅ Tip: Always use a hardware wallet + check blockchain explorers to verify transactions.

Web3 is powerful — but only if you protect your side of the chain.

— abdulrehmanads

#Cybersecurity #Web3Safety #CryptoScams #BlockchainSecurity

#OrderTypes101 5 Cybersecurity Red Flags You Shouldn’t Ignore in 2025”

🚨 Cyber attacks aren’t coming. They’re already here.

Here are 5 red flags you need to watch for:
1. 🔗 Unfamiliar wallet connection requests
2. 📧 Emails with slightly altered domain names (e.g. amaz0n.com)
3. 📦 Free airdrops asking for your private key
4. 🧪 Projects without verifiable smart contract audits
5. 👤 Fake team profiles with no LinkedIn presence

✅ Tip: Always use a hardware wallet + check blockchain explorers to verify transactions.

Web3 is powerful — but only if you protect your side of the chain.

— abdulrehmanads

#Cybersecurity #Web3Safety #CryptoScams #BlockchainSecurity

#Liquidity101 5 Cybersecurity Red Flags You Shouldn’t Ignore in 2025”

🚨 Cyber attacks aren’t coming. They’re already here.

Here are 5 red flags you need to watch for:
1. 🔗 Unfamiliar wallet connection requests
2. 📧 Emails with slightly altered domain names (e.g. amaz0n.com)
3. 📦 Free airdrops asking for your private key
4. 🧪 Projects without verifiable smart contract audits
5. 👤 Fake team profiles with no LinkedIn presence

✅ Tip: Always use a hardware wallet + check blockchain explorers to verify transactions.

Web3 is powerful — but only if you protect your side of the chain.

— abdulrehmanads

#Cybersecurity #Web3Safety #CryptoScams #BlockchainSecurity

#TradingPairs101 5 Cybersecurity Red Flags You Shouldn’t Ignore in 2025”

🚨 Cyber attacks aren’t coming. They’re already here.

Here are 5 red flags you need to watch for:
1. 🔗 Unfamiliar wallet connection requests
2. 📧 Emails with slightly altered domain names (e.g. amaz0n.com)
3. 📦 Free airdrops asking for your private key
4. 🧪 Projects without verifiable smart contract audits
5. 👤 Fake team profiles with no LinkedIn presence

✅ Tip: Always use a hardware wallet + check blockchain explorers to verify transactions.

Web3 is powerful — but only if you protect your side of the chain.

— abdulrehmanads

#Cybersecurity #Web3Safety #CryptoScams #BlockchainSecurity

#CryptoSecurity101 5 Cybersecurity Red Flags You Shouldn’t Ignore in 2025”

🚨 Cyber attacks aren’t coming. They’re already here.

Here are 5 red flags you need to watch for:
1. 🔗 Unfamiliar wallet connection requests
2. 📧 Emails with slightly altered domain names (e.g. amaz0n.com)
3. 📦 Free airdrops asking for your private key
4. 🧪 Projects without verifiable smart contract audits
5. 👤 Fake team profiles with no LinkedIn presence

✅ Tip: Always use a hardware wallet + check blockchain explorers to verify transactions.

Web3 is powerful — but only if you protect your side of the chain.

— abdulrehmanads

#CyberSecurity #Web3Safety #CryptoScams #BlockchainSecurity

#CryptoSecurity101 be alert

#CryptoFees101 The China–US trade war, which began in 2018 under President Donald Trump, marked a significant escalation in economic tensions between the world’s two largest economies. The conflict started when the US imposed tariffs on Chinese goods to address trade imbalances, alleged intellectual property theft, and unfair trade practices. China responded with its own tariffs on American products, leading to a tit-for-tat escalation.

The trade war affected global supply chains, increased costs for businesses and consumers, and disrupted industries from agriculture to technology. The US aimed to pressure China into changing policies related to technology transfer, subsidies, and market access. China, meanwhile, sought to assert its economic sovereignty and reduce reliance on the US.

In January 2020, both countries signed the “Phase One” trade deal, in which China agreed to increase purchases of US goods, and the US suspended further tariff hikes. However, many core issues remained unresolved, and tensions have continued under President Biden, shifting toward broader strategic competition involving technology restrictions, investment barriers, and national security concerns.

The trade war reflects deeper geopolitical rivalries and has accelerated global efforts to diversify trade partners and reduce dependence on single markets, reshaping the global economic landscape in lasting ways.

#TradingMistakes101 The China–US trade war, which began in 2018 under President Donald Trump, marked a significant escalation in economic tensions between the world’s two largest economies. The conflict started when the US imposed tariffs on Chinese goods to address trade imbalances, alleged intellectual property theft, and unfair trade practices. China responded with its own tariffs on American products, leading to a tit-for-tat escalation.

The trade war affected global supply chains, increased costs for businesses and consumers, and disrupted industries from agriculture to technology. The US aimed to pressure China into changing policies related to technology transfer, subsidies, and market access. China, meanwhile, sought to assert its economic sovereignty and reduce reliance on the US.

In January 2020, both countries signed the “Phase One” trade deal, in which China agreed to increase purchases of US goods, and the US suspended further tariff hikes. However, many core issues remained unresolved, and tensions have continued under President Biden, shifting toward broader strategic competition involving technology restrictions, investment barriers, and national security concerns.

The trade war reflects deeper geopolitical rivalries and has accelerated global efforts to diversify trade partners and reduce dependence on single markets, reshaping the global economic landscape in lasting ways.

#CryptoCharts101 The China–US trade war, which began in 2018 under President Donald Trump, marked a significant escalation in economic tensions between the world’s two largest economies. The conflict started when the US imposed tariffs on Chinese goods to address trade imbalances, alleged intellectual property theft, and unfair trade practices. China responded with its own tariffs on American products, leading to a tit-for-tat escalation.

The trade war affected global supply chains, increased costs for businesses and consumers, and disrupted industries from agriculture to technology. The US aimed to pressure China into changing policies related to technology transfer, subsidies, and market access. China, meanwhile, sought to assert its economic sovereignty and reduce reliance on the US.

In January 2020, both countries signed the “Phase One” trade deal, in which China agreed to increase purchases of US goods, and the US suspended further tariff hikes. However, many core issues remained unresolved, and tensions have continued under President Biden, shifting toward broader strategic competition involving technology restrictions, investment barriers, and national security concerns.

The trade war reflects deeper geopolitical rivalries and has accelerated global efforts to diversify trade partners and reduce dependence on single markets, reshaping the global economic landscape in lasting ways.

#USChinaTradeTalks The China–US trade war, which began in 2018 under President Donald Trump, marked a significant escalation in economic tensions between the world’s two largest economies. The conflict started when the US imposed tariffs on Chinese goods to address trade imbalances, alleged intellectual property theft, and unfair trade practices. China responded with its own tariffs on American products, leading to a tit-for-tat escalation.

The trade war affected global supply chains, increased costs for businesses and consumers, and disrupted industries from agriculture to technology. The US aimed to pressure China into changing policies related to technology transfer, subsidies, and market access. China, meanwhile, sought to assert its economic sovereignty and reduce reliance on the US.

In January 2020, both countries signed the “Phase One” trade deal, in which China agreed to increase purchases of US goods, and the US suspended further tariff hikes. However, many core issues remained unresolved, and tensions have continued under President Biden, shifting toward broader strategic competition involving technology restrictions, investment barriers, and national security concerns.

The trade war reflects deeper geopolitical rivalries and has accelerated global efforts to diversify trade partners and reduce dependence on single markets, reshaping the global economic landscape in lasting ways.

The China–US trade war, which began in 2018 under President Donald Trump, marked a significant escalation in economic tensions between the world’s two largest economies. The conflict started when the US imposed tariffs on Chinese goods to address trade imbalances, alleged intellectual property theft, and unfair trade practices. China responded with its own tariffs on American products, leading to a tit-for-tat escalation.

The trade war affected global supply chains, increased costs for businesses and consumers, and disrupted industries from agriculture to technology. The US aimed to pressure China into changing policies related to technology transfer, subsidies, and market access. China, meanwhile, sought to assert its economic sovereignty and reduce reliance on the US.

In January 2020, both countries signed the “Phase One” trade deal, in which China agreed to increase purchases of US goods, and the US suspended further tariff hikes. However, many core issues remained unresolved, and tensions have continued under President Biden, shifting toward broader strategic competition involving technology restrictions, investment barriers, and national security concerns.

The trade war reflects deeper geopolitical rivalries and has accelerated global efforts to diversify trade partners and reduce dependence on single markets, reshaping the global economic landscape in lasting ways.

$BTC The China–US trade war, which began in 2018 under President Donald Trump, marked a significant escalation in economic tensions between the world’s two largest economies. The conflict started when the US imposed tariffs on Chinese goods to address trade imbalances, alleged intellectual property theft, and unfair trade practices. China responded with its own tariffs on American products, leading to a tit-for-tat escalation.

The trade war affected global supply chains, increased costs for businesses and consumers, and disrupted industries from agriculture to technology. The US aimed to pressure China into changing policies related to technology transfer, subsidies, and market access. China, meanwhile, sought to assert its economic sovereignty and reduce reliance on the US.

In January 2020, both countries signed the “Phase One” trade deal, in which China agreed to increase purchases of US goods, and the US suspended further tariff hikes. However, many core issues remained unresolved, and tensions have continued under President Biden, shifting toward broader strategic competition involving technology restrictions, investment barriers, and national security concerns.

The trade war reflects deeper geopolitical rivalries and has accelerated global efforts to diversify trade partners and reduce dependence on single markets, reshaping the global economic landscape in lasting ways.

$BTC Vote for users

Cybersecurity Risks in Web3 & Crypto

⚠️ Web3 promises freedom — but also opens new doors for cyberattacks.

As we move toward decentralization, the surface area for cyber threats is expanding.

🚨 Here are some top cybersecurity risks in the Web3 & crypto space:
1. Smart Contract Exploits – Vulnerable code leads to massive hacks
2. Phishing & Wallet Draining – Social engineering now targets your crypto
3. Rug Pulls & Exit Scams – Fake projects disappear with your funds
4. Bridge Attacks – Cross-chain bridges have become hot targets
5. Private Key Theft – If you lose it, you lose everything

🧠 Security is no longer optional — it’s foundational.

👉 Protect yourself:
🔒 Use hardware wallets
🔍 Double-check project audits
🔁 Keep learning about evolving attack patterns

Have you faced or witnessed a Web3-related scam or threat?
Drop your story below. Let’s make this space safer 👇

#Web3Security #CryptoRisks #Blockchain #Cybersecurity #DeFi

$SOL #Trump100Days Stay aware fraud phishing !!!

Investigation of the “+450 USDC (t.ly/USPOOL)” Transaction

This transaction is not from a known legitimate USDC pool or platform. Instead, it appears to be a classic scam airdrop of a fake “USDС” token. There is no reputable DeFi project or exchange called “USPOOL,” and the short link suggests a malicious site (e.g. uspool.cc), which ScamAdviser flags with a very low trust score (likely a scam) . On‐chain explorers show this token contract with 10,000,000 units distributed to many addresses, but its market price is $0 and it has no real liquidity. In other words, it’s a self‑issued token (on chains like Base/Polygon) masquerading as USDC, not an actual USDC deposit from any real pool or service.
• Origin/Platform: No legitimate platform “USPOOL” exists. The token’s name “USDС” (notice the Cyrillic letters) is a ploy. Blockchain dashboards (Zapper, DexGuru, etc.) list this as a USDС token distribution with a claim link, but in all cases its value is zero. The scammer likely created a token contract and airdropped tokens to random wallets. The associated link “t.ly/USPOOL” presumably points to a scam website (ScamAdviser warns that uspool.cc has a strong likelihood of being a scam ). In short, this 450 “USDC” did not come from any real USDC pool or staking reward – it’s a bogus token issued by fraudsters.

#AirdropSafetyGuide Stay aware fraud phishing !!!

Investigation of the “+450 USDC (t.ly/USPOOL)” Transaction

This transaction is not from a known legitimate USDC pool or platform. Instead, it appears to be a classic scam airdrop of a fake “USDС” token. There is no reputable DeFi project or exchange called “USPOOL,” and the short link suggests a malicious site (e.g. uspool.cc), which ScamAdviser flags with a very low trust score (likely a scam) . On‐chain explorers show this token contract with 10,000,000 units distributed to many addresses, but its market price is $0 and it has no real liquidity. In other words, it’s a self‑issued token (on chains like Base/Polygon) masquerading as USDC, not an actual USDC deposit from any real pool or service.
• Origin/Platform: No legitimate platform “USPOOL” exists. The token’s name “USDС” (notice the Cyrillic letters) is a ploy. Blockchain dashboards (Zapper, DexGuru, etc.) list this as a USDС token distribution with a claim link, but in all cases its value is zero. The scammer likely created a token contract and airdropped tokens to random wallets. The associated link “t.ly/USPOOL” presumably points to a scam website (ScamAdviser warns that uspool.cc has a strong likelihood of being a scam ). In short, this 450 “USDC” did not come from any real USDC pool or staking reward – it’s a bogus token issued by fraudsters.

#AltcoinETFsPostponed #Trump100Days Stay aware fraud phishing !!!

Investigation of the “+450 USDC (t.ly/USPOOL)” Transaction

This transaction is not from a known legitimate USDC pool or platform. Instead, it appears to be a classic scam airdrop of a fake “USDС” token. There is no reputable DeFi project or exchange called “USPOOL,” and the short link suggests a malicious site (e.g. uspool.cc), which ScamAdviser flags with a very low trust score (likely a scam) . On‐chain explorers show this token contract with 10,000,000 units distributed to many addresses, but its market price is $0 and it has no real liquidity. In other words, it’s a self‑issued token (on chains like Base/Polygon) masquerading as USDC, not an actual USDC deposit from any real pool or service.
• Origin/Platform: No legitimate platform “USPOOL” exists. The token’s name “USDС” (notice the Cyrillic letters) is a ploy. Blockchain dashboards (Zapper, DexGuru, etc.) list this as a USDС token distribution with a claim link, but in all cases its value is zero. The scammer likely created a token contract and airdropped tokens to random wallets. The associated link “t.ly/USPOOL” presumably points to a scam website (ScamAdviser warns that uspool.cc has a strong likelihood of being a scam ). In short, this 450 “USDC” did not come from any real USDC pool or staking reward – it’s a bogus token issued by fraudsters.

#Trump100Days Stay aware fraud phishing !!!

Investigation of the “+450 USDC (t.ly/USPOOL)” Transaction

This transaction is not from a known legitimate USDC pool or platform. Instead, it appears to be a classic scam airdrop of a fake “USDС” token. There is no reputable DeFi project or exchange called “USPOOL,” and the short link suggests a malicious site (e.g. uspool.cc), which ScamAdviser flags with a very low trust score (likely a scam) . On‐chain explorers show this token contract with 10,000,000 units distributed to many addresses, but its market price is $0 and it has no real liquidity. In other words, it’s a self‑issued token (on chains like Base/Polygon) masquerading as USDC, not an actual USDC deposit from any real pool or service.
• Origin/Platform: No legitimate platform “USPOOL” exists. The token’s name “USDС” (notice the Cyrillic letters) is a ploy. Blockchain dashboards (Zapper, DexGuru, etc.) list this as a USDС token distribution with a claim link, but in all cases its value is zero. The scammer likely created a token contract and airdropped tokens to random wallets. The associated link “t.ly/USPOOL” presumably points to a scam website (ScamAdviser warns that uspool.cc has a strong likelihood of being a scam ). In short, this 450 “USDC” did not come from any real USDC pool or staking reward – it’s a bogus token issued by fraudsters.