Stark99
Open Trade
Occasional Trader
9.2 Months
12 Following
19 Followers
23 Liked
1 Shared
Posts
Quotes
#CryptoSecurity101 Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#CryptoFees101 Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#BigTechStablecoin Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
$USDC Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
$BTC Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#TrumpVsMusk 'Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#CircleIPO Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#TradingPairs101 Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#Liquidity101 Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#OrderTypes101 Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#CEXvsDEX101 Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#TradingTypes101 Until now, every Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that needed cryptographic primitives had to reinvent the wheel. Each one came bundled with its own custom Python implementation of the secp256k1 elliptic curve and related algorithms, each subtly different from one another. These inconsistencies introduced quiet liabilities and made reviewing BIPs unnecessarily complicated. This problem was recently highlighted in Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #348, and it’s something at least a handful of developers in the Bitcoin development community have long felt: there should be a unified, reusable standard for cryptographic BIP reference secp256k1 code.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
Last week, Jonas Nick and Tim Ruffing of Blockstream research and Sebastian Falbesoner made big progress towards this. As part of their existing ChillDKG proposal, the team released secp256k1lab. A new, intentionally INSECURE Python library for prototyping, experimenting, and BIP specifications. It’s not for production use (because it’s not constant-time and therefore vulnerable to side-channel attacks), but it fills a critical gap: it offers a clean, consistent reference for secp256k1 functionality, including BIP-340-style Schnorr signatures, ECDH, and low-level field/group arithmetic. The goal is simple: make it easier and safer to write future BIPs by avoiding redundant, one-off implementations. For BIP authors, this means: less custom code, fewer spec issues, and a clearer path from prototype to proposal.
#StablecoinPayments Bitcoin dips to $90,800 amid profit-taking and dollar strength
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
#AirdropSafetyGuide Bitcoin dips to $90,800 amid profit-taking and dollar strength
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
#AltcoinETFsPostponed Bitcoin dips to $90,800 amid profit-taking and dollar strength
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
#Trump100Days Bitcoin dips to $90,800 amid profit-taking and dollar strength
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
$BTC Bitcoin dips to $90,800 amid profit-taking and dollar strength
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
#AirdropStepByStep Bitcoin dips to $90,800 amid profit-taking and dollar strength
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
#AbuDhabiStablecoin Bitcoin dips to $90,800 amid profit-taking and dollar strength
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
#ArizonaBTCReserve Bitcoin dips to $90,800 amid profit-taking and dollar strength
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
Bitcoin has faced notable volatility, falling to an intraday low of $90,770 before bouncing back to $93,500 on Wednesday. Its market dominance decreased to 57.36% due to profit-taking and market turbulence sparked by Trump's trade policy announcements. As of 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was down 0.6% at $93,461 over the past 24 hours, while Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, gained 0.46% to $3,426.
Bitcoin dips below $93,000 amid rising liquidations and profit-taking
Bitcoin faced selling pressure on Tuesday, dipping to $92,600 before recovering to $94,600. Its market dominance fell to 57.38%, impacted by long-position liquidations. By 12:19 p.m., Bitcoin was trading 3.5% lower at $94,785, while Ethereum rose 1.5%
Login to explore more contents