Malik Muzzamil

What is #HumaFinance ? @Huma Finance 🟣$HUMA
#Huma Finance is an advanced DeFi protocol that offers income-backed lending (PayFi) on the blockchain. Instead of traditional collateral models, it allows users to borrow by using their regular income as collateral. This allows individuals and institutions to tokenize their earnings and access instant liquidity.
🔧 Key Features:
Income-Based Lending Mechanism: Users can borrow against collateral from sources such as their fixed salaries, bill payments, or digital income.
Staking and Governance: HUMA token holders can vote on protocol governance and earn rewards by staking.
Multi-Chain Infrastructure: It runs on Ethereum, BNB Chain, and other EVM-compatible chains.
Investor Trust: Backed by major corporations such as Fenbushi Capital, HashKey Capital, and the Stellar Foundation.
📈 Price Analysis as of August 3, 2025
✅ Current Price:
Price: $0.0326 USD
24-Hour Increase: +1.9%
Market Capitalization: ~$56 million
Huma Supply: ~$1.73 billion
📊 Technical Indicators:
Macd signal is positive: Indicates short-term persistence.
RSI in the range (around 50): No overbought/oversold pressure, room for upward movement.
Short-term Targets: The $0.034 - $0.036 range appears technically open.
🔮 Positive Scenarios and Future Prospects
Token Supply Under Control
The majority of the HUMA token is locked, and the circulating supply is limited. This creates immediate price pressure.
Network Expansion Continues
Huma Finance continues to integrate with various Web3 applications and budgets. New partnerships and integrations are driving demand.
Institutional and Global Support
The presence of powerful entities like the Stellar Foundation builds confidence in an innovative long-term vision.
End 2025 Predictions
Sources like Bitget, CoinLore, and DigitalCoin predict that HUMA could potentially rise by 40-60% throughout the year.
🚀 Summary Assessment
Huma Finance is a project that has taken a revolutionary step in the DeFi world, bringing the revenue-capable information to the blockchain. As of August 3, 2025, its price appears technically positive, and with institutional support, it has upside potential by the end of the year.
Targets of $0.035-$0.038 are technically feasible in the short term, and $0.045 in the medium term.
HUMA
0.03276
+1.39%
#TrumpTariffs #MarketPullback #ProjectCrypto
#WhiteHouseDigitalAssetReport #ETHCorporateReserves $HUMA

WalletConnect is the secret that holds together a world of broken blockchains, networks, bridges, and complex wallets. It does this in a manner that is safe, simple, and smooth. 🧩✨
WalletConnect has been a key part of the Web3 infrastructure since it came out in 2018. It now works with more than 600 wallets, including as MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Zerion, and Rainbow. It also lets more than 300 million individuals connect to more than 65,000 dApps. That means that 47.5 million people could communicate to each other across chains without having to give up security or experience.

A Single Protocol to Link Them All
You don't have to worry about copying and pasting wallet addresses or dealing with chains that don't work anymore. Users may link to many blockchains from a single wallet using WalletConnect. It includes Ethereum, Solana, Optimism, BNB Chain, and many more.
When you move between DeFi, NFTs, and DAOs, end-to-end encryption keeps your data secure. It's like Apple's AirDrop for Web3, except it's quicker, smarter, and can be used anywhere. 📲⚡
$WCT is the currency that keeps the WalletConnect network running.
The new WCT currency turns the protocol from a plug-in service into a fully decentralized ecosystem. You may find WCT on Solana and on Optimism's OP Mainnet. It gives people:
🔸 Governance: You may vote on new features, protocol updates, and ideas. Staking: You may safeguard the network and get rewards by staking your tokens. Incentives: Everyone who uses, produces, or verifies the system gets something of value that is shared.
It's not just a token; it's a way for us to work together for the future of decentralized UX. 🧠💰
⚒️ Why WalletConnect Can't Be Replaced in Web3
Let's be honest: most people don't care what sort of chain they're on. They simply want things to function. WalletConnect understands this. Customers don't need to know about bridge dangers, gas prices, or L2 rollups. Instead of showing how complicated it is, it enables people connect.
WalletConnect is now the normal method to connect dApps, not just one option. This is because it puts the user experience (UX) first. WalletConnect is used by a lot of important systems, such as Uniswap, OpenSea, Aave, and Snapshot. 🛠️🧪
The Future: From Hidden Infrastructure to a Living Ecosystem
The WalletConnect Network and WCT are taking the project out of the dark and into the open. We're not only talking about integrations that happen on their own. This is a real, live ecosystem that people are building together.
Updates driven by the DAO, dev grants, staking expansions, and new tools that make it look like magic to link wallets are on the way. ✨🎩
🧠 Too long; I didn't read it.
✅ 47.5 million users
✅ 600+ wallets and 65,000+ dApps
✅ 300 million connections With $WCT , you may manage, stake, and decentralize. The standard for how people feel on Web3
WalletConnect isn't just a trend; it's the secret force that keeps the whole decentralized economy functioning. The community is now in control with $WCT . Get ready. 🏁💥
#WalletConnect @WalletConnect $WCT #ProjectCrypto #WhiteHouseDigitalAssetReport #MarketPullback #FOMCMeeting

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) used a staff blog on July 31 to state what everyone else was thinking: Bitcoin should now be included in the world's most important economic data. The article was timed to coincide with the UN Statistical Commission's adoption of the new System of National Accounts (SNA). It says, "Bitcoin, for example, has a real economic effect, in part because it takes a lot of energy to make." However, it isn't included in gross domestic product since it doesn't entail producing things or services in the conventional sense.
To fill up the void in that measurement, compilers have decided to "classify certain crypto assets as 'non-produced nonfinancial assets,' which are reflected in national wealth." Governments have decided to include Bitcoin in their balance sheets, not because they think it's worth anything. Being assessed alongside land and subsurface assets is a sign of institutional acknowledgment in the terminology that central banks and treasuries use for a technology that was formerly rejected.
The IMF's own social media post summed up the message in a manner that spread across BTC circles: "Bitcoin uses as much electricity as Argentina but isn't counted in GDP because it doesn't make traditional goods or services." That statement brings back a concept from prior IMF study that saw Bitcoin and AI as power-hungry industries whose effects governments need to know about, not dismiss.
In 2024, the Fund's blog said that BTC mining and data centers together used about 2% of the world's electricity in 2022. It also talked about policy tools, like taxing energy, to control emissions. Several summaries of the same analysis, based on IEA projections cited by IMF officials, show a baseline path toward about 3.5% by 2027. No matter what you think of the framing, the most important thing for markets is statistical visibility. Once an activity is measured in a clear way, it becomes part of the macro discourse about assets, flows, and external balances.
The external accounts make that visibility more stronger. The IMF's new Balance of Payments Manual (BPM7) includes Bitcoin in cross-border statistics by categorizing transfers of non-liability crypto like BTC as transactions in "non-produced nonfinancial assets." It also recognizes "validation services" as services, which is very important.
Draft chapters provide clear examples of how a miner or validator in Economy A is paid by a user in Economy B. This is documented as cross-border services trade. An addendum on revisions from BPM6 says that payments for validation are "recorded... as cross-border transactions in crypto assets payable... to the producer of the services." In real life, mining and staking sold to people who don't live in the country count as exports in the services account, while buying and selling $ across borders counts as capital account transactions. For a long time, this industry has been seen as "off the books," therefore this is a big move.
Bitcoin-native speakers quickly made the point clear. David Bailey commented, "This is actually pretty big news—IMF officially incorporating bitcoin into [the] international development paradigm." He went on to say that "balance of trade, GDP, [and] sovereign credit quality… will now include bitcoin's economic footprint." Even if you just look at the most important parts, the point is clear: macro gatekeepers will be counting things that used to be hidden.
For Jan Wüstenfeld, a researcher at Melanion GreenTech, the stakes are as much about people as they are about numbers. He said, "BTC is the most effective way to turn energy into a lifeline for those who are suffering under IMF policies." He also said, "Nothing beats Bitcoin's energy-to-lifeboat ratio."
Daniel Batten, a climate researcher, took direct aim at the Fund's energy framing, labeling it "FUD" in a rallying cry—"Game on"—that shows how Bitcoin circles are seeing this moment: not as criticism, but as proof that the asset has become too important to ignore.
The Sustainable Bitcoin Protocol gave the most detailed response, saying that the word "energy-intensive" that many people used ignores the wider picture of formal integration. The organization said, "It's understandable that people are upset that @IMFNews says Bitcoin is 'energy-intensive,' but this is actually a good, turning point!"
The IMF recently made it official that BTC is a non-produced capital asset. Bitcoin is no longer hidden. It's something that even the IMF has to measure and report. That is making it legal. That's what visibility is. That's what macro adoption means. Their thread is similar to the BPM7 and SNA mechanics: once Bitcoin is recognized as a capital asset and its validation activity is booked as services, it is automatically included in balance-of-payments and national wealth data.
None of this indicates that the IMF has altered its mind on sovereign Bitcoin policy; it just means that the Fund is updating its data while still making its argument for risk. Batten's new study says that IMF leverage has actually made it harder for nation-states to embrace.
He talks about El Salvador's deal with the IMF, in which officials promised "not to accumulate further bitcoins 'at the level of the overall public sector,'" even though the National Bitcoin Office announced further acquisitions for a "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve."
Batten also spoke about Pakistan, where a lot of news stories in early July reported that the IMF had turned down a proposal to give subsidized power for Bitcoin mining and other companies that use a lot of energy. Local and international news sites said that the idea was vetoed because of concerns about the electricity market and fiscal risk. However, Pakistan's electricity Division and the IMF promptly denied that any official rejection had taken place.
In light of that stance, the July 31 standards announcement is still clearly good for Bitcoin. There are two things that the IMF blog says that are important for asset allocators. First, it says that "certain crypto assets will be classified as 'non-produced nonfinancial assets,'" which means they would be included as part of measured national wealth. Second, it shows that BPM7 is being followed such that cross-border flows and validation-service revenues are recognized consistently in both external and national accounts.
#TrumpTariffs #MarketPullback #SECProjectCrypto #WhiteHouseDigitalAssetReport #FOMCMeeting $BTC
$ETH
$XRP