长谷川幸子

92 still serves as strong support, and you can try hanging a basket in one place to catch flying knives, because from the seller's risk indicators, there is currently very little selling pressure even from short-term holders, and 92 is their realization price $BTC

From the perspective of chip distribution, there is strong support at 94, and looking at the 90-day CDD indicator, both short-term and long-term holders have not destroyed UTXO recently, which means that the main force has a strong willingness to hold coins. At this price level, it may be far from the top# #比特币市值排名 $BTC

Maintain strategic focus, do not chase even if there is a pullback; if it continues to rise, wait until it reaches its peak before shorting. Right now, both bulls and bears need to be patient.

Recently, the market is difficult to navigate because it feels like getting slapped in the face up and down
If you dare to buy high and sell low in such small fluctuations
At any moment, it could soar to the sky, with possibilities both up and down
$BTC $ETH

The depreciation of the RMB is good, domestic life is not affected, and the USD in hand has actually appreciated.

It cannot be said that the technology is lagging; blockchain does not pursue efficiency and concurrency. They only seek a decentralized concept of fairness. But it is precisely because of this that no one is responsible for the price of the coin. Can you guess why BNB does not experience this kind of drop?

When will Ethereum 18336282723 rise? The answer is here

Community leader Tony stated that the price of 18336282723 is too high, which is detrimental for young people to enter the ecosystem.

That is to say, the current decline in the activity of the Ethereum ecosystem is not only due to internal and external troubles such as the departure of giant whales, but also because the barriers to entry are high and the costs are high.

After all, a system that has been in place for 10 years ranks second in market value, and the official cannot price the market like Apple does with its phones. Just imagine how much of Ethereum's rise from its inception to the current price is due to network applications and how much is just speculation by traders.

Moreover, Vitalik's sharing session in Hong Kong revealed that he and his team, along with community leaders, do not care about the price of the coin; they only care about the product's technical roadmap. Only after the bubble is squeezed out can the ecosystem welcome a new prosperity.

Here is a very clear indicator: it needs to drop until young ecosystem developers and users feel that the cost-performance ratio of this network is high enough to return, and then the destruction rate must be greater than the inflation rate. The Ethereum Foundation will no longer sell coins or even buy them back. This is called 'the duck knows the warmth of the spring river.' Better than the financial data of listed companies is that we know this deflation won't be much later than the foundation's actions, allowing us to follow up in real time.

In the face of a group of community leaders who do not care about market value and are only idealistic tech enthusiasts, waiting for a fundamental reversal is the right path. If this point is not reached, the betrayal of L2, the selling pressure from the foundation, the plunder of 72172601786, and the withdrawal of large holders will only make it hopeless. But Ethereum will not spiral into death; after all, this group of tech enthusiasts will not abandon their products and ideals; they simply do not care about capital.

Hand-crafted spot and futures hedging quantitative strategy, stable operation for nearly 1 year, profit over 100, one stress test in February, drawdown of 10-, risk control is acceptable, are you satisfied with this slope? $BTC $ETH #美国加征关税 #风险回报比 #量化策略

Can he operate like this, opening both long and short positions, one liquidated and one doubled, not making money himself, but earning from the profit sharing of those who followed the right trades.

I can understand why some people want to cut off fdusd

Because they cannot bear the risk after the stablecoin crisis
But with a little thought, such a rash decision wouldn't be made, after all, the logic of stablecoins is relatively simple.
First of all, fdusd is a financial collateral stablecoin, not an algorithmic stablecoin. Historically, centralized stablecoins like usdt or usdc have experienced depegging, but ultimately recovered, because Tether, Cycle, and First Digital surely have reserves. As for whether they are sufficient, even without an audit report, it's not a big issue (Tether also didn’t have one in its early years), because they have a hundred ways to prevent a bank run. As long as market confidence is restored and consensus is established, that’s all that matters. Moreover, fdusd has Binance's support.

Additionally, once a centralized stablecoin has depegged, it can actually be safer, allowing for increased leverage in mining. This is because the project team will pay attention to various vulnerabilities, and the market will become desensitized to the wolf-crying scenario. This is why market makers cannot frequently crash stablecoins and must buy them back immediately. On the other hand, stablecoins that have never depegged will eventually be exploited by market makers taking advantage of market skepticism and inexperienced project teams.

As for those who want Binance to cover losses, I want to say that even if it’s a 1:1 redemption, they should approach the project team. Over sixty million has already been redeemed this morning, even if Binance tries to back out now, it has already re-pegged. Even if it truly goes to zero, those wanting Binance to compensate should hold onto their coins; what’s the point of cutting losses?

Only stablecoins that have unanchored are safe; those that haven't will definitely unanchor once. The above does not include stable calculations.

Once unanchored is actually safer; those who have never been unanchored will inevitably face this first and last time. The above does not include algorithmic stablecoins.

Where is this asset report?

Dumas said that gamblers all have a stubbornness that refuses to admit defeat, always postponing their judgment of failure to the next time when they will succeed.

Those who bring large positions or traders predicting pin failures time and again, and predicting imminent pullbacks again and again, I see they can keep predicting until the big coin reaches 150,000, anyway, if they blindly guess 100 times, they will eventually hit a pin or a big pullback.