被割实名认证

Is there really no chance?

For reference only

Musk's move is quite explosive! I just came across his latest interaction, confirming that he is personally stepping into the U.S. political arena—his founded "The Party of the United States" is officially entering the midterm elections next year! 💥

Some speculate that the platform of "The Party of the United States" will be super hardcore: drastically reducing astronomical government debt, fully pushing for the rapid development of AI technology, and completely unbinding various regulations... What do you think? Netizens listed them, and Musk directly responded with a "That's right!" stamp of approval! This isn't just wishful thinking; it's a blueprint slapped right in the face. 😂

To be honest, what really takes my breath away is the financial capability. Wall Street directly pointed out: Money? Is that even an issue for Musk? The fundraising thresholds in federal elections seem like paper in front of him. He could throw down real cash, potentially overturning the entire election game rules...

Thinking carefully, the three major strategies he wants to implement are all fierce moves:

​Debt Reduction​ → Could potentially touch welfare cheese, a powder keg;
​Rushing AI​ → Technological leap but with huge ethical controversies;
​Deregulation​ → Business-friendly but public safety concerns;

Every move is on the cutting edge, and this party hasn’t even started yet but is already a hot topic.

It feels like the midterm elections next year are definitely going to change dramatically. Musk, from electric cars to Starlink to brain-computer interfaces, has been doing disruptive operations in technology. Now, with this combination of "tech fantasies + capital giant" charging into politics, it is likely to completely tear a hole in Washington's old rules... You say he's an idealist? I see him more as an ambitious person who understands the art of rule-breaking.

Let’s not forget he also owns the X platform, a billion-level traffic nuclear weapon. If he really starts the propaganda machine, the volume will crush traditional parties in no time. Just thinking about this scene gives me goosebumps— a man who controls core technology, is richer than a country, and has his own social empire, seriously getting into politics? The super variable of the American political landscape has already reserved its seat. What do you think of this move?

Did you know that you can receive money from the government for having a baby now? The other day while having afternoon tea, I saw them calculating the costs, and suddenly there was an extra three hundred yuan that could be flexibly allocated in the monthly expenses for diapers and formula. As a mother, my eyes lit up—it's not just about money; it’s like gaining extra confidence to combat the high costs of formula and the intense competition in early education. A couple of days ago, I went to the maternal and child health hospital, and in the corridor, I overheard a nurse chatting with a pregnant woman: 'If all policies could be like this subsidy and be credited monthly without any tricks, we might have to wait until next year for obstetric beds.' However, what strikes me the most isn’t the numbers; look at the timeline for 2025, it’s clear that the government is racing against the demographic structure. Young people nowadays say they are chill about raising kids, but who doesn’t want a soft, cuddly baby in their heart? Ultimately, many are deterred by reality. This extra three hundred each month feels like society is saying: we’ll help share some of the burdens of raising children.

Self-service

Having been in the crypto space for a few years, I can't say I'm a veteran, but I've experienced both bull and bear markets. To be honest, playing with DeFi derivatives in the past two years feels almost like 'cultivating one's practice'—especially the step of 'cross-chain', it's like 'crossing a calamity'!

Want to do some contract trading on a new chain, but your assets are on another chain? Sure, first you need to find a cross-chain bridge, choose a route, wait for confirmation, pay gas fees, and pray that nothing goes wrong along the way; after finally getting across, let's open an order, but each operation requires popping up the wallet and signing, like navigating a maze while fingerprinting; not to mention assets scattered across several chains, when you want to use them, oh? How much usable money do I have left in my wallet? It's exhausting.

Until March this year, when I saw the airdrop event from MYX Finance. 10,000,000 of 23863640709?! That’s quite a sum. At that time, the concept of 'chain abstraction' was just heating up, using assets from any chain to open positions, without cross-chain, without frequent signatures, fast transactions, and the assets are always in your hands! 'Is it really that smooth?' My first reaction was skepticism.

But it’s an airdrop, why not take advantage of it. I already had some USDT idling on the Arbitrum chain. Following the old rules, if I wanted to play on Linea, I had to cross-chain, which was time-consuming and costly. But on MYX, I directly selected to use USDT on Arbitrum as collateral under the Linea network, clicked the open position button, signed once for confirmation, and done! I didn't feel the delay and friction of cross-chain. It felt like taking a Didi ride, the car just came over from nearby, I didn’t have to worry about which company’s car it was. Later I learned this was called 'chain abstraction technology' + 'dual account model', I don't understand the terminology, but 'smooth' is indeed smooth.

What really made me realize I might have hit something was the IDO jointly held by Binance Wallet and PancakeSwap at the beginning of May. Wow! Oversubscribed by 30,296%! Launched on Binance Alpha without a hitch. This signaled to me: the project is reliable, and the market recognizes it extremely well. APY—228.71%? I doubted I had misread the decimal! Although I know high APYs are unsustainable—it's early-stage benefits. I didn’t hesitate to stake part of my 23863640709. It felt like buying a star entrepreneur's stock while also getting considerable dividends. Awesome!

Can I follow?

🏆 TOP 5 Best Long Targets
1. LEVERUSDT (Overall Score: 93)
Current Price: $0.000313
24-Hour Change: -0.76%
Key Signals:
Daily RSI Oversold (29.5)
Approaching Key Support Level
High Negative Funding Rate (-0.521%) - Shorts Pay Longs
Double Bottom Pattern Confirmed

2. TRUMPUSDT (Overall Score: 90)
Current Price: $9.073
24-Hour Change: +1.28%
Key Signals:
Daily RSI Low (31.3)
4-Hour Moving Average Golden Cross Signal
Approaching Key Support Level
Double Bottom Pattern

3. ALPHAUSDT (Overall Score: 88)
Current Price: $0.014210
24-Hour Change: -7.55%
Key Signals:
4H RSI Low (32.8)
Daily RSI Severely Oversold (17.5)
Negative Funding Rate (-0.086%)
Increased Trading Volume

4. MELANIAUSDT (Overall Score: 78)
Current Price: $0.198700
24-Hour Change: -1.88%
Key Signals:
Daily RSI Oversold (21.4)
Volume Surge Signal
Approaching Key Support Level

5. PUMPUSDT (Overall Score: 70)
Current Price: $0.047100
24-Hour Change: -8.58%
Key Signals:
Double Bottom Pattern
V-Shaped Reversal Pattern
Approaching Recent Low

I just watched the live demonstration of Neuralink by Musk, and I got goosebumps! The precision of that robotic arm just "clicking" the chip into the brain was really like something out of a sci-fi movie—only they are swapping it into a living human brain! Can you believe it takes only 1.5 seconds from opening the skull to implantation? I can barely get my instant noodles boiling in that time!

What's even scarier is the timeline: they want to restore sight to the blind by 2026? By 2028, all of humanity will be directly connected to the AI cloud? Now I finally understand what Musk means when he says "humans are the biological guidance system for AI"—he's going to personally press the upgrade button for human civilization! When I saw that trending topic about paralyzed patients playing chess with their minds, I thought it was just a gimmick, but now I get it: it's like forcibly inserting a USB port into a flesh-and-blood body?

To be honest, watching him calmly debug the chip sent chills down my spine. In the future, we could wake up, open our eyes, and be online; close our eyes and back up our memories in the cloud? That would save us from learning foreign languages and memorizing vocabulary... But when all memories can be uploaded and shared, what will be left of our late-night chats over cold beers? The way he took off his glasses on stage is becoming more and more haunting: now taking off glasses, next step is pulling the plug?

In the crypto world, it's all about the heartbeat. Among the top 100 contract coins, only 8 have broken their historical highs, and several are wildly testing the waters at the door.

🔥 ​The real performance of the "Chosen Ones":​​

1️⃣ BANANAS31 (code name Banana) — a real tough character

Soaring 152% in 30 days!💥

The trading volume continues to explode, but remind yourself: this kind of new coin volatility can throw me out of the carriage, 5% position is the maximum.

2️⃣ BID — the invisible champion making money quietly

A monthly increase of 199%, ranking first in the field (current price $0.1216)

But it has retraced 14% from its peak, the fate of small-cap coins — they rise fiercely and fall brutally; I placed a 20% stop-loss order before daring to touch it.

3️⃣ ​AI Twins Breakout​ 👑

OCEAN and AGIX both broke historical highs (around $0.7)

The logic behind it is very clear: the global AI arms race has reached the blockchain! But I must pour cold water on it: concept coins are prone to wild fluctuations; those who chased AGIX at high prices last week are still standing guard on the mountaintop...

⚡ ​The dark horse about to break out​

ALPACA made my pupils tremble!

A crazy surge of 391% in a single day (current price $1.19)

Only 19% away from the previous high! 👉 But with this kind of impulsive surge, I choose to wait for a pullback confirmation; rushing in now is like gambling with my life!

💡 ​Trading Notes​

✅ Focused on the AI sector: NVIDIA's earnings report week will surely drive new narratives

✅ Be decisive in taking profits: if BANANAS drops below $0.015, get out immediately

✅ Position allocation:

Banana/BID each accounts for 3%
Chase ALPACA after it breaks the previous high by 1%
Keep the remaining funds for BTC pullbacks

"Thinking new highs will continue to rise" was my worst understanding last year!

Common characteristics of such coins:

When retail investors FOMO, the big players are just unloading 📉
Must set a trailing stop-loss (I have a habit of running if it falls 15% from the high)
Coins that surge often spike in the dead of night 🕛 Not placing orders before sleep is equivalent to giving away money

🌟 ​Current Strategy​

For those holding BTC/ETH, don’t worry; this round is a localized trend.

If you want to make quick money, pay attention to three points:

1️⃣ AI coins pull back to the 10-day moving average (OCEAN has reached the sniper position)

2️⃣ Can ALPACA hold above $1.25?

1. The market is severely differentiated:
Bitcoin is really a tough guy, the ETF swallowed 547 million USD yesterday! Even traditional giant GameStop prepared to enter with 450 million USD (I highly suspect they want to buy BTC). But altcoins seem to be drained of blood, and the funds clearly can't keep up with the rhythm. What does this indicate? Now it's all about the market rhythm led by institutions, and the small retail investors' money barely makes a splash.

2. Key Information
The Japanese listed company Metaplanet is going crazy! They went all-in with 1,234 BTC, surpassing Tesla in holdings! They are now ranked seventh in the global listed company holding list (I guess they want to be the Asian version of MicroStrategy). High-leverage gambling scene is brutal 👉 A 50x leveraged insider dog was liquidated three times in three days, with over ten million USD vanished into thin air (once again proving: contracts are indeed a slaughterhouse for retail investors!). The Trump family coin WLF is quietly preparing to launch transfers (this dealer's wash trading strategy is impressive, likely to coordinate with news to pump the price). SharpLink Gaming has silently hoarded 194,000 ETH (nearly 600 million USD! Ethereum whales are crazily accumulating underwater).

3. Undercurrents in the Hong Kong market:
The most shocking is the data from Economic Information — the queue outside the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission for upgrading to a Type 1 license has reached 40 companies! (38 brokerages + 1 bank + 1 internet giant) But mainland brokerage firms are doing a 'shell' business: they can't open exchanges themselves and rely entirely on HashKey's Qmnibus service to attract clients ($HSK is definitely a hidden winner).

4. U.S. nuclear-level policy forecast:
The FHFA director from the Trump faction personally spoke up: requested Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac to accept cryptocurrency as loan collateral! (If this lands, it’s equivalent to opening a trillion-level capital floodgate for the crypto world, just thinking about it gives me goosebumps!)

📌 Thoughts:
The trend of institutions swallowing BTC simply cannot stop, the inflow speed of ETFs exceeds expectations (BlackRock is probably grabbing discounted chips). The compliance speed in Hong Kong is far beyond imagination, but licenses are graded: local brokerages get the meat (HashKey/OSL), while mainland firms can only sip on the soup (so don’t blindly chase brokerage concept stocks).
The Trump concept has become a clear card, with WLF unlocking + policy endorsement working in tandem (but be aware of the risks, this play could turn into a killing field at any time).

Labubu's One-Night Fall from Grace: When We No Longer Believe in the Future

Last week while cleaning out my shoe cabinet, I dug out that dusty Labubu strawberry cookie keychain. Last year at this time, I was still showing off in my friend circle about how lucky I was to have drawn it. The craziness of squatting in front of a trendy toy store at three in the morning now feels like a joke—this little plastic piece priced at 799 yuan can't even sell for 50 on secondhand markets now.

What really struck me during this wave of declining interest in trendy toys was the day the Labubi-themed store in Shanghai Global Harbor closed, when a dozen post-00s squatted at the entrance holding unopened boxes of figurines—not to hold some farewell ceremony, but to set up a street stall. "Anyway, there’s no hope for a price increase anymore, let’s see how much we can recover," said one boy wearing a fisherman hat as he pulled out his phone to browse job listings.

Our generation long stopped believing in the stock market and mutual funds, yet we were willing to believe that paper figures and plastic toys could bring about a myth of sudden wealth. Posting about hidden edition items in our friend circles is, in essence, no different from our elders forwarding virtual currency advertisements—both are desperately seeking a lifeline in an era of inflation.

Experts always say this is a downgrade in consumption, but I think it’s the collapse of faith in the future. We used to be willing to pay a premium, essentially buying into the expectation that "tomorrow will be better"—that we would get promotions at work, make money from side hustles, and see assets appreciate. But now, when unemployment at 35 and AI replacement have become certain topics, those trendy toys that once carried the illusion of appreciation naturally revert from "blue-chip stocks" back to plastic pieces.

Recently, I noticed an interesting phenomenon: college students have started group buying counterfeit Labubu on Pinduoduo. When I asked them, "Aren't you afraid of being mocked for playing with knockoffs?" one third-year male student’s words struck hard: "What’s the difference between genuine and counterfeit? Anyway, we are all nearing our expiration date of youth." This made me think of the young people who packed the Yonghe Temple last year, only to turn around and buy a cup of "Compassion Americano" for 48 yuan at a temple café—this generation’s split lies in wanting to grasp certain small joys while also letting go of the gamble for sudden wealth.

The bubble of capital games will eventually burst, but when even the youngest post-00s begin to lose interest in passing the parcel, it may indicate that something deeper is rotting. Just like I saw yesterday on secondhand markets—a new business of burning trendy toys, where someone is actually willing to pay to have their once-coveted limited edition thrown into the incinerator.

Trump calls out to Tehran on his own social media, saying "Iran hasn't been able to be great again" (Make Iran Great Again?). He suggests they consider changing their leadership. This 70-something internet celebrity truly knows how to stir things up, casually making the American "color revolution" sound as easy as changing chefs in a restaurant.

However, upon reflection, it's quite interesting; this is not the first time America has acted as a "regime beautician" for others. From Saddam in 2003 to Gaddafi in Libya, every forced demolition has not brought a model of democracy, but instead left behind ruins. Now across the Persian Gulf, young Iranians are sneaking over walls to watch TikTok and learn Western fashion, while local clerics cling to traditional barriers. This kind of societal tearing and regime change, isn't it just tearing down old dangerous buildings only to construct half-finished ones in the ruins?

The darkest humor of it all is that while the old man prescribes a remedy for Iran, he hasn't even got his own backyard's "Make America Great Again" sorted out yet. The calculations for the midterm elections are clear; who doesn't know that playing the Middle Eastern card is a basic operation for rallying conservatives? It's just unclear whether those post-2000s students at Tehran University, holding anti-hijab slogans, will really believe this blonde old man's "kind reminder"?

"Family, who understands! Today I sent a 'laugh until tears' sticker in the class group, and my good buddy with an Android phone directly messaged me asking: 'Did you encounter something sad today?'

The thing is, I recently switched to the iPhone 15 and I'm feeling pretty smug about it. I stumbled upon the trending topic on Weibo #iPhone emoji actually looks like this on Android#, and when I clicked in, I was completely caught off guard. That day, while chatting with my crush, I kept thinking I sent a 'shy smile,' but it turned into an awkward 'awkward.jpg' with a fake smile on his Xiaomi phone. No wonder he suddenly became so polite in his replies!

The most shocking part is those emojis with their own stories—like the pitiful holey socks in Apple's system, which turn into a sinister devilish smiley face on some Android devices; the officially confirmed sweet 'hand-holding emoji' appears as two squares with a stick in the middle on outdated Android systems. Not to mention some special symbols, sending a 'coffin' to express lying flat ends up showing a 'tombstone' on the recipient's phone, scaring my mother into inviting a master to perform rituals overnight.

After catching up on the trending topics, I realized that every emoji has three design standards behind it: Apple's rounded emojis always come with a 'soft light filter,' while Android insists on geometric lines and a scientific aesthetic. Even funnier is that some emojis can actually clash on Android 12 and HarmonyOS 4.0, truly creating a 'different pixel universe on the same Earth,' right?

Now, chatting with cross-platform friends makes me shiver; who would have thought the modern version of 'pointing at a deer and calling it a horse' actually happens in phone conversation boxes? Even the speed of system updates can create information gaps, these days you really need a 'Emoji Misfire Prevention Guide' to communicate well: send classic yellow soybeans often, always include text explanations for emotional fluctuations, and if you're really unsure about an emoji, it’s best to send a screenshot to another phone first...

I suddenly feel that app stores should develop a 'cross-platform translator,' or sooner or later someone will turn an international conference into a dispute because of different smiley symbols. So now, I recommend to everyone: there are countless emojis, but caution is the first rule; using the wrong emoji can leave friends in tears!

Someone exploited a vulnerability in the Meta Pool staking contract to "print money" on the spot, conjuring up more than 9,700 mpETH out of thin air, which at the time was worth a whopping 27 million dollars! But guess what? This genius hacker, after all the fuss, ended up being able to convert less than ten ETH into real money—this scene is like someone using a legendary treasure map to dig up a mountain of gold, only to find out at the exchange that there’s no one in the market to take on such an outrageous fortune.

Clearly, there are assets worth nine figures lying right there in the contract, but in the face of a dried-up liquidity pool, assets without liquidity are just a string of numerical ghosts in the world of code.

As long as a certain long-tail asset encounters extreme market conditions, the entire system could instantaneously play out a "Monopoly Game Bankruptcy". Nowadays, even hackers have begun to consider cash-out methodologies; they need to assess the depth of the pool before deciding whether to cast their nets to catch fish. "The deeper the pool, the more real the wealth". Can your pool really catch my money?

In the early hours of a certain night in July 2024, the candlestick charts of a cryptocurrency exchange suddenly fluctuated violently. A cryptocurrency called TRUMP, featuring a profile of a blonde-haired face, surged 467% within 3 hours, while at that moment, the President was toasting with crypto moguls at a private dinner in his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.

"When we changed our Twitter avatar to Bitcoin, our click-through rate increased by 400%,” revealed a former White House digital advisor, uncovering just the tip of the iceberg. In an era where traditional lobbying faces regulatory pressure, cryptocurrency has become a new form of black gold flowing through the revolving door of politics and business. When the name of a New York real estate tycoon was minted into a token, this symbol of value became a 'power acceptance bill' in the capital markets.

The astonishing findings of on-chain detectives:
1. A wallet registered in the Cayman Islands accurately absorbed 23 trillion TRUMP tokens 48 hours before Trump's primary victory.
2. The token's white paper stated 'decentralized governance,' but the code concealed unlimited issuance rights for the founder.
3. On the day of the surge at 18:30, major U.S. crypto media outlets suddenly released headlines stating 'Trump may support cryptocurrency.'

"This is simply an algorithmic attack on democracy," exclaimed the director of the Stanford Crypto Lab, pointing to the on-chain data in astonishment. When the fervor of supporters, the gambling nature of the crypto market, and the multiple narratives of political endorsement converge, a token project can raise the equivalent of ten years' worth of traditional fundraising in just 24 hours. Even more frightening is that all transaction records are publicly available on the blockchain, yet no one can prove whether this is truly 'legal harvesting.'

Financial history is repeating itself, but this time it is cloaked in the magical guise of decentralization. The stock manipulation techniques from the eve of the Great Depression in 1929 have been resurrected in the age of digital currency. Those retail investors still staring at the candlestick charts at three in the morning would never imagine that the 'MAGA vision' they fervently chase is merely a smart contract generated by keystrokes in the basement of some estate.

No lobbying groups are needed, no political donations required, just a meticulously designed token symbol is enough to allow fervent capital to automatically complete the on-chain closed loop of power monetization.

#TradersLeague

The dark web has revealed shocking news—the true identity of Bitcoin's creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, is likely the deceased cryptography pioneer Hal Finney!

Let's turn back time to January 12, 2009, when the first recorded transaction on the Bitcoin network was Satoshi transferring 10 coins to Hal. Logically, wouldn’t any programmer use themselves as a guinea pig for testing first? This unusual action clearly looks like a self-directed double act.

Here's a hardcore detail: Hal, who lived in California, was just two blocks away from a Japanese professor named Dorian Nakamoto. Looking back now, isn’t it possible that the name "Satoshi Nakamoto" was borrowed from a neighbor? If that’s the case, this smoke screen was indeed played brilliantly.

The most striking clue is the key detail of ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis). By the end of 2010, as Bitcoin started to show some promise, Satoshi vanished from the scene, which coincidentally aligns with Hal's deteriorating health before his death in 2014. He fought with his last strength to plant this decentralized flame firmly in the virtual world, leaving not even a gravestone behind.

Upon careful consideration of his insistence on not claiming credit during his lifetime, it really reflects a deep understanding of human nature. If Bitcoin truly carried the founder's golden name, countries would have already shut down the mining operations, preventing the crypto landscape valued in trillions from forming. Just based on this attitude of "doing what needs to be done and then disappearing, keeping oneself and name hidden," Hal truly embodied the state of "the highest level is not aware of its existence" from Eastern philosophy.

Now, looking at the skyrocketing price of Bitcoin, who still cares about who Satoshi is? This precisely proves Hal's clever planning—true decentralization should be like the sands of the Sahara: the tighter you grip it, the faster it slips away; only by completely letting go can it spread far and wide. As people are about to forget this puzzle, perhaps it is at that moment that Hal is smiling in satisfaction from above.